IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/ijebaa/vxiiy2024i2p91-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Board Size as a Mediator in the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Audit Quality: Insights from Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Ines Ben Jazia
  • Maali Kachouri

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate how corporate social responsibility and affects audit quality. Design/methodology/approach: The study is based on a sample of 600 European firms over the period 2010 to 2022; the paper uses panel data regressions. This study applied structural equations models that specify both a direct and an indirect link between corporate social responsibility and audit quality. Findings: We find a positive association between CSR and audit quality, meaning that highly rated companies for CSR activities pay more audit fees. In addition, this study shows that board size mediates the relationship between corporate social responsibility and audit quality. Practical implications: The findings may be of interest to the academic researchers, investors, and regulators. For academic researchers, it is interested in discovering the dynamic relation between corporate social responsibility, audit fees, and board size. For investors, our results show that board size mediate the relation between CSR and audit fees. For regulators, our results advise the worldwide policy maker to give the importance of audit quality to improve the engagement firms in corporate social responsibility reporting. Originality/value: The paper extends the existing literature by examining the mediation effect of board size on the relationship between CSR and audit quality in European context. To the authors’ knowledge, no research studies examined empirically the direct and indirect relationship between CSR, audit quality and board size. Therefore, the main contribution of this research is to show how corporate social responsibility affect audit quality measured by audit fees through board size.

Suggested Citation

  • Ines Ben Jazia & Maali Kachouri, 2024. "Board Size as a Mediator in the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Audit Quality: Insights from Europe," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(2), pages 91-112.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:ijebaa:v:xii:y:2024:i:2:p:91-112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijeba.com/journal/844/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ntim, Collins G. & Lindop, Sarah & Thomas, Dennis A., 2013. "Corporate governance and risk reporting in South Africa: A study of corporate risk disclosures in the pre- and post-2007/2008 global financial crisis periods," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 363-383.
    2. Nguyen Thanh Liem & Nguyen Vinh Khuong & Phung Anh Thu, 2020. "Social and Environmental Contributions, Board Size and Cash Holding: The Case of Energy Firms," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(4), pages 17-22.
    3. Michael C. Jensen, 2010. "The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 22(1), pages 43-58, January.
    4. Lin Liao & Teng (Philip) Lin & Yuyu Zhang, 2018. "Corporate Board and Corporate Social Responsibility Assurance: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 211-225, June.
    5. Rakia Riguen & Bassem Salhi & Anis Jarboui, 2021. "The Impact of Audit Characteristics on Corporate Tax Avoidance: The Moderating Role of Gender Diversity," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business (continues Analele Stiintifice), Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 68(1), pages 97-114, March.
    6. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    7. Ting-Chiao Huang & Hua-Wei Huang & Chih-Chen Lee, 2014. "Corporate executive’s gender and audit fees," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(6), pages 527-547, May.
    8. Viput Ongsakul & Pornsit Jiraporn & Shenghui Tong & Sirimon Treepongkaruna, 2020. "The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on shareholder value: evidence from the 9/11 terrorist attack," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(1), pages 91-105, December.
    9. T. Suryanto & J.E. Thalassinos & E.I. Thalassinos, 2017. "Board Characteristics, Audit Committee and Audit Quality: The Case of Indonesia," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(3), pages 44-57.
    10. María‐Florencia Amorelli & Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez, 2021. "Trends in the dynamic evolution of board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 537-554, March.
    11. Ranjith Appuhami & Shamim Tashakor, 2017. "The Impact of Audit Committee Characteristics on CSR Disclosure: An Analysis of Australian Firms," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 27(4), pages 400-420, December.
    12. Ridzwana Mohd-Said & Lim Teck Shen & Hairul Suhaimi Nahar & Rosmila Senik, 2018. "Board compositions and social reporting: evidence from Malaysia," International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2), pages 128-143.
    13. Azlan Amran & Shiau Ping Lee & S. Susela Devi, 2014. "The Influence of Governance Structure and Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility Toward Sustainability Reporting Quality," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(4), pages 217-235, May.
    14. Govindan, Kannan & Kilic, Merve & Uyar, Ali & Karaman, Abdullah S., 2021. "Drivers and value-relevance of CSR performance in the logistics sector: A cross-country firm-level investigation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    15. Nan Sun & Aly Salama & Khaled Hussainey & Murya Habbash, 2010. "Corporate environmental disclosure, corporate governance and earnings management," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(7), pages 679-700, July.
    16. Abdur Rouf & M. Akhtaruddin, 2019. "Corporate governance reporting in Bangladesh," International Journal of Ethics and Systems, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(1), pages 42-57, October.
    17. Jihai Lu & Sohail Ahmad Javeed & Rashid Latief & Tao Jiang & Tze San Ong, 2021. "The Moderating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Association of Internal Corporate Governance and Profitability; Evidence from Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-22, May.
    18. Mustafa, Aree Saeed & Che-Ahmad, Ayoib & Chandren, Sitraselvi, 2018. "Board diversity, audit committee characteristics and audit quality: The moderating role of control-ownership wedge," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center (PRADEC), vol. 14(3), May.
    19. Husam Aldamen & Janice Hollindale & Jennifer L. Ziegelmayer, 2018. "Female audit committee members and their influence on audit fees," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 58(1), pages 57-89, March.
    20. DeAngelo, Linda Elizabeth, 1981. "Auditor size and audit quality," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 183-199, December.
    21. Marco Allegrini & Giulio Greco, 2013. "Corporate boards, audit committees and voluntary disclosure: evidence from Italian Listed Companies," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(1), pages 187-216, February.
    22. Mohamed Chakib Kolsi & Riham Muqattash & Ahmad Al-Hiyari, 2021. "How do external auditor attributes impact corporate social responsibility disclosures: empirical evidence from ADX-listed companies," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(2), pages 293-315, January.
    23. Aseem Kaul & Jiao Luo, 2018. "An economic case for CSR: The comparative efficiency of for‐profit firms in meeting consumer demand for social goods," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1650-1677, June.
    24. Du, Shuili & Xu, Xiaolu & Yu, Kun, 2020. "Does corporate social responsibility affect auditor-client contracting? Evidence from auditor selection and audit fees," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    25. Murya Habbash & Salim Alghamdi, 2017. "Audit quality and earnings management in less developed economies: the case of Saudi Arabia," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 21(2), pages 351-373, June.
    26. Woo Sung Kim & Kunsu Park & Sang Hoon Lee, 2018. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Ownership Structure, and Firm Value: Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, July.
    27. Victor Cui & Shujun Ding & Mingzhi Liu & Zhenyu Wu, 2018. "Revisiting the Effect of Family Involvement on Corporate Social Responsibility: A Behavioral Agency Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 291-309, September.
    28. repec:eme:ijoes0:ijoes-02-2019-0035 is not listed on IDEAS
    29. Xiao, Jason Zezhong & Yang, He & Chow, Chee W., 2004. "The determinants and characteristics of voluntary Internet-based disclosures by listed Chinese companies," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 191-225.
    30. Aree Saeed Mustafa & Ayoib Che-Ahmad & Sitraselvi Chandren, 2018. "Board diversity, audit committee characteristics and audit quality: The moderating role of control-ownership wedge," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center, vol. 14(3), pages 587-614, June.
    31. Karen M. Y. Lai & Bin Srinidhi & Ferdinand A. Gul & Judy S. L. Tsui, 2017. "Board Gender Diversity, Auditor Fees, and Auditor Choice," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(3), pages 1681-1714, September.
    32. Maretno Agus Harjoto & Indrarini Laksmana & Robert Lee, 2015. "The impact of demographic characteristics of CEOs and directors on audit fees and audit delay," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(8/9), pages 963-997, October.
    33. Samaha, Khaled & Khlif, Hichem & Hussainey, Khaled, 2015. "The impact of board and audit committee characteristics on voluntary disclosure: A meta-analysis," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 13-28.
    34. DeFond, Mark & Zhang, Jieying, 2014. "A review of archival auditing research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 275-326.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Isabel-María García-Sánchez & Nicola Raimo & Víctor Amor-Esteban & Filippo Vitolla, 2023. "Board committees and non-financial information assurance services," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(1), pages 1-42, March.
    2. Akbas Halil Emre, 2016. "The Relationship Between Board Characteristics and Environmental Disclosure: Evidence from Turkish Listed Companies," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 11(2), pages 7-19, December.
    3. Thi H.H. Nguyen & Mohamed H. Elmagrhi & Collins G. Ntim & Yue Wu, 2021. "Environmental performance, sustainability, governance and financial performance: Evidence from heavily polluting industries in China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2313-2331, July.
    4. Aree Saeed MUSTAFA & Luqman Muhammed SAEED & Nishtiman Hashim MOHAMMED, 2018. "Auditor Selection in Borsa Istanbul," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 16(152), pages 599-599.
    5. Sarhan, Ahmed A. & Ntim, Collins G. & Al-Najjar, Basil, 2019. "Antecedents of audit quality in MENA countries: The effect of firm- and country-level governance quality," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 85-107.
    6. Fernando, Guy D. & Schneible, Richard A. & Zhang, Wei, 2024. "Institutional ownership and women in the top management team," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    7. Nadia Smaili & Camélia Radu & Amir Khalili, 2023. "Board effectiveness and cybersecurity disclosure," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(4), pages 1049-1071, December.
    8. María del Mar Miras-Rodríguez & Domingo Martínez-Martínez & Bernabé Escobar-Pérez, 2018. "Which Corporate Governance Mechanisms Drive CSR Disclosure Practices in Emerging Countries?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Collins G. Ntim & Kwaku K. Opong & Jo Danbolt, 2015. "Board size, corporate regulations and firm valuation in an emerging market: a simultaneous equation approach," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 194-220, March.
    10. Jaime Guerrero-Villegas & Leticia Pérez-Calero & José Manuel Hurtado-González & Pilar Giráldez-Puig, 2018. "Board Attributes and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: A Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Halil Emre Akbaş & Seda Canikli, 2018. "Determinants of Voluntary Greenhouse Gas Emission Disclosure: An Empirical Investigation on Turkish Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.
    12. Junhui Wang & Jerry Sun, 2022. "The role of audit committees in social responsibility and environmental disclosures: evidence from Chinese energy sector," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(1), pages 113-128, March.
    13. Masoud Azizkhani & Sarowar Hossain & Mai Nguyen, 2023. "Effects of audit committee chair characteristics on auditor choice, audit fee and audit quality," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 3675-3707, September.
    14. Helmi A. Boshnak, 2021. "The Impact of Audit Committee Characteristics on Audit Quality: Evidence from Saudi Arabia," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 11(4), pages 1-12.
    15. Alhababsah, Salem & Yekini, Sina, 2021. "Audit committee and audit quality: An empirical analysis considering industry expertise, legal expertise and gender diversity," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    16. Mariasole Bannò & Emilia Filippi & Sandro Trento, 2023. "Women in top echelon positions and their effects on sustainability: a review, synthesis and future research agenda," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(1), pages 181-251, March.
    17. Ahmed A. Elamer & Collins G. Ntim & Hussein A. Abdou & Andrews Owusu & Mohamed Elmagrhi & Awad Elsayed Awad Ibrahim, 2021. "Are bank risk disclosures informative? Evidence from debt markets," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 1270-1298, January.
    18. Khaleed Omair Alotaibi & Khaled Hussainey, 2016. "Determinants of CSR disclosure quantity and quality: Evidence from non-financial listed firms in Saudi Arabia," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(4), pages 364-393, November.
    19. Nejla Ould Daoud Ellili & Cemil Kuzey & Ali Uyar & Abdullah S. Karaman, 2024. "Moderating role of internal factors in corporate social responsibility reporting persistence and corporate market value," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 2878-2899, July.
    20. Ines Kateb & Ines Belgacem, 2024. "Navigating governance and accounting reforms in Saudi Arabia's emerging market: impact of audit quality, board characteristics, and IFRS adoption on financial performance," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(2), pages 290-312, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Corporate Social Responsibility; audit quality; board size; agency theory; audit fees.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing
    • L21 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Business Objectives of the Firm

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:ijebaa:v:xii:y:2024:i:2:p:91-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijeba.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.