IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i8p989-d1444704.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Manager–Team (Dis)agreement on Stress-Preventive Behaviours: Relationship with Psychosocial Work Environment and Employees’ Well-Being

Author

Listed:
  • Stefano Toderi

    (Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Glauco Cioffi

    (Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Joanna Yarker

    (Affinity Health at Work, London SW12 9NW, UK
    Birkbeck Business School, University of London, London WC1E 7HU, UK)

  • Rachel Lewis

    (Affinity Health at Work, London SW12 9NW, UK
    Birkbeck Business School, University of London, London WC1E 7HU, UK)

  • Jonathan Houdmont

    (Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK)

  • Cristian Balducci

    (Department for Life Quality Studies, University of Bologna, 47921 Rimini, Italy)

Abstract

The “Management Competencies to Prevent and Reduce Stress at Work” (MCPARS) approach focuses on identifying the stress-preventive managers’ competencies able to optimise the employees’ well-being through the management of the psychosocial work environment. Considering leadership as contextualised in complex social dynamics, the self–other agreement (SOA) investigation of the MCPARS may enhance previous findings, as it allows for exploring the manager–team perceptions’ (dis)agreement and its potential implications. However, no studies have tested the MCPARS using the SOA and multisource data. Grounded in Yammarino and Atwater’s SOA reference theory, we conducted an in-depth investigation on the MCPARS’s theoretical framework by examining the implications of manager–team (dis)agreement, regarding managers’ competencies, on employees’ psychosocial environment (H1–H2) and affective well-being (H3). Data from 36 managers and 475 employees were analysed by performing several polynomial regressions, response surface, and mediation analyses. The results reveal a significant relationship between SOA on MCPARS and employees’ perceptions of the psychosocial environment (H1). Employees report better perceptions when supervised by in-agreement good or under-estimator managers, while lower ratings occur under over-estimator or in-agreement poor managers (H2). Moreover, the psychosocial environment significantly mediated the relationship between SOA on MCPARS and employees’ well-being (H3). The MCPARS theoretical model’s soundness is supported, and its implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefano Toderi & Glauco Cioffi & Joanna Yarker & Rachel Lewis & Jonathan Houdmont & Cristian Balducci, 2024. "Manager–Team (Dis)agreement on Stress-Preventive Behaviours: Relationship with Psychosocial Work Environment and Employees’ Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(8), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:8:p:989-:d:1444704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/8/989/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/8/989/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miren Chenevert & Michela Vignoli & Paul M. Conway & Cristian Balducci, 2022. "Workplace Bullying and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptomology: The Influence of Role Conflict and the Moderating Effects of Neuroticism and Managerial Competencies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Edwards, Jeffrey R., 1994. "The Study of Congruence in Organizational Behavior Research: Critique and a Proposed Alternative," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 51-100, April.
    3. Stefano Toderi & Cristian Balducci, 2018. "Stress-Preventive Management Competencies, Psychosocial Work Environments, and Affective Well-Being: A Multilevel, Multisource Investigation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sandra Salvoni & Caroline Biron & Marie-Hélène Gilbert & Julie Dextras-Gauthier & Hans Ivers, 2024. "Managing Virtual Presenteeism during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multilevel Study on Managers’ Stress Management Competencies to Foster Functional Presenteeism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(9), pages 1-18, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lamar Pierce & Jason Snyder, 2015. "Unethical Demand and Employee Turnover," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(4), pages 853-869, November.
    2. Sang-June Park & Youjae Yi, 2016. "Performance-only measures vs. performance-expectation measures of service quality," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(15-16), pages 741-756, December.
    3. Adams, Leen & Faseur, Tineke & Geuens, Maggie, 2010. "The Influence of the Self-Regulatory Focus on the Effectiveness of Stop-Smoking Campaigns for Young Smokers," Working Papers 2010/38, Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management.
    4. Cristian Balducci & Elfi Baillien & Anja Van den Broeck & Stefano Toderi & Franco Fraccaroli, 2020. "Job Demand, Job Control, and Impaired Mental Health in the Experience of Workplace Bullying Behavior: A Two-Wave Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-12, February.
    5. Ding, Jingjing & Dong, Wei & Liang, Liang & Zhu, Joe, 2017. "Goal congruence analysis in multi-Division Organizations with shared resources based on data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(3), pages 961-973.
    6. Martin Obschonka & Eva Schmitt-Rodermund & Rainer K. Silbereisen & Samuel D. Gosling & Jeff Potter, 2013. "The Regional Distribution and Correlates of an Entrepreneurship-Prone Personality Profile in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom: A Socioecological Perspective," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 550, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    7. Venus, Merlijn & Stam, Daan & van Knippenberg, Daan, 2013. "Leader emotion as a catalyst of effective leader communication of visions, value-laden messages, and goals," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 53-68.
    8. Park, Tae-Youn & Kim, Seongsu & Sung, Li-Kuo, 2017. "Fair pay dispersion: A regulatory focus theory view," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 1-11.
    9. Nancy K. Lankton & D. Harrison McKnight & Ryan T. Wright & Jason Bennett Thatcher, 2016. "Research Note—Using Expectation Disconfirmation Theory and Polynomial Modeling to Understand Trust in Technology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 197-213, March.
    10. Gehad Mohammed Ahmed Naji & Ahmad Shahrul Nizam Isha & Abdulsamad Alazzani & Paula Brough & Muhammad Shoaib Saleem & Mysara Eissa Mohyaldinn & Mohammed Alzoraiki, 2022. "Do Leadership, Organizational Communication, and Work Environment Impact Employees’ Psychosocial Hazards in the Oil and Gas Industry?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-20, April.
    11. Peter Foreman & David A. Whetten, 2002. "Members' Identification with Multiple-Identity Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(6), pages 618-635, December.
    12. Anderson, Cameron & Brion, Sebastien & Moore, Don A. & Kennedy, Jessica A., 2012. "A status-enhancement account of overconfidence," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt6s5812wf, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    13. Miyuki Takase & Phillip Maude & Elizabeth Manias, 2006. "The impact of role discrepancy on nurses’ intention to quit their jobs," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(9), pages 1071-1080, September.
    14. Spiros Gounaris, 2005. "An alternative measure for assessing perceived quality of software house services," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 803-823, September.
    15. Wach, Bernhard A. & Wehner, Marius C. & Weißenberger, Barbara E. & Kabst, Rüdiger, 2021. "United we stand: HR and line managers’ shared views on HR strategic integration," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 410-422.
    16. Hughes, Paul & Hughes, Matthew & Stokes, Peter & Lee, Hanna & Rodgers, Peter & Degbey, William Y., 2020. "Micro-foundations of organizational ambidexterity in the context of cross-border mergers and acquisitions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    17. Justin J. P. Jansen & Michiel P. Tempelaar & Frans A. J. van den Bosch & Henk W. Volberda, 2009. "Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 797-811, August.
    18. Schminke, Marshall & Ambrose, Maureen L. & Neubaum, Donald O., 2005. "The effect of leader moral development on ethical climate and employee attitudes," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 135-151, July.
    19. Sang-June Park & Youjae Yi, 2017. "A composite measure of performance–expectation and performance-only measures," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(15-16), pages 936-947, December.
    20. Kari Kristinsson & Sigurdur Gudjonsson & Bryndis Kristjansdottir, 2023. "Tough Times Require Tough People: The Benefits of Grit for Reducing Employee Burnout," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(11), pages 1-8, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:8:p:989-:d:1444704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.