IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i12p4771-d1173055.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing Resilience Aspects of Operation Options for Offshore Wind Farms beyond the End-of-Life

Author

Listed:
  • Corinna Köpke

    (Fraunhofer Institute for High-Speed Dynamics, Ernst-Mach-Institut, EMI, Am Klingelberg 1, 79588 Efringen-Kirchen, Germany)

  • Jennifer Mielniczek

    (Independent Researcher, Hedwig-Augustin-Str. 27, 25348 Glückstadt, Germany)

  • Alexander Stolz

    (Department of Sustainable Systems Engineering, INATECH, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Emmy-Noether-Straße 2, 79110 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany)

Abstract

An anticipated challenge for the offshore wind industry is the legally standardized decommissioning of offshore wind infrastructure after the expiration of the respective approval period. To meet the energy and climate targets set by, e.g., the German Federal Government, this challenge must be mastered in the context of sustainability. Potential concepts are (i) the deconstruction of offshore infrastructure without replacement, (ii) the continued operation of the plants, (iii) partially or even completely replacing them with newer, modernized plants (re-powering). Re-powering could also be a combination of existing infrastructures with other innovative technologies, such as hydrogen. In this work, the three concepts are analyzed along with their risks and additional factors, such as feasibility, cost-effectiveness, predictability of technological progress, and, planning security, are discussed. A quantitative risk and resilience analysis is conceptually demonstrated for the specific risk of extreme weather and wave conditions caused by climate change. Synthetic wave height data are generated and the corresponding load changes are applied to example offshore wind farms. The three end-of-life options are compared using resilience indicators that serve as exemplary measures for the energy output, which serves as the key performance indicator.

Suggested Citation

  • Corinna Köpke & Jennifer Mielniczek & Alexander Stolz, 2023. "Testing Resilience Aspects of Operation Options for Offshore Wind Farms beyond the End-of-Life," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-12, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:12:p:4771-:d:1173055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/12/4771/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/12/4771/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heping Xie & Zhiyu Zhao & Tao Liu & Yifan Wu & Cheng Lan & Wenchuan Jiang & Liangyu Zhu & Yunpeng Wang & Dongsheng Yang & Zongping Shao, 2022. "A membrane-based seawater electrolyser for hydrogen generation," Nature, Nature, vol. 612(7941), pages 673-678, December.
    2. Ebbe Bagge Paulsen & Peter Enevoldsen, 2021. "A Multidisciplinary Review of Recycling Methods for End-of-Life Wind Turbine Blades," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-13, July.
    3. Renjie Mo & Haigui Kang & Miao Li & Xuanlie Zhao, 2017. "Seismic Fragility Analysis of Monopile Offshore Wind Turbines under Different Operational Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Maria Martinez Luengo & Athanasios Kolios, 2015. "Failure Mode Identification and End of Life Scenarios of Offshore Wind Turbines: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Charlton, T.S. & Rouainia, M., 2022. "Geotechnical fragility analysis of monopile foundations for offshore wind turbines in extreme storms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 1126-1140.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wu, Jingyi & Yu, Yang & Jin, Zihang & Zhang, Wenhao, 2024. "Multi-dimensional resilience assessment framework of offshore structure under mooring failure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    2. Vetters, Jade & Thomassen, Gwenny & Van Passel, Steven, 2024. "Sailing through end-of-life challenges: A comprehensive review for offshore wind," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hao Shi & Tanyuan Wang & Jianyun Liu & Weiwei Chen & Shenzhou Li & Jiashun Liang & Shuxia Liu & Xuan Liu & Zhao Cai & Chao Wang & Dong Su & Yunhui Huang & Lior Elbaz & Qing Li, 2023. "A sodium-ion-conducted asymmetric electrolyzer to lower the operation voltage for direct seawater electrolysis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Leimeister, Mareike & Kolios, Athanasios, 2018. "A review of reliability-based methods for risk analysis and their application in the offshore wind industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1065-1076.
    3. Caputo, Antonio C. & Federici, Alessandro & Pelagagge, Pacifico M. & Salini, Paolo, 2023. "Offshore wind power system economic evaluation framework under aleatory and epistemic uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    4. Rubert, T. & Zorzi, G. & Fusiek, G. & Niewczas, P. & McMillan, D. & McAlorum, J. & Perry, M., 2019. "Wind turbine lifetime extension decision-making based on structural health monitoring," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 611-621.
    5. Albara M. Mustafa & Abbas Barabadi, 2022. "Criteria-Based Fuzzy Logic Risk Analysis of Wind Farms Operation in Cold Climate Regions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Jannie Sønderkær Nielsen & Lindsay Miller-Branovacki & Rupp Carriveau, 2021. "Probabilistic and Risk-Informed Life Extension Assessment of Wind Turbine Structural Components," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Jijian Lian & Ou Cai & Xiaofeng Dong & Qi Jiang & Yue Zhao, 2019. "Health Monitoring and Safety Evaluation of the Offshore Wind Turbine Structure: A Review and Discussion of Future Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-29, January.
    8. Li, Dayong & Zhao, Jipeng & Wu, Yuqi & Zhang, Yukun & Liang, Hao, 2024. "An innovative bionic offshore wind foundation: Scaled suction caisson," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    9. Li, Chen & Mogollón, José M. & Tukker, Arnold & Dong, Jianning & von Terzi, Dominic & Zhang, Chunbo & Steubing, Bernhard, 2022. "Future material requirements for global sustainable offshore wind energy development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    10. Renqiang Xi & Piguang Wang & Xiuli Du & Chengshun Xu & Junbo Jia, 2020. "Evaluation of an Uncoupled Method for Analyzing the Seismic Response of Wind Turbines Excited by Wind and Earthquake Loads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-27, July.
    11. Gennitsaris, Stavros & Sagani, Angeliki & Sofianopoulou, Stella & Dedoussis, Vassilis, 2023. "Integrated LCA and DEA approach for circular economy-driven performance evaluation of wind turbine end-of-life treatment options," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 339(C).
    12. Maria Martinez-Luengo & Mahmood Shafiee, 2019. "Guidelines and Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Structural Health Monitoring Implementation in Offshore Wind Turbine Support Structures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-26, March.
    13. Chenhui Zhou & Jia Shi & Zhaoqi Dong & Lingyou Zeng & Yan Chen & Ying Han & Lu Li & Wenyu Zhang & Qinghua Zhang & Lin Gu & Fan Lv & Mingchuan Luo & Shaojun Guo, 2024. "Oxophilic gallium single atoms bridged ruthenium clusters for practical anion-exchange membrane electrolyzer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    14. Hon Chung Lau, 2022. "Decarbonizing Thailand’s Economy: A Proposal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-31, December.
    15. Lund, K.W. & Madsen, E.S., 2024. "State-of-the-art value chain roadmap for sustainable end-of-life wind turbine blades," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    16. Hailun Xie & Lars Johanning, 2023. "A Hierarchical Met-Ocean Data Selection Model for Fast O&M Simulation in Offshore Renewable Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, February.
    17. Li, Ming & Luo, Haojie & Zhou, Shijie & Senthil Kumar, Gokula Manikandan & Guo, Xinman & Law, Tin Chung & Cao, Sunliang, 2022. "State-of-the-art review of the flexibility and feasibility of emerging offshore and coastal ocean energy technologies in East and Southeast Asia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    18. Mengjun Xiao & Qianbao Wu & Ruiqi Ku & Liujiang Zhou & Chang Long & Junwu Liang & Andraž Mavrič & Lei Li & Jing Zhu & Matjaz Valant & Jiong Li & Zhenhua Zeng & Chunhua Cui, 2023. "Self-adaptive amorphous CoOxCly electrocatalyst for sustainable chlorine evolution in acidic brine," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    19. Manisha Sawant & Sameer Thakare & A. Prabhakara Rao & Andrés E. Feijóo-Lorenzo & Neeraj Dhanraj Bokde, 2021. "A Review on State-of-the-Art Reviews in Wind-Turbine- and Wind-Farm-Related Topics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-30, April.
    20. Sixie Zhang & Yunan Wang & Shuyu Li & Zhongfeng Wang & Haocheng Chen & Li Yi & Xu Chen & Qihao Yang & Wenwen Xu & Aiying Wang & Zhiyi Lu, 2023. "Concerning the stability of seawater electrolysis: a corrosion mechanism study of halide on Ni-based anode," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:12:p:4771-:d:1173055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.