IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i3p1558-d1057582.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermodynamic Performance Comparison of CCHP System Based on Organic Rankine Cycle and Two-Stage Vapor Compression Cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Tailu Li

    (School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China)

  • Jingyi Wang

    (School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China)

  • Yao Zhang

    (School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China)

  • Ruizhao Gao

    (School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China)

  • Xiang Gao

    (School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China)

Abstract

Owing to different temperature rages of power generation and refrigeration in the cogeneration system, for the sake of selecting the working fluids that are suitable for both power generation and refrigeration simultaneously, 17 commonly used working fluids are evaluated in this paper, based on an organic Rankine cycle coupled with a two-stage vapor compression cycle system in different geothermal fluid temperatures. The performances of working fluids under different working conditions, and the maximum power generation as well as cooling capacity are analyzed. Additionally, the main parameters are analyzed to optimize the system performance. The results indicate that net power output has a local maximum where it corresponds to the optimal evaporation temperature. Besides, the lower the critical temperature, the greater the thermal conductance, and the pressure ratio decreases with evaporation temperature. Hydrocarbons all have higher total heat source recovery efficiency. R1234yf, propane and R1234ze, R152a have excellent maximum net power output when the geothermal fluid temperature is low and high, respectively. R134a always has better maximum net power output and cooling capacity. The net power output is used for cooling, and the COP is closed, therefore, maximum net power output results in the maximum cooling capacity. In addition, that of propane and R1234yf are excellent until the geothermal fluid temperature are 140 °C and 120 °C separately. R1234ze and R152a are good when the geothermal fluid temperatures are 140 °C and 150 °C, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Tailu Li & Jingyi Wang & Yao Zhang & Ruizhao Gao & Xiang Gao, 2023. "Thermodynamic Performance Comparison of CCHP System Based on Organic Rankine Cycle and Two-Stage Vapor Compression Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:3:p:1558-:d:1057582
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/3/1558/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/3/1558/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarkar, Jahar & Bhattacharyya, Souvik, 2015. "Potential of organic Rankine cycle technology in India: Working fluid selection and feasibility study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1618-1625.
    2. Vering, Christian & Kroppa, Hendrik & Venzik, Valerius & Streblow, Rita & Müller, Dirk, 2022. "Towards an integral decision-making process applied to the refrigerant selection in heat pumps," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 815-827.
    3. Toffolo, Andrea & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Manente, Giovanni & Paci, Marco, 2014. "A multi-criteria approach for the optimal selection of working fluid and design parameters in Organic Rankine Cycle systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 219-232.
    4. Franco, Alessandro & Vaccaro, Maurizio, 2012. "An integrated “Reservoir-Plant” strategy for a sustainable and efficient use of geothermal resources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 299-310.
    5. Abas, Naeem & Kalair, Ali Raza & Khan, Nasrullah & Haider, Aun & Saleem, Zahid & Saleem, Muhammad Shoaib, 2018. "Natural and synthetic refrigerants, global warming: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 557-569.
    6. Zhao, Huiru & Li, Bingkang & Lu, Hao & Wang, Xuejie & Li, Hongze & Guo, Sen & Xue, Wanlei & Wang, Yuwei, 2022. "Economy-environment-energy performance evaluation of CCHP microgrid system: A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    7. Huang, Z.F. & Soh, K.Y. & Islam, M.R. & Chua, K.J., 2022. "Digital twin driven life-cycle operation optimization for combined cooling heating and power-cold energy recovery (CCHP-CER) system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    8. Pan, Shu-Yuan & Gao, Mengyao & Shah, Kinjal J. & Zheng, Jianming & Pei, Si-Lu & Chiang, Pen-Chi, 2019. "Establishment of enhanced geothermal energy utilization plans: Barriers and strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 19-32.
    9. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 159-170.
    10. Dawo, Fabian & Fleischmann, Jonas & Kaufmann, Florian & Schifflechner, Christopher & Eyerer, Sebastian & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2021. "R1224yd(Z), R1233zd(E) and R1336mzz(Z) as replacements for R245fa: Experimental performance, interaction with lubricants and environmental impact," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    11. Mott, A. & Baba, A. & Hadi Mosleh, M. & Ökten, H.E. & Babaei, M. & Gören, A.Y. & Feng, C. & Recepoğlu, Y.K. & Uzelli, T. & Uytun, H. & Morata, D. & Yüksel, A. & Sedighi, M., 2022. "Boron in geothermal energy: Sources, environmental impacts, and management in geothermal fluid," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    12. Lee, Minwoo & Kim, Jinyoung & Shin, Hyun Ho & Cho, Wonhee & Kim, Yongchan, 2022. "CO2 emissions and energy performance analysis of ground-source and solar-assisted ground-source heat pumps using low-GWP refrigerants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Tail & Zhang, Yao & Gao, Haiyang & Gao, Xiang & Jin, Fengyun, 2023. "Techno-economic-environmental performance of different system configuration for combined heating and power based on organic Rankine cycle and direct/indirect heating," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P2).
    2. Liu, Qiang & Shang, Linlin & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2016. "Performance analyses of a hybrid geothermal–fossil power generation system using low-enthalpy geothermal resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 149-162.
    3. R.V., Rohit & R., Vipin Raj & Kiplangat, Dennis C. & R., Veena & Jose, Rajan & Pradeepkumar, A.P. & Kumar, K. Satheesh, 2023. "Tracing the evolution and charting the future of geothermal energy research and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    4. Liu, Qiang & Shen, Aijing & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2015. "Parametric optimization and performance analyses of geothermal organic Rankine cycles using R600a/R601a mixtures as working fluids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 410-420.
    5. Toledo-Paz, Lili M. & Colorado-Garrido, Dario & Conde-Gutiérrez, Roberto A. & Herrera-Romero, José Vidal & Escalante-Soberanis, Mauricio Alberto, 2024. "Improvement of a double flash cycle using a heat exchanger with liquid cooling and liquid splitting technology for a geothermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    6. Chen, Chaofan & Witte, Francesco & Tuschy, Ilja & Kolditz, Olaf & Shao, Haibing, 2022. "Parametric optimization and comparative study of an organic Rankine cycle power plant for two-phase geothermal sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    7. Alvin Kiprono Bett & Saeid Jalilinasrabady, 2021. "Optimization of ORC Power Plants for Geothermal Application in Kenya by Combining Exergy and Pinch Point Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    8. Mastrowski, Mikolaj & Smolka, Jacek & Hafner, Armin & Haida, Michal & Palacz, Michal & Banasiak, Krzysztof, 2019. "Experimental study of the heat transfer problem in expansion devices in CO2 refrigeration systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 586-597.
    9. Zhao, Zhen & Luo, Jielin & Zou, Dexin & Yang, Kaiyin & Wang, Qin & Chen, Guangming, 2023. "Experimental investigation on the inhibition of flame retardants on the flammability of R1234ze(E)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    10. Liu, Xinglei & Liu, Jun & Ren, Kezheng & Liu, Xiaoming & Liu, Jiacheng, 2022. "An integrated fuzzy multi-energy transaction evaluation approach for energy internet markets considering judgement credibility and variable rough precision," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    11. Tieyu Gao & Changwei Liu, 2017. "Off-Design Performances of Subcritical and Supercritical Organic Rankine Cycles in Geothermal Power Systems under an Optimal Control Strategy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-25, August.
    12. Guillaume, Ludovic & Legros, Arnaud & Desideri, Adriano & Lemort, Vincent, 2017. "Performance of a radial-inflow turbine integrated in an ORC system and designed for a WHR on truck application: An experimental comparison between R245fa and R1233zd," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(P3), pages 408-422.
    13. Zhuang, Yu & Zhou, Congcong & Dong, Yachao & Du, Jian & Shen, Shengqiang, 2021. "A hierarchical optimization and design of double Kalina Cycles for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    14. Jiang, Sufan & Gao, Shan & Pan, Guangsheng & Zhao, Xin & Liu, Yu & Guo, Yasen & Wang, Sicheng, 2020. "A novel robust security constrained unit commitment model considering HVDC regulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    15. Adams, Benjamin M. & Kuehn, Thomas H. & Bielicki, Jeffrey M. & Randolph, Jimmy B. & Saar, Martin O., 2015. "A comparison of electric power output of CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) and brine geothermal systems for varying reservoir conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 365-377.
    16. Moein Shamoushaki & Mehdi Aliehyaei & Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary, 2021. "Energy, Exergy, Exergoeconomic, and Exergoenvironmental Assessment of Flash-Binary Geothermal Combined Cooling, Heating and Power Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-24, July.
    17. Mahmoudan, Alireza & Samadof, Parviz & Hosseinzadeh, Siamak & Garcia, Davide Astiaso, 2021. "A multigeneration cascade system using ground-source energy with cold recovery: 3E analyses and multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    18. Liya Ren & Jianyu Liu & Huaixin Wang, 2020. "Thermodynamic Optimization of a Waste Heat Power System under Economic Constraint," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-23, July.
    19. Kasaeian, Alibakhsh & Hosseini, Seyed Mohsen & Sheikhpour, Mojgan & Mahian, Omid & Yan, Wei-Mon & Wongwises, Somchai, 2018. "Applications of eco-friendly refrigerants and nanorefrigerants: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 91-99.
    20. Guillermo Valencia Ochoa & Carlos Acevedo Peñaloza & Jorge Duarte Forero, 2019. "Thermoeconomic Optimization with PSO Algorithm of Waste Heat Recovery Systems Based on Organic Rankine Cycle System for a Natural Gas Engine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:3:p:1558-:d:1057582. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.