IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i21p7890-d951908.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a Biomass Gasification Process for the Coproduction of Methanol and Power from Red Sea Microalgae

Author

Listed:
  • Abdulrahman A. Al-Rabiah

    (Chemical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Jiyad N. Al-Dawsari

    (King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST), Riyadh 11442, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdelhamid M. Ajbar

    (Chemical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Rayan K. Al Darwish

    (Chemical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Omar Y. Abdelaziz

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden)

Abstract

In this study, an algae biomass gasification process using a dual fluidized bed with combined power and methanol cogeneration was developed. The gasification process was modeled using Aspen Plus and validated using experimental data of two microalgae species ( Nannochloropsis oculata and Dunaliella salina ) commonly found on the western coast of Saudi Arabia. The impacts of different operating conditions, including the gasifier temperature, steam-to-biomass ratio, and algae-char split ratio, on the compositions of four main gases (CO, CO 2 , CH 4 , and H 2 ) were investigated. The results of the parametric studies indicated that the gasification temperature has a significant effect on the composition of the synthesis gas, where 700–850 °C was the ideal operating range for gasification. Altering the ratio of biomass to steam showed a slightly smaller effect on the synthesis gas composition. The char split ratio should be kept below 75% to ensure an adequate heat supply to the process. The proposed process successfully converted 45.7% of the biomass feed to methanol at a production capacity of 290 metric tons per day. On the other hand, 38 MW of electricity capacity was generated in the combined power cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdulrahman A. Al-Rabiah & Jiyad N. Al-Dawsari & Abdelhamid M. Ajbar & Rayan K. Al Darwish & Omar Y. Abdelaziz, 2022. "Development of a Biomass Gasification Process for the Coproduction of Methanol and Power from Red Sea Microalgae," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:21:p:7890-:d:951908
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/21/7890/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/21/7890/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adnan, Muflih A. & Hossain, Mohammad M., 2018. "Gasification of various biomasses including microalgae using CO2 – A thermodynamic study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 598-607.
    2. Motta, Ingrid Lopes & Miranda, Nahieh Toscano & Maciel Filho, Rubens & Wolf Maciel, Maria Regina, 2018. "Biomass gasification in fluidized beds: A review of biomass moisture content and operating pressure effects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 998-1023.
    3. Ahmad, Anis Atikah & Zawawi, Norfadhila Abdullah & Kasim, Farizul Hafiz & Inayat, Abrar & Khasri, Azduwin, 2016. "Assessing the gasification performance of biomass: A review on biomass gasification process conditions, optimization and economic evaluation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1333-1347.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kartal, Furkan & Özveren, Uğur, 2020. "A deep learning approach for prediction of syngas lower heating value from CFB gasifier in Aspen plus®," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    2. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    3. Wang, Linzheng & Zhang, Ruizhi & Deng, Ruiqu & Liu, Zeqing & Luo, Yonghao, 2023. "Comprehensive parametric study of fixed-bed co-gasification process through Multiple Thermally Thick Particle (MTTP) model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    4. Buentello-Montoya, D.A. & Duarte-Ruiz, C.A. & Maldonado-Escalante, J.F., 2023. "Co-gasification of waste PET, PP and biomass for energy recovery: A thermodynamic model to assess the produced syngas quality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    5. Zhao, Xinyue & Chen, Heng & Zheng, Qiwei & Liu, Jun & Pan, Peiyuan & Xu, Gang & Zhao, Qinxin & Jiang, Xue, 2023. "Thermo-economic analysis of a novel hydrogen production system using medical waste and biogas with zero carbon emission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    6. Sérgio Ferreira & Eliseu Monteiro & Luís Calado & Valter Silva & Paulo Brito & Cândida Vilarinho, 2019. "Experimental and Modeling Analysis of Brewers´ Spent Grains Gasification in a Downdraft Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, November.
    7. Kim, Jun Young & Kim, Dongjae & Li, Zezhong John & Dariva, Claudio & Cao, Yankai & Ellis, Naoko, 2023. "Predicting and optimizing syngas production from fluidized bed biomass gasifiers: A machine learning approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    8. Khushbu Kumari & Raushan Kumar & Nirmali Bordoloi & Tatiana Minkina & Chetan Keswani & Kuldeep Bauddh, 2023. "Unravelling the Recent Developments in the Production Technology and Efficient Applications of Biochar for Agro-Ecosystems," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, February.
    9. Lech Nowicki & Dorota Siuta & Maciej Markowski, 2020. "Pyrolysis of Rapeseed Oil Press Cake and Steam Gasification of Solid Residues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-12, August.
    10. Liu, Li & Jiang, Peng & Qian, Hongliang & Mu, Liwen & Lu, Xiaohua & Zhu, Jiahua, 2022. "CO2-negative biomass conversion: An economic route with co-production of green hydrogen and highly porous carbon," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    11. Ruivo, Luís & Silva, Tiago & Neves, Daniel & Tarelho, Luís & Frade, Jorge, 2023. "Thermodynamic guidelines for improved operation of iron-based catalysts in gasification of biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    12. Andrea Porcu & Stefano Sollai & Davide Marotto & Mauro Mureddu & Francesca Ferrara & Alberto Pettinau, 2019. "Techno-Economic Analysis of a Small-Scale Biomass-to-Energy BFB Gasification-Based System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, February.
    13. Sunyong Park & Seon Yeop Kim & Ha Eun Kim & Kwang Cheol Oh & Seok Jun Kim & La Hoon Cho & Young Kwang Jeon & DaeHyun Kim, 2023. "Calorific Value Prediction Model Using Structure Composition of Heat-Treated Lignocellulosic Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Pérez, Nestor Proenza & Pedroso, Daniel Travieso & Machin, Einara Blanco & Antunes, Julio Santana & Tuna, Celso Eduardo & Silveira, José Luz, 2019. "Geometrical characteristics of sugarcane bagasse for being used as fuel in fluidized bed technologies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1210-1224.
    15. Garcia, Dorival Pinheiro & Caraschi, José Cláudio & Ventorim, Gustavo & Vieira, Fábio Henrique Antunes & de Paula Protásio, Thiago, 2019. "Assessment of plant biomass for pellet production using multivariate statistics (PCA and HCA)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 796-805.
    16. Nadia Cerone & Francesco Zimbardi, 2021. "Effects of Oxygen and Steam Equivalence Ratios on Updraft Gasification of Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, May.
    17. Natarianto Indrawan & Betty Simkins & Ajay Kumar & Raymond L. Huhnke, 2020. "Economics of Distributed Power Generation via Gasification of Biomass and Municipal Solid Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    18. Howaniec, Natalia & Smoliński, Adam, 2017. "Biowaste utilization in the process of co-gasification with bituminous coal and lignite," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 18-23.
    19. Monteiro, Eliseu & Ramos, Ana & Rouboa, Abel, 2024. "Fundamental designs of gasification plants for combined heat and power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    20. Long, Jimiao & Deng, Lei & Che, Defu, 2020. "Analysis on organic compounds in water leachate from biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1070-1078.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:21:p:7890-:d:951908. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.