IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v13y2022i5d10.1007_s13198-022-01628-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new model for calculating rational failure rates based on network assets worth

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Taghi Tahooneh

    (Iran University of Science and Technology-Advanced Technology School)

  • Reza Dashti

    (Iran University of Science and Technology-Advanced Technology School)

Abstract

The rational failure rate estimation has always been a great challenge in electric power distribution companies' regulatory. To prevent risk creation for companies and guarantee their encouragement to improve the distribution system's reliability, companies should calculate the failure rate by approximation and low error. Several factors influence the failure rate, including asset life, geographical factors, clash culture with installations, urban planning, etc. On the other hand, the history of investing in this system can also cause high exhaustion in assets. It is virtually impossible to consider all these factors and achieve a rational failure rate. Also, insufficient investment in the past years of electricity distribution companies is an important factor in asset aging and determining the failure rate. On the other hand, the company's investment trend is affected by the accepted failure rate of the regulator for each distribution company. In this paper, using the investment process and the total worth of assets of power distribution companies in each year, a model is presented to estimate the failure rate of the network. The failure rate calculated with this model can divide the budget between power distribution companies by the regulator and determine the rewards and penalties.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Taghi Tahooneh & Reza Dashti, 2022. "A new model for calculating rational failure rates based on network assets worth," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(5), pages 2221-2233, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:13:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s13198-022-01628-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-022-01628-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-022-01628-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-022-01628-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dashti, Reza & Yousefi, Shaghayegh, 2013. "Reliability based asset assessment in electrical distribution systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 129-136.
    2. Davis, P. & Burn, S. & Moglia, M. & Gould, S., 2007. "A physical probabilistic model to predict failure rates in buried PVC pipelines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(9), pages 1258-1266.
    3. Dashti, Reza & Yousefi, Shaghayegh & Parsa Moghaddam, Mohsen, 2013. "Comprehensive efficiency evaluation model for electrical distribution system considering social and urban factors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 53-61.
    4. Guilani, Pedram Pourkarim & Azimi, Parham & Niaki, S.T.A. & Niaki, Seyed Armin Akhavan, 2016. "Redundancy allocation problem of a system with increasing failure rates of components based on Weibull distribution: A simulation-based optimization approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 187-196.
    5. Zeng, Hongtao & Lan, Tian & Chen, Qiming, 2016. "Five and four-parameter lifetime distributions for bathtub-shaped failure rate using Perks mortality equation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 307-315.
    6. De Rosa, Francesco & Cesoni, Raffaello & Genta, Stefano & Maggiore, Paolo, 2017. "Failure rate evaluation method for HW architecture derived from functional safety standards (ISO 19014, ISO 25119, IEC 61508)," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 124-133.
    7. Brissaud, Florent, 2017. "Using field feedback to estimate failure rates of safety-related systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 206-213.
    8. Ghasemi, Mostafa & Dashti, Reza, 2017. "A risk-based model for performance-based regulation of electric distribution companies," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 36-44.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammad Taghitahooneh & Aidin Shaghaghi & Reza Dashti & Abolfazl Ahmadi, 2024. "A review of failure rate studies in power distribution networks," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(8), pages 3571-3584, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hinker, Jonas & Hemkendreis, Christian & Drewing, Emily & März, Steven & Hidalgo Rodríguez, Diego I. & Myrzik, Johanna M.A., 2017. "A novel conceptual model facilitating the derivation of agent-based models for analyzing socio-technical optimality gaps in the energy domain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1219-1230.
    2. Liu, Aihua & Chen, Ke & Huang, Xiaofei & Li, Didi & Zhang, Xiaochun, 2021. "Dynamic risk assessment model of buried gas pipelines based on system dynamics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    3. Gholinezhad, Hadi & Zeinal Hamadani, Ali, 2017. "A new model for the redundancy allocation problem with component mixing and mixed redundancy strategy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 66-73.
    4. Janjic, Aleksandar & Velimirovic, Lazar Z. & Vranic, Petar, 2021. "Designing an electricity distribution reward-penalty scheme based on spatial reliability statistics," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    5. Zhou, Zhi-Jie & Hu, Chang-Hua & Xu, Dong-Ling & Chen, Mao-Yin & Zhou, Dong-Hua, 2010. "A model for real-time failure prognosis based on hidden Markov model and belief rule base," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 269-283, November.
    6. Dashti, Reza & Yousefi, Shaghayegh & Parsa Moghaddam, Mohsen, 2013. "Comprehensive efficiency evaluation model for electrical distribution system considering social and urban factors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 53-61.
    7. Mirzaei, Mohammad Javad & Dashti, Reza & Kazemi, Ahad & Amirioun, Mohammad Hassan, 2015. "An asset-management model for use in the evaluation and regulation of public-lighting systems," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 19-28.
    8. ValinÄ ius, Mindaugas & ŽutautaitÄ—, Inga & Dundulis, Gintautas & RimkeviÄ ius, Sigitas & Janulionis, Remigijus & Bakas, Rimantas, 2015. "Integrated assessment of failure probability of the district heating network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 314-322.
    9. Kim, Heungseob & Kim, Pansoo, 2017. "Reliability models for a nonrepairable system with heterogeneous components having a phase-type time-to-failure distribution," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 37-46.
    10. Kowal, Karol, 2022. "Lifetime reliability and availability simulation for the electrical system of HTTR coupled to the electricity-hydrogen cogeneration plant," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    11. Hu, Zhuangli & Zhang, Yongjun & Li, Canbing & Li, Jing & Cao, Yijia & Luo, Diansheng & Cao, Huazhen, 2015. "Utilization efficiency of electrical equipment within life cycle assessment: Indexes, analysis and a case," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 885-896.
    12. Lima, Eliana Sangreman & Costa, Ana Paula Cabral Seixas, 2019. "Improving Asset Management under a regulatory view," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.
    13. Andrade, Antonio Ramos & Stow, Julian, 2017. "Assessing the potential cost savings of introducing the maintenance option of ‘Economic Tyre Turning’ in Great Britain railway wheelsets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 317-325.
    14. Jaume Fitó & Julien Ramousse, 2024. "Multi-Stakeholder Decision Support Based on Multicriteria Assessment: Application to Industrial Waste Heat Recovery for a District Heating Network in Grenoble, France," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-25, April.
    15. Granig, Wolfgang & Faller, Lisa-Marie & Hammerschmidt, Dirk & Zangl, Hubert, 2019. "Dependability considerations of redundant sensor systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.
    16. Petridis, Konstantinos & Ünsal, Mehmet Güray & Dey, Prasanta Kumar & Örkcü, H. Hasan, 2019. "A novel network data envelopment analysis model for performance measurement of Turkish electric distribution companies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 985-998.
    17. Zhang, Jintao & Bagtzoglou, Yiannis & Zhu, Jin & Li, Baikun & Zhang, Wei, 2023. "Fragility-based system performance assessment of critical power infrastructure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    18. Feizabadi, Mohammad & Jahromi, Abdolhamid Eshraghniaye, 2017. "A new model for reliability optimization of series-parallel systems with non-homogeneous components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 101-112.
    19. Karimi, Behzad & Niaki, S.T.A. & Haleh, Hassan & Naderi, Bahman, 2018. "Bi-objective optimization of a job shop with two types of failures for the operating machines that use automated guided vehicles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 92-104.
    20. Xu, Qiang & Chen, Qiuwen & Li, Weifeng & Ma, Jinfeng, 2011. "Pipe break prediction based on evolutionary data-driven methods with brief recorded data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(8), pages 942-948.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:13:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s13198-022-01628-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.