IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i23p6143-d1537723.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distributed Dispatch and Profit Allocation for Parks Using Co-Operative Game Theory and the Generalized Nash Bargaining Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Hanwen Wang

    (Suqian Wanda Electric Power Industry Co., Ltd., Suqian 223800, China)

  • Xiang Li

    (School of Electrical and Power Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Haojun Hu

    (Suqian Wanda Electric Power Industry Co., Ltd., Suqian 223800, China)

  • Yizhou Zhou

    (School of Electrical and Power Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

Abstract

To improve the regulatory capacity of distributed resources within the park and enhance the flexibility of market transactions, this paper introduces a distributed dispatch and profit allocation method grounded in cooperative game theory and the generalized Nash bargaining framework. Initially, models for individual park equipment are established. Subsequently, a distributed dispatch model is constructed, followed by the development of a profit allocation strategy based on contribution levels, using the generalized Nash bargaining method. The model is solved using the alternating direction method of multipliers. The results show that the proposed approach achieves fast convergence, optimizes resource sharing and mutual support within the park, lowers operational costs, ensures a fairer distribution of profits, and promotes increased cooperation among park entities.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanwen Wang & Xiang Li & Haojun Hu & Yizhou Zhou, 2024. "Distributed Dispatch and Profit Allocation for Parks Using Co-Operative Game Theory and the Generalized Nash Bargaining Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-19, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:23:p:6143-:d:1537723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/23/6143/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/23/6143/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olivier Compte & Philippe Jehiel, 2010. "The Coalitional Nash Bargaining Solution," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 78(5), pages 1593-1623, September.
    2. Hui, Hengyu & Bao, Minglei & Ding, Yi & Yan, Jinyue & Song, Yonghua, 2023. "Probabilistic integrated flexible regions of multi-energy industrial parks: Conceptualization and characterization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 349(C).
    3. Wang, Zaichuang & Chen, Laijun & Li, Xiaozhu & Mei, Shengwei, 2023. "A Nash bargaining model for energy sharing between micro-energy grids and energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    4. Yao, Wenliang & Wang, Chengfu & Yang, Ming & Wang, Kang & Dong, Xiaoming & Zhang, Zhenwei, 2023. "A tri-layer decision-making framework for IES considering the interaction of integrated demand response and multi-energy market clearing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 342(C).
    5. Chen, Changming & Wu, Xueyan & Li, Yan & Zhu, Xiaojun & Li, Zesen & Ma, Jien & Qiu, Weiqiang & Liu, Chang & Lin, Zhenzhi & Yang, Li & Wang, Qin & Ding, Yi, 2021. "Distributionally robust day-ahead scheduling of park-level integrated energy system considering generalized energy storages," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    6. Jing, Rui & Xie, Mei Na & Wang, Feng Xiang & Chen, Long Xiang, 2020. "Fair P2P energy trading between residential and commercial multi-energy systems enabling integrated demand-side management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    7. Zhou, Yizhou & Li, Xiang & Han, Haiteng & Wei, Zhinong & Zang, Haixiang & Sun, Guoqiang & Chen, Sheng, 2024. "Resilience-oriented planning of integrated electricity and heat systems: A stochastic distributionally robust optimization approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(PA).
    8. Ding, Yixing & Xu, Qingshan & Hao, Lili & Xia, Yuanxing, 2023. "A Stackelberg Game-based robust optimization for user-side energy storage configuration and power pricing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    9. Zhong, Xiaoqing & Zhong, Weifeng & Liu, Yi & Yang, Chao & Xie, Shengli, 2022. "Cooperative operation of battery swapping stations and charging stations with electricity and carbon trading," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Yuekuan & Lund, Peter D., 2023. "Peer-to-peer energy sharing and trading of renewable energy in smart communities ─ trading pricing models, decision-making and agent-based collaboration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 177-193.
    2. Okada, Akira, 2011. "Coalitional bargaining games with random proposers: Theory and application," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 227-235, September.
    3. Wang, Tonghe & Hua, Haochen & Shi, Tianying & Wang, Rui & Sun, Yizhong & Naidoo, Pathmanathan, 2024. "A bi-level dispatch optimization of multi-microgrid considering green electricity consumption willingness under renewable portfolio standard policy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    4. Zhong, Xiaoqing & Zhong, Weifeng & Lin, Zhenjia & Zhou, Guoxu & Lai, Loi Lei & Xie, Shengli & Yan, Jinyue, 2024. "Localized electricity and carbon allowance management for interconnected discrete manufacturing systems considering algorithmic and physical feasibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 372(C).
    5. Venkat Venkatasubramanian & Yu Luo, 2018. "How much income inequality is fair? Nash bargaining solution and its connection to entropy," Papers 1806.05262, arXiv.org.
    6. Wang, Juan & Zheng, Junjun & Yu, Liukai & Goh, Mark & Tang, Yunying & Huang, Yongchao, 2023. "Distributed Reputation-Distance iterative auction system for Peer-To-Peer power trading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    7. Ray, Debraj & Vohra, Rajiv, 2015. "Coalition Formation," Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications,, Elsevier.
    8. Joosung Lee, 2013. "Bargaining and Buyout," 2013 Papers ple701, Job Market Papers.
    9. Hao, Junhong & Feng, Xiaolong & Chen, Xiangru & Jin, Xilin & Wang, Xingce & Hao, Tong & Hong, Feng & Du, Xiaoze, 2024. "Optimal scheduling of active distribution network considering symmetric heat and power source-load spatial-temporal characteristics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 373(C).
    10. Philippe Jehiel & Laurent Lamy, 2018. "A Mechanism Design Approach to the Tiebout Hypothesis," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 126(2), pages 735-760.
    11. Nieva, Ricardo, 2015. "The Coalitional Nash Bargaining Solution with Simultaneous Payoff Demands," Climate Change and Sustainable Development 206838, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    12. Debraj Ray & Rajiv Vohra, 2024. "Nash Bargaining with Coalitional Threats," Working Papers 2024-001, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    13. Burguet, Roberto & Caminal, Ramon, 2020. "Coalitional bargaining with consistent counterfactuals," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    14. Jianhong Hao & Ting Huang & Yi Sun & Xiangpeng Zhan & Yu Zhang & Peng Wu, 2024. "Optimal Prosumer Operation with Consideration for Bounded Rationality in Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-22, April.
    15. Wang, Qi & Huang, Chunyi & Wang, Chengmin & Li, Kangping & Xie, Ning, 2024. "Joint optimization of bidding and pricing strategy for electric vehicle aggregator considering multi-agent interactions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    16. Markus K. Brunnermeier & Michael Sockin & Wei Xiong, 2020. "China’s Model of Managing the Financial System," Working Papers 2020-45, Princeton University. Economics Department..
    17. Okada, Akira & 岡田, 章, 2012. "The Stationary Equilibrium of Three-Person Cooperative Games: A Classification," Discussion Papers 2012-06, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.
    18. Chander, Parkash & Wooders, Myrna, 2020. "Subgame-perfect cooperation in an extensive game," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    19. Zare, Amir & Mehdinejad, Mehdi & Abedi, Mehrdad, 2024. "Designing a decentralized peer-to-peer energy market for an active distribution network considering loss and transaction fee allocation, and fairness," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    20. Britz, Volker & Herings, P. Jean-Jacques & Predtetchinski, Arkadi, 2015. "Delay, multiplicity, and non-existence of equilibrium in unanimity bargaining games," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 192-202.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:23:p:6143-:d:1537723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.