IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v8y2014i1p1-30d43924.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recent Advances in Second Generation Ethanol Production by Thermophilic Bacteria

Author

Listed:
  • Sean Michael Scully

    (Faculty of Natural Resource Sciences, University of Akureyri, Borgir, Nordurslod 2, IS-600 Akureyri, Iceland)

  • Johann Orlygsson

    (Faculty of Natural Resource Sciences, University of Akureyri, Borgir, Nordurslod 2, IS-600 Akureyri, Iceland)

Abstract

There is an increased interest in using thermophilic bacteria for the production of bioethanol from complex lignocellulosic biomass due to their higher operating temperatures and broad substrate range. This review focuses upon the main genera of thermophilic anaerobes known to produce ethanol, their physiology, and the relevance of various environmental factors on ethanol yields including the partial pressure of hydrogen, ethanol tolerance, pH and substrate inhibition. Additionally, recent development in evolutionary adaptation and genetic engineering of thermophilic bacteria is highlighted. Recent developments in advanced process techniques used for ethanol production are reviewed with an emphasis on the advantages of using thermophilic bacteria in process strategies including separate saccharification and fermentation, simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF), and consolidated bioprocessing (CBP).

Suggested Citation

  • Sean Michael Scully & Johann Orlygsson, 2014. "Recent Advances in Second Generation Ethanol Production by Thermophilic Bacteria," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-30, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:8:y:2014:i:1:p:1-30:d:43924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/1/1/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/1/1/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sigurbjornsdottir, Margret Audur & Orlygsson, Johann, 2012. "Combined hydrogen and ethanol production from sugars and lignocellulosic biomass by Thermoanaerobacterium AK54, isolated from hot spring," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 785-791.
    2. Amore, Antonella & Faraco, Vincenza, 2012. "Potential of fungi as category I Consolidated BioProcessing organisms for cellulosic ethanol production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 3286-3301.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Majidian, Parastoo & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Zeinolabedini, Mehrshad & Naghshbandi, Mohammad Pooya & Chisti, Yusuf, 2018. "Metabolic engineering of microorganisms for biofuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3863-3885.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Varrone, C. & Liberatore, R. & Crescenzi, T. & Izzo, G. & Wang, A., 2013. "The valorization of glycerol: Economic assessment of an innovative process for the bioconversion of crude glycerol into ethanol and hydrogen," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 349-357.
    2. Sarma, Saurabh Jyoti & Pachapur, Vinayak & Brar, Satinder Kaur & Le Bihan, Yann & Buelna, Gerardo, 2015. "Hydrogen biorefinery: Potential utilization of the liquid waste from fermentative hydrogen production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 942-951.
    3. Aditiya, H.B. & Mahlia, T.M.I. & Chong, W.T. & Nur, Hadi & Sebayang, A.H., 2016. "Second generation bioethanol production: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 631-653.
    4. Soares, Juliana Ferreira & Confortin, Tássia Carla & Todero, Izelmar & Mayer, Flávio Dias & Mazutti, Marcio Antonio, 2020. "Dark fermentative biohydrogen production from lignocellulosic biomass: Technological challenges and future prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    5. Arora, Richa & Behera, Shuvashish & Kumar, Sachin, 2015. "Bioprospecting thermophilic/thermotolerant microbes for production of lignocellulosic ethanol: A future perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 699-717.
    6. Rossana Liguori & Anna Pennacchio & Luciana Porto de Souza Vandenberghe & Addolorata De Chiaro & Leila Birolo & Carlos Ricardo Soccol & Vincenza Faraco, 2021. "Screening of Fungal Strains for Cellulolytic and Xylanolytic Activities Production and Evaluation of Brewers’ Spent Grain as Substrate for Enzyme Production by Selected Fungi," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.
    7. Zhang, Yan & Zhang, Fang & Chen, Man & Chu, Pei-Na & Ding, Jing & Zeng, Raymond J., 2013. "Hydrogen supersaturation in extreme-thermophilic (70°C) mixed culture fermentation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 213-219.
    8. Arora, Richa & Behera, Shuvashish & Sharma, Nilesh Kumar & Kumar, Sachin, 2017. "Augmentation of ethanol production through statistically designed growth and fermentation medium using novel thermotolerant yeast isolates," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 406-421.
    9. Meyer, Pimphan A. & Tews, Iva J. & Magnuson, Jon K. & Karagiosis, Sue A. & Jones, Susanne B., 2013. "Techno-economic analysis of corn stover fungal fermentation to ethanol," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 657-668.
    10. Melendez, Jesus R. & Mátyás, Bence & Hena, Sufia & Lowy, Daniel A. & El Salous, Ahmed, 2022. "Perspectives in the production of bioethanol: A review of sustainable methods, technologies, and bioprocesses," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    11. Monirul Islam Miskat & Ashfaq Ahmed & Hemal Chowdhury & Tamal Chowdhury & Piyal Chowdhury & Sadiq M. Sait & Young-Kwon Park, 2020. "Assessing the Theoretical Prospects of Bioethanol Production as a Biofuel from Agricultural Residues in Bangladesh: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    12. Roy, Shantonu & Vishnuvardhan, M. & Das, Debabrata, 2014. "Continuous thermophilic biohydrogen production in packed bed reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 51-58.
    13. Chu, Chen-Yeon & Sen, Biswarup & Lay, Chyi-How & Lin, Yi-Chun & Lin, Chiu-Yue, 2012. "Direct fermentation of sweet potato to produce maximal hydrogen and ethanol," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 10-18.
    14. Avelino Gonçalves, Fabiano & dos Santos, Everaldo Silvino & de Macedo, Gorete Ribeiro, 2015. "Use of cultivars of low cost, agroindustrial and urban waste in the production of cellulosic ethanol in Brazil: A proposal to utilization of microdistillery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1287-1303.
    15. Masum, B.M. & Masjuki, H.H. & Kalam, M.A. & Rizwanul Fattah, I.M. & Palash, S.M. & Abedin, M.J., 2013. "Effect of ethanol–gasoline blend on NOx emission in SI engine," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 209-222.
    16. Carrillo-Nieves, Danay & Rostro Alanís, Magdalena J. & de la Cruz Quiroz, Reynaldo & Ruiz, Héctor A. & Iqbal, Hafiz M.N. & Parra-Saldívar, Roberto, 2019. "Current status and future trends of bioethanol production from agro-industrial wastes in Mexico," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 63-74.
    17. Troiano, D. & Orsat, V. & Dumont, M.J., 2020. "Status of filamentous fungi in integrated biorefineries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    18. Mendes, Fabrício Bruno & Ibraim Pires Atala, Daniel & Thoméo, João Cláudio, 2017. "Is cellulase production by solid-state fermentation economically attractive for the second generation ethanol production?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 525-533.
    19. Silva, V. & Ratti, R.P. & Sakamoto, I.K. & Andrade, M.V.F. & Varesche, M.B.A., 2018. "Biotechnological products in batch reactors obtained from cellulose, glucose and xylose using thermophilic anaerobic consortium," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 537-545.
    20. Liu, Xianhua & Hao, Miaoqing & Feng, Mengnan & Zhang, Lin & Zhao, Yong & Du, Xiwen & Wang, Guangyi, 2013. "A One-compartment direct glucose alkaline fuel cell with methyl viologen as electron mediator," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 176-183.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:8:y:2014:i:1:p:1-30:d:43924. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.