IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v7y2014i10p6645-6664d41274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methods for Risk-Based Planning of O&M of Wind Turbines

Author

Listed:
  • Jannie Sønderkær Nielsen

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, Sofiendalsvej 11, 9200 Aalborg SV, Denmark)

  • John Dalsgaard Sørensen

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, Sofiendalsvej 11, 9200 Aalborg SV, Denmark)

Abstract

In order to make wind energy more competitive, the big expenses for operation and maintenance must be reduced. Consistent decisions that minimize the expected costs can be made based on risk-based methods. Such methods have been implemented for maintenance planning for oil and gas structures, but for offshore wind turbines, the conditions are different and the methods need to be adjusted accordingly. This paper gives an overview of various approaches to solve the decision problem: methods with decision rules based on observed variables, a method with decision rules based on the probability of failure, a method based on limited memory influence diagrams and a method based on the partially observable Markov decision process. The methods with decision rules based on observed variables are easy to use, but can only take the most recent observation into account, when a decision is made. The other methods can take more information into account, and especially, the method based on the Markov decision process is very flexible and accurate. A case study shows that the Markov decision process and decision rules based on the probability of failure are equally good and give lower costs compared to decision rules based on observed variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Jannie Sønderkær Nielsen & John Dalsgaard Sørensen, 2014. "Methods for Risk-Based Planning of O&M of Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:7:y:2014:i:10:p:6645-6664:d:41274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/7/10/6645/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/7/10/6645/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steffen L. Lauritzen & Dennis Nilsson, 2001. "Representing and Solving Decision Problems with Limited Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(9), pages 1235-1251, September.
    2. Editorial Article, 0. "The Information for Authors," Economics of Contemporary Russia, Regional Public Organization for Assistance to the Development of Institutions of the Department of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, issue 4.
    3. Editorial Article, 0. "The Information for Authors," Economics of Contemporary Russia, Regional Public Organization for Assistance to the Development of Institutions of the Department of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, issue 3.
    4. Editorial Article, 0. "The Information for Authors," Economics of Contemporary Russia, Regional Public Organization for Assistance to the Development of Institutions of the Department of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, issue 2.
    5. Editorial Article, 0. "The Information for Authors," Economics of Contemporary Russia, Regional Public Organization for Assistance to the Development of Institutions of the Department of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, issue 2.
    6. Editorial Article, 0. "The Information for Authors," Economics of Contemporary Russia, Regional Public Organization for Assistance to the Development of Institutions of the Department of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, issue 4.
    7. Allan P. O. Williams, 2006. "Impact of Strategies," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: The Rise of Cass Business School, chapter 13, pages 167-181, Palgrave Macmillan.
    8. Editorial Article, 0. "The Information for Authors," Economics of Contemporary Russia, Regional Public Organization for Assistance to the Development of Institutions of the Department of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, issue 3.
    9. Editorial Article, 0. "The Information for Authors," Economics of Contemporary Russia, Regional Public Organization for Assistance to the Development of Institutions of the Department of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, issue 1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oh, So Young & Joung, Chanwoo & Lee, Seonghwan & Shim, Yoon-Bo & Lee, Dahun & Cho, Gyu-Eun & Jang, Juhyeong & Lee, In Yong & Park, Young-Bin, 2024. "Condition-based maintenance of wind turbine structures: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    2. Lee, Dongkyu & Song, Junho, 2023. "Risk-informed operation and maintenance of complex lifeline systems using parallelized multi-agent deep Q-network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    3. Bismut, Elizabeth & Straub, Daniel, 2021. "Optimal adaptive inspection and maintenance planning for deteriorating structural systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    4. Adedipe, Tosin & Shafiee, Mahmood & Zio, Enrico, 2020. "Bayesian Network Modelling for the Wind Energy Industry: An Overview," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    5. Lopez, Javier Contreras & Kolios, Athanasios & Wang, Lin & Chiachio, Manuel & Dimitrov, Nikolay, 2024. "Reliability-based leading edge erosion maintenance strategy selection framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    6. Pinciroli, Luca & Baraldi, Piero & Ballabio, Guido & Compare, Michele & Zio, Enrico, 2022. "Optimization of the Operation and Maintenance of renewable energy systems by Deep Reinforcement Learning," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 752-763.
    7. Shafiee, Mahmood & Sørensen, John Dalsgaard, 2019. "Maintenance optimization and inspection planning of wind energy assets: Models, methods and strategies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    8. Masoud Asgarpour & John Dalsgaard Sørensen, 2018. "Bayesian Based Diagnostic Model for Condition Based Maintenance of Offshore Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Simon Ambühl & John Dalsgaard Sørensen, 2017. "Sensitivity of Risk-Based Maintenance Planning of Offshore Wind Turbine Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, April.
    10. Pinciroli, Luca & Baraldi, Piero & Zio, Enrico, 2023. "Maintenance optimization in industry 4.0," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    11. Jannie S. Nielsen & John D. Sørensen, 2017. "Bayesian Estimation of Remaining Useful Life for Wind Turbine Blades," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-13, May.
    12. Kroetz, H.M. & Moustapha, M. & Beck, A.T. & Sudret, B., 2020. "A Two-Level Kriging-Based Approach with Active Learning for Solving Time-Variant Risk Optimization Problems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    13. Tautz-Weinert, Jannis & Yürüşen, Nurseda Y. & Melero, Julio J. & Watson, Simon J., 2019. "Sensitivity study of a wind farm maintenance decision - A performance and revenue analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 93-105.
    14. Mohamed, Emad & Seresht, Nima Gerami & Jafari, Parinaz & AbouRizk, Simaan, 2024. "Risk assessment for onshore wind projects in Canada," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kritana Prueksakorn & Cheng-Xu Piao & Hyunchul Ha & Taehyeung Kim, 2015. "Computational and Experimental Investigation for an Optimal Design of Industrial Windows to Allow Natural Ventilation during Wind-Driven Rain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Hualin Xie & Jinlang Zou & Hailing Jiang & Ning Zhang & Yongrok Choi, 2014. "Spatiotemporal Pattern and Driving Forces of Arable Land-Use Intensity in China: Toward Sustainable Land Management Using Emergy Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Stephan E. Maurer & Andrei V. Potlogea, 2021. "Male‐biased Demand Shocks and Women's Labour Force Participation: Evidence from Large Oil Field Discoveries," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 88(349), pages 167-188, January.
    4. Tie Hua Zhou & Ling Wang & Keun Ho Ryu, 2015. "Supporting Keyword Search for Image Retrieval with Integration of Probabilistic Annotation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-18, May.
    5. T. Karski, 2019. "Opinions and Controversies in Problem of The So-Called Idiopathic Scoliosis. Information About Etiology, New Classification and New Therapy," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 12(5), pages 9612-9616, January.
    6. Wesley Mendes-da-Silva, 2020. "What Makes an Article be More Cited?," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 24(6), pages 507-513.
    7. Wisdom Akpalu & Mintewab Bezabih, 2015. "Tenure Insecurity, Climate Variability and Renting out Decisions among Female Small-Holder Farmers in Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Wei Chen & Shu-Yu Liu & Chih-Han Chen & Yi-Shan Lee, 2011. "Bounded Memory, Inertia, Sampling and Weighting Model for Market Entry Games," Games, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-13, March.
    9. David Harborth & Sebastian Pape, 2020. "Empirically Investigating Extraneous Influences on the “APCO” Model—Childhood Brand Nostalgia and the Positivity Bias," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Taeyeoun Roh & Yujin Jeong & Byungun Yoon, 2017. "Developing a Methodology of Structuring and Layering Technological Information in Patent Documents through Natural Language Processing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-19, November.
    11. He-Yau Kang & Amy H. I. Lee & Tzu-Ting Huang, 2016. "Project Management for a Wind Turbine Construction by Applying Fuzzy Multiple Objective Linear Programming Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, December.
    12. A. B. Atkinson & Stephen P. Jenkins, 2020. "A Different Perspective on the Evolution of UK Income Inequality," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 66(2), pages 253-266, June.
    13. Haiyan Xu & Yanhui Ding & Jing Sun & Kun Zhao & Yuanjian Chen, 2019. "Dynamic Group Recommendation Based on the Attention Mechanism," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, September.
    14. Adina Letiţia Negruşa & Valentin Toader & Aurelian Sofică & Mihaela Filofteia Tutunea & Rozalia Veronica Rus, 2015. "Exploring Gamification Techniques and Applications for Sustainable Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-30, August.
    15. Ahmad N. Alkenani & Mohammad Ashraf & Ghulam Mohammad, 2020. "Quantum Codes from Constacyclic Codes over the Ring F q [ u 1 , u 2 ]/? u 1 2 - u 1 , u 2 2 - u 2 , u 1 u 2 - u 2 u 1 ?," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-11, May.
    16. Shang-Yuan Chen & Jui-Ting Huang, 2012. "A Smart Green Building: An Environmental Health Control Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(5), pages 1-16, May.
    17. Yanhong Feng & Xu Yu & Gai-Ge Wang, 2019. "A Novel Monarch Butterfly Optimization with Global Position Updating Operator for Large-Scale 0-1 Knapsack Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-31, November.
    18. Xiaoshu Cao & Feiwen Liang & Huiling Chen & Yongwei Liu, 2017. "Circuity Characteristics of Urban Travel Based on GPS Data: A Case Study of Guangzhou," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-21, November.
    19. S. B. Reshetnikov & M. R. Skirdov, 2017. "Analysis of methodological approaches to determination and assessment of the human capital," Russian Journal of Industrial Economics, MISIS, vol. 10(1).
    20. Mi Jung Son & Jin Han Park & Ka Hyun Ko, 2019. "Some Hesitant Fuzzy Hamacher Power-Aggregation Operators for Multiple-Attribute Decision-Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-33, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:7:y:2014:i:10:p:6645-6664:d:41274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.