IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v14y2021i11p550-d678608.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unleveraged Portfolios and Pure Allocation Return

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara Alemanni

    (DIEC Department of Economics, University of Genoa, Via Vivaldi 5, 16126 Genoa, Italy
    SDA Bocconi School of Management, Via Sarfatti 10, 20136 Milano, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Mario Maggi

    (Department of Economics and Management, University of Pavia, Via S. Felice 5, 27100 Pavia, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Pierpaolo Uberti

    (DIEC Department of Economics, University of Genoa, Via Vivaldi 5, 16126 Genoa, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

In asset management, the portfolio leverage affects performance, and can be subject to constraints and operational limitations. Due to the possible leverage aversion of the investors, the comparison between portfolio performances can be incomplete or misleading. We propose a procedure to unleverage the mean-variance efficient portfolios to satisfy a leverage requirement. We obtain a class of unleveraged portfolios that are homogeneous in terms of leverage, so therefore properly comparable. The proposed unleverage procedure permits isolating the pure allocation return, i.e., the return component, due to the qualitative choice of portfolio allocation, from the return component due to the portfolio leverage. Theoretical analysis and empirical evidence on actual data show that efficient mean-variance portfolios, once unleveraged, uncover mean-variance dominance relations hidden by the leverage contribution to portfolio return. Our approach may be useful to practitioners proposing to take long positions on “short assets” (e.g. inverse ETF), thereby considering short positions as active investment choices, in contrast with the usual interpretation where are used to overweight long positions.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara Alemanni & Mario Maggi & Pierpaolo Uberti, 2021. "Unleveraged Portfolios and Pure Allocation Return," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-11, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:11:p:550-:d:678608
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/11/550/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/11/550/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edirisinghe, Chanaka & Jeong, Jaehwan & Chen, Jingnan, 2021. "Optimal portfolio deleveraging under market impact and margin restrictions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 746-759.
    2. Grill, Michael & Lambert, Claudia & Marquardt, Philipp & Watfe, Gibran & Weistroffer, Christian, 2018. "Counterparty and liquidity risks in exchange-traded funds," Financial Stability Review, European Central Bank, vol. 2.
    3. Huang, Mei-Yueh & Lin, Jun-Biao, 2011. "Do ETFs provide effective international diversification?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 335-344, September.
    4. Bruce I. Jacobs & Kenneth N. Levy & Harry M. Markowitz, 2005. "Portfolio Optimization with Factors, Scenarios, and Realistic Short Positions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(4), pages 586-599, August.
    5. Pogue, G A, 1970. "An Extension of the Markowitz Portfolio Selection Model to Include Variable Transactions' Costs, Short Sales, Leverage Policies and Taxes," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 25(5), pages 1005-1027, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cristiano Arbex Valle, 2024. "Portfolio optimisation: bridging the gap between theory and practice," Papers 2407.00887, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2024.
    2. J J Glen, 2011. "Mean-variance portfolio rebalancing with transaction costs and funding changes," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(4), pages 667-676, April.
    3. Guerard, John, 2023. "Harry Markowitz: An appreciation," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 1496-1501.
    4. Babalos, Vassilios & Caporale, Guglielmo Maria & Philippas, Nikolaos, 2012. "Efficiency evaluation of Greek equity funds," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 317-333.
    5. Yousefi, Hamed & Najand, Mohammad, 2022. "Geographical diversification using ETFs: Multinational evidence from COVID-19 pandemic," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    6. Trabelsi, Mohamed Ali, 2010. "Choix de portefeuille: comparaison des différentes stratégies [Portfolio selection: comparison of different strategies]," MPRA Paper 82946, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Dec 2010.
    7. Anand, Abhinav & Li, Tiantian & Kurosaki, Tetsuo & Kim, Young Shin, 2016. "Foster–Hart optimal portfolios," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 117-130.
    8. Auer, Benjamin R., 2014. "Should hedge funds be cautious reporting high returns?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 195-201.
    9. Naka, Atsuyuki & Noman, Abdullah, 2017. "Diversification of risk exposure through country mutual funds under alternative investment opportunities," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 215-227.
    10. Kim, Jinhwan & Cho, Hoon & Seok, Sangik, 2023. "Liquidity risk, return performance, and tracking error: Synthetic vs. Physical ETFs," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    11. Walter Briec & Kristiaan Kerstens & Octave Jokung, 2007. "Mean-Variance-Skewness Portfolio Performance Gauging: A General Shortage Function and Dual Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 135-149, January.
    12. Thomas J. Brennan & Andrew W. Lo, 2010. "Impossible Frontiers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(6), pages 905-923, June.
    13. Liu Yang & Qing Zhou, 2021. "Leverage constraints and corporate financing decisions," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(4), pages 5199-5230, December.
    14. Farouk, Faizal & Masih, Mansur, 2016. "Are there profit (returns) in Shariah-compliant exchange traded funds? The multiscale propensity," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 360-375.
    15. Giorgio Arici & Marco Dalai & Riccardo Leonardi & Arnaldo Spalvieri, 2018. "A Communication Theoretic Interpretation of Modern Portfolio Theory Including Short Sales, Leverage and Transaction Costs," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    16. Fang, Yong & Lai, K.K. & Wang, Shou-Yang, 2006. "Portfolio rebalancing model with transaction costs based on fuzzy decision theory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 879-893, December.
    17. Chanaka Edirisinghe & Jaehwan Jeong, 2022. "Mean–Variance Portfolio Efficiency under Leverage Aversion and Trading Impact," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, February.
    18. Atskanov, Isuf, 2015. "Dynamic optimization of an investment portfolio on European stock markets using pair copulas," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 40(4), pages 84-105.
    19. Li, Hua & Bai, Zhidong & Wong, Wing-Keung & McAleer, Michael, 2022. "Spectrally-Corrected Estimation for High-Dimensional Markowitz Mean-Variance Optimization," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 133-150.
    20. Gianfranco Guastaroba & Renata Mansini & M. Speranza, 2009. "Models and Simulations for Portfolio Rebalancing," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 33(3), pages 237-262, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:11:p:550-:d:678608. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.