IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i7p1037-d105402.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Seismic Fragility Analysis of Monopile Offshore Wind Turbines under Different Operational Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Renjie Mo

    (State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Haigui Kang

    (State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Miao Li

    (Engineering, Faculty of Business, Justice and Behavioural Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Panorama Avenue, Bathurst, NSW 2795, Australia)

  • Xuanlie Zhao

    (State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

Abstract

Offshore wind turbines in seismic active areas suffer from earthquake impacts. In this study, seismic fragility analysis of a monopile offshore wind turbine considering different operational conditions was performed. A finite element model for a 5 MW monopile offshore wind turbine was developed using the OpenSees platform. The interaction between the monopile and the seabed soil was modeled as a beam-on-nonlinear-winkler-foundation (BNWF). A nonlinear time history truncated incremental dynamic analysis (TIDA) was conducted to obtain seismic responses and engineering demand parameters. Potential damage states (DSs) were defined as excessive displacement at the nacelle, rotation at the tower top, and the allowable and yield stresses at the transition piece. Fragility curves were plotted to assess the probability of exceeding different damage states. It was found that seismic responses of the wind turbine are considerably influenced by environmental wind and wave loads. Subject to earthquake motions, wind turbines in normal operation at the rated wind speed experience higher levels of probability of exceeding damage states than those in other operational conditions, i.e., in idling or operating at higher or lower wind speed conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Renjie Mo & Haigui Kang & Miao Li & Xuanlie Zhao, 2017. "Seismic Fragility Analysis of Monopile Offshore Wind Turbines under Different Operational Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-22, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:7:p:1037-:d:105402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/7/1037/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/7/1037/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cheng-Yu Ku & Lien-Kwei Chien, 2016. "Modeling of Load Bearing Characteristics of Jacket Foundation Piles for Offshore Wind Turbines in Taiwan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Liu, Xiong & Lu, Cheng & Li, Gangqiang & Godbole, Ajit & Chen, Yan, 2017. "Effects of aerodynamic damping on the tower load of offshore horizontal axis wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1101-1114.
    3. Carswell, W. & Johansson, J. & Løvholt, F. & Arwade, S.R. & Madshus, C. & DeGroot, D.J. & Myers, A.T., 2015. "Foundation damping and the dynamics of offshore wind turbine monopiles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 724-736.
    4. Kim, Dong Hyawn & Lee, Sang Geun & Lee, Il Keun, 2014. "Seismic fragility analysis of 5 MW offshore wind turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 250-256.
    5. Abhinav, K.A. & Saha, Nilanjan, 2017. "Stochastic response of jacket supported offshore wind turbines for varying soil parameters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 550-564.
    6. Yu-Kai Wang & Juin-Fu Chai & Yu-Wen Chang & Ti-Ying Huang & Yu-Shu Kuo, 2016. "Development of Seismic Demand for Chang-Bin Offshore Wind Farm in Taiwan Strait," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Koukoura, Christina & Natarajan, Anand & Vesth, Allan, 2015. "Identification of support structure damping of a full scale offshore wind turbine in normal operation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 882-895.
    8. Asareh, Mohammad-Amin & Schonberg, William & Volz, Jeffery, 2016. "Effects of seismic and aerodynamic load interaction on structural dynamic response of multi-megawatt utility scale horizontal axis wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 49-58.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Renqiang Xi & Piguang Wang & Xiuli Du & Chengshun Xu & Junbo Jia, 2020. "Evaluation of an Uncoupled Method for Analyzing the Seismic Response of Wind Turbines Excited by Wind and Earthquake Loads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-27, July.
    2. Mo, Renjie & Cao, Renjing & Liu, Minghou & Li, Miao, 2021. "Effect of ground motion directionality on seismic dynamic responses of monopile offshore wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 179-199.
    3. Antonio Casimiro Caputo & Alessandro Federici & Pacifico Marcello Pelagagge & Paolo Salini, 2023. "Scenario Analysis of Offshore Wind-Power Systems under Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Li, Ming & Luo, Haojie & Zhou, Shijie & Senthil Kumar, Gokula Manikandan & Guo, Xinman & Law, Tin Chung & Cao, Sunliang, 2022. "State-of-the-art review of the flexibility and feasibility of emerging offshore and coastal ocean energy technologies in East and Southeast Asia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    5. Chenyang Yuan & Yunfei Xie & Jing Li & Weifeng Bai & Haohao Li, 2022. "Influence of the Number of Ground Motions on Fragility Analysis of 5 MW Wind Turbines Subjected to Aerodynamic and Seismic Loads Interaction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Corinna Köpke & Jennifer Mielniczek & Alexander Stolz, 2023. "Testing Resilience Aspects of Operation Options for Offshore Wind Farms beyond the End-of-Life," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-12, June.
    7. Fitzgerald, Breiffni & McAuliffe, James & Baisthakur, Shubham & Sarkar, Saptarshi, 2023. "Enhancing the reliability of floating offshore wind turbine towers subjected to misaligned wind-wave loading using tuned mass damper inerters (TMDIs)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 522-538.
    8. Jian Zhang & Guo-Kai Yuan & Songye Zhu & Quan Gu & Shitang Ke & Jinghua Lin, 2022. "Seismic Analysis of 10 MW Offshore Wind Turbine with Large-Diameter Monopile in Consideration of Seabed Liquefaction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-31, March.
    9. Yang, Yang & Bashir, Musa & Li, Chun & Michailides, Constantine & Wang, Jin, 2020. "Mitigation of coupled wind-wave-earthquake responses of a 10 MW fixed-bottom offshore wind turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 1171-1184.
    10. Georgios Malliotakis & Panagiotis Alevras & Charalampos Baniotopoulos, 2021. "Recent Advances in Vibration Control Methods for Wind Turbine Towers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-37, November.
    11. Caputo, Antonio C. & Federici, Alessandro & Pelagagge, Pacifico M. & Salini, Paolo, 2023. "Offshore wind power system economic evaluation framework under aleatory and epistemic uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cong, Shuai & James Hu, Sau-Lon & Li, Hua-Jun, 2022. "Using incomplete complex modes for model updating of monopiled offshore wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 522-534.
    2. Mo, Renjie & Cao, Renjing & Liu, Minghou & Li, Miao, 2021. "Effect of ground motion directionality on seismic dynamic responses of monopile offshore wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 179-199.
    3. Meng, Jiayao & Dai, Kaoshan & Zhao, Zhi & Mao, Zhenxi & Camara, Alfredo & Zhang, Songhan & Mei, Zhu, 2020. "Study on the aerodynamic damping for the seismic analysis of wind turbines in operation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 1224-1242.
    4. Liu, Wenyi, 2016. "Design and kinetic analysis of wind turbine blade-hub-tower coupled system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 547-557.
    5. Renqiang Xi & Piguang Wang & Xiuli Du & Chengshun Xu & Junbo Jia, 2020. "Evaluation of an Uncoupled Method for Analyzing the Seismic Response of Wind Turbines Excited by Wind and Earthquake Loads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-27, July.
    6. He, Kunpeng & Ye, Jianhong, 2023. "Seismic dynamics of offshore wind turbine-seabed foundation: Insights from a numerical study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 200-221.
    7. Chen, Chao & Duffour, Philippe & Fromme, Paul & Hua, Xugang, 2021. "Numerically efficient fatigue life prediction of offshore wind turbines using aerodynamic decoupling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 1421-1434.
    8. Yang, Yang & Bashir, Musa & Li, Chun & Michailides, Constantine & Wang, Jin, 2020. "Mitigation of coupled wind-wave-earthquake responses of a 10 MW fixed-bottom offshore wind turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 1171-1184.
    9. Rezaei, Ramtin & Fromme, Paul & Duffour, Philippe, 2018. "Fatigue life sensitivity of monopile-supported offshore wind turbines to damping," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 450-459.
    10. Wang, Xuefei & Yang, Xu & Zeng, Xiangwu, 2017. "Seismic centrifuge modelling of suction bucket foundation for offshore wind turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 1013-1022.
    11. Meng, Qingshen & Hua, Xugang & Chen, Chao & Zhou, Shuai & Liu, Feipeng & Chen, Zhengqing, 2022. "Analytical study on the aerodynamic and hydrodynamic damping of the platform in an operating spar-type floating offshore wind turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 772-788.
    12. Pim van der Male & Marco Vergassola & Karel N. van Dalen, 2020. "Decoupled Modelling Approaches for Environmental Interactions with Monopile-Based Offshore Wind Support Structures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-35, October.
    13. Chenyang Yuan & Yunfei Xie & Jing Li & Weifeng Bai & Haohao Li, 2022. "Influence of the Number of Ground Motions on Fragility Analysis of 5 MW Wind Turbines Subjected to Aerodynamic and Seismic Loads Interaction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    14. Alberto Maria Avossa & Cristoforo Demartino & Pasquale Contestabile & Francesco Ricciardelli & Diego Vicinanza, 2017. "Some Results on the Vulnerability Assessment of HAWTs Subjected to Wind and Seismic Actions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-16, August.
    15. Yuan, Chenyang & Chen, Jianyun & Li, Jing & Xu, Qiang, 2017. "Fragility analysis of large-scale wind turbines under the combination of seismic and aerodynamic loads," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1122-1134.
    16. Zuo, Haoran & Bi, Kaiming & Hao, Hong & Xin, Yu & Li, Jun & Li, Chao, 2020. "Fragility analyses of offshore wind turbines subjected to aerodynamic and sea wave loadings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1269-1282.
    17. Jian Zhang & Guo-Kai Yuan & Songye Zhu & Quan Gu & Shitang Ke & Jinghua Lin, 2022. "Seismic Analysis of 10 MW Offshore Wind Turbine with Large-Diameter Monopile in Consideration of Seabed Liquefaction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-31, March.
    18. Lee, Yeon-Seung & González, José A. & Lee, Ji Hyun & Kim, Young Il & Park, K.C. & Han, Soonhung, 2016. "Structural topology optimization of the transition piece for an offshore wind turbine with jacket foundation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1214-1225.
    19. Seo, Junwon & Pokhrel, Jharna & Hu, Jong Wan, 2022. "Multi-Hazard Fragility Analysis of Offshore Wind Turbine Portfolios using Surrogate Models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    20. Wen, Binrong & Jiang, Zhihao & Li, Zhanwei & Peng, Zhike & Dong, Xingjian & Tian, Xinliang, 2022. "On the aerodynamic loading effect of a model Spar-type floating wind turbine: An experimental study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 306-319.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:7:p:1037-:d:105402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.