IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p15265-d975721.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Zero Waste Systems: Barriers and Measures to Recycling of Construction and Demolition Waste

Author

Listed:
  • Lilliana Abarca-Guerrero

    (Chemistry School, Environmental Protection Research Center, Instituto Tecnologico de Costa Rica, Cartago 30104, Costa Rica)

  • Susi Lobo-Ugalde

    (Asociación Centroamericana para la Economía, la Salud y el Ambiente, San Jose 40602, Costa Rica)

  • Nicole Méndez-Carpio

    (Chemistry School, Instituto Tecnologico de Costa Rica, Cartago 30104, Costa Rica)

  • Rosibel Rodríguez-Leandro

    (Chemistry School, Instituto Tecnologico de Costa Rica, Cartago 30104, Costa Rica)

  • Victoria Rudin-Vega

    (Asociación Centroamericana para la Economía, la Salud y el Ambiente, San Jose 40602, Costa Rica)

Abstract

Urbanization, population growth, increased consumption, infrastructure, and housing needs are some of the factors that result in increased waste. Recycling has been a crucial way to reduce the amount of materials that end up in disposal sites and is how citizens, more aware of the impacts on the environment, participate in some of the schemes to reduce waste. Zero waste is an approach developed to preserve the finite resources available, but major barriers are hindering its efficient and effective implementation. This study intended to unveil those barriers in the Costa Rican construction sector and to propose measures to increase the recycling rates. In order to achieve the objective, construction companies, cement producers, waste managers, personnel of refuse material facilities, waste transformers, construction material distributors, and a director of the Ministry of Health were interviewed to determine the challenges in the valorization of concrete, wood, metal, and packaging waste materials. This article reports the findings, which include, among others, the fact that most construction companies dispose the waste without any separation, except for metals. The cement producer companies do not participate in any form of collection system in spite of the available technology and equipment and the absence of innovative technologies for the transformation of materials.

Suggested Citation

  • Lilliana Abarca-Guerrero & Susi Lobo-Ugalde & Nicole Méndez-Carpio & Rosibel Rodríguez-Leandro & Victoria Rudin-Vega, 2022. "Zero Waste Systems: Barriers and Measures to Recycling of Construction and Demolition Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15265-:d:975721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15265/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15265/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lilliana Abarca-Guerrero & Ger Maas & Hijmen Van Twillert, 2017. "Barriers and Motivations for Construction Waste Reduction Practices in Costa Rica," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-14, December.
    2. World Bank, 2015. "Results in the Latin America and Caribbean Region 2015, Volume 5," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 21912.
    3. Ali Al-Otaibi & Patrick Aaniamenga Bowan & Mahmoud M. Abdel daiem & Noha Said & John Obas Ebohon & Aasem Alabdullatief & Essa Al-Enazi & Greg Watts, 2022. "Identifying the Barriers to Sustainable Management of Construction and Demolition Waste in Developed and Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Ali Karji & Mostafa Namian & Mohammadsoroush Tafazzoli, 2020. "Identifying the Key Barriers to Promote Sustainable Construction in the United States: A Principal Component Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Begum, Rawshan Ara & Siwar, Chamhuri & Pereira, Joy Jacqueline & Jaafar, Abdul Hamid, 2006. "A benefit–cost analysis on the economic feasibility of construction waste minimisation: The case of Malaysia," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 86-98.
    6. Christopher Kennedy & John Cuddihy & Joshua Engel‐Yan, 2007. "The Changing Metabolism of Cities," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 11(2), pages 43-59, April.
    7. World Bank, 2015. "Results in the Latin America and Caribbean Region, 2015, Volume 6," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 24445.
    8. Håvard Bergsdal & Rolf André Bohne & Helge Brattebø, 2007. "Projection of Construction and Demolition Waste in Norway," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 11(3), pages 27-39, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fernando Antonio da Silva Fernandes & Dayriane do Socorro de Oliveira Costa & Camilo Andrés Guerrero Martin & João Adriano Rossignolo, 2023. "Vitreous Foam with Thermal Insulating Property Produced with the Addition of Waste Glass Powder and Rice Husk Ash," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Luis Alonso González Corrales & Rodrigo Cesar Pierozan & Gregório Luís Silva Araújo & Ennio Marques Palmeira, 2023. "Evaluation of Construction and Demolition Waste and Other Alternative Fills for Strip-Reinforced Soil Walls," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saeed Kamranfar & Farid Damirchi & Mitra Pourvaziri & Pardayev Abdunabi Xalikovich & Samira Mahmoudkelayeh & Reza Moezzi & Amir Vadiee, 2023. "A Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling Analysis of the Primary Barriers to Sustainable Construction in Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Mora Cortez, Roberto & Johnston, Wesley J., 2018. "Needed B2B marketing capabilities: Insights from the USA and emerging Latin America," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 594-609.
    3. David N. Bristow & Eugene A. Mohareb, 2020. "From the urban metabolism to the urban immune system," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(2), pages 300-312, April.
    4. Pérez, Ivone & Trujillo, Lourdes & González, María Manuela, 2016. "Efficiency determinants of container terminals in Latin American and the Caribbean," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1-14.
    5. Noushin Islam & Malindu Sandanayake & Shobha Muthukumaran & Dimuth Navaratna, 2024. "Review on Sustainable Construction and Demolition Waste Management—Challenges and Research Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-30, April.
    6. Cornelis Leeuwen & Jos Frijns & Annemarie Wezel & Frans Ven, 2012. "City Blueprints: 24 Indicators to Assess the Sustainability of the Urban Water Cycle," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(8), pages 2177-2197, June.
    7. Yung-Jaan Lee, 2022. "Hybrid Ecological Footprint of Taipei," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, April.
    8. Kien Ton Tong & Ngoc Tan Nguyen & Giang Hoang Nguyen & Tomonori Ishigaki & Ken Kawamoto, 2022. "Management Assessment and Future Projections of Construction and Demolition Waste Generation in Hai Phong City, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-29, August.
    9. Massimo Palme & Agnese Salvati, 2020. "Sustainability and Urban Metabolism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-3, January.
    10. Yun-Yun Ko & Yin-Hao Chiu, 2020. "Empirical Study of Urban Development Evaluation Indicators Based on the Urban Metabolism Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-15, September.
    11. Koenraad Danneels, 2023. "THE POLITICS OF URBAN ECOLOGY: Paul Duvigneaud and the Rise of Ecological Urbanism in Brussels during the 1970s," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(5), pages 792-808, September.
    12. Daniela Perrotti, 2019. "Evaluating urban metabolism assessment methods and knowledge transfer between scientists and practitioners: A combined framework for supporting practice-relevant research," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(8), pages 1458-1479, October.
    13. Xiaoyue Wang & Shuyao Wu & Shuangcheng Li, 2017. "Urban Metabolism of Three Cities in Jing-Jin-Ji Urban Agglomeration, China: Using the MuSIASEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-21, August.
    14. Jennie Moore, 2015. "Ecological Footprints and Lifestyle Archetypes: Exploring Dimensions of Consumption and the Transformation Needed to Achieve Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-17, April.
    15. Yuan Chen & Minhas Asim, 2024. "Data-Driven Predictive Analysis and Sustainable Management of Concrete Waste in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-22, May.
    16. John A. Paravantis & Panagiotis D. Tasios & Vasileios Dourmas & Georgios Andreakos & Konstantinos Velaoras & Nikoletta Kontoulis & Panagiota Mihalakakou, 2021. "A Regression Analysis of the Carbon Footprint of Megacities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, January.
    17. Brinkley, Catherine & Raj, Subhashni, 2022. "Perfusion and urban thickness: The shape of cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    18. Chen, Shaoqing & Chen, Bin, 2017. "Coupling of carbon and energy flows in cities: A meta-analysis and nexus modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 774-783.
    19. Zhang, Ning & Zhang, Duo & Zuo, Jian & Miller, Travis R. & Duan, Huabo & Schiller, Georg, 2022. "Potential for CO2 mitigation and economic benefits from accelerated carbonation of construction and demolition waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    20. Zhang, Yan & Liu, Hong & Fath, Brian D., 2014. "Synergism analysis of an urban metabolic system: Model development and a case study for Beijing, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 272(C), pages 188-197.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15265-:d:975721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.