Author
Listed:
- Antonio Rosato
(Department of Architecture and Industrial Design, SENS i-Lab, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 81031 Aversa, Italy)
- Mohammad El Youssef
(Department of Architecture and Industrial Design, SENS i-Lab, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 81031 Aversa, Italy)
- Rita Mercuri
(Department of Architecture and Industrial Design, SENS i-Lab, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 81031 Aversa, Italy)
- Armin Hooman
(Department of Energy “Galileo Ferraris”, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy)
- Marco Savino Piscitelli
(Department of Energy “Galileo Ferraris”, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy)
- Alfonso Capozzoli
(Department of Energy “Galileo Ferraris”, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy)
Abstract
Faults of heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems can cause significant consequences, such as negatively affecting thermal comfort of occupants, energy demand, indoor air quality, etc. Several methods of fault detection and diagnosis (FDD) in building energy systems have been proposed since the late 1980s in order to reduce the consequences of faults in heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems. All the proposed FDD methods require laboratory data, or simulated data, or field data. Furthermore, the majority of the recently proposed FDD methods require labelled faulty and normal data to be developed. Thus, providing reliable ground truth data of HVAC systems with different technical characteristics is of great importance for advances in FDD methods for HVAC units. The primary objective of this study is to examine the operational behaviour of a typical single-duct dual-fan constant air volume air-handling unit (AHU) in both faulty and fault-free conditions. The investigation encompasses a series of experiments conducted under Mediterranean climatic conditions in southern Italy during summer and winter. This study investigates the performance of the AHU by artificially introducing seven distinct typical faults: (1) return air damper kept always closed (stuck at 0%); (2) fresh air damper kept always closed (stuck at 0%); (3) fresh air damper kept always opened (stuck at 100%); (4) exhaust air damper kept always closed (stuck at 0%); (5) supply air filter partially clogged at 50%; (6) fresh air filter partially clogged at 50%; and (7) return air filter partially clogged at 50%. The collected data from the faulty scenarios are compared to the corresponding data obtained from fault-free performance measurements conducted under similar boundary conditions. Indoor thermo-hygrometric conditions, electrical power and energy consumption, operation time of AHU components, and all key operating parameters are measured for all the aforementioned faulty tests and their corresponding normal tests. In particular, the experimental results demonstrated that the exhaust air damper stuck at 0% significantly reduces the percentage of time with indoor air relative humidity kept within the defined deadbands by about 29% (together with a reduction in the percentage of time with indoor air temperature kept within the defined deadbands by 7.2%) and increases electric energy consumption by about 13% during winter. Moreover, the measured data underlined that the effects on electrical energy demand and indoor thermo-hygrometric conditions are minimal (with deviations not exceeding 5.6% during both summer and winter) in the cases of 50% clogging of supply air filter, fresh air filter, and return air filter. The results of this study can be exploited by researchers, facility managers, and building operators to better recognize root causes of faulty evidences in AHUs and also to develop and test new FDD tools.
Suggested Citation
Antonio Rosato & Mohammad El Youssef & Rita Mercuri & Armin Hooman & Marco Savino Piscitelli & Alfonso Capozzoli, 2025.
"Assessment of Indoor Thermo-Hygrometric Conditions and Energy Demands Associated to Filters and Dampers Faults via Experimental Tests of a Typical Air-Handling Unit During Summer and Winter in Souther,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-40, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:618-:d:1579568
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:618-:d:1579568. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.