IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2024i11p512-d1521603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Influencing Key Audit Matter Reporting in the Stock Exchange of Thailand: Empirical Evidence from 2016–2020 Data

Author

Listed:
  • Praphada Srisuwan

    (School of Accountancy and Finance, Walailak University, Tha Sala 80160, Thailand)

  • Trairong Swatdikun

    (School of Accountancy and Finance, Walailak University, Tha Sala 80160, Thailand)

  • Shubham Pathak

    (Center of Excellence in Sustainable Disaster Management (CESDM), School of Accountancy and Finance, Walailak University, Tha Sala 80160, Thailand)

  • Lidya Primta Surbakti

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Jakarta 12450, Indonesia)

  • Alisara Saramolee

    (School of Accountancy and Finance, Walailak University, Tha Sala 80160, Thailand)

Abstract

This study aims to respond to the new auditing standard on the information reporting of Key Audit Matters (KAMs) as a separate section in the auditor’s report, which will increase the transparency and quality of the report. It not only explores the current practice of KAM reporting among Thai listed companies but also seeks factors that influence KAM reporting in Thailand. This study explores the quantitative methodology through secondary data collected from the Thai Stock Exchange. This archival research explores 343 listed companies in the Thai Stock Exchange from 2016 to 2020. Descriptive statistics, a correlation matrix, and regression analysis are employed. The results suggest that the type of auditor (Big 4 or non-Big-4 audit firms), audit fee, audit independence, and industry have a direct positive impact on Key Audit Matter reporting at a 0.05 significance level. However, the evidence also suggests that the presence of females on the board, year, ROA (return on asset), risk, and size were not validated factors that have direct positive impacts on Key Audit Matter reporting at a 0.05 significance level.

Suggested Citation

  • Praphada Srisuwan & Trairong Swatdikun & Shubham Pathak & Lidya Primta Surbakti & Alisara Saramolee, 2024. "Factors Influencing Key Audit Matter Reporting in the Stock Exchange of Thailand: Empirical Evidence from 2016–2020 Data," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:11:p:512-:d:1521603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/11/512/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/11/512/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. María‐Florencia Amorelli & Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez, 2021. "Trends in the dynamic evolution of board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 537-554, March.
    2. Phattarawade Sawangjan & Muttanachai Suttipun, 2020. "The Relationship Between Key Audit Matters (KAMS) Disclosure and Stock Reaction: Cross-Sectional Study of Thailand, Malaysia, and Singapore," GATR Journals jfbr174, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    3. Joseph A. Petrick & Robert F. Scherer, 2003. "The Enron Scandal and the Neglect of Management Integrity Capacity," American Journal of Business, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(1), pages 37-50, April.
    4. Kriengkrai Boonlert-U-Thai & Muttanachai Suttipun, 2023. "Influence of external and internal auditors on key audit matters (KAMs) reporting in Thailand," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 2256084-225, December.
    5. Mahmoud Elmarzouky & Khaled Hussainey & Tarek Abdelfattah, 2022. "The key audit matters and the audit cost: does governance matter?," International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(1), pages 195-217, December.
    6. Laura Parte & María-Del-Mar Camacho-Miñano & María-Jesús Segovia-Vargas & Yolanda Pérez-Pérez, 2022. "How difficult is to understand the extended audit report?," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 2113494-211, December.
    7. W. Robert Knechel & Marleen Willekens, 2006. "The Role of Risk Management and Governance in Determining Audit Demand," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(9-10), pages 1344-1367.
    8. Saeed Rabea Baatwah & Ehsan Saleh Almoataz & Waddah Kamal Omer & Khaled Salmen Aljaaidi, 2022. "Does KAM disclosure make a difference in emerging markets? An investigation into audit fees and report lag," International Journal of Emerging Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(3), pages 798-821, August.
    9. Suneerat Wuttichindanon & Panya Issarawornrawanich, 2020. "Determining factors of key audit matter disclosure in Thailand," Pacific Accounting Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(4), pages 563-584, November.
    10. W. Robert Knechel & Marleen Willekens, 2006. "The Role of Risk Management and Governance in Determining Audit Demand," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(9‐10), pages 1344-1367, November.
    11. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    12. Mahmoud Elmarzouky & Khaled Hussainey & Tarek Abdelfattah, 2022. "The key audit matters and the audit cost: does governance matter?," International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(1), pages 195-217, December.
    13. Karen M. Y. Lai & Bin Srinidhi & Ferdinand A. Gul & Judy S. L. Tsui, 2017. "Board Gender Diversity, Auditor Fees, and Auditor Choice," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(3), pages 1681-1714, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Persakis, Anthony & Iatridis, George Emmanuel, 2016. "Audit quality, investor protection and earnings management during the financial crisis of 2008: An international perspective," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 73-101.
    2. Fernando, Guy D. & Schneible, Richard A. & Zhang, Wei, 2024. "Institutional ownership and women in the top management team," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    3. Knechel, W. Robert & Thomas, Edward & Driskill, Matthew, 2020. "Understanding financial auditing from a service perspective," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    4. Habiba Al‐Shaer & Mahbub Zaman, 2018. "Credibility of sustainability reports: The contribution of audit committees," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 973-986, November.
    5. Bremert, Michael & Voeller, Dennis & Zein, Nicole, 2007. "Interdependencies between Elements of Governance and Auditing : Evidence from Germany," Papers 07-76, Sonderforschungsbreich 504.
    6. Salau O. Abdulmalik & Ayoib Che Ahmad, 2015. "The Effect of 2011 Revised Code of Corporate Governance on Pricing Behaviour of Nigerian Auditors," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2015(4), pages 45-65.
    7. Aditya Aji Prabhawa & Iman Harymawan, 2022. "Readability of Financial Footnotes, Audit Fees, and Risk Management Committee," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, August.
    8. Iman Harymawan & Aditya Aji Prabhawa & Mohammad Nasih & Fajar Kristanto Gautama Putra, 2021. "Risk Management Committee, Auditor Choice and Audit Fees," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-16, August.
    9. Ines Maraghni & Mehdi Nekhili, 2017. "Audit committee characteristics and audit fees: Evidence from France [Caractéristiques du comité d’audit et honoraires d’audit : cas des entreprises françaises]," Post-Print hal-01907594, HAL.
    10. Eduardo Flores & Douglas Augusto De Paula & Joelson de Oliveira Sampaio, 2022. "Business Students Expectations of Brazilian Corporate Governance: Insights for a Sustainable Path in an Emerging Business Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
    11. Desender, Kurt A. & Garcia-Cestona, Miguel A. & Crespi, Rafel & Aguilera, Ruth V., 2009. "Board Characteristics and Audit Fees: Why Ownership Structure Matters?," Working Papers 09-0107, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    12. Ines Ben Jazia & Maali Kachouri, 2024. "Board Size as a Mediator in the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Audit Quality: Insights from Europe," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(2), pages 91-112.
    13. Bryan, David B., 2017. "Organized labor, audit quality, and internal control," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 11-26.
    14. Shamsun Nahar & Mohammad Istiaq Azim & Md Moazzem Hossain, 2020. "Risk disclosure and risk governance characteristics: evidence from a developing economy," International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(4), pages 577-605, April.
    15. Al-Najjar, Basil & Salama, Aly, 2022. "Mind the gap: Are female directors and executives more sensitive to the environment in high-tech us firms?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    16. Alexey Litvinenko, 2023. "A Comparative Analysis of Altman's Z-Score and T. Jury's Cash-Based Credit Risk Models with The Application to The Production Company and The Data for The Years 2016-2022," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 22(3), pages 518-553, September.
    17. George Drogalas & Michail Nerantzidis & Dimitrios Mitskinis & Ioannis Tampakoudis, 2021. "The relationship between audit fees and audit committee characteristics: evidence from the Athens Stock Exchange," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(1), pages 24-41, March.
    18. Aggarwal, Raj & Jindal, Varun & Seth, Rama, 2019. "Board diversity and firm performance: The role of business group affiliation," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 1-1.
    19. Crespí-Cladera, Rafel & Pascual-Fuster, Bartolomé, 2014. "Does the independence of independent directors matter?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 116-134.
    20. Hernández-Atienza, Fernando & Rodríguez-Sanz, Juan Antonio & Tejerina-Gaite, Fernando, 2024. "The pathways of board diversity in European contexts: Exploring the influence of director types on firm performance," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:11:p:512-:d:1521603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.