IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i18p3485-d268516.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Waste Generation Characteristics during New Apartment Construction—Considering the Construction Phase

Author

Listed:
  • Young-Chan Kim

    (Innovative Durable Building and Infrastructure Research Center, Hanyang University, 55 Hanyangdaehak-ro, Sangnok-gu, Ansan 426-791, Korea)

  • Yuan-Long Zhang

    (School of Architecture, Civil, Environmental and Energy Engineering, Kyungpook National University, 80 Daehak-ro, Buk-gu, Daegu 41566, Korea)

  • Won-Jun Park

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Kangwon National University, 346, Jungang-ro, Samcheok-si, Gangwon-do 25913, Korea)

  • Gi-Wook Cha

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Jeju National University, 102 Jejudaehak-ro, Jeju-si, Jeju Special Self-Governing Province 63243, Korea)

  • Jung-Wan Kim

    (POSCO E&C, Building Works Division, Building Technology Group 241, Incheon tower-daero, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 22009, Korea)

  • Won-Hwa Hong

    (School of Architecture, Civil, Environmental and Energy Engineering, Kyungpook National University, 80 Daehak-ro, Buk-gu, Daegu 41566, Korea)

Abstract

The waste generation rate (WGR) is used to predict the generation of construction and demolition waste (C&DW) and has become a prevalent tool for efficient waste management systems. Many studies have focused on deriving the WGR, but most focused on demolition waste rather than construction waste (CW). Moreover, previous studies have used theoretical databases and thus were limited in showing changes in the generated CW during the construction period of actual sites. In this study, CW data were collected for recently completed apartment building sites through direct measurement, and the WGR was calculated by CW type for the construction period. The CW generation characteristics by type were analyzed, and the results were compared with those of previous studies. In this study, CW was classified into six types: Waste concrete, waste asphalt concrete, waste wood, waste synthetic resin, waste board, and mixed waste. The amount of CW generated was lowest at the beginning of the construction period. It slowly increased over time and then decreased again at the end. In particular, waste concrete and mixed waste were generated throughout the construction period, while other CWs were generated in the middle of the construction period or towards the end. The research method and results of this study are significant in that the construction period was considered, which has been neglected in previous studies on the WGR. These findings are expected to contribute to the development of efficient CW management systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Young-Chan Kim & Yuan-Long Zhang & Won-Jun Park & Gi-Wook Cha & Jung-Wan Kim & Won-Hwa Hong, 2019. "Analysis of Waste Generation Characteristics during New Apartment Construction—Considering the Construction Phase," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:18:p:3485-:d:268516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/18/3485/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/18/3485/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gi-Wook Cha & Young-Chan Kim & Hyeun Jun Moon & Won-Hwa Hong, 2017. "The Effects of Data Collection Method and Monitoring of Workers’ Behavior on the Generation of Demolition Waste," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Håvard Bergsdal & Rolf André Bohne & Helge Brattebø, 2007. "Projection of Construction and Demolition Waste in Norway," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 11(3), pages 27-39, July.
    3. Esa, Mohd Reza & Halog, Anthony & Rigamonti, Lucia, 2017. "Strategies for minimizing construction and demolition wastes in Malaysia," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 219-229.
    4. Lachimpadi, Suresh Kumar & Pereira, Joy Jacqueline & Taha, Mohd Raihan & Mokhtar, Mazlin, 2012. "Construction waste minimisation comparing conventional and precast construction (Mixed System and IBS) methods in high-rise buildings: A Malaysia case study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 96-103.
    5. Weisheng Lu, 2014. "Estimating the Amount of Building-Related Construction and Demolition Waste in China," Springer Books, in: Donglang Yang & Yanjun Qian (ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 539-548, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaoxuan Wei & Meng Ye & Liang Yuan & Wei Bi & Weisheng Lu, 2022. "Analyzing the Freight Characteristics and Carbon Emission of Construction Waste Hauling Trucks: Big Data Analytics of Hong Kong," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-21, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kien Ton Tong & Ngoc Tan Nguyen & Giang Hoang Nguyen & Tomonori Ishigaki & Ken Kawamoto, 2022. "Management Assessment and Future Projections of Construction and Demolition Waste Generation in Hai Phong City, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-29, August.
    2. Gangolells, Marta & Casals, Miquel & Forcada, Núria & Macarulla, Marcel, 2014. "Analysis of the implementation of effective waste management practices in construction projects and sites," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 99-111.
    3. Esa, Mohd Reza & Halog, Anthony & Rigamonti, Lucia, 2017. "Strategies for minimizing construction and demolition wastes in Malaysia," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 219-229.
    4. López-Guerrero, Rafael E. & Vera, Sergio & Carpio, Manuel, 2022. "A quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the sustainability of industrialised building systems: A bibliographic review and analysis of case studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    5. Dong Yang & Mengyuan Dang & Lingwen Sun & Feng Han & Feng Shi & Hongbo Zhang & Hongjun Zhang, 2021. "A System Dynamics Model for Urban Residential Building Stock towards Sustainability: The Case of Jinan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-23, September.
    6. Chen, Rong-Hui & Lin, Yuanhsu & Tseng, Ming-Lang, 2015. "Multicriteria analysis of sustainable development indicators in the construction minerals industry in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P1), pages 123-133.
    7. Luiz Maurício Maués & Norma Beltrão & Isabela Silva, 2021. "GHG Emissions Assessment of Civil Construction Waste Disposal and Transportation Process in the Eastern Amazon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-26, May.
    8. Jin, Ruoyu & Li, Bo & Zhou, Tongyu & Wanatowski, Dariusz & Piroozfar, Poorang, 2017. "An empirical study of perceptions towards construction and demolition waste recycling and reuse in China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 86-98.
    9. Lilliana Abarca-Guerrero & Susi Lobo-Ugalde & Nicole Méndez-Carpio & Rosibel Rodríguez-Leandro & Victoria Rudin-Vega, 2022. "Zero Waste Systems: Barriers and Measures to Recycling of Construction and Demolition Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    10. Chung, Shan Shan, 2010. "Projecting municipal solid waste: The case of Hong Kong SAR," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(11), pages 759-768.
    11. Taulo, J.L. & Sebitosi, A.B., 2016. "Material and energy flow analysis of the Malawian tea industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 1337-1350.
    12. Lanfang, Liu & Issam, Srour & Chong, Wai K. & Christopher, Hermreck, 2015. "Integrating G2G, C2C and resource flow analysis into life cycle assessment framework: A case of construction steel’s resource loop," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 143-152.
    13. Li, Jingru & Ding, Zhikun & Mi, Xuming & Wang, Jiayuan, 2013. "A model for estimating construction waste generation index for building project in China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 20-26.
    14. Lai Sheung Au & Seungjun Ahn & Tae Wan Kim, 2018. "System Dynamic Analysis of Impacts of Government Charges on Disposal of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Hong Kong Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    15. Villoria Sáez, Paola & del Río Merino, Mercedes & Porras-Amores, César & San-Antonio González, Alicia, 2014. "Assessing the accumulation of construction waste generation during residential building construction works," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 67-74.
    16. Bakshan, Amal & Srour, Issam & Chehab, Ghassan & El-Fadel, Mutasem, 2015. "A field based methodology for estimating waste generation rates at various stages of construction projects," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 70-80.
    17. Kleemann, Fritz & Lehner, Hubert & Szczypińska, Anna & Lederer, Jakob & Fellner, Johann, 2017. "Using change detection data to assess amount and composition of demolition waste from buildings in Vienna," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 37-46.
    18. Vivian Wing-Yan Tam & Weisheng Lu, 2016. "Construction Waste Management Profiles, Practices, and Performance: A Cross-Jurisdictional Analysis in Four Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-16, February.
    19. Gi-Wook Cha & Won-Hwa Hong & Se-Hyu Choi & Young-Chan Kim, 2023. "Developing an Optimal Ensemble Model to Estimate Building Demolition Waste Generation Rate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    20. Musa Mohammed & Nasir Shafiq & Ali Elmansoury & Al-Baraa Abdulrahman Al-Mekhlafi & Ehab Farouk Rached & Noor Amila Zawawi & Abdulrahman Haruna & Aminu Darda’u Rafindadi & Muhammad Bello Ibrahim, 2021. "Modeling of 3R (Reduce, Reuse and Recycle) for Sustainable Construction Waste Reduction: A Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:18:p:3485-:d:268516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.