IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oabmxx/v9y2022i1p2113494.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How difficult is to understand the extended audit report?

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Parte
  • María-Del-Mar Camacho-Miñano
  • María-Jesús Segovia-Vargas
  • Yolanda Pérez-Pérez

Abstract

The external audit report is a guarantee of financial information reliability that companies provide to the market for stakeholders’ decisions. However, some firms did not disclose relevant information on company risks for users due to managers’ pressure. Few years ago, auditors of listed companies in Europe have had to break down firms’ risks using the Key Audit Matters (KAMs) in a new format called extended audit report. This article conducts an empirical analysis to examine the content of this report, to know how difficult to read is and its differences between the first and the second year of its implementation. Using all Spanish listed companies, our results show that extended audit reports are difficult to understand. Furthermore, the evidence corroborates that KAMs are sticky for a firm year to year as there are no statistically significant differences in the readability indices, neither in the narrative nor linguistic style, comparing the first two years of its implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Parte & María-Del-Mar Camacho-Miñano & María-Jesús Segovia-Vargas & Yolanda Pérez-Pérez, 2022. "How difficult is to understand the extended audit report?," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 2113494-211, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:9:y:2022:i:1:p:2113494
    DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2022.2113494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23311975.2022.2113494
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23311975.2022.2113494?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oabmxx:v:9:y:2022:i:1:p:2113494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/OABM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.