IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i4p947-d1592476.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Evaluation of Biogas Potential of Cassava, Yam and Plantain Peel Mixtures Using Theoretical Models and Hohenheim Biogas Yield Test-Based Experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph Yankyera Kusi

    (Regional Centre of Energy and Environmental Sustainability (RCEES), University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani P.O. Box 214, Ghana
    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ho Technical University, Ho P.O. Box HP 217, Ghana
    Hochschule für Forstwirtschaft Rottenburg, Schadenweiler Hof, 72108 Rottenburg, Germany)

  • Florian Empl

    (Hochschule für Forstwirtschaft Rottenburg, Schadenweiler Hof, 72108 Rottenburg, Germany)

  • Ralf Müller

    (Hochschule für Forstwirtschaft Rottenburg, Schadenweiler Hof, 72108 Rottenburg, Germany)

  • Stefan Pelz

    (Hochschule für Forstwirtschaft Rottenburg, Schadenweiler Hof, 72108 Rottenburg, Germany)

  • Jens Poetsch

    (Hochschule für Forstwirtschaft Rottenburg, Schadenweiler Hof, 72108 Rottenburg, Germany)

  • Gregor Sailer

    (State Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Bioenergy, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstraße 9, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Rainer Kirchhof

    (Hochschule für Forstwirtschaft Rottenburg, Schadenweiler Hof, 72108 Rottenburg, Germany)

  • Nana Sarfo Agyemang Derkyi

    (Regional Centre of Energy and Environmental Sustainability (RCEES), University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani P.O. Box 214, Ghana
    Department of Renewable Energy Engineering, University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani P.O. Box 214, Ghana)

  • Francis Attiogbe

    (Regional Centre of Energy and Environmental Sustainability (RCEES), University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani P.O. Box 214, Ghana
    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani P.O. Box 214, Ghana)

Abstract

This research aimed to evaluate the comparative biogas yields of waste (peels) of selected fibrous materials from the West African region: cassava, plantain, a mixture of cassava, plantain and yam. Three models: The Boyle model, the Modified Boyle’s model, and the Buswell and Müller’s model were used to determine the theoretical maximum biomethane potentials (TMBP), while the Hohenheim Biogas Yield test (D-HBT) was used to undertake a batch test of anaerobic digestion. The samples were co-digested with digested sewage sludge (DSS) for 39 days, with an operating temperature of 37 ± 0.5 °C. The study draws comparisons between the TBMPs and the experimental results, the experimental results of the different substrates, and the experimental results and figures reported in the literature. From the experimental results, plantain peels had the highest biogas yield (468 ± 72 mL/g oTS ), followed by a mixture of yam, cassava and plantain peels (362 ± 31 mL/g oTS ) and cassava peels obtained the least biogas yield (218 ± 19 mL/g oTS ). TMBPS of 204.04, 209.03 and 217.45 CH 4 mL/g oTS were obtained for plantain peels, a mixture of yam, cassava and plantain peels and cassava peels, respectively, evaluated using Boyle’s model. For all the samples, the TMBPS (205.56, 209.03 and 218.45 CH 4 mL /g oTS , respectively) obtained using the Buswell and Mueller model were slightly higher than those obtained by both the Boyle and the modified Boyle’s model (163.23, 167.22 and 174.76 CH 4 mL/g oTS , respectively). While the study result is sufficient to imply that generating biogas from fibrous waste materials in its mixture form is a valuable approach, it is not sufficient to conclude that the use of these waste materials in its naturally occurring mixture form has a technical added advantage in co-digestion over their individual potential. However, future studies could explore this possibility with different fractions of the mixture with a view to optimising generation. The study finds that theoretically modelling the biogas potential of fibrous materials is a good method for biogas evaluation despite having overestimation tendencies, as this challenge could be corrected by applying factors that result in these tendencies, biodegradability indices. The data can, therefore, find use in fibrous waste treatment and waste-to-energy technologies, especially in Africa. This application will not be negatively affected by whether single water streams are used or their mixture.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph Yankyera Kusi & Florian Empl & Ralf Müller & Stefan Pelz & Jens Poetsch & Gregor Sailer & Rainer Kirchhof & Nana Sarfo Agyemang Derkyi & Francis Attiogbe, 2025. "An Evaluation of Biogas Potential of Cassava, Yam and Plantain Peel Mixtures Using Theoretical Models and Hohenheim Biogas Yield Test-Based Experiments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-17, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:4:p:947-:d:1592476
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/4/947/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/4/947/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jay N. Meegoda & Brian Li & Kush Patel & Lily B. Wang, 2018. "A Review of the Processes, Parameters, and Optimization of Anaerobic Digestion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Ruitong Yang & Fuqiang Wang & Zhonghao Rao & Chao Shen & Dong Li, 2024. "Advancing Sustainable Energy Solutions: Innovations in Clean Energy Applications and Conventional Energy Efficiency Upgrade," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-3, May.
    3. Chibueze G. Achi & Amro Hassanein & Stephanie Lansing, 2020. "Enhanced Biogas Production of Cassava Wastewater Using Zeolite and Biochar Additives and Manure Co-Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-13, January.
    4. Joseph Yankyera Kusi & Florian Empl & Ralf Müller & Stefan Pelz & Jens Poetsch & Gregor Sailer & Rainer Kirchhof & Nana Sarfo Agyemang Derkyi & Francis Attiogbe & Sarah Elikplim Siabi, 2024. "Evaluation of Energetic Potential of Slaughterhouse Waste and Its Press Water Obtained by Pressure-Induced Separation via Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Nathaniel Sawyerr & Cristina Trois & Tilahun Workneh & Vincent Okudoh, 2019. "An Overview of Biogas Production: Fundamentals, Applications and Future Research," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(2), pages 105-116.
    6. Moaaz Shehab & Camelia Stratulat & Kemal Ozcan & Aylin Boztepe & Alper Isleyen & Edwin Zondervan & Kai Moshammer, 2022. "A Comprehensive Analysis of the Risks Associated with the Determination of Biofuels’ Calorific Value by Bomb Calorimetry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amro Hassanein & Freddy Witarsa & Stephanie Lansing & Ling Qiu & Yong Liang, 2020. "Bio-Electrochemical Enhancement of Hydrogen and Methane Production in a Combined Anaerobic Digester (AD) and Microbial Electrolysis Cell (MEC) from Dairy Manure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-12, October.
    2. van der Berg, David J. & Teke, George Mbella & Görgens, Johann F. & van Rensburg, Eugéne, 2024. "Predicting commercial-scale anaerobic digestion using biomethane potential," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    3. Katarzyna Ignatowicz & Gabriel Filipczak & Barbara Dybek & Grzegorz Wałowski, 2023. "Biogas Production Depending on the Substrate Used: A Review and Evaluation Study—European Examples," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Luis G. Cortés & J. Barbancho & D. F. Larios & J. D. Marin-Batista & A. F. Mohedano & C. Portilla & M. A. de la Rubia, 2022. "Full-Scale Digesters: Model Predictive Control with Online Kinetic Parameter Identification Strategy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Tae-Bong Kim & Jun-Hyeong Lee & Young-Man Yoon, 2024. "Residence Time Reduction in Anaerobic Reactors: Investigating the Economic Benefits of Magnetite-Induced Direct Interspecies Electron Transfer Mechanism," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-13, January.
    6. Maria Salud Camilleri-Rumbau & Kelly Briceño & Lene Fjerbæk Søtoft & Knud Villy Christensen & Maria Cinta Roda-Serrat & Massimiliano Errico & Birgir Norddahl, 2021. "Treatment of Manure and Digestate Liquid Fractions Using Membranes: Opportunities and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-30, March.
    7. Yongping Li & Jiaoning Zhu & Yun Tang & Xiangyuan Shi & Sumera Anwar & Juanling Wang & Li Gao & Jingxuan Zhang, 2023. "Impact of Varying Mass Concentrations of Ammonia Nitrogen on Biogas Production and System Stability of Anaerobic Fermentation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, August.
    8. Shuhei Matsuda & Takahiro Yamato & Yoshiyuki Mochizuki & Yoshinori Sekiguchi & Takashi Ohtsuki, 2020. "Batch-Mode Analysis of Thermophilic Methanogenic Microbial Community Changes in the Overacidification Stage in Beverage Waste Treatment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-13, October.
    9. Babak Mokhtarani & Jafar Zanganeh & Behdad Moghtaderi, 2025. "A Review on Biohydrogen Production Through Dark Fermentation, Process Parameters and Simulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-24, February.
    10. Wei En Tan & Peng Yen Liew & Lian See Tan & Kok Sin Woon & Nor Erniza Mohammad Rozali & Wai Shin Ho & Jamian NorRuwaida, 2022. "Life Cycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis for Anaerobic Digestion as Cow Manure Management System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Jessica Quintana-Najera & A. John Blacker & Louise A. Fletcher & Andrew B. Ross, 2023. "Understanding the Influence of Biochar Augmentation in Anaerobic Digestion by Principal Component Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-18, March.
    12. Irina N. Vikhareva & Guliya K. Aminova & Aliya K. Mazitova, 2022. "Resource Cycling: Application of Anaerobic Utilization Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, July.
    13. Arthur Chevalier & Philippe Evon & Florian Monlau & Virginie Vandenbossche & Cecilia Sambusiti, 2023. "Twin-Screw Extrusion Mechanical Pretreatment for Enhancing Biomethane Production from Agro-Industrial, Agricultural and Catch Crop Biomasses," Waste, MDPI, vol. 1(2), pages 1-18, May.
    14. Guoqin Xu & Junlin Ji & Zhanyao Zheng & Hongchuan Song & Hong Yang & Jing Liu & Fang Yin & Wudi Zhang & Shumei Hao, 2023. "Performance and Energy Utilization Efficiency of an Expanded Granular Sludge Bed Reactor in the Treatment of Cassava Alcohol Wastewater," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-15, November.
    15. Camelia Stratulat & Raluca Elena Ginghina & Adriana Elena Bratu & Alper Isleyen & Murat Tunc & Katarina Hafner-Vuk & Anne Mette Frey & Henrik Kjeldsen & Jochen Vogl, 2023. "Development- and Validation-Improved Metrological Methods for the Determination of Inorganic Impurities and Ash Content from Biofuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-14, July.
    16. Joanna Mikusińska & Monika Kuźnia & Klaudia Czerwińska & Małgorzata Wilk, 2023. "Hydrothermal Carbonization of Digestate Produced in the Biogas Production Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-18, July.
    17. Sukriti Singh & Nehil Shreyash & Venkateswara R. Kode & Xianghong Qian & S. Ranil Wickramasinghe, 2024. "Review of Separation and Purification of Biobased Derivatives Produced from Food Waste for Industrial Use," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 905-928, June.
    18. Magdalena Zdeb & Marta Bis & Artur Przywara, 2023. "Multi-Criteria Analysis of the Influence of Lignocellulosic Biomass Pretreatment Techniques on Methane Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, January.
    19. Harjinder Kaur & Raghava R. Kommalapati, 2023. "Process Optimization and Biomethane Recovery from Anaerobic Digestion of Agro-Industry Wastes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-14, September.
    20. Oluwafunmilayo Abiola Aworanti & Oluseye Omotoso Agbede & Samuel Enahoro Agarry & Ayobami Olu Ajani & Oyetola Ogunkunle & Opeyeolu Timothy Laseinde & S. M. Ashrafur Rahman & Islam Md Rizwanul Fattah, 2023. "Decoding Anaerobic Digestion: A Holistic Analysis of Biomass Waste Technology, Process Kinetics, and Operational Variables," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-36, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:4:p:947-:d:1592476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.