IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i9p2009-d1381776.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Stakeholder Decision Support Based on Multicriteria Assessment: Application to Industrial Waste Heat Recovery for a District Heating Network in Grenoble, France

Author

Listed:
  • Jaume Fitó

    (Laboratoire Procédés Energie Bâtiment (LOCIE), CNRS UMR 5271—Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Polytech Annecy-Chambéry, Campus Scientifique, Savoie Technolac, 73376 Le Bourget-Du-Lac CEDEX, France)

  • Julien Ramousse

    (Laboratoire Procédés Energie Bâtiment (LOCIE), CNRS UMR 5271—Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Polytech Annecy-Chambéry, Campus Scientifique, Savoie Technolac, 73376 Le Bourget-Du-Lac CEDEX, France)

Abstract

The decarbonization and decentralization of district heating networks lead to the shared use of on-site resources by multiple stakeholders. The optimal design of prospective equipment in such contexts should take into account the preferences and objectives of each stakeholder. This article focuses on the adaptation of a 4E multicriteria model (the criteria being energy, exergy, economic, and exergoeconomic) to include and compare the stakeholders’ performance criteria around the technical design. In addition, two graphical supports are proposed that represent and cross-analyze the different stakeholders’ preferred optima. A preliminary implementation of the methodology is illustrated through a study case in France, which features waste heat recovery for district heating utilization. After presenting the results, a discussion is offered on how to complete the methodology with an iterative negotiation procedure to determine the most suitable design. It was concluded, among other considerations, that the relaxation of the stakeholders’ optimality requirements can greatly enable the project’s feasibility. Such a relaxation could be implemented in the form of a joint consortium. In addition, the results showed that stakeholder relaxations of requirements can lead to new solutions that may outperform the best solutions pre-relaxation. Lastly, perspectives are suggested toward verifying whether relaxed requirements from upstream stakeholders might be more impactful than those of downstream stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaume Fitó & Julien Ramousse, 2024. "Multi-Stakeholder Decision Support Based on Multicriteria Assessment: Application to Industrial Waste Heat Recovery for a District Heating Network in Grenoble, France," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-25, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:9:p:2009-:d:1381776
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/9/2009/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/9/2009/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jano-Ito, Marco A. & Crawford-Brown, Douglas, 2017. "Investment decisions considering economic, environmental and social factors: An actors' perspective for the electricity sector of Mexico," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 92-106.
    2. Steffen Wehkamp & Lucas Schmeling & Lena Vorspel & Fabian Roelcke & Kai-Lukas Windmeier, 2020. "District Energy Systems: Challenges and New Tools for Planning and Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Dashti, Reza & Yousefi, Shaghayegh & Parsa Moghaddam, Mohsen, 2013. "Comprehensive efficiency evaluation model for electrical distribution system considering social and urban factors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 53-61.
    4. Hinker, Jonas & Hemkendreis, Christian & Drewing, Emily & März, Steven & Hidalgo Rodríguez, Diego I. & Myrzik, Johanna M.A., 2017. "A novel conceptual model facilitating the derivation of agent-based models for analyzing socio-technical optimality gaps in the energy domain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1219-1230.
    5. Gährs, Swantje & Knoefel, Jan, 2020. "Stakeholder demands and regulatory framework for community energy storage with a focus on Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    6. Miró, Laia & Brueckner, Sarah & McKenna, Russell & Cabeza, Luisa F., 2016. "Methodologies to estimate industrial waste heat potential by transferring key figures: A case study for Spain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 866-873.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chinese, D. & Meneghetti, A. & Cortella, G. & Giordano, L. & Tomasinsig, E. & Benedetti, M., 2024. "Environmental and economic assessment of industrial excess heat recovery collaborations through 4th generation district heating systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hinker, Jonas & Hemkendreis, Christian & Drewing, Emily & März, Steven & Hidalgo Rodríguez, Diego I. & Myrzik, Johanna M.A., 2017. "A novel conceptual model facilitating the derivation of agent-based models for analyzing socio-technical optimality gaps in the energy domain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1219-1230.
    2. Adrian Grimm & Patrik Schönfeldt & Herena Torio & Peter Klement & Benedikt Hanke & Karsten von Maydell & Carsten Agert, 2021. "Deduction of Optimal Control Strategies for a Sector-Coupled District Energy System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Pia Szichta & Ingela Tietze, 2020. "Sharing Economy in der Elektrizitätswirtschaft: Treiber und Hemmnisse [Title sharing economy in the electricity sector: drivers and barriers]," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 109-125, December.
    4. Sahoo, Somadutta & Zuidema, Christian & van Stralen, Joost N.P. & Sijm, Jos & Faaij, André, 2022. "Detailed spatial analysis of renewables’ potential and heat: A study of Groningen Province in the northern Netherlands," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    5. Sellak, Hamza & Ouhbi, Brahim & Frikh, Bouchra & Palomares, Iván, 2017. "Towards next-generation energy planning decision-making: An expert-based framework for intelligent decision support," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1544-1577.
    6. Herbes, Carsten & Rilling, Benedikt & Ringel, Marc, 2021. "Policy frameworks and voluntary markets for biomethane – How do different policies influence providers’ product strategies?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    7. Waseem Akram & Muaz Niazi & Laszlo Barna Iantovics & Athanasios V. Vasilakos, 2019. "Towards Agent-Based Model Specification of Smart Grid: A Cognitive Agent-Based Computing Approach," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 17(3-B), pages 546-585.
    8. Juárez-Luna, David & Mosiño, Alejandro, 2024. "Electricity generation portfolios in Mexico: Environmental, economic, and policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    9. Jassem Suaad & Zakaria Zarina & Che Azmi Anna, 2020. "Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Architecture and Environmental Investment Decision-Making," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 193-210, January.
    10. Bovera, Filippo & Lo Schiavo, Luca, 2022. "From energy communities to sector coupling:a taxonomy for regulatory experimentation in the age of the European Green Deal," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    11. González-Bravo, Ramón & Fuentes-Cortés, Luis Fabián & Ponce-Ortega, José María, 2017. "Defining priorities in the design of power and water distribution networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1026-1040.
    12. Chen, Huadong & Wang, Can & Cai, Wenjia & Wang, Jianhui, 2018. "Simulating the impact of investment preference on low-carbon transition in power sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 440-455.
    13. Hong, Gui-Bing & Pan, Tze-Chin & Chan, David Yih-Liang & Liu, I-Hung, 2020. "Bottom-up analysis of industrial waste heat potential in Taiwan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    14. Miró, Laia & Gasia, Jaume & Cabeza, Luisa F., 2016. "Thermal energy storage (TES) for industrial waste heat (IWH) recovery: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 284-301.
    15. Mohammad Taghi Tahooneh & Reza Dashti, 2022. "A new model for calculating rational failure rates based on network assets worth," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(5), pages 2221-2233, October.
    16. Kathleen Mallard & Vincent Debusschere & Lauric Garbuio, 2020. "Multi-Criteria Method for Sustainable Design of Energy Conversion Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-18, August.
    17. Rebeca Ramirez Acosta & Chathura Wanigasekara & Emilie Frost & Tobias Brandt & Sebastian Lehnhoff & Christof Büskens, 2023. "Integration of Intelligent Neighbourhood Grids to the German Distribution Grid: A Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, May.
    18. Marta Bottero & Federico Dell’Anna & Vito Morgese, 2021. "Evaluating the Transition Towards Post-Carbon Cities: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-28, January.
    19. Cezar-Petre Simion & Cătălin-Alexandru Verdeș & Alexandra-Andreea Mironescu & Florin-Gabriel Anghel, 2023. "Digitalization in Energy Production, Distribution, and Consumption: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-30, February.
    20. Anastasovski, Aleksandar, 2023. "What is needed for transformation of industrial parks into potential positive energy industrial parks? A review," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:9:p:2009-:d:1381776. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.