IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3765-d1072841.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Mini-Review on Syngas Fermentation to Bio-Alcohols: Current Status and Challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Vishal Ahuja

    (University Institute of Biotechnology, Chandigarh University, Mohali 140413, Punjab, India
    University Centre for Research & Development, Chandigarh University, Mohali 140413, Punjab, India)

  • Arvind Kumar Bhatt

    (Department of Biotechnology, Himachal Pradesh University, Shimla 171005, Himachal Pradesh, India)

  • Balasubramani Ravindran

    (Department of Environmental Energy and Engineering, Kyonggi University, Yeongtong-Gu, Suwon-si 16227, Republic of Korea)

  • Yung-Hun Yang

    (Department of Biological Engineering, College of Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea
    Institute for Ubiquitous Information Technology and Applications, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea)

  • Shashi Kant Bhatia

    (Department of Biological Engineering, College of Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea
    Institute for Ubiquitous Information Technology and Applications, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Biomass gasification produces syngas, mainly comprised of CO and H 2 along with H 2 S, CO 2 , N 2, and tar compounds. Inorganic carbon present in syngas as CO and CO 2 can be utilized for the production of several value-added chemicals including ethanol, higher alcohols, fuels, and hydrogen. However, chemical sequestration operates at a high temperature of 300–500 °C and pressure of 3–5 MPa in the presence of heavy metal catalysts. Catalyst regeneration and the maintenance of high temperature and pressure increased the cost of operation. Microorganisms like algae and bacteria including Acetobacterium and Clostridium also have the potential to sequester carbon from the gas phase. Research has emphasized the production of microbial metabolites with a high market value from syngas. However, scale-up and commercialization of technology have some obstacles like inefficient mass transfer, microbial contamination, inconsistency in syngas composition, and requirement for a clean-up process. The current review summarizes the recent advances in syngas production and utilization with special consideration of alcohol and energy-related products along with challenges for scale-up.

Suggested Citation

  • Vishal Ahuja & Arvind Kumar Bhatt & Balasubramani Ravindran & Yung-Hun Yang & Shashi Kant Bhatia, 2023. "A Mini-Review on Syngas Fermentation to Bio-Alcohols: Current Status and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3765-:d:1072841
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3765/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3765/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Daniell & Michael Köpke & Séan Dennis Simpson, 2012. "Commercial Biomass Syngas Fermentation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(12), pages 1-46, December.
    2. Gabriele Calì & Paolo Deiana & Claudia Bassano & Simone Meloni & Enrico Maggio & Michele Mascia & Alberto Pettinau, 2020. "Syngas Production, Clean-Up and Wastewater Management in a Demo-Scale Fixed-Bed Updraft Biomass Gasification Unit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Bhatia, Shashi Kant & Bhatia, Ravi Kant & Jeon, Jong-Min & Kumar, Gopalakrishnan & Yang, Yung-Hun, 2019. "Carbon dioxide capture and bioenergy production using biological system – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 143-158.
    4. Westerholm, Maria & Moestedt, Jan & Schnürer, Anna, 2016. "Biogas production through syntrophic acetate oxidation and deliberate operating strategies for improved digester performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 124-135.
    5. Niklas Höhne & Takeshi Kuramochi & Carsten Warnecke & Frauke Röser & Hanna Fekete & Markus Hagemann & Thomas Day & Ritika Tewari & Marie Kurdziel & Sebastian Sterl & Sofia Gonzales, 2017. "The Paris Agreement: resolving the inconsistency between global goals and national contributions," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 16-32, January.
    6. Monir, Minhaj Uddin & Aziz, Azrina Abd & Khatun, Fatema & Yousuf, Abu, 2020. "Bioethanol production through syngas fermentation in a tar free bioreactor using Clostridium butyricum," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 1116-1123.
    7. Tang, Yunheng & Huang, Yun & Gan, Wentian & Xia, Ao & Liao, Qiang & Zhu, Xianqing, 2021. "Ethanol production from gas fermentation: Rapid enrichment and domestication of bacterial community with continuous CO/CO2 gas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 337-344.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xu Tang & Dali Wu & Sanming Wang & Xuhai Pan, 2023. "Research on Real-Time Prediction of Hydrogen Sulfide Leakage Diffusion Concentration of New Energy Based on Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fagbohungbe, Michael O. & Komolafe, Abiodun O. & Okere, Uchechukwu V., 2019. "Renewable hydrogen anaerobic fermentation technology: Problems and potentials," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Song, Yapeng & Hu, Wanrong & Qiao, Wei & Westerholm, Maria & Wandera, Simon M. & Dong, Renjie, 2022. "Upgrading the performance of high solids feeding anaerobic digestion of chicken manure under extremely high ammonia level," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 13-20.
    3. Qi, Chuanren & Cao, Dingge & Gao, Xingzu & Jia, Sumeng & Yin, Rongrong & Nghiem, Long D. & Li, Guoxue & Luo, Wenhai, 2023. "Optimising organic composition of feedstock to improve microbial dynamics and symbiosis to advance solid-state anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and organic waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    4. Ramachandriya, Karthikeyan D. & Kundiyana, Dimple K. & Wilkins, Mark R. & Terrill, Jennine B. & Atiyeh, Hasan K. & Huhnke, Raymond L., 2013. "Carbon dioxide conversion to fuels and chemicals using a hybrid green process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 289-299.
    5. Kuang-Feng Cheng & Chien-Shu Tsai & Chu-Chuan Hsu & Szu-Chung Lin & Ting-Chung Tsai & Jen-Yao Lee, 2019. "Emission Tax and Compensation Subsidy with Cross-Industry Pollution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, February.
    6. Palakodeti, Advait & Azman, Samet & Rossi, Barbara & Dewil, Raf & Appels, Lise, 2021. "A critical review of ammonia recovery from anaerobic digestate of organic wastes via stripping," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    7. Yong Bian & Zhi Yu & Xuelan Zeng & Jingchun Feng & Chao He, 2018. "Achieving China’s Long-Term Carbon Emission Abatement Targets: A Perspective from Regional Disparity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Bi, Shaojie & Westerholm, Maria & Hu, Wanrong & Mahdy, Ahmed & Dong, Taili & Sun, Yingcai & Qiao, Wei & Dong, Renjie, 2021. "The metabolic performance and microbial communities of anaerobic digestion of chicken manure under stressed ammonia condition: A case study of a 10-year successful biogas plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 644-651.
    9. Lourenço, Vitor Alves & Nadaleti, Willian Cézar & Vieira, Bruno Müller & Chua, Hui, 2021. "Methane production test of the anaerobic sludge from rice parboiling industries with the addition of biodiesel glycerol from rice bran oil in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    10. Wen, Wen & Zhou, P. & Zhang, Fuqiang, 2018. "Carbon emissions abatement: Emissions trading vs consumer awareness," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 34-47.
    11. Yapeng Song & Wei Qiao & Jiahao Zhang & Renjie Dong, 2023. "Process Performance and Functional Microbial Community in the Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-22, June.
    12. Elvira E. Ziganshina & Svetlana S. Bulynina & Ayrat M. Ziganshin, 2022. "Impact of Granular Activated Carbon on Anaerobic Process and Microbial Community Structure during Mesophilic and Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, January.
    13. Laura Rodríguez-Fernández & Ana Belén Fernández Carvajal & María Bujidos-Casado, 2020. "Allocation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Using the Fairness Principle: A Multi-Country Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-15, July.
    14. Marta Pacheco & Filomena Pinto & Anders Brunsvik & Rui André & Paula Marques & Ricardo Mata & Joana Ortigueira & Francisco Gírio & Patrícia Moura, 2023. "Effects of Lignin Gasification Impurities on the Growth and Product Distribution of Butyribacterium methylotrophicum during Syngas Fermentation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.
    15. Gunerhan, Ali & Altuntas, Onder & Caliskan, Hakan, 2023. "Utilization of renewable and sustainable aviation biofuels from waste tyres for sustainable aviation transport sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    16. Lin, Jin & Dong, Jun & Liu, Dongran & Zhang, Yaoyu & Ma, Tongtao, 2022. "From peak shedding to low-carbon transitions: Customer psychological factors in demand response," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    17. Ahmadi, Ehsan & Yousefzadeh, Samira & Mokammel, Adel & Miri, Mohammad & Ansari, Mohsen & Arfaeinia, Hossein & Badi, Mojtaba Yegane & Ghaffari, Hamid Reza & Rezaei, Soheila & Mahvi, Amir Hossein, 2020. "Kinetic study and performance evaluation of an integrated two-phase fixed-film baffled bioreactor for bioenergy recovery from wastewater and bio-wasted sludge," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    18. Lewis C. King & Jeroen C. J. M. Bergh, 2021. "Potential carbon leakage under the Paris Agreement," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 1-19, April.
    19. Simge Sertkaya & Nuri Azbar & Haris Nalakath Abubackar & Tugba Keskin Gundogdu, 2021. "Design of Low-Cost Ethanol Production Medium from Syngas: An Optimization of Trace Metals for Clostridium ljungdahlii," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, October.
    20. Grimalt-Alemany, Antonio & Asimakopoulos, Konstantinos & Skiadas, Ioannis V. & Gavala, Hariklia N., 2020. "Modeling of syngas biomethanation and catabolic route control in mesophilic and thermophilic mixed microbial consortia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3765-:d:1072841. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.