IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v206y2020ics0360544220312688.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of CO2 production for enhanced oil recovery from four power plants

Author

Listed:
  • Arroyave, Juan D.
  • Chejne, Farid
  • Mejía, Juan M.
  • Maya, Juan C.

Abstract

Four coal-based power plants were evaluated with respect to their capacity to produce CO2 for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR). The plant characteristics were evaluated using energy and exergoeconomic criteria and a robust coal gasification/combustion mathematical model that can predict temperature, converted fraction and particle size distribution for solids have been used for a high pressure fluidized bed. Other models based on Python, Aspen Hysys and Microsoft Excel have been used too. Integrating carbon sequestration reduces the global energy and exergy efficiencies of all power plants (up to 10%). However, the Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) is a promising technology utilizing coal for generating electrical energy and direct compression of CO2 (11–20 MPa). Similarly, integrating gasification with Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFC), allows for the pre-combustion capture of CO2, with the advantage of lower initial investment costs. The oxy-fuel combustion (OXY) plant offers high energy and exergy efficiencies, but the exergoeconomic cost of CO2 is increased by 31 USD/t as compared to IGCC. The conventional thermoelectric (CT) plant exhibit disadvantages due to their simple power cycle and the elevated initial investment costs. This suggests that coal-gasification based plants are the best alternatives for CO2 production for EOR and co-generated electrical power.

Suggested Citation

  • Arroyave, Juan D. & Chejne, Farid & Mejía, Juan M. & Maya, Juan C., 2020. "Evaluation of CO2 production for enhanced oil recovery from four power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:206:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220312688
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544220312688
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118161?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Im-orb, Karittha & Wiyaratn, Wisitsree & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2018. "Technical and economic assessment of the pyrolysis and gasification integrated process for biomass conversion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 592-603.
    2. Siefert, Nicholas S. & Litster, Shawn, 2013. "Exergy and economic analyses of advanced IGCC–CCS and IGFC–CCS power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 315-328.
    3. Moioli, Stefania & Giuffrida, Antonio & Romano, Matteo C. & Pellegrini, Laura A. & Lozza, Giovanni, 2016. "Assessment of MDEA absorption process for sequential H2S removal and CO2 capture in air-blown IGCC plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1452-1470.
    4. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2012. "Integrated assessment of IGCC power generation technology with carbon capture and storage (CCS)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 434-445.
    5. Wang, Meihong & Joel, Atuman S. & Ramshaw, Colin & Eimer, Dag & Musa, Nuhu M., 2015. "Process intensification for post-combustion CO2 capture with chemical absorption: A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 275-291.
    6. Ferrara, G. & Lanzini, A. & Leone, P. & Ho, M.T. & Wiley, D.E., 2017. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic analysis of post-combustion CO2 capture using MEA-solvent chemical absorption," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 113-128.
    7. Yan, Linbo & He, Boshu & Pei, Xiaohui & Li, Xusheng & Wang, Chaojun, 2013. "Energy and exergy analyses of a Zero emission coal system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1094-1103.
    8. Giuffrida, Antonio & Romano, Matteo C. & Lozza, Giovanni G., 2010. "Thermodynamic assessment of IGCC power plants with hot fuel gas desulfurization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(11), pages 3374-3383, November.
    9. Siefert, Nicholas S. & Chang, Brian Y. & Litster, Shawn, 2014. "Exergy and economic analysis of a CaO-looping gasifier for IGFC–CCS and IGCC–CCS," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 230-245.
    10. Parraga, Joel & Khalilpour, Kaveh Rajab & Vassallo, Anthony, 2018. "Polygeneration with biomass-integrated gasification combined cycle process: Review and prospective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 219-234.
    11. Cao, Yang & He, Boshu & Ding, Guangchao & Su, Liangbin & Duan, Zhipeng, 2017. "Energy and exergy investigation on two improved IGCC power plants with different CO2 capture schemes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 47-57.
    12. Masnadi, Mohammad S. & Grace, John R. & Bi, Xiaotao T. & Lim, C. Jim & Ellis, Naoko & Li, Yong Hua & Watkinson, A. Paul, 2015. "Single-fuel steam gasification of switchgrass and coal in a bubbling fluidized bed: A comprehensive parametric reference for co-gasification study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 133-147.
    13. Li, Kangkang & Leigh, Wardhaugh & Feron, Paul & Yu, Hai & Tade, Moses, 2016. "Systematic study of aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA)-based CO2 capture process: Techno-economic assessment of the MEA process and its improvements," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 648-659.
    14. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2014. "Economic evaluations of coal-based combustion and gasification power plants with post-combustion CO2 capture using calcium looping cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 665-673.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sterkhov, K.V. & Khokhlov, D.A. & Zaichenko, M.N. & Pleshanov, K.A., 2021. "A zero carbon emission CCGT power plant and an existing steam power station modernization scheme," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    2. Miriam Navarrete Procopio & Gustavo Urquiza & Laura Castro, 2023. "Analysis of Absorber Packed Height for Power Plants with Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ren, Siyue & Feng, Xiao & Wang, Yufei, 2021. "Emergy evaluation of the integrated gasification combined cycle power generation systems with a carbon capture system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    2. Igor Donskoy, 2023. "Techno-Economic Efficiency Estimation of Promising Integrated Oxyfuel Gasification Combined-Cycle Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Zheng, Yawen & Gao, Lin & He, Song, 2023. "Analysis of the mechanism of energy consumption for CO2 capture in a power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    4. Chen, Shiyi & Lior, Noam & Xiang, Wenguo, 2015. "Coal gasification integration with solid oxide fuel cell and chemical looping combustion for high-efficiency power generation with inherent CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 298-312.
    5. Wu, Ying & Chen, Xiaoping & Ma, Jiliang & Wu, Ye & Liu, Daoyin & Xie, Weiyi, 2020. "System integration optimization for coal-fired power plant with CO2 capture by Na2CO3 dry sorbents," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    6. Calin-Cristian Cormos, 2018. "Techno-Economic Evaluations of Copper-Based Chemical Looping Air Separation System for Oxy-Combustion and Gasification Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Li, Fang-zhou & Kang, Jing-xian & Song, Yun-cai & Feng, Jie & Li, Wen-ying, 2020. "Thermodynamic feasibility for molybdenum-based gaseous oxides assisted looping coal gasification and its derived power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    8. Perejón, Antonio & Romeo, Luis M. & Lara, Yolanda & Lisbona, Pilar & Martínez, Ana & Valverde, Jose Manuel, 2016. "The Calcium-Looping technology for CO2 capture: On the important roles of energy integration and sorbent behavior," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 787-807.
    9. Lee, Woo-Sung & Lee, Jae-Cheol & Oh, Hyun-Taek & Baek, Seung-Won & Oh, Min & Lee, Chang-Ha, 2017. "Performance, economic and exergy analyses of carbon capture processes for a 300 MW class integrated gasification combined cycle power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 731-742.
    10. Ji, Long & Yu, Hai & Li, Kangkang & Yu, Bing & Grigore, Mihaela & Yang, Qi & Wang, Xiaolong & Chen, Zuliang & Zeng, Ming & Zhao, Shuaifei, 2018. "Integrated absorption-mineralisation for low-energy CO2 capture and sequestration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 356-366.
    11. Carlos Arnaiz del Pozo & Ángel Jiménez Álvaro & Jan Hendrik Cloete & Schalk Cloete & Shahriar Amini, 2020. "Exergy Analysis of Gas Switching Chemical Looping IGCC Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-25, January.
    12. Arnaiz del Pozo, Carlos & Cloete, Schalk & Jiménez Álvaro, Ángel, 2023. "Ammonia from solid fuels: A cost-effective route to energy security with negative CO2 emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    13. Peter Viebahn & Emile J. L. Chappin, 2018. "Scrutinising the Gap between the Expected and Actual Deployment of Carbon Capture and Storage—A Bibliometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-45, September.
    14. Pereira, Luís M.C. & Vega, Lourdes F., 2018. "A systematic approach for the thermodynamic modelling of CO2-amine absorption process using molecular-based models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 273-291.
    15. Zhao, Bin & Liu, Fangzheng & Cui, Zheng & Liu, Changjun & Yue, Hairong & Tang, Siyang & Liu, Yingying & Lu, Houfang & Liang, Bin, 2017. "Enhancing the energetic efficiency of MDEA/PZ-based CO2 capture technology for a 650MW power plant: Process improvement," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 362-375.
    16. Cao, Yang & He, Boshu & Ding, Guangchao & Su, Liangbin & Duan, Zhipeng, 2017. "Energy and exergy investigation on two improved IGCC power plants with different CO2 capture schemes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 47-57.
    17. Zhan, Honglei & Zhao, Kun & Xiao, Lizhi, 2015. "Spectral characterization of the key parameters and elements in coal using terahertz spectroscopy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 1140-1145.
    18. Obara, Shin'ya & Morel, Jorge & Okada, Masaki & Kobayashi, Kazuma, 2016. "Performance evaluation of an independent microgrid comprising an integrated coal gasification fuel cell combined cycle, large-scale photovoltaics, and a pumped-storage power station," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 78-93.
    19. Joel, Atuman S. & Wang, Meihong & Ramshaw, Colin & Oko, Eni, 2017. "Modelling, simulation and analysis of intensified regenerator for solvent based carbon capture using rotating packed bed technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 11-25.
    20. Martin Haaf & Peter Ohlemüller & Jochen Ströhle & Bernd Epple, 2020. "Techno-economic assessment of alternative fuels in second-generation carbon capture and storage processes," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 149-164, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:206:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220312688. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.