IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i6p2728-d1097579.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Process Optimization and CO 2 Emission Analysis of Coal/Biomass Gasification Integrated with a Chemical Looping Process

Author

Listed:
  • Ratikorn Sornumpol

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand)

  • Dang Saebea

    (Research Unit of Developing Technology and Innovation of Alternative Energy for Industries, Burapha University, Chonburi 20131, Thailand)

  • Amornchai Arpornwichanop

    (Center of Excellence in Process and Energy Systems Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand)

  • Yaneeporn Patcharavorachot

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand)

Abstract

Biomass gasification is an attractive technology and one of the pathways for producing hydrogen. Due to the variable seasons and low calorific value of biomass, the addition of coal in the gasifier is suggested because coal has a high calorific value and carbon-to-hydrogen ratio. In general, the gaseous product obtained in gasification always contains a high amount of carbon dioxide, therefore, the co-gasification of biomass and coal should integrate with the calcium looping carbon dioxide capture process to provide purified hydrogen. In this work, the model of the co-gasification of biomass and coal integrated with the calcium looping carbon dioxide capture process was developed through an Aspen Plus simulator. The developed model was used to analyze the performance of this process. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated that increasing the gasification temperature, steam-to-feed (S/F) ratio, calcium oxide-to-feed (CaO/F) ratio, and regenerator temperature could improve hydrogen production. Next, further optimization was performed to identify the optimal operating condition that maximizes hydrogen production. The results showed that the optimal operating temperature of the gasifier is 700 °C with an S/F mass ratio of 2 and coal to biomass (C/B) mass ratio of 0.75:0.25. However, the carbonator and regenerator temperatures should be 450 °C and 950 °C, respectively, with a CaO/F mass ratio of 3. Under these operating conditions, the maximum H 2 content and H 2 yield can be provided as 99.59%vol. (dry basis) and 92.38 g hydrogen/kg biomass feeding. The other results revealed that the energy efficiency and carbon capture efficiency of this process are 42.86% and 99.99%, respectively, and that the specific emission of released CO 2 is 80.77 g CO 2 /MJ.

Suggested Citation

  • Ratikorn Sornumpol & Dang Saebea & Amornchai Arpornwichanop & Yaneeporn Patcharavorachot, 2023. "Process Optimization and CO 2 Emission Analysis of Coal/Biomass Gasification Integrated with a Chemical Looping Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:6:p:2728-:d:1097579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/6/2728/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/6/2728/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ekaterina Matus & Olga Sukhova & Ilyas Ismagilov & Mikhail Kerzhentsev & Olga Stonkus & Zinfer Ismagilov, 2021. "Hydrogen Production through Autothermal Reforming of Ethanol: Enhancement of Ni Catalyst Performance via Promotion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Abdul Rahim Shaikh & Qinhui Wang & Long Han & Yi Feng & Zohaib Sharif & Zhixin Li & Jianmeng Cen & Sunel Kumar, 2022. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen and Electricity Production by Biomass Calcium Looping Gasification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Gao, Ningbo & Śliz, Maciej & Quan, Cui & Bieniek, Artur & Magdziarz, Aneta, 2021. "Biomass CO2 gasification with CaO looping for syngas production in a fixed-bed reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 652-661.
    4. Mauro Prestipino & Antonio Piccolo & Maria Francesca Polito & Antonio Galvagno, 2022. "Combined Bio-Hydrogen, Heat, and Power Production Based on Residual Biomass Gasification: Energy, Exergy, and Renewability Assessment of an Alternative Process Configuration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Shen, Ye & Li, Xian & Yao, Zhiyi & Cui, Xiaoqiang & Wang, Chi-Hwa, 2019. "CO2 gasification of woody biomass: Experimental study from a lab-scale reactor to a small-scale autothermal gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 497-506.
    6. Raluca-Andreea Felseghi & Elena Carcadea & Maria Simona Raboaca & Cătălin Nicolae TRUFIN & Constantin Filote, 2019. "Hydrogen Fuel Cell Technology for the Sustainable Future of Stationary Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-28, December.
    7. Bogdan Ulejczyk & Paweł Jóźwik & Łukasz Nogal & Michał Młotek & Krzysztof Krawczyk, 2022. "Efficient Conversion of Ethanol to Hydrogen in a Hybrid Plasma-Catalytic Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-11, April.
    8. Grigorios Rekleitis & Katherine-Joanne Haralambous & Maria Loizidou & Konstantinos Aravossis, 2020. "Utilization of Agricultural and Livestock Waste in Anaerobic Digestion (A.D): Applying the Biorefinery Concept in a Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-14, August.
    9. Tabea J. Stadler & Philipp Barbig & Julian Kiehl & Rafael Schulz & Thomas Klövekorn & Peter Pfeifer, 2021. "Sorption-Enhanced Water-Gas Shift Reaction for Synthesis Gas Production from Pure CO: Investigation of Sorption Parameters and Reactor Configurations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-22, January.
    10. M. Shahabuddin & Sankar Bhattacharya, 2021. "Co-Gasification Characteristics of Coal and Biomass Using CO 2 Reactant under Thermodynamic Equilibrium Modelling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-12, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vladislav Sadykov, 2023. "Advances in Hydrogen and Syngas Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-4, March.
    2. Huang, Hongyi & Liu, Jingyong & Liu, Hui & Evrendilek, Fatih & Zhang, Gang & He, Yao, 2022. "Turning the co-combustion synergy of textile dyeing sludge and waste biochar into emission-to-bottom slag pollution controls toward a circular economy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 760-777.
    3. Tera, Ibrahim & Zhang, Shengan & Liu, Guilian, 2024. "A conceptual hydrogen, heat and power polygeneration system based on biomass gasification, SOFC and waste heat recovery units: Energy, exergy, economic and emergy (4E) assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    4. He, Yahui & Li, Xiaofu & Meng, Li & Zhang, Wenqi & Wang, Yinfeng & Wang, Lei & Bi, Xiaotao & Zhu, Yuezhao, 2024. "Experimental investigation on high-temperature co-gasification and melting behavior of petrochemical sludge and bituminous coal in CO2 atmosphere," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    5. Guoqiang Wang & Feng Wang & Delun Guan, 2022. "A Study of Thermoelectric Generation Coupled with Methanol Steam Reforming for Hydrogen Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-11, November.
    6. Xiaojun Liu & Thomas Lendormi & Jean-Louis Lanoisellé, 2021. "Conventional and Innovative Hygienization of Feedstock for Biogas Production: Resistance of Indicator Bacteria to Thermal Pasteurization, Pulsed Electric Field Treatment, and Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    7. M. Shahabuddin & Tanvir Alam, 2022. "Gasification of Solid Fuels (Coal, Biomass and MSW): Overview, Challenges and Mitigation Strategies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    8. Khomein, Piyachai & Ketelaars, Wesley & Lap, Tijs & Liu, Gao, 2021. "Sulfonated aromatic polymer as a future proton exchange membrane: A review of sulfonation and crosslinking methods," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    9. Mehroze Iqbal & Amel Benmouna & Frederic Claude & Mohamed Becherif, 2023. "Efficient and Reliable Power-Conditioning Stage for Fuel Cell-Based High-Power Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-15, June.
    10. Oliver Gregor Gorbach & Noha Saad Hussein & Jessica Thomsen, 2021. "Impact of Internal Carbon Prices on the Energy System of an Organisation’s Facilities in Germany, Japan and the United Kingdom Compared to Potential External Carbon Prices," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-41, July.
    11. Vijai Kaarthi Visvanathan & Karthikeyan Palaniswamy & Dineshkumar Ponnaiyan & Mathan Chandran & Thanarajan Kumaresan & Jegathishkumar Ramasamy & Senthilarasu Sundaram, 2023. "Fuel Cell Products for Sustainable Transportation and Stationary Power Generation: Review on Market Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-21, March.
    12. Raluca-Andreea Felseghi & Ioan Așchilean & Nicoleta Cobîrzan & Andrei Mircea Bolboacă & Maria Simona Raboaca, 2021. "Optimal Synergy between Photovoltaic Panels and Hydrogen Fuel Cells for Green Power Supply of a Green Building—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, June.
    13. Matteo Baldelli & Lorenzo Bartolucci & Stefano Cordiner & Giorgio D’Andrea & Emanuele De Maina & Vincenzo Mulone, 2023. "Biomass to H2: Evaluation of the Impact of PV and TES Power Supply on the Performance of an Integrated Bio-Thermo-Chemical Upgrading Process for Wet Residual Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-17, March.
    14. Nurul Waheeda Mazlan & Munirah Shafiqah Murat & Chung-Jen Tseng & Oskar Hasdinor Hassan & Nafisah Osman, 2022. "Lattice Expansion and Crystallite Size Analyses of NiO-BaCe 0. 54 Zr 0. 36 Y 0. 1 O 3-δ Anode Composite for Proton Ceramic Fuel Cells Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-10, November.
    15. Bogdan Ulejczyk & Łukasz Nogal & Michał Młotek & Krzysztof Krawczyk, 2022. "Efficient Plasma Technology for the Production of Green Hydrogen from Ethanol and Water," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, April.
    16. Yang, Xiaoxia & Gu, Shengshen & Kheradmand, Amanj & Kan, Tao & He, Jing & Strezov, Vladimir & Zou, Ruiping & Yu, Aibing & Jiang, Yijiao, 2022. "Tunable syngas production from biomass: Synergistic effect of steam, Ni–CaO catalyst, and biochar," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    17. Aragon-Briceño, Christian & Pożarlik, Artur & Bramer, Eddy & Brem, Gerrit & Wang, Shule & Wen, Yuming & Yang, Weihong & Pawlak-Kruczek, Halina & Niedźwiecki, Łukasz & Urbanowska, Agnieszka & Mościcki,, 2022. "Integration of hydrothermal carbonization treatment for water and energy recovery from organic fraction of municipal solid waste digestate," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 577-591.
    18. Yepes Maya, Diego Mauricio & Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo & Andrade, Rubenildo Vieira & Ratner, Albert & Martínez Angel, Juan Daniel, 2021. "Biomass gasification using mixtures of air, saturated steam, and oxygen in a two-stage downdraft gasifier. Assessment using a CFD modeling approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1014-1030.
    19. AlNouss, Ahmed & Parthasarathy, Prakash & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Al-Ansari, Tareq & Mackey, Hamish & McKay, Gordon, 2020. "Techno-economic and sensitivity analysis of coconut coir pith-biomass gasification using ASPEN PLUS," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    20. Ekaterina Matus & Mikhail Kerzhentsev & Ilyas Ismagilov & Andrey Nikitin & Sergey Sozinov & Zinfer Ismagilov, 2023. "Hydrogen Production from Biogas: Development of an Efficient Nickel Catalyst by the Exsolution Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-21, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:6:p:2728-:d:1097579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.