IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i11p2592-d184178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Long Working Hours and Job Quality in Europe: Gender and Welfare State Differences

Author

Listed:
  • Lucía Artazcoz

    (Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona, 08023 Barcelona, Spain
    CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain
    Center for Research in Occupational Health, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08002 Barcelona, Spain
    Institute of Biomedical Research (IIB-Sant Pau), 08041 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Imma Cortès-Franch

    (Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona, 08023 Barcelona, Spain
    CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain
    Institute of Biomedical Research (IIB-Sant Pau), 08041 Barcelona, Spain
    Departament de Pediatria, Obstetrícia i Ginecologia, i de Medicina Preventiva, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Vicenta Escribà-Agüir

    (Centre for Public Health Research (Health Inequalities Area), Nursing Department, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
    Valencian School for Health Studies, Regional Ministry of Health. Generalitat Valenciana, 46010 Valencia, Spain)

  • María López

    (Center for Research in Occupational Health, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08002 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Fernando G. Benavides

    (CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain
    Center for Research in Occupational Health, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08002 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

Chronic extreme long working hours (LWH) have been found consistently associated with poor health status. However, the evidence for moderately LWH (41–60 h a week) is contradictory. Although poor job quality has been proposed as one of the mechanisms of this relationship, there are almost no studies about LWH and job quality. The objectives of this study were to analyze the association between moderately LWH and job quality in the EU27, as well as to examine differences by welfare regimes and gender. This is a cross-sectional study based on data from the 2010 European Working Conditions Survey. A subsample of employees from the EU27 aged 16–64 years who worked 30–60 h a week was selected (12,574 men and 8787 women). Overall, moderately LWH were not consistently associated with poor job quality except among women from Eastern European countries. Therefore, in the EU27 poor job quality does not seem to explain the relationship between moderately LWH and poor health status. The findings among women from Eastern European countries may be related to their weakened position in the labor market and to their work-family conflict resulting from a process of re-familisation that constrains their choices for a good job.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucía Artazcoz & Imma Cortès-Franch & Vicenta Escribà-Agüir & María López & Fernando G. Benavides, 2018. "Long Working Hours and Job Quality in Europe: Gender and Welfare State Differences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:11:p:2592-:d:184178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/11/2592/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/11/2592/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arne L. Kalleberg & Stephen Vaisey, 2005. "Pathways to a Good Job: Perceived Work Quality among the Machinists in North America," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 43(3), pages 431-454, September.
    2. Robert Drago & Mark Wooden & David Black, 2009. "Long Work Hours: Volunteers and Conscripts," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 47(3), pages 571-600, September.
    3. John Zelenski & Steven Murphy & David Jenkins, 2008. "The Happy-Productive Worker Thesis Revisited," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 521-537, December.
    4. Olivier Thévenon, 2011. "Family Policies in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 37(1), pages 57-87, March.
    5. Mark Smith & Paola Villa, 2014. "The Long Tail of the Great Recession. Foregone Employment and Foregone Policies," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(2), pages 85-119.
    6. Golden, Lonnie & Wiens-Tuers, Barbara, 2006. "To your happiness? Extra hours of labor supply and worker well-being," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 382-397, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nils Backhaus, 2022. "Working Time Control and Variability in Europe Revisited: Correlations with Health, Sleep, and Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Paula Franklin & Wouter Zwysen & Agnieszka Piasna, 2022. "Temporal Dimensions of Job Quality and Gender: Exploring Differences in the Associations of Working Time and Health between Women and Men," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-18, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Rudolf, 2014. "Work Shorter, Be Happier? Longitudinal Evidence from the Korean Five-Day Working Policy," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 15(5), pages 1139-1163, October.
    2. Merja Kauhanen & Jouko Nätti, 2011. "Involuntary temporary and part-time work, job quality and well-being at work," Working Papers 272, Työn ja talouden tutkimus LABORE, The Labour Institute for Economic Research LABORE.
    3. Merja Kauhanen & Jouko Nätti, 2015. "Involuntary Temporary and Part-Time Work, Job Quality and Well-Being at Work," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 120(3), pages 783-799, February.
    4. Argyro Avgoustaki & Almudena Cañibano, 2020. "Motivational Drivers of Extensive Work Effort: Are Long Hours Always Detrimental to Well‐being?," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 355-398, July.
    5. Ayhan Gormus & Simla Güzel, 2021. "Life Satisfaction and Job Quality Relationship: Findings from the OECD Countries for Linear Regression Models," Journal of Social Policy Conferences, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0(81), pages 1-33, December.
    6. Małgorzata W Kożusznik & José M Peiró & Aida Soriano, 2019. "Daily eudaimonic well-being as a predictor of daily performance: A dynamic lens," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, April.
    7. Georges Steffgen & Philipp E. Sischka & Martha Fernandez de Henestrosa, 2020. "The Quality of Work Index and the Quality of Employment Index: A Multidimensional Approach of Job Quality and Its Links to Well-Being at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-31, October.
    8. Stefanie König & Beate Cesinger, 2015. "Gendered work–family conflict in Germany: do self-employment and flexibility matter?," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 29(4), pages 531-549, August.
    9. Zachary Van Winkle & Anette Fasang, 2021. "The complexity of employment and family life courses across 20th century Europe: More evidence for larger cross-national differences but little change across 1916‒1966 birth cohorts," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 44(32), pages 775-810.
    10. Matloob Piracha & Massimiliano Tani & Zhiming Cheng & Ben Zhe Wang, 2023. "Social assimilation and immigrants’ labour market outcomes," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 36(1), pages 37-67, January.
    11. Sara Baiocco & Cinzia Alcidi & Francesco Corti & Mattia Di Salvo, 2022. "Changing Social Investment Strategies in the EU," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2022-01, Joint Research Centre.
    12. Guzi, Martin & de Pedraza, Pablo, 2013. "A Web Survey Analysis of the Subjective Well-being of Spanish Workers," IZA Discussion Papers 7618, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Roberta Rutigliano, 2020. "Counting on Potential Grandparents? Adult Children’s Entry Into Parenthood Across European Countries," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(4), pages 1393-1414, August.
    14. Piracha, Matloob & Tani, Massimiliano & Cheng, Zhiming & Wang, Ben Zhe, 2021. "Ethnic Identity and Immigrants' Labour Market Outcomes," IZA Discussion Papers 14123, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. Vincenza Capone & Mohsen Joshanloo & Miriam Sang-Ah Park, 2022. "Job Satisfaction Mediates the Relationship between Psychosocial and Organization Factors and Mental Well-Being in Schoolteachers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Alex Bryson & John Forth & Lucy Stokes, 2015. "Does Worker Wellbeing Affect Workplace Performance?," National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) Discussion Papers 447, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
    17. Cristián Coo & Marisa Salanova, 2018. "Mindfulness Can Make You Happy-and-Productive: A Mindfulness Controlled Trial and Its Effects on Happiness, Work Engagement and Performance," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 1691-1711, August.
    18. Liu, Yang & Zhang, Yuchen & Zhao, Xiaoli & Farnoosh, Arash & Ma, Ruoran, 2024. "Synergistic effect of environmental governance instruments embedded in social contexts: A case study of China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    19. Costa-Font, J.; & Saenz de Miera Juarez, B., 2021. "Working the Weight Out? Working Time Reduction and Overweight," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 21/18, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    20. Robert Breunig & Xiaodong Gong & Gordon Leslie, 2015. "The Dynamics of Satisfaction with Working Hours in Australia: The Usefulness of Panel Data in Evaluating the Case for Policy Intervention," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(1), pages 130-154, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:11:p:2592-:d:184178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.