IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v219y2023ip2s0960148123014684.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-economic-environmental performance of different system configuration for combined heating and power based on organic Rankine cycle and direct/indirect heating

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Tail
  • Zhang, Yao
  • Gao, Haiyang
  • Gao, Xiang
  • Jin, Fengyun

Abstract

Low system efficiency and poor economic performance of geothermal driven organic Rankine cycle (ORC) is serious due to standalone power generation and high initial investment cost. Based on ORC, four combined heating and power (CHP) systems are proposed to improve the above problem, including with the geothermal tailwater (GT-ORC-CHP), cooling water (CW-ORC-CHP), geothermal tailwater and cooling water (GTCW-ORC-CHP) as well as heat pump (HP) is added into GTCW-ORC-CHP (HP-ORC-CHP). Techno-economic performances are analyzed and compared. The results show that the GT-ORC-CHP has better power generation performance, with the highest net power output of 2349.67 kW and wider application range. The GTCW-ORC-CHP and HP-ORC-CHP have advantages in the heat supply performance and overall economic performance. The high geothermal water temperature, evaporation temperature of ORC, and evaporation temperature of HP have had a positive multi-objective optimization effect on the net power output (Wnet) and levelized energy cost (LEC) of each system. The multi-objective optimization indicates that the GTCW-ORC-CHP is suggested as the geothermal energy cascade utilization method from the perspectives of the exergy efficiency and total cost rate, and the cost and exergy destruction of the heat exchangers occupies the largest share in each system, all accounting for over about 80%.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Tail & Zhang, Yao & Gao, Haiyang & Gao, Xiang & Jin, Fengyun, 2023. "Techno-economic-environmental performance of different system configuration for combined heating and power based on organic Rankine cycle and direct/indirect heating," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P2).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:219:y:2023:i:p2:s0960148123014684
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.119553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148123014684
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119553?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarkar, Jahar & Bhattacharyya, Souvik, 2015. "Potential of organic Rankine cycle technology in India: Working fluid selection and feasibility study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1618-1625.
    2. Tailu Li & Xuelong Li & Haiyang Gao & Xiang Gao & Nan Meng, 2022. "Thermodynamic Performance of Geothermal Energy Cascade Utilization for Combined Heating and Power Based on Organic Rankine Cycle and Vapor Compression Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Le, Van Long & Kheiri, Abdelhamid & Feidt, Michel & Pelloux-Prayer, Sandrine, 2014. "Thermodynamic and economic optimizations of a waste heat to power plant driven by a subcritical ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) using pure or zeotropic working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 622-638.
    4. Jiang, Jiatong & Hu, Bin & Wang, R.Z. & Ge, Tianshu & Liu, Hua & Zhang, Zhiping & Zhou, Yu, 2023. "Experiments of advanced centrifugal heat pump with supply temperature up to 100 °C using low-GWP refrigerant R1233zd(E)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    5. Eyerer, Sebastian & Dawo, Fabian & Schifflechner, Christopher & Niederdränk, Anne & Spliethoff, Hartmut & Wieland, Christoph, 2022. "Experimental evaluation of an ORC-CHP architecture based on regenerative preheating for geothermal applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    6. Toffolo, Andrea & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Manente, Giovanni & Paci, Marco, 2014. "A multi-criteria approach for the optimal selection of working fluid and design parameters in Organic Rankine Cycle systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 219-232.
    7. Franco, Alessandro & Vaccaro, Maurizio, 2012. "An integrated “Reservoir-Plant” strategy for a sustainable and efficient use of geothermal resources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 299-310.
    8. Li, Tailu & Zhang, Zhigang & Lu, Jian & Yang, Junlan & Hu, Yujie, 2015. "Two-stage evaporation strategy to improve system performance for organic Rankine cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 323-334.
    9. Qiu, K. & Entchev, E., 2022. "A micro-CHP system with organic Rankine cycle using R1223zd(E) and n-Pentane as working fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    10. Wang, Lingbao & Bu, Xianbiao & Li, Huashan, 2020. "Multi-objective optimization and off-design evaluation of organic rankine cycle (ORC) for low-grade waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    11. Zhang, Fei-yang & Feng, Yong-qiang & He, Zhi-xia & Xu, Jing-wei & Zhang, Qiang & Xu, Kang-jing, 2022. "Thermo-economic optimization of biomass-fired organic Rankine cycles combined heat and power system coupled CO2 capture with a rated power of 30 kW," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen & Liu, Qiang, 2018. "Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 409-421.
    2. Yi, Zhitong & Luo, Xianglong & Chen, Jianyong & Chen, Ying, 2017. "Mathematical modelling and optimization of a liquid separation condenser-based organic Rankine cycle used in waste heat utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 916-934.
    3. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen, 2019. "Design and performance analyses for a novel organic Rankine cycle with supercritical-subcritical heat absorption process coupling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1400-1414.
    4. Tailu Li & Jingyi Wang & Yao Zhang & Ruizhao Gao & Xiang Gao, 2023. "Thermodynamic Performance Comparison of CCHP System Based on Organic Rankine Cycle and Two-Stage Vapor Compression Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Yu, Haoshui & Eason, John & Biegler, Lorenz T. & Feng, Xiao, 2017. "Simultaneous heat integration and techno-economic optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for multiple waste heat stream recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 322-333.
    6. Liu, Qiang & Shang, Linlin & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2016. "Performance analyses of a hybrid geothermal–fossil power generation system using low-enthalpy geothermal resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 149-162.
    7. Karimi, Shahram & Mansouri, Sima, 2018. "A comparative profitability study of geothermal electricity production in developed and developing countries: Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of different ORC configurations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 600-619.
    8. Lazzaretto, Andrea & Manente, Giovanni & Toffolo, Andrea, 2018. "SYNTHSEP: A general methodology for the synthesis of energy system configurations beyond superstructures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 924-949.
    9. Meng, Dongyu & Liu, Qiang & Ji, Zhongli, 2022. "Effects of two-phase expander on the thermoeconomics of organic double-flash cycles for geothermal power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    10. Liu, Qiang & Shen, Aijing & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2015. "Parametric optimization and performance analyses of geothermal organic Rankine cycles using R600a/R601a mixtures as working fluids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 410-420.
    11. Chen, Chaofan & Witte, Francesco & Tuschy, Ilja & Kolditz, Olaf & Shao, Haibing, 2022. "Parametric optimization and comparative study of an organic Rankine cycle power plant for two-phase geothermal sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    12. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen, 2019. "Effects of heat source temperature and mixture composition on the combined superiority of dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycle and zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 436-449.
    13. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 159-170.
    14. Amini, Ali & Mirkhani, Nima & Pakjesm Pourfard, Pedram & Ashjaee, Mehdi & Khodkar, Mohammad Amin, 2015. "Thermo-economic optimization of low-grade waste heat recovery in Yazd combined-cycle power plant (Iran) by a CO2 transcritical Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 74-84.
    15. Li, Chengyu & Wang, Huaixin, 2016. "Power cycles for waste heat recovery from medium to high temperature flue gas sources – from a view of thermodynamic optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 707-721.
    16. Yang, Fubin & Zhang, Hongguang & Bei, Chen & Song, Songsong & Wang, Enhua, 2015. "Parametric optimization and performance analysis of ORC (organic Rankine cycle) for diesel engine waste heat recovery with a fin-and-tube evaporator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 128-141.
    17. Manente, Giovanni & Da Lio, Luca & Lazzaretto, Andrea, 2016. "Influence of axial turbine efficiency maps on the performance of subcritical and supercritical Organic Rankine Cycle systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 761-772.
    18. Bamorovat Abadi, Gholamreza & Yun, Eunkoo & Kim, Kyung Chun, 2015. "Experimental study of a 1 kw organic Rankine cycle with a zeotropic mixture of R245fa/R134a," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2363-2373.
    19. Zhang, Siyuan & Liu, Xinxin & Liu, Liang & Pan, Xiaohui & Li, Qibin & Wang, Shukun & Jiao, Youzhou & He, Chao & Li, Gang, 2024. "Thermo-economic assessment and multi-objective optimization of organic Rankine cycle driven by solar energy and waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    20. Samadi, Fereshteh & Kazemi, Neda, 2020. "Exergoeconomic analysis of zeotropic mixture on the new proposed organic Rankine cycle for energy production from geothermal resources," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1250-1265.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:219:y:2023:i:p2:s0960148123014684. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.