IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i3p1175-d489040.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards Sustainable Diets: Understanding the Cognitive Mechanism of Consumer Acceptance of Biofortified Foods and the Role of Nutrition Information

Author

Listed:
  • Amar Razzaq

    (College of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, No. 1 Shizishan Street, Hongshan District, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Yifan Tang

    (College of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, No. 1 Shizishan Street, Hongshan District, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Ping Qing

    (College of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, No. 1 Shizishan Street, Hongshan District, Wuhan 430070, China)

Abstract

Micronutrient malnutrition, also known as hidden hunger, continues to affect more than 2 billion people globally. Biofortification, which is a process of breeding staple crops with improved micronutrient contents such as vitamin A, iron, and zinc, offers a cost-effective and sustainable solution in reducing hidden hunger. However, the success of these foods depends on consumer acceptance. In contrast to previous studies, this research focuses on the mechanism of consumer acceptance of biofortified crops that undergo physical changes (i.e., changes in appearance) after biofortification. We use data on 473 Chinese consumers collected through online surveys to examine their purchase intentions for biofortified foods that have visible (vs. invisible) nutrition traits. Using two online surveys, we conduct two studies to reveal the mechanism and antecedents of consumer acceptance of different biofortified foods. In Study 1, we find that consumer purchase intentions vary depending upon the visibility of nutrition traits in biofortified foods. Specifically, consumers exhibit a nutrition-related food neophobia (NFN) regardless of visibility of the nutrition trait in biofortified foods; and a sensory-affective food neophobia (SFN) which is only pronounced when the nutrition trait in biofortified foods is visible. The results of the mediation analysis show that for both types of biofortified foods, NFN mediates consumers’ purchasing intentions. For foods that involve visible changes after biofortification, SFN acts as an additional mediator of consumer purchase intentions. Using ordered logistic regression analysis, we find that both food neophobias have a negative impact on consumer acceptance of biofortified foods. The results of Study 2 confirm our findings and further show that nutrition information moderates the mediation of NFN and SFN, i.e., the negative impact of NFN and SFN on purchase intentions can be reduced by providing nutrition information to consumers. The results of this study have several theoretical and practical implications and are of interest to stakeholders and marketers in the promotion of biofortified foods.

Suggested Citation

  • Amar Razzaq & Yifan Tang & Ping Qing, 2021. "Towards Sustainable Diets: Understanding the Cognitive Mechanism of Consumer Acceptance of Biofortified Foods and the Role of Nutrition Information," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:1175-:d:489040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1175/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1175/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Etumnu, Chinonso, 2016. "Behavioral Determinants of Biofortified Food Acceptance: The Case of Orange-fleshed Sweet Potato in Ghana," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235249, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Alan de Brauw & Patrick Eozenou & Daniel O Gilligan & Christine Hotz & Neha Kumar & J V Meenakshi, 2018. "Biofortification, Crop Adoption and Health Information: Impact Pathways in Mozambique and Uganda," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 100(3), pages 906-930.
    3. Mthokozisi K. Zuma & Unathi Kolanisi & Albert T. Modi, 2018. "The Potential of Integrating Provitamin A-Biofortified Maize in Smallholder Farming Systems to Reduce Malnourishment in South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-12, April.
    4. Giuseppe Timpanaro & Claudio Bellia & Vera Teresa Foti & Alessandro Scuderi, 2020. "Consumer Behaviour of Purchasing Biofortified Food Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-14, August.
    5. Hsiao-Ping Chang & Chun-Chieh Ma & Han-Shen Chen, 2020. "The Impacts of Young Consumers’ Health Values on Functional Beverages Purchase Intentions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-12, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Feng Ji & Guangyuan Zhao & Lun Meng & Rana Tehseen & Fushuai Wang, 2022. "Cultivating Talents for Reporting Environmental News on China’s Carbon Neutrality Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Yufeng He & Tinggui Chen, 2022. "Does the 10-Year Fishing Ban Compensation Policy in the Yangtze River Basin Improve the Livelihoods of Fishing Households? Evidence from Ma’anshan City, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Nirmala Bandumula & Santosha Rathod & Gabrijel Ondrasek & Muthuraman Pitchiah Pillai & Raman Meenakshi Sundaram, 2022. "An Economic Evaluation of Improved Rice Production Technology in Telangana State, India," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-12, September.
    4. Tao Lian & Shamsheer ul Haq & Pomi Shahbaz & Lei Zhao & Muhammad Nadeem & Babar Aziz, 2022. "Changing Food Patterns during the Pandemic: Exploring the Role of Household Dynamics and Income Stabilization Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Abdelhalim R. Doeim & Thowayeb H. Hassan & Mohamed Y. Helal & Mahmoud I. Saleh & Amany E. Salem & Mohamed A. S. Elsayed, 2022. "Service Value and Repurchase Intention in the Egyptian Fast-Food Restaurants: Toward a New Measurement Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Ying Lu & Sang Do Park, 2022. "Time Series Analysis of Policy Discourse on Green Consumption in China: Text Mining and Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Kirill A. Zhichkin & Vladimir V. Nosov & Lyudmila N. Zhichkina & Artur A. Gubadullin, 2022. "The Theory of Agriculture Multifunctionality on the Example of Private Households," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Min Zhu & Haiyun Tang & Ehsan Elahi & Zainab Khalid & Kaili Wang & Nimra Nisar, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Changes and Influencing Factors of Ecological Protection Levels in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yellow River," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Fen Liao & Yan Li & Ping Qing & Jie Feng & Anxu Wang & Jian Li & Junsheng Huo & Linjie Wang & Tong Chen & Jing Sun & Hongmei Mao, 2023. "Impact of folate biofortified food supplement on rural women's health and willingness‐to‐pay: A study based on a connected randomized controlled trial—Becker–DeGroot–Marschak experiment in China," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(S1), pages 1458-1477, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rute M. Caeiro & Pedro C. Vicente, 2020. "Knowledge of vitamin A deficiency and crop adoption: Evidence from a field experiment in Mozambique," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(2), pages 175-190, March.
    2. Martin, Will, 2021. "Tools for measuring the full impacts of agricultural interventions," IFPRI-MCC technical papers 2, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    3. Valera, Harold Glenn & Yamano, Takashi & Pede, Valerien & Puskur, Ranjitha & Habib, Muhammad Ashraful & Bashar, Khairul, 2021. "Impact of Nutrition Training on Long-Term Adoption of High Zinc Rice: A Randomized Control Trial Study Among Female Farmers in Bangladesh," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315165, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Sylvester Ochieng Ogutu & Andrea Fongar & Theda Gödecke & Lisa Jäckering & Henry Mwololo & Michael Njuguna & Meike Wollni & Matin Qaim, 2020. "How to make farming and agricultural extension more nutrition-sensitive: evidence from a randomised controlled trial in Kenya [Agricultural extension: good intentions and hard realities]," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 47(1), pages 95-118.
    5. repec:hal:cdiwps:halshs-02532955 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Berber Kramer, 2017. "Cooking Contests for Healthier Recipes: Impacts on Nutrition Knowledge and Behaviors in Bangladesh," Working Papers id:11943, eSocialSciences.
    7. Ruel, Marie T. & Quisumbing, Agnes R. & Balagamwala, Mysbah, 2017. "Nutrition-sensitive agriculture: What have we learned and where do we go from here?:," IFPRI discussion papers 1681, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    8. Elizabeth Kempen & Lorna Christie, 2022. "Designing to Attract in an Emerging Market: Applying Behavioural Reasoning Theory to South African Consumer Reactions to an Ultra-High Temperature Milk Product Line Extension," Journal of Marketing and Consumer Behaviour in Emerging Markets, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 1(14), pages 4-21.
    9. Pedro Cuesta-Valiño & Pablo Gutiérrez Rodríguez & Estela Núñez-Barriopedro, 2020. "Perception of Advertisements for Healthy Food on Social Media: Effect of Attitude on Consumers’ Response," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Rui Zhao & Meng Yang & Jianxiao Liu & Linchuan Yang & Zhikang Bao & Xinyun Ren, 2020. "University Students’ Purchase Intention and Willingness to Pay for Carbon-Labeled Food Products: A Purchase Decision-Making Experiment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-15, September.
    11. Denise Hörner & Adrien Bouguen & Markus Frölich & Meike Wollni, 2022. "Knowledge and Adoption of Complex Agricultural Technologies: Evidence from an Extension Experiment," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 36(1), pages 68-90.
    12. Caroline Hambloch & Kai Mausch & Costanza Conti & Andy Hall, 2023. "Simple solutions for complex problems? What is missing in agriculture for nutrition interventions," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(2), pages 363-379, April.
    13. Mathew T. Baker & Peng Lu & Jean A. Parrella & Holli R. Leggette, 2022. "Consumer Acceptance toward Functional Foods: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-40, January.
    14. Quisumbing, Agnes R. & Ahmed, Akhter & Gilligan, Daniel O. & Hoddinott, John & Kumar, Neha & Leroy, Jef L. & Menon, Purnima & Olney, Deanna K. & Roy, Shalini & Ruel, Marie, 2020. "Randomized controlled trials of multi-sectoral programs: Lessons from development research," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    15. Christophe Muller & Nouréini Sayouti, 2019. "How do agro-pastoral policies affect the dietary intake of agro-pastoralists in Niger?," Working Papers halshs-02165137, HAL.
    16. Adetomiwa Kolapo & Akeem Abiade Tijani & Seyi Olalekan Olawuyi, 2024. "Exploring the Role of Farmer-Led Jumpstarting Project on Adoption of Orange-Fleshed Sweet Potato in Nigeria: Implications on Productivity and Poverty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-35, August.
    17. Christophe Muller & Nouréini Sayouti, 2019. "How Do Agro-Pastoral Policies Affect the Dietary Intake of Agro-Pastoralists? Evidence from Niger," AMSE Working Papers 1917, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France, revised Apr 2020.
    18. Boru Douthwaite & Claudio Proietti & Vivian Polar & Graham Thiele, 2023. "Using theory to understand how policy change happens: Insights from agricultural research for development," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 200-212.
    19. Gilligan, Daniel O. & Kumar, Neha & McNiven, Scott & Meenakshi, J.V. & Quisumbing, Agnes R., 2012. "Bargaining-Power and Biofortification: The Role of Gender in Adoption of Orange Sweet Potato in Uganda," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 125017, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    20. Jones, Kelly M. & de Brauw, Alan, 2015. "Using Agriculture to Improve Child Health: Promoting Orange Sweet Potatoes Reduces Diarrhea," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 15-24.
    21. Gilligan, Daniel O. & Kumar, Neha & McNiven, Scott & Meenakshi, J.V. & Quisumbing, Agnes, 2020. "Bargaining power, decision making, and biofortification: The role of gender in adoption of orange sweet potato in Uganda," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:1175-:d:489040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.