IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v15y2022i9p382-d898106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing Novel Technique for Investigating Guidelines and Frameworks: A Text Mining Comparison between International and Japanese Green Bonds

Author

Listed:
  • Kentaka Aruga

    (Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Saitama University, 255 Shimo-Okubo, Sakura-ku, Saitama 338-8570, Japan)

  • Md. Monirul Islam

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh
    Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan)

  • Yoshihiro Zenno

    (Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Saitama University, 255 Shimo-Okubo, Sakura-ku, Saitama 338-8570, Japan)

  • Arifa Jannat

    (Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan
    Institute of Agribusiness and Development Studies, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh)

Abstract

In most cases, the official documents related to guidelines and frameworks are complicated, long, and hard to understand for general readers, regardless of whether the government and financial companies follow international standards or not. In this context, the current study examines how the green bond (GB) guidelines created by the Japanese government are aligned with the Green Bond Principles (GBP) and Climate Bonds Standard (CBS) through a text mining technique. It also investigates whether the GB frameworks for the Japanese public and private companies follow the GB guidelines of the Japanese government. While the CBS is the guideline that focuses on climate bonds, the GBP specializes in GB whose scope is broader. The word frequency and word cloud analyses identify that the documents created by the Japanese government and companies have more similarities with the GBP, indicating that the Japanese GB guidelines and frameworks are more aligned with the GBP than the CBS. A pairwise word network matrix analysis also reveals that the Japanese GB guidelines and frameworks are more focused on broader environmental issues and sustainability than the CBS, which had more similarities with the GBP than the CBS.

Suggested Citation

  • Kentaka Aruga & Md. Monirul Islam & Yoshihiro Zenno & Arifa Jannat, 2022. "Developing Novel Technique for Investigating Guidelines and Frameworks: A Text Mining Comparison between International and Japanese Green Bonds," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:9:p:382-:d:898106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/9/382/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/9/382/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aaryan Gupta & Vinya Dengre & Hamza Abubakar Kheruwala & Manan Shah, 2020. "Comprehensive review of text-mining applications in finance," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Candace Partridge & Francesca Romana Medda, 2020. "The evolution of pricing performance of green municipal bonds," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 44-64, January.
    3. Madurika Nanayakkara & Sisira Colombage, 2019. "Do investors in Green Bond market pay a premium? Global evidence," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(40), pages 4425-4437, August.
    4. Satish Kumar & Vinodh Madhavan & Riya Sureka, 2020. "The Journal of Emerging Market Finance: A Bibliometric Overview (2002–2019)," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 19(3), pages 326-352, December.
    5. Giuseppe Cortellini & Ida Claudia Panetta, 2021. "Green Bond: A Systematic Literature Review for Future Research Agendas," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-29, December.
    6. Olivier David Zerbib, 2019. "The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: Evidence from green bonds," Post-Print halshs-02008641, HAL.
    7. Zerbib, Olivier David, 2019. "The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: Evidence from green bonds," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 39-60.
    8. Atanu Sengupta & Sanjoy De, 2020. "Review of Literature," India Studies in Business and Economics, in: Assessing Performance of Banks in India Fifty Years After Nationalization, chapter 0, pages 15-30, Springer.
    9. Zhouhao Wang & Enda Liu & Hiroki Sakaji & Tomoki Ito & Kiyoshi Izumi & Kota Tsubouchi & Tatsuo Yamashita, 2018. "Estimation of Cross-Lingual News Similarities Using Text-Mining Methods," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. K. Thomas Liaw, 2020. "Survey of Green Bond Pricing and Investment Performance," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, August.
    2. Giuseppe Cortellini & Ida Claudia Panetta, 2021. "Green Bond: A Systematic Literature Review for Future Research Agendas," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-29, December.
    3. Jankovic, Irena & Vasic, Vladimir & Kovacevic, Vlado, 2022. "Does transparency matter? Evidence from panel analysis of the EU government green bonds," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    4. Anne‐Marie Anderson & Richard Kish, 2024. "Rewarding performance through sustainability‐linked bonds," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 294-319, June.
    5. Zirek, Duygu & Unsal, Omer, 2023. "Green bonds: Do investors benefit from third-party certification?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    6. Emre Arat & Britta Hachenberg & Florian Kiesel & Dirk Schiereck, 2023. "Greenium, credit rating, and the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(7), pages 547-557, December.
    7. Yoshihiro Zenno & Kentaka Aruga, 2023. "Investigating Factors Affecting Institutional Investors’ Green Bond Investments: Cases for Beijing and Shenzhen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Zhu, Bo & Zhao, Yue, 2022. "Carbon risk and the cost of bank loans: Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    9. Chaofeng Tang & Kentaka Aruga & Yi Hu, 2023. "The Dynamic Correlation and Volatility Spillover among Green Bonds, Clean Energy Stock, and Fossil Fuel Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-23, April.
    10. Karel Janda & Binyi Zhang, 2021. "Attractiveness of Chinese Bonds Financing Climate and Environmental Projects," FFA Working Papers 4.007, Prague University of Economics and Business, revised 26 Apr 2022.
    11. Arif, Muhammad & Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr & Farid, Saqib & Nepal, Rabindra & Jamasb, Tooraj, 2022. "Diversifier or more? Hedge and safe haven properties of green bonds during COVID-19," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    12. Kanamura, Takashi, 2021. "Risk Mitigation and Return Resilience for High Yield Bond ETFs with ESG Components," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    13. Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & López-Cabarcos, M.Ángeles & Caby, Jérôme & Šević, Aleksandar, 2021. "The influence of investor sentiment on the green bond market," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    14. Mishra, Tapas & Park, Donghyun & Parhi, Mamata & Uddin, Gazi Salah & Tian, Shu, 2023. "A memory in the bond: Green bond and sectoral investment interdependence in a fractionally cointegrated VAR framework," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    15. Chuc Anh Tu & Tapan Sarker & Ehsan Rasoulinezhad, 2020. "Factors Influencing the Green Bond Market Expansion: Evidence from a Multi-Dimensional Analysis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, June.
    16. Zinan Hu & Ruicheng Yang & Sumuya Borjigin, 2024. "A multistage forecasting model for green bond cost optimization with dynamic corporate risk constraints," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(7), pages 2607-2634, November.
    17. Kristin Ulrike Löffler & Aleksandar Petreski & Andreas Stephan, 2021. "Drivers of green bond issuance and new evidence on the “greenium”," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, March.
    18. Kanamura, Takashi, 2020. "Are green bonds environmentally friendly and good performing assets?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    19. Kamila Tomczak, 2024. "Sovereign Green Bond Market: Drivers of Yields and Liquidity," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Rakesh Kumar Verma & Rohit Bansal, 2023. "Stock Market Reaction on Green-Bond Issue: Evidence from Indian Green-Bond Issuers," Vision, , vol. 27(2), pages 264-272, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:9:p:382-:d:898106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.