IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i14p7477-d593551.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Multilevel Regression and Poststratification to Estimate Physical Activity Levels from Health Surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Marina Christofoletti

    (Department of Physical Education, School of Sports, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88040-900, SC, Brazil)

  • Tânia R. B. Benedetti

    (Department of Physical Education, School of Sports, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88040-900, SC, Brazil)

  • Felipe G. Mendes

    (Department of Physical Education, School of Sports, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88040-900, SC, Brazil)

  • Humberto M. Carvalho

    (Department of Physical Education, School of Sports, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88040-900, SC, Brazil)

Abstract

Background: Large-scale health surveys often consider sociodemographic characteristics and several health indicators influencing physical activity that often vary across subpopulations. Data in a survey for some small subpopulations are often not representative of the larger population. Objective: We developed a multilevel regression and poststratification (MRP) model to estimate leisure-time physical activity across Brazilian state capitals and evaluated whether the MRP outperforms single-level regression estimates based on the Brazilian cross-sectional national survey VIGITEL (2018). Methods: We used various approaches to compare the MRP and single-level model (complete-pooling) estimates, including cross-validation with various subsample proportions tested. Results: MRP consistently had predictions closer to the estimation target than single-level regression estimations. The mean absolute errors were smaller for the MRP estimates than single-level regression estimates with smaller sample sizes. MRP presented substantially smaller uncertainty estimates compared to single-level regression estimates. Overall, the MRP was superior to single-level regression estimates, particularly with smaller sample sizes, yielding smaller errors and more accurate estimates. Conclusion: The MRP is a promising strategy to predict subpopulations’ physical activity indicators from large surveys. The observations present in this study highlight the need for further research, which could, potentially, incorporate more information in the models to better interpret interactions and types of activities across target populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Marina Christofoletti & Tânia R. B. Benedetti & Felipe G. Mendes & Humberto M. Carvalho, 2021. "Using Multilevel Regression and Poststratification to Estimate Physical Activity Levels from Health Surveys," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7477-:d:593551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7477/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7477/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carpenter, Bob & Gelman, Andrew & Hoffman, Matthew D. & Lee, Daniel & Goodrich, Ben & Betancourt, Michael & Brubaker, Marcus & Guo, Jiqiang & Li, Peter & Riddell, Allen, 2017. "Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 76(i01).
    2. Park, David K. & Gelman, Andrew & Bafumi, Joseph, 2004. "Bayesian Multilevel Estimation with Poststratification: State-Level Estimates from National Polls," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(4), pages 375-385.
    3. Diez-Roux, A.V., 1998. "Bringing context back into epidemiology: Variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 88(2), pages 216-222.
    4. Marcela Mello Soares & Emanuella Gomes Maia & Rafael Moreira Claro, 2020. "Availability of public open space and the practice of leisure-time physical activity among the Brazilian adult population," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 65(8), pages 1467-1476, November.
    5. Roberta Mendes Abreu Silva & Amanda Cristina de Souza Andrade & Waleska Teixeira Caiaffa & Danielle Souto de Medeiros & Vanessa Moraes Bezerra, 2020. "National Adolescent School-based Health Survey - PeNSE 2015: Sedentary behavior and its correlates," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, January.
    6. Hanretty, Chris & Lauderdale, Benjamin E. & Vivyan, Nick, 2018. "Comparing Strategies for Estimating Constituency Opinion from National Survey Samples," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(3), pages 571-591, July.
    7. Yair Ghitza & Andrew Gelman, 2013. "Deep Interactions with MRP: Election Turnout and Voting Patterns Among Small Electoral Subgroups," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(3), pages 762-776, July.
    8. Buttice, Matthew K. & Highton, Benjamin, 2013. "How Does Multilevel Regression and Poststratification Perform with Conventional National Surveys?," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(4), pages 449-467.
    9. Johan Heyden & Stefaan Demarest & Koen Van Herck & Dirk Bacquer & Jean Tafforeau & Herman Van Oyen, 2014. "Association between variables used in the field substitution and post-stratification adjustment in the Belgian health interview survey and non-response," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 59(1), pages 197-206, February.
    10. Jeffrey R. Lax & Justin H. Phillips, 2009. "How Should We Estimate Public Opinion in The States?," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(1), pages 107-121, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lauderdale, Benjamin E. & Bailey, Delia & Blumenau, Jack & Rivers, Douglas, 2020. "Model-based pre-election polling for national and sub-national outcomes in the US and UK," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 399-413.
    2. Cerina, Roberto & Duch, Raymond, 2020. "Measuring public opinion via digital footprints," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 987-1002.
    3. Wang, Wei & Rothschild, David & Goel, Sharad & Gelman, Andrew, 2015. "Forecasting elections with non-representative polls," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 980-991.
    4. Margaret Weden & Christine Peterson & Jeremy Miles & Regina Shih, 2015. "Evaluating Linearly Interpolated Intercensal Estimates of Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics of U.S. Counties and Census Tracts 2001–2009," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 34(4), pages 541-559, August.
    5. Christopher Claassen & Richard Traunmüller, 2020. "Improving and Validating Survey Estimates of Religious Demography Using Bayesian Multilevel Models and Poststratification," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 49(3), pages 603-636, August.
    6. Laura C. Dawkins & Daniel B. Williamson & Stewart W. Barr & Sally R. Lampkin, 2020. "‘What drives commuter behaviour?': a Bayesian clustering approach for understanding opposing behaviours in social surveys," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(1), pages 251-280, January.
    7. Roberto Cerina & Raymond Duch, 2021. "Polling India via regression and post-stratification of non-probability online samples," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-34, November.
    8. Facchini, Giovanni & Hatton, Timothy J. & Steinhardt, Max F., 2024. "Opening Heaven’s Door: Public Opinion and Congressional Votes on the 1965 Immigration Act," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 84(1), pages 232-270, March.
    9. Yonatan Ben-Shalom & Ignacio Martinez & Mariel Finucane, "undated". "Risk of Workforce Exit Due to Disability: State Differences in 2003–2016," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 8aed03744a06419dbda68be8c, Mathematica Policy Research.
    10. Caldarulo, Mattia & Mossberger, Karen & Howell, Anthony, 2023. "Community-wide broadband adoption and student academic achievement," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1).
    11. Skinner, Benjamin T. & Doyle, William R., 2024. "Predicting postsecondary attendance by family income in the United States using multilevel regression with poststratification," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    12. Jinan N. Allan & Joseph T. Ripberger & Wesley Wehde & Makenzie Krocak & Carol L. Silva & Hank C. Jenkins‐Smith, 2020. "Geographic Distributions of Extreme Weather Risk Perceptions in the United States," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(12), pages 2498-2508, December.
    13. Matto Mildenberger & Jennifer R. Marlon & Peter D. Howe & Anthony Leiserowitz, 2017. "The spatial distribution of Republican and Democratic climate opinions at state and local scales," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 145(3), pages 539-548, December.
    14. Andrew Gelman & Bob Carpenter, 2020. "Bayesian analysis of tests with unknown specificity and sensitivity," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(5), pages 1269-1283, November.
    15. Matto Mildenberger & Peter Howe & Erick Lachapelle & Leah Stokes & Jennifer Marlon & Timothy Gravelle, 2016. "The Distribution of Climate Change Public Opinion in Canada," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-14, August.
    16. Montalvo, José G. & Papaspiliopoulos, Omiros & Stumpf-Fétizon, Timothée, 2019. "Bayesian forecasting of electoral outcomes with new parties’ competition," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 52-70.
    17. José Garcia Montalvo & Omiros Papaspiliopoulos & Timothée Stumpf-Fétizon, 2018. "Bayesian forecasting of electoral outcomes with new parties' competition," Economics Working Papers 1624, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    18. Nicholas Beauchamp, 2017. "Predicting and Interpolating State‐Level Polls Using Twitter Textual Data," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(2), pages 490-503, April.
    19. José García-Montalvo & Omiros Papaspiliopoulos & Timothée Stumpf-Fétizon, 2018. "Bayesian Forecasting of Electoral Outcomes with new Parties' Competition," Working Papers 1065, Barcelona School of Economics.
    20. Francis,David C. & Kubinec ,Robert, 2022. "Beyond Political Connections : A Measurement Model Approach to Estimating Firm-levelPolitical Influence in 41 Economies," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10119, The World Bank.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7477-:d:593551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.