IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i18p6577-d1238484.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drilling Deeper in Shallow Geoexchange Heat Pump Systems—Thermogeological, Energy and Hydraulic Benefits and Restraints

Author

Listed:
  • Tomislav Kurevija

    (Faculty of Mining, Geology and Petroleum Engineering, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Marija Macenić

    (Faculty of Mining, Geology and Petroleum Engineering, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Martina Tuschl

    (Croatian Hydrocarbon Agency, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

In the last decade, due to climate change concerns and new environmental regulations in the EU, there was a tremendous rise in installed heat pump systems in new homes and buildings. The majority of these installed units are related to air-source heat pumps, as they offer a good trade-off between capital and operating expenses. However, when analysing heating and cooling heat pump systems from the primary energy consumption and ecological aspects, groundwater and shallow geothermal heat pump systems offer superior efficiency, compared to all market-available thermo-technical systems today. In the last decade, ground-source systems have seen some technological improvement by employing new borehole heat exchanger designs, such as piping with internal fins and a wider diameter (so called Turbocollector) to enhance the heat transfer between fluid and rock, as well as to reduce the pressure drop in the system. Furthermore, the process of drilling deeper offers higher ground temperatures and consequently higher seasonal performance factors in the heating cycle, due to the effect of the geothermal gradient. Nevertheless, although deeper boreholes provide better heat extraction rates per meter during the heat pump heating cycle, at the same time, it reduces heat rejection rates during the heat pump cooling cycle. The objective of this paper is to analyse and evaluate benefits and downsides of a new approach in the heat pump system design with deeper borehole heat exchangers of up to 300 m, comparing it to the traditional design of double-loop exchangers with 100 m depth. The geothermal borehole grid design simulation model, along with heat extraction and rejection, is performed on a yearly basis. The results are showing that the benefits of shallow geothermal boreholes, from the hydraulic and thermodynamic point of view, still dominate over deeper solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomislav Kurevija & Marija Macenić & Martina Tuschl, 2023. "Drilling Deeper in Shallow Geoexchange Heat Pump Systems—Thermogeological, Energy and Hydraulic Benefits and Restraints," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:18:p:6577-:d:1238484
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/18/6577/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/18/6577/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walch, Alina & Mohajeri, Nahid & Gudmundsson, Agust & Scartezzini, Jean-Louis, 2021. "Quantifying the technical geothermal potential from shallow borehole heat exchangers at regional scale," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 369-380.
    2. Seung-Min Lee & Seung-Hoon Park & Yong-Sung Jang & Eui-Jong Kim, 2021. "Proposition of Design Capacity of Borehole Heat Exchangers for Use in the Schematic-Design Stage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Zhang, Changxing & Wang, Xinjie & Sun, Pengkun & Kong, Xiangqiang & Sun, Shicai, 2020. "Effect of depth and fluid flow rate on estimate for borehole thermal resistance of single U-pipe borehole heat exchanger," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 2399-2408.
    4. Macenić, M. & Kurevija, T. & Medved, I., 2020. "Novel geothermal gradient map of the Croatian part of the Pannonian Basin System based on data interpretation from 154 deep exploration wells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    5. Galgaro, Antonio & Farina, Zeno & Emmi, Giuseppe & De Carli, Michele, 2015. "Feasibility analysis of a Borehole Heat Exchanger (BHE) array to be installed in high geothermal flux area: The case of the Euganean Thermal Basin, Italy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 93-104.
    6. Casasso, Alessandro & Sethi, Rajandrea, 2014. "Efficiency of closed loop geothermal heat pumps: A sensitivity analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 737-746.
    7. Tomislav Kurevija & Kristina Strpić & Sonja Koščak-Kolin, 2018. "Applying Petroleum the Pressure Buildup Well Test Procedure on Thermal Response Test—A Novel Method for Analyzing Temperature Recovery Period," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, February.
    8. Jun, Liu & Xu, Zhang & Jun, Gao & Jie, Yang, 2009. "Evaluation of heat exchange rate of GHE in geothermal heat pump systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2898-2904.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Somogyi, Viola & Sebestyén, Viktor & Nagy, Georgina, 2017. "Scientific achievements and regulation of shallow geothermal systems in six European countries – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 934-952.
    2. Joanna Piotrowska-Woroniak, 2021. "Assessment of Ground Regeneration around Borehole Heat Exchangers between Heating Seasons in Cold Climates: A Case Study in Bialystok (NE, Poland)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-32, August.
    3. Joanna Piotrowska-Woroniak, 2021. "Determination of the Selected Wells Operational Power with Borehole Heat Exchangers Operating in Real Conditions, Based on Experimental Tests," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Perego, Rodolfo & Viesi, Diego & Pera, Sebastian & Dalla Santa, Giorgia & Cultrera, Matteo & Visintainer, Paola & Galgaro, Antonio, 2020. "Revision of hydrothermal constraints for the installation of closed-loop shallow geothermal systems through underground investigation, monitoring and modeling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1378-1395.
    5. R.V., Rohit & R., Vipin Raj & Kiplangat, Dennis C. & R., Veena & Jose, Rajan & Pradeepkumar, A.P. & Kumar, K. Satheesh, 2023. "Tracing the evolution and charting the future of geothermal energy research and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    6. Rivera, Jaime A. & Blum, Philipp & Bayer, Peter, 2015. "Analytical simulation of groundwater flow and land surface effects on thermal plumes of borehole heat exchangers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 421-433.
    7. Han, Chanjuan & Yu, Xiong (Bill), 2016. "Performance of a residential ground source heat pump system in sedimentary rock formation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 89-98.
    8. Esa Dube Kerme & Alan S. Fung & Wey H. Leong, 2024. "Analysis of the Combined Effect of Major Influencing Parameters for Designing High-Performance Single (sBHE) and Double (dBHE) U-Tube Borehole Heat Exchangers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-52, May.
    9. Khaled Salhein & C. J. Kobus & Mohamed Zohdy & Ahmed M. Annekaa & Edrees Yahya Alhawsawi & Sabriya Alghennai Salheen, 2024. "Heat Transfer Performance Factors in a Vertical Ground Heat Exchanger for a Geothermal Heat Pump System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-28, October.
    10. Luca Alberti & Adriana Angelotti & Matteo Antelmi & Ivana La Licata, 2017. "A Numerical Study on the Impact of Grouting Material on Borehole Heat Exchangers Performance in Aquifers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-15, May.
    11. Han, Chanjuan & Yu, Xiong (Bill), 2016. "Sensitivity analysis of a vertical geothermal heat pump system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 148-160.
    12. Cassina, Lisa & Laloui, Lyesse & Rotta Loria, Alessandro F., 2022. "Thermal interactions among vertical geothermal borehole fields," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 1204-1220.
    13. Rivera, Jaime A. & Blum, Philipp & Bayer, Peter, 2015. "Ground energy balance for borehole heat exchangers: Vertical fluxes, groundwater and storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1341-1351.
    14. Li, Xiang & Yilmaz, Selin & Patel, Martin K. & Chambers, Jonathan, 2023. "Techno-economic analysis of fifth-generation district heating and cooling combined with seasonal borehole thermal energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    15. Tang, F. & Lahoori, M. & Nowamooz, H. & Rosin-Paumier, S. & Masrouri, F., 2021. "A numerical study into effects of soil compaction and heat storage on thermal performance of a Horizontal Ground Heat Exchanger," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 740-752.
    16. Park, Sangwoo & Lee, Dongseop & Choi, Hyun-Jun & Jung, Kyoungsik & Choi, Hangseok, 2015. "Relative constructability and thermal performance of cast-in-place concrete energy pile: Coil-type GHEX (ground heat exchanger)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 56-66.
    17. Song, Xianzhi & Shi, Yu & Li, Gensheng & Yang, Ruiyue & Xu, Zhengming & Zheng, Rui & Wang, Gaosheng & Lyu, Zehao, 2017. "Heat extraction performance simulation for various configurations of a downhole heat exchanger geothermal system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1489-1503.
    18. Shen, Junhao & Zhou, Chaohui & Luo, Yongqiang & Tian, Zhiyong & Zhang, Shicong & Fan, Jianhua & Ling, Zhang, 2023. "Comprehensive thermal performance analysis and optimization study on U-type deep borehole ground source heat pump systems based on a new analytical model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    19. Eloisa Di Sipio & David Bertermann, 2017. "Factors Influencing the Thermal Efficiency of Horizontal Ground Heat Exchangers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.
    20. Hossein Javadi & Seyed Soheil Mousavi Ajarostaghi & Marc A. Rosen & Mohsen Pourfallah, 2018. "A Comprehensive Review of Backfill Materials and Their Effects on Ground Heat Exchanger Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:18:p:6577-:d:1238484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.