IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i10p3971-d1142295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biogas Production from Arthrospira platensis Biomass

Author

Listed:
  • Małgorzata Hawrot-Paw

    (Department of Renewable Energy Engineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Pawla VI 1, 71-459 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Adam Koniuszy

    (Department of Renewable Energy Engineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Pawla VI 1, 71-459 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Patryk Ratomski

    (Department of Renewable Energy Engineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Pawla VI 1, 71-459 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Magdalena Sąsiadek

    (Department of Renewable Energy Engineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Pawla VI 1, 71-459 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Andrzej Gawlik

    (Department of Renewable Energy Engineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Pawla VI 1, 71-459 Szczecin, Poland)

Abstract

Biogas production by fermentation is a relatively low-cost and simple method for the transformation of a substrate into an energy carrier with a wide range of possible applications. The aim of this study was to determine the potential of Arthrospira platensis biomass as a source of bioenergy produced during anaerobic digestion (AD). The studies were carried out on a fractional-technical scale. Biogas yield and composition were analyzed as a function of the amount of biomass subjected to anaerobic digestion, the substrate dosing frequency in the digester and the use of biomass pre-hydrolysis in the mixing compartment. The energy efficiency of the process was also compared for each sample. In addition, a biomass conversion power index was developed and determined. It was found that A. platensis biomass had significant energy potential, and the amount of biogas obtained and its calorific value changed depending on the applied treatments. The maximum cumulative biogas production was 505 L kg −1 volatile solids (VS), while the maximum average methane (CH 4 ) content was 67.32%. A two-fold increase in the organic loading rate from 1 g VS·L −1 volatile solids (VS) to 2 g VS·L −1 had a positive effect on methane concentration. The highest energy efficiency of the AD process was obtained for 2 g VS·L −1 , with a single feedstock input into the digester, in a single-stage process (2/s/-), while the highest conversion power ratio was for a feedstock of 1 g VS·L −1 , under the same process conditions (1/s/-). Moreover, the energy efficiency of the microalgae fermentation process obtained in the study is higher compared to conventional substrates used in biogas plants. This energy analysis can support the selection of cogeneration power engines in a biogas plant and help to determine the potential output of the biogas plant, especially with varying energy and heat demand.

Suggested Citation

  • Małgorzata Hawrot-Paw & Adam Koniuszy & Patryk Ratomski & Magdalena Sąsiadek & Andrzej Gawlik, 2023. "Biogas Production from Arthrospira platensis Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-12, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:10:p:3971-:d:1142295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/10/3971/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/10/3971/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frigon, Jean-Claude & Matteau-Lebrun, Frédérique & Hamani Abdou, Rekia & McGinn, Patrick J. & O’Leary, Stephen J.B. & Guiot, Serge R., 2013. "Screening microalgae strains for their productivity in methane following anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 100-107.
    2. Barik, Debabrata & Murugan, S., 2014. "Investigation on combustion performance and emission characteristics of a DI (direct injection) diesel engine fueled with biogas–diesel in dual fuel mode," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 760-771.
    3. Roberts, Keiron P. & Heaven, Sonia & Banks, Charles J., 2016. "Comparative testing of energy yields from micro-algal biomass cultures processed via anaerobic digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P1), pages 744-753.
    4. Raúl Barros & Sara Raposo & Etiele G. Morais & Brígida Rodrigues & Valdemira Afonso & Pedro Gonçalves & José Marques & Paulo Ricardo Cerqueira & João Varela & Margarida Ribau Teixeira & Luísa Barreira, 2022. "Biogas Production from Microalgal Biomass Produced in the Tertiary Treatment of Urban Wastewater: Assessment of Seasonal Variations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-10, August.
    5. Grigorios Rekleitis & Katherine-Joanne Haralambous & Maria Loizidou & Konstantinos Aravossis, 2020. "Utilization of Agricultural and Livestock Waste in Anaerobic Digestion (A.D): Applying the Biorefinery Concept in a Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Alexandros Eftaxias & Evangelia Anna Passa & Christos Michailidis & Christodoulos Daoutis & Apostolos Kantartzis & Vasileios Diamantis, 2022. "Residual Forest Biomass in Pinus Stands: Accumulation and Biogas Production Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-11, July.
    7. Wu, Di & Li, Lei & Zhao, Xiaofei & Peng, Yun & Yang, Pingjin & Peng, Xuya, 2019. "Anaerobic digestion: A review on process monitoring," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 1-12.
    8. Cherubini, Francesco & Bird, Neil D. & Cowie, Annette & Jungmeier, Gerfried & Schlamadinger, Bernhard & Woess-Gallasch, Susanne, 2009. "Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 434-447.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ratikorn Sornumpol & Dang Saebea & Amornchai Arpornwichanop & Yaneeporn Patcharavorachot, 2023. "Process Optimization and CO 2 Emission Analysis of Coal/Biomass Gasification Integrated with a Chemical Looping Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Mendez, Lara & Mahdy, Ahmed & Ballesteros, Mercedes & González-Fernández, Cristina, 2014. "Methane production of thermally pretreated Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus sp. biomass at increasing biomass loads," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 238-242.
    3. Chintala, V. & Subramanian, K.A., 2015. "Experimental investigations on effect of different compression ratios on enhancement of maximum hydrogen energy share in a compression ignition engine under dual-fuel mode," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 448-462.
    4. Roopnarain, Ashira & Rama, Haripriya & Ndaba, Busiswa & Bello-Akinosho, Maryam & Bamuza-Pemu, Emomotimi & Adeleke, Rasheed, 2021. "Unravelling the anaerobic digestion ‘black box’: Biotechnological approaches for process optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    5. Rives, Jesús & Fernandez-Rodriguez, Ivan & Gabarrell, Xavier & Rieradevall, Joan, 2012. "Environmental analysis of cork granulate production in Catalonia – Northern Spain," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 132-142.
    6. Wei, Zhilong & Zhen, Haisheng & Leung, Chunwah & Cheung, Chunshun & Huang, Zuohua, 2020. "Effects of unburned gases velocity on the CO/NO2/NOx formations and overall emissions of laminar premixed biogas-hydrogen impinging flame," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    7. Luo, Erga & Yan, Ru & He, Yaping & Han, Zhen & Feng, Yiyu & Qian, Wenrong & Li, Jinkai, 2024. "Does biogas industrial policy promote the industrial transformation?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    8. Seber, Gonca & Escobar, Neus & Valin, Hugo & Malina, Robert, 2022. "Uncertainty in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of sustainable aviation fuels from vegetable oils," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    9. Xiaojun Liu & Thomas Lendormi & Jean-Louis Lanoisellé, 2021. "Conventional and Innovative Hygienization of Feedstock for Biogas Production: Resistance of Indicator Bacteria to Thermal Pasteurization, Pulsed Electric Field Treatment, and Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Talibi, Midhat & Hellier, Paul & Ladommatos, Nicos, 2017. "Combustion and exhaust emission characteristics, and in-cylinder gas composition, of hydrogen enriched biogas mixtures in a diesel engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 397-412.
    11. Padi, Richard Kingsley & Douglas, Sean & Murphy, Fionnuala, 2023. "Techno-economic potentials of integrating decentralised biomethane production systems into existing natural gas grids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    12. Watanabe, Hideo & Li, Dalin & Nakagawa, Yoshinao & Tomishige, Keiichi & Kaya, Kunimitsu & Watanabe, Makoto M., 2014. "Characterization of oil-extracted residue biomass of Botryococcus braunii as a biofuel feedstock and its pyrolytic behavior," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 475-484.
    13. Alberto Benato & Chiara D’Alpaos & Alarico Macor, 2022. "Possible Ways of Extending the Biogas Plants Lifespan after the Feed-In Tariff Expiration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-23, October.
    14. Zygmunt Stanula & Marek Wieruszewski & Adam Zydroń & Krzysztof Adamowicz, 2023. "Optimizing Forest-Biomass-Distribution Logistics from a Multi-Level Perspective—Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-17, December.
    15. Raja Chowdhury & Nidia Caetano & Matthew J. Franchetti & Kotnoor Hariprasad, 2023. "Life Cycle Based GHG Emissions from Algae Based Bioenergy with a Special Emphasis on Climate Change Indicators and Their Uses in Dynamic LCA: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    16. Kozarac, Darko & Taritas, Ivan & Vuilleumier, David & Saxena, Samveg & Dibble, Robert W., 2016. "Experimental and numerical analysis of the performance and exhaust gas emissions of a biogas/n-heptane fueled HCCI engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 180-193.
    17. Georgia-Christina Mitraka & Konstantinos N. Kontogiannopoulos & Maria Batsioula & George F. Banias & Anastasios I. Zouboulis & Panagiotis G. Kougias, 2022. "A Comprehensive Review on Pretreatment Methods for Enhanced Biogas Production from Sewage Sludge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-56, September.
    18. Li, C.Y. & Deethayat, T. & Wu, J.Y. & Kiatsiriroat, T. & Wang, R.Z., 2018. "Simulation and evaluation of a biomass gasification-based combined cooling, heating, and power system integrated with an organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 238-255.
    19. Krzysztof Biernat & Izabela Samson-Bręk & Zdzisław Chłopek & Marlena Owczuk & Anna Matuszewska, 2021. "Assessment of the Environmental Impact of Using Methane Fuels to Supply Internal Combustion Engines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, June.
    20. Budzianowski, Wojciech M., 2016. "A review of potential innovations for production, conditioning and utilization of biogas with multiple-criteria assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1148-1171.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:10:p:3971-:d:1142295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.