IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i23p6038-d1534325.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fallen Leaves as a Substrate for Biogas Production

Author

Listed:
  • Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45A Str., 15-351 Bialystok, Poland)

  • Robert Czubaszek

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45A Str., 15-351 Bialystok, Poland)

Abstract

Fallen leaves in cities are often treated as waste; therefore, they are collected, transported outside urban areas, and composted, which contributes to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Instead of this conventional management approach, fallen leaves could be utilized as a feedstock in biogas production, helping to reduce GHG emissions, increase renewable energy generation, and provide fertilizer. The aim of this study was to compare the mono-digestion of fallen leaves from three tree species commonly found in parks and along streets—northern red oak ( Quercus rubra L.), small-leaved lime ( Tilia cordata Mill.), and Norway maple ( Acer platanoides L.)—in both wet and dry anaerobic digestion (AD) systems. A biochemical methane potential (BMP) test was conducted in batch assays for each of the three substrates in both AD technologies at a temperature of 38 ± 1 °C. The highest specific methane yield (SMY) was obtained from Quercus leaves in wet AD technology, with a methane yield of 115.69 ± 4.11 NL kg VS −1 . The lowest SMY (55.23 ± 3.36 NL kg VS −1 ) was observed during the dry AD of Tilia leaves. The type of technology had no significant impact on the SMY of Acer and Tilia leaves; however, the methane yield from Quercus leaves in wet AD was significantly higher ( p < 0.05) than that from dry AD. Studies on the use of fallen leaves from Tilia cordata , Quercus rubra , and Acer platanoides as substrates in mono-digestion technology have shown their limited suitability for biogas production. Nevertheless, this feedstock may be more effectively used as a co-substrate, mainly due to the low concentrations of ammonia (NH 3 ) and hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S) in the biogas produced from these leaves, both of which are considered inhibitors of the AD process.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek & Robert Czubaszek, 2024. "Fallen Leaves as a Substrate for Biogas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:23:p:6038-:d:1534325
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/23/6038/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/23/6038/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Zhongzhong & Hu, Yuansheng & Wang, Shun & Wu, Guangxue & Zhan, Xinmin, 2023. "A critical review on dry anaerobic digestion of organic waste: Characteristics, operational conditions, and improvement strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    2. Westerholm, Maria & Moestedt, Jan & Schnürer, Anna, 2016. "Biogas production through syntrophic acetate oxidation and deliberate operating strategies for improved digester performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 124-135.
    3. Oluwafunmilayo Abiola Aworanti & Oluseye Omotoso Agbede & Samuel Enahoro Agarry & Ayobami Olu Ajani & Oyetola Ogunkunle & Opeyeolu Timothy Laseinde & S. M. Ashrafur Rahman & Islam Md Rizwanul Fattah, 2023. "Decoding Anaerobic Digestion: A Holistic Analysis of Biomass Waste Technology, Process Kinetics, and Operational Variables," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-36, April.
    4. Krzysztof Mudryk & Marcin Jewiarz & Marek Wróbel & Marcin Niemiec & Arkadiusz Dyjakon, 2021. "Evaluation of Urban Tree Leaf Biomass-Potential, Physico-Mechanical and Chemical Parameters of Raw Material and Solid Biofuel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, February.
    5. Susanne Theuerl & Johanna Klang & Annette Prochnow, 2019. "Process Disturbances in Agricultural Biogas Production—Causes, Mechanisms and Effects on the Biogas Microbiome: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ankita Das & Sandeep Das & Nandita Das & Prisha Pandey & Birson Ingti & Vladimir Panchenko & Vadim Bolshev & Andrey Kovalev & Piyush Pandey, 2023. "Advancements and Innovations in Harnessing Microbial Processes for Enhanced Biogas Production from Waste Materials," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-34, August.
    2. Qi, Chuanren & Cao, Dingge & Gao, Xingzu & Jia, Sumeng & Yin, Rongrong & Nghiem, Long D. & Li, Guoxue & Luo, Wenhai, 2023. "Optimising organic composition of feedstock to improve microbial dynamics and symbiosis to advance solid-state anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and organic waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    3. Bi, Shaojie & Westerholm, Maria & Hu, Wanrong & Mahdy, Ahmed & Dong, Taili & Sun, Yingcai & Qiao, Wei & Dong, Renjie, 2021. "The metabolic performance and microbial communities of anaerobic digestion of chicken manure under stressed ammonia condition: A case study of a 10-year successful biogas plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 644-651.
    4. Yapeng Song & Wei Qiao & Jiahao Zhang & Renjie Dong, 2023. "Process Performance and Functional Microbial Community in the Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Liang, Yi & Yu, Jiadong & Yao, Zonglu & Sun, Yuxuan & Zhao, Lixin, 2024. "Performance, interaction, and metabolic pathway of novel dry–wet anaerobic digestion for treating high-solid agricultural waste," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    6. Ahmadi, Ehsan & Yousefzadeh, Samira & Mokammel, Adel & Miri, Mohammad & Ansari, Mohsen & Arfaeinia, Hossein & Badi, Mojtaba Yegane & Ghaffari, Hamid Reza & Rezaei, Soheila & Mahvi, Amir Hossein, 2020. "Kinetic study and performance evaluation of an integrated two-phase fixed-film baffled bioreactor for bioenergy recovery from wastewater and bio-wasted sludge," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    7. Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski & Paweł Dudziec & Michał Krzyżaniak & Ewelina Olba-Zięty, 2021. "Solid Biomass Energy Potential as a Development Opportunity for Rural Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    8. Ao, Tianjie & Chen, Lin & Zhou, Pan & Liu, Xiaofeng & Li, Dong, 2021. "The role of oxidation-reduction potential as an early warning indicator, and a microbial instability mechanism in a pilot-scale anaerobic mesophilic digestion of chicken manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 223-232.
    9. Krzysztof Dziedzic & Bogusława Łapczyńska-Kordon & Michał Jurczyk & Marek Wróbel & Marcin Jewiarz & Krzysztof Mudryk & Tadeusz Pająk, 2022. "Solid Digestate—Mathematical Modeling of Combustion Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.
    10. Hartung, Christina & Andrade, Diana & Dandikas, Vasilis & Eickenscheidt, Tim & Drösler, Matthias & Zollfrank, Cordt & Heuwinkel, Hauke, 2020. "Suitability of paludiculture biomass as biogas substrate − biogas yield and long-term effects on anaerobic digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 64-71.
    11. Antonio Serrano & Fernando G. Fermoso & Bernabé Alonso-Fariñas & Guillermo Rodríguez-Gutiérrez & Sergio López & Juan Fernandez-Bolaños & Rafael Borja, 2019. "Long-Term Evaluation of Mesophilic Semi-Continuous Anaerobic Digestion of Olive Mill Solid Waste Pretreated with Steam-Explosion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-13, June.
    12. Andersson, Johanna & Helander-Claesson, Jonas & Olsson, Jesper, 2020. "Study on reduced process temperature for energy optimisation in mesophilic digestion: A lab to full-scale study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    13. Hasanpour Seyedlar, Niloufar & Zamir, Seyed Morteza & Nosrati, Mohsen & Rene, Eldon R., 2024. "H2S mitigation for biogas upgrading in a full-scale anaerobic digestion process by using artificial neural network modeling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    14. Solli, Linn & Schnürer, Anna & Horn, Svein J., 2018. "Process performance and population dynamics of ammonium tolerant microorganisms during co-digestion of fish waste and manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 529-536.
    15. Wu, Di & Li, Lei & Peng, Yun & Yang, Pingjin & Peng, Xuya & Sun, Yongming & Wang, Xiaoming, 2021. "State indicators of anaerobic digestion: A critical review on process monitoring and diagnosis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    16. Vishal Ahuja & Arvind Kumar Bhatt & Balasubramani Ravindran & Yung-Hun Yang & Shashi Kant Bhatia, 2023. "A Mini-Review on Syngas Fermentation to Bio-Alcohols: Current Status and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    17. Susanne Theuerl & Christiane Herrmann & Monika Heiermann & Philipp Grundmann & Niels Landwehr & Ulrich Kreidenweis & Annette Prochnow, 2019. "The Future Agricultural Biogas Plant in Germany: A Vision," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-32, January.
    18. Di Capua, Francesco & Spasiano, Danilo & Giordano, Andrea & Adani, Fabrizio & Fratino, Umberto & Pirozzi, Francesco & Esposito, Giovanni, 2020. "High-solid anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge: challenges and opportunities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    19. Fuchs, Werner & Wang, Xuemei & Gabauer, Wolfgang & Ortner, Markus & Li, Zifu, 2018. "Tackling ammonia inhibition for efficient biogas production from chicken manure: Status and technical trends in Europe and China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 186-199.
    20. Sławomir Francik & Bogusława Łapczyńska-Kordon & Norbert Pedryc & Wojciech Szewczyk & Renata Francik & Zbigniew Ślipek, 2022. "The Use of Artificial Neural Networks for Determining Values of Selected Strength Parameters of Miscanthus × Giganteus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-26, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:23:p:6038-:d:1534325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.