IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i23p7896-d1293337.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Calorific Value Prediction Model Using Structure Composition of Heat-Treated Lignocellulosic Biomass

Author

Listed:
  • Sunyong Park

    (Department of Interdisciplinary Program in Smart Agriculture, Kangwon National University, Hyoja 2 Dong 192-1, Chuncheon-si 24341, Republic of Korea)

  • Seon Yeop Kim

    (Department of Biosystems Engineering, Kangwon National University, Hyoja 2 Dong 192-1, Chuncheon-si 24341, Republic of Korea)

  • Ha Eun Kim

    (Department of Biosystems Engineering, Kangwon National University, Hyoja 2 Dong 192-1, Chuncheon-si 24341, Republic of Korea)

  • Kwang Cheol Oh

    (Agriculture and Life Science Research Institute, Kangwon National University, Hyoja 2 Dong 192-1, Chuncheon-si 24341, Republic of Korea)

  • Seok Jun Kim

    (Department of Interdisciplinary Program in Smart Agriculture, Kangwon National University, Hyoja 2 Dong 192-1, Chuncheon-si 24341, Republic of Korea)

  • La Hoon Cho

    (Department of Interdisciplinary Program in Smart Agriculture, Kangwon National University, Hyoja 2 Dong 192-1, Chuncheon-si 24341, Republic of Korea)

  • Young Kwang Jeon

    (Department of Interdisciplinary Program in Smart Agriculture, Kangwon National University, Hyoja 2 Dong 192-1, Chuncheon-si 24341, Republic of Korea)

  • DaeHyun Kim

    (Department of Interdisciplinary Program in Smart Agriculture, Kangwon National University, Hyoja 2 Dong 192-1, Chuncheon-si 24341, Republic of Korea
    Agriculture and Life Science Research Institute, Kangwon National University, Hyoja 2 Dong 192-1, Chuncheon-si 24341, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This study aims to identify an equation for predicting the calorific value for heat-treated biomass using structural analysis. Different models were constructed using 129 samples of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, and calorific values obtained from previous studies. These models were validated using 41 additional datasets, and an optimal model was identified using its results and following performance metrics: the coefficient of determination (R 2 ), mean absolute error (MAE), root-mean-squared error (RMSE), average absolute error (AAE), and average bias error (ABE). Finally, the model was verified using 25 additional data points. For the overall dataset, R 2 was ~0.52, and the RMSE range was 1.46–1.77. For woody biomass, the R 2 range was 0.78–0.83, and the RMSE range was 0.9626–1.2810. For herbaceous biomass, the R 2 range was 0.5251–0.6001, and the RMSE range was 1.1822–1.3957. The validation results showed similar or slightly poorer performances. The optimal model was then tested using the test data. For overall biomass and woody biomass, the performance metrics of the obtained model were superior to those in previous studies, whereas for herbaceous biomass, lower performance metrics were observed. The identified model demonstrated equal or superior performance compared to linear models. Further improvements are required based on a wider range of structural biomass data.

Suggested Citation

  • Sunyong Park & Seon Yeop Kim & Ha Eun Kim & Kwang Cheol Oh & Seok Jun Kim & La Hoon Cho & Young Kwang Jeon & DaeHyun Kim, 2023. "Calorific Value Prediction Model Using Structure Composition of Heat-Treated Lignocellulosic Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:23:p:7896-:d:1293337
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/23/7896/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/23/7896/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Motta, Ingrid Lopes & Miranda, Nahieh Toscano & Maciel Filho, Rubens & Wolf Maciel, Maria Regina, 2018. "Biomass gasification in fluidized beds: A review of biomass moisture content and operating pressure effects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 998-1023.
    2. Granados, D.A. & Ruiz, R.A. & Vega, L.Y. & Chejne, F., 2017. "Study of reactivity reduction in sugarcane bagasse as consequence of a torrefaction process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 818-827.
    3. Esteban Valdez & Lope G. Tabil & Edmund Mupondwa & Duncan Cree & Hadi Moazed, 2021. "Microwave Torrefaction of Oat Hull: Effect of Temperature and Residence Time," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-15, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roberto C. Beber & Camila d. S. Turini & Vinicius C. Beber & Roberta M. Nogueira & Evaldo M. Pires, 2025. "Effect of Plant Part and Age on the Proximate, Chemical, and Elemental Characteristics of Elephant Grass Cultivar BRS Capiaçu for Combustion-Based Sustainable Bioenergy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-21, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Shengxiong & Lei, Can & Qin, Jie & Yi, Cheng & Chen, Tao & Yao, Lingling & Li, Bo & Wen, Yujiao & Zhou, Zhi & Xia, Mao, 2022. "Properties, kinetics and pyrolysis products distribution of oxidative torrefied camellia shell in different oxygen concentration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    2. Lech Nowicki & Dorota Siuta & Maciej Markowski, 2020. "Pyrolysis of Rapeseed Oil Press Cake and Steam Gasification of Solid Residues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-12, August.
    3. Abdulrahman A. Al-Rabiah & Jiyad N. Al-Dawsari & Abdelhamid M. Ajbar & Rayan K. Al Darwish & Omar Y. Abdelaziz, 2022. "Development of a Biomass Gasification Process for the Coproduction of Methanol and Power from Red Sea Microalgae," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-14, October.
    4. Sara Maen Asaad & Abrar Inayat & Lisandra Rocha-Meneses & Farrukh Jamil & Chaouki Ghenai & Abdallah Shanableh, 2022. "Prospective of Response Surface Methodology as an Optimization Tool for Biomass Gasification Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Niu, Qi & Ronsse, Frederik & Qi, Zhiyong & Zhang, Dongdong, 2022. "Fast torrefaction of large biomass particles by superheated steam: Enhanced solid products for multipurpose production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 552-563.
    6. Lin, Yi-Li & Zheng, Nai-Yun & Lin, Ching-Shi, 2021. "Repurposing Washingtonia filifera petiole and Sterculia foetida follicle waste biomass for renewable energy through torrefaction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    7. Bareschino, P. & Mancusi, E. & Tregambi, C. & Pepe, F. & Urciuolo, M. & Brachi, P. & Ruoppolo, G., 2021. "Integration of biomasses gasification and renewable-energies-driven water electrolysis for methane production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    8. Donghoon Shin & Akhil Francis & Purushothaman Vellayani Aravind & Theo Woudstra & Wiebren de Jong & Dirk Roekaerts, 2022. "Numerical Evaluation of Biochar Production Performance of Downdraft Gasifier by Thermodynamic Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-18, October.
    9. Mukherjee, C. & Denney, J. & Mbonimpa, E.G. & Slagley, J. & Bhowmik, R., 2020. "A review on municipal solid waste-to-energy trends in the USA," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    10. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Al-Ansari, Tareq & Inayat, Muddasser & Sulaiman, Shaharin A. & Parthasarathy, Prakash & McKay, Gordon, 2020. "A critical review on the influence of process parameters in catalytic co-gasification: Current performance and challenges for a future prospectus," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    11. Aui, A. & Wang, Y. & Mba-Wright, M., 2021. "Evaluating the economic feasibility of cellulosic ethanol: A meta-analysis of techno-economic analysis studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    12. Ghulamullah Maitlo & Imran Ali & Kashif Hussain Mangi & Safdar Ali & Hubdar Ali Maitlo & Imran Nazir Unar & Abdul Majeed Pirzada, 2022. "Thermochemical Conversion of Biomass for Syngas Production: Current Status and Future Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-30, February.
    13. Chen, Wei-Hsin & Lin, Bo-Jhih & Colin, Baptiste & Chang, Jo-Shu & Pétrissans, Anélie & Bi, Xiaotao & Pétrissans, Mathieu, 2018. "Hygroscopic transformation of woody biomass torrefaction for carbon storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 768-776.
    14. Zhang, Fengxia & Yang, Shiliang & Yang, Bin & Wang, Hua, 2022. "Mesoscale bubble dynamics in the gasifier of a 1MWth dual fluidized bed gasifier for biomass gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    15. Reyes, Y.A. & Pérez, M. & Barrera, E.L. & Martínez, Y. & Cheng, K.K., 2022. "Thermochemical conversion processes of Dichrostachys cinerea as a biofuel: A review of the Cuban case," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    16. María Pilar González-Vázquez & Fernando Rubiera & Covadonga Pevida & Daniel T. Pio & Luís A.C. Tarelho, 2021. "Thermodynamic Analysis of Biomass Gasification Using Aspen Plus: Comparison of Stoichiometric and Non-Stoichiometric Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, January.
    17. Ashfaq Ahmed & Muhammad S. Abu Bakar & Abdul Razzaq & Syarif Hidayat & Farrukh Jamil & Muhammad Nadeem Amin & Rahayu S. Sukri & Noor S. Shah & Young-Kwon Park, 2021. "Characterization and Thermal Behavior Study of Biomass from Invasive Acacia mangium Species in Brunei Preceding Thermochemical Conversion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, May.
    18. Ángel Darío González-Delgado & Alexander Vargas-Mira & Carlos Zuluaga-García, 2023. "Economic Evaluation and Technoeconomic Resilience Analysis of Two Routes for Hydrogen Production via Indirect Gasification in North Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-16, November.
    19. Woon, Kok Sin & Phuang, Zhen Xin & Taler, Jan & Varbanov, Petar Sabev & Chong, Cheng Tung & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Lee, Chew Tin, 2023. "Recent advances in urban green energy development towards carbon emissions neutrality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    20. Filipe Neves & Armando A. Soares & Abel Rouboa, 2024. "Modeling of a Biomass Cogeneration Plant from a Gasification Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-14, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:23:p:7896-:d:1293337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.