IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i13p5149-d1186364.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selection of Organic Fluid Based on Exergetic Performance of Subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for Warm Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Ehtisham Siddiqui

    (Mechanical Engineering Department, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

  • Eydhah Almatrafi

    (K. A. CARE Energy Research and Innovation Center, Centre of Excellence in Desalination Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering-Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

  • Usman Saeed

    (Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

  • Aqeel Ahmad Taimoor

    (Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The organic Rankine cycle (ORC) exhibits considerable promise in efficiently utilizing low-to-medium-grade heat. Currently, there is a range of organic fluids available in the market, and selecting the appropriate one for a specific application involves considering factors such as the cycle’s thermodynamic performance, plant size, and compatibility with turbomachinery. The objective of our study is to examine the exergetic performance of the ORC with internal heat regeneration. We analyze 12 different organic fluids to evaluate their suitability based on parameters like exergy efficiency and heat exchange area requirements. Additionally, we investigate the need for internal heat regeneration by comparing the overall exergy performance with a simpler ORC configuration. To ensure broad applicability, we consider source temperatures ranging from 150 to 300 °C, which are relevant to industrial waste heat, geothermal sources, and solar energy. For each case, we calculate specific net power output and the UA value (heat exchanger conductance) to gain insights into selecting the appropriate organic fluid for specific source temperatures. Cyclohexane, benzene, isopropyl alcohol, and hexafluorobenzene show poor exergy efficiency due to their high boiling points. Pentane and cyclopentane provides the highest exergy efficiency of 62.2% at source temperature of 300 °C, whereas pentane is found to be the most suitable at source temperatures of 200 and 150 °C with exergy efficiency of 67.7% and 61.7%, respectively. At 200 °C source temperature, RE347mcc achieves 65.9% exergy efficiency. The choice of organic fluid for a given heat source is highly influenced by its critical properties. Moreover, the normal boiling temperature of the organic fluid significantly impacts exergy destruction during the condensation process within the cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Ehtisham Siddiqui & Eydhah Almatrafi & Usman Saeed & Aqeel Ahmad Taimoor, 2023. "Selection of Organic Fluid Based on Exergetic Performance of Subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for Warm Regions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-14, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:13:p:5149-:d:1186364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/13/5149/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/13/5149/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuan Zhao & Chenghao Gao & Chengjun Li & Jie Sun & Chunyan Wang & Qiang Liu & Jun Zhao, 2022. "Energy and Exergy Analyses of Geothermal Organic Rankine Cycles Considering the Effect of Brine Reinjection Temperature," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Hærvig, J. & Sørensen, K. & Condra, T.J., 2016. "Guidelines for optimal selection of working fluid for an organic Rankine cycle in relation to waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 592-602.
    3. Toffolo, Andrea & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Manente, Giovanni & Paci, Marco, 2014. "A multi-criteria approach for the optimal selection of working fluid and design parameters in Organic Rankine Cycle systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 219-232.
    4. Xu, Weicong & Zhao, Li & Mao, Samuel S. & Deng, Shuai, 2020. "Towards novel low temperature thermodynamic cycle: A critical review originated from organic Rankine cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    5. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2013. "A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 325-342.
    6. Wang, E.H. & Zhang, H.G. & Fan, B.Y. & Ouyang, M.G. & Zhao, Y. & Mu, Q.H., 2011. "Study of working fluid selection of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3406-3418.
    7. Xu, Weicong & Zhao, Ruikai & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Li & Mao, Samuel S., 2021. "Is zeotropic working fluid a promising option for organic Rankine cycle: A quantitative evaluation based on literature data," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ivan Korolija & Richard Greenough, 2016. "Modelling the Influence of Climate on the Performance of the Organic Rankine Cycle for Industrial Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen & Liu, Qiang, 2018. "Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 409-421.
    3. Muhammad Tauseef Nasir & Michael Chukwuemeka Ekwonu & Yoonseong Park & Javad Abolfazli Esfahani & Kyung Chun Kim, 2021. "Assessment of a District Trigeneration Biomass Powered Double Organic Rankine Cycle as Primed Mover and Supported Cooling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, February.
    4. Muhammad Tauseef Nasir & Michael Chukwuemeka Ekwonu & Javad Abolfazali Esfahani & Kyung Chun Kim, 2021. "Integrated Vapor Compression Chiller with Bottoming Organic Rankine Cycle and Onsite Low-Grade Renewable Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-41, October.
    5. Fuhaid Alshammari & Apostolos Karvountzis-Kontakiotis & Apostolos Pesyridis & Muhammad Usman, 2018. "Expander Technologies for Automotive Engine Organic Rankine Cycle Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-36, July.
    6. Juan A. White & Santiago Velasco, 2019. "Approximating the Temperature–Entropy Saturation Curve of ORC Working Fluids From the Ideal Gas Isobaric Heat Capacity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-14, August.
    7. Antonio Mariani & Biagio Morrone & Davide Laiso & Maria Vittoria Prati & Andrea Unich, 2022. "Waste Heat Recovery in a Compression Ignition Engine for Marine Application Using a Rankine Cycle Operating with an Innovative Organic Working Fluid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-18, October.
    8. Zhou, Feng & Joshi, Shailesh N. & Rhote-Vaney, Raphael & Dede, Ercan M., 2017. "A review and future application of Rankine Cycle to passenger vehicles for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1008-1021.
    9. Bamorovat Abadi, Gholamreza & Kim, Kyung Chun, 2017. "Investigation of organic Rankine cycles with zeotropic mixtures as a working fluid: Advantages and issues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1000-1013.
    10. Siddiqui, Muhammad Ehtisham & Almatrafi, Eydhah & Bamasag, Ahmad & Saeed, Usman, 2022. "Adoption of CO2-based binary mixture to operate transcritical Rankine cycle in warm regions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 1372-1380.
    11. Wu, Xialai & Chen, Junghui & Xie, Lei, 2019. "Fast economic nonlinear model predictive control strategy of Organic Rankine Cycle for waste heat recovery: Simulation-based studies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 520-534.
    12. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2017. "Integrated thermoeconomic optimization of standard and regenerative ORC for different heat source types and capacities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 570-598.
    13. Niu, Jintao & Wang, Jiansheng & Liu, Xueling, 2023. "Thermodynamic and economic analysis of organic Rankine cycle combined with flash cycle and ejector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    14. Larsen, Ulrik & Pierobon, Leonardo & Wronski, Jorrit & Haglind, Fredrik, 2014. "Multiple regression models for the prediction of the maximum obtainable thermal efficiency of organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 503-510.
    15. Yu, Haoshui & Eason, John & Biegler, Lorenz T. & Feng, Xiao, 2017. "Simultaneous heat integration and techno-economic optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for multiple waste heat stream recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 322-333.
    16. Li, Jing & Alvi, Jahan Zeb & Pei, Gang & Su, Yuehong & Li, Pengcheng & Gao, Guangtao & Ji, Jie, 2016. "Modelling of organic Rankine cycle efficiency with respect to the equivalent hot side temperature," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 668-683.
    17. van Kleef, Luuk M.T. & Oyewunmi, Oyeniyi A. & Markides, Christos N., 2019. "Multi-objective thermo-economic optimization of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) power systems in waste-heat recovery applications using computer-aided molecular design techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    18. Emily Spayde & Pedro J. Mago & Heejin Cho, 2017. "Performance Evaluation of a Solar-Powered Regenerative Organic Rankine Cycle in Different Climate Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.
    19. Chintala, Venkateswarlu & Kumar, Suresh & Pandey, Jitendra K., 2018. "A technical review on waste heat recovery from compression ignition engines using organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 493-509.
    20. Kazemi, Shabnam & Nor, Mohamad Iskandr Mohamad & Teoh, Wen Hui, 2020. "Thermodynamic and economic investigation of an ionic liquid as a new proposed geothermal fluid in different organic Rankine cycles for energy production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:13:p:5149-:d:1186364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.