IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v14y2021i8p359-d609498.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing Risks in the Improved Model of Rolling Mill Loading: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Nelli Vladimirovna Syreyshchikova

    (Department of Automated Mechanical Engineering, South Ural State University, Lenin Prosp. 76, 454080 Chelyabinsk, Russia)

  • Danil Yurievich Pimenov

    (Department of Automated Mechanical Engineering, South Ural State University, Lenin Prosp. 76, 454080 Chelyabinsk, Russia)

  • Elena Nikolaevna Yaroslavova

    (Department of Foreign Languages, South Ural State University, Lenin Prosp. 76, 454080 Chelyabinsk, Russia)

  • Munish Kumar Gupta

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Opole University of Technology, 45-758 Opole, Poland)

  • Muhammad Aamir

    (School of Engineering, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia)

  • Khaled Giasin

    (School of Mechanical and Design Engineering, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 3DJ, UK)

Abstract

This article reflects the main sources of risks for metallurgical enterprises in Russia, presenting the implementation of an innovative approach to increasing the competitiveness of an industrial enterprise, which is a typical representative of large enterprises of the metallurgical industry, based on the development of risk-oriented thinking when loading rolling mills with orders of intersecting assortment according to a new model. To reduce the emerging risks of a new model of the loading process of rolling mills of a metallurgical enterprise, it is proposed to take into account the risks in a complex way, taking into account their interactions with the use of integrated risk management (IRM). Practical development of the implemented approach was carried out by identifying the risks of the new improved loading process and their causes at each stage of the process. Risks were identified by analysis, qualitative and quantitative assessment of the likelihood of risks and the severity of consequences from their implementation with the establishment of events with a high potential hazard. Possible causes of hazardous events have been identified. To reduce the likelihood of unfavorable events, measures have been developed to influence significant risks and their effectiveness has been determined. The development of an innovative approach using risk-based thinking in a previously unexplored field of the application provides competitive advantages for enterprises of the metallurgical industry, increases income by reducing the cost of manufacturing products and production volumes by reducing time costs, achieving an economic efficiency of up to 10 million rubles per year. The practical significance of the dissemination of development results in similar industries is obvious and relevant for metallurgy as a whole.

Suggested Citation

  • Nelli Vladimirovna Syreyshchikova & Danil Yurievich Pimenov & Elena Nikolaevna Yaroslavova & Munish Kumar Gupta & Muhammad Aamir & Khaled Giasin, 2021. "Managing Risks in the Improved Model of Rolling Mill Loading: A Case Study," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:8:p:359-:d:609498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/8/359/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/8/359/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samson, Danny A., 1987. "Corporate risk philosophy for improved risk management," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 107-122, April.
    2. Susan Scott & Nicholas Perry, 2012. "The enactment of risk categories: The role of information systems in organizing and re-organizing risk management practices in the energy industry," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 125-141, April.
    3. Atanu Sengupta & Sanjoy De, 2020. "Review of Literature," India Studies in Business and Economics, in: Assessing Performance of Banks in India Fifty Years After Nationalization, chapter 0, pages 15-30, Springer.
    4. Surya Prakash & Gunjan Soni & Ajay Pal Singh Rathore, 2017. "A critical analysis of supply chain risk management content: a structured literature review," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(1), pages 69-90, February.
    5. Giorgio Stefano Bertinetti & Elisa Cavezzali & Gloria Gardenal, 2013. "The effect of the enterprise risk management implementation on the firm value of European companies," Working Papers 10, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Varun Tripathi & Somnath Chattopadhyaya & Alok Bhadauria & Shubham Sharma & Changhe Li & Danil Yurievich Pimenov & Khaled Giasin & Sunpreet Singh & Girish Dutt Gautam, 2021. "An Agile System to Enhance Productivity through a Modified Value Stream Mapping Approach in Industry 4.0: A Novel Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-31, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. jean georges innocent magloire TAPE & Kouamé Jean-Marc N'DRI, 2023. "Gestion du risque opérationnel et performance des banques en zone UEMOA," Journal of Academic Finance, RED research unit, university of Gabes, Tunisia, vol. 14(2), pages 128-141, December.
    2. José María López-Sanz & Azucena Penelas-Leguía & Pablo Gutiérrez-Rodríguez & Pedro Cuesta-Valiño, 2021. "Sustainable Development and Consumer Behavior in Rural Tourism—The Importance of Image and Loyalty for Host Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Cristina Blasi Casagran & Colleen Boland & Elena Sánchez-Montijano & Eva Vilà Sanchez, 2021. "The Role of Emerging Predictive IT Tools in Effective Migration Governance," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 133-145.
    4. Maria Maddalena Sirufo & Francesca De Pietro & Alessandra Catalogna & Lia Ginaldi & Massimo De Martinis, 2021. "The Microbiota-Bone-Allergy Interplay," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Oleh Pasko & Mykola Hordiyenko & Fuli Chen & Yarmila Tkal & Yulia Abraham, 2021. "Mapping Global Research on International Financial Reporting Standards: A Scientometric Review," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(3), pages 116-134, May.
    6. Zhang, Tianyu & Dong, Peiwu & Zeng, Yongchao & Ju, Yanbing, 2022. "Analyzing the diffusion of competitive smart wearable devices: An agent-based multi-dimensional relative agreement model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 90-105.
    7. Vitor Hugo Ferreira & André da Costa Pinho & Dickson Silva de Souza & Bárbara Siqueira Rodrigues, 2021. "A New Clustering Approach for Automatic Oscillographic Records Segmentation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    8. Maurizio Massaro & Francesca Dal Mas & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Carlo Bagnoli, 2020. "Crypto‐economy and new sustainable business models: Reflections and projections using a case study analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2150-2160, September.
    9. Ines A. Ferreira & Rachel M. Gisselquist & Finn Tarp, 2021. "On the impact of inequality on growth, human development, and governance," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2021-34, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    10. He Tingting, 2021. "Comparing Money and Time Donation: What Do Experiments Tell Us?," Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, Sciendo, vol. 41(3), pages 65-94, September.
    11. Beatriz Calzada Olvera & Mario Gonzalez-Sauri & Federico Louvin & David-Alexander Harings Moya, 2021. "COVID-19 in Central America: effects of firm resilience and policy responses on employment," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2021-166, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    12. Alberto Cerezo-Narváez & Andrés Pastor-Fernández & Manuel Otero-Mateo & Pablo Ballesteros-Pérez, 2022. "The Influence of Knowledge on Managing Risk for the Success in Complex Construction Projects: The IPMA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-30, August.
    13. Iversen, Sara V. & Naomi, van der Velden & Convery, Ian & Mansfield, Lois & Holt, Claire D.S., 2022. "Why understanding stakeholder perspectives and emotions is important in upland woodland creation – A case study from Cumbria, UK," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    14. Kik, M.C. & Claassen, G.D.H. & Meuwissen, M.P.M. & Smit, A.B. & Saatkamp, H.W., 2021. "Actor analysis for sustainable soil management – A case study from the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    15. Rafidah Md Noor & Nadia Bella Gustiani Rasyidi & Tarak Nandy & Raenu Kolandaisamy, 2020. "Campus Shuttle Bus Route Optimization Using Machine Learning Predictive Analysis: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, December.
    16. Dominika Ehrenbergerová & Martin Hodula & Zuzana Gric, 2022. "Does capital-based regulation affect bank pricing policy?," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 135-167, April.
    17. Bergeaud Antonin & Ray Simon, 2020. "The macroeconomics of teleworking [Macroéconomie du télétravail]," Bulletin de la Banque de France, Banque de France, issue 231.
    18. Ana Iolanda Vodă & Cristina Cautisanu & Camelia Grădinaru & Chris Tănăsescu & Gustavo Herminio Salati Marcondes de Moraes, 2022. "Exploring Digital Literacy Skills in Social Sciences and Humanities Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-31, February.
    19. Ana Teresa Ferreira-Oliveira & José Keating & Isabel Silva, 2020. "Sustainable HRM as a Pathway to Sustainability—HRMS Relevance on Affective Commitment through Organizational Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-27, November.
    20. Lauren R. Gullett & Dana M. Alhasan & W. Braxton Jackson & Chandra L. Jackson, 2022. "Employment Industry and Occupational Class in Relation to Serious Psychological Distress in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-26, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:8:p:359-:d:609498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.