IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i14p5233-d866431.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Residual Forest Biomass in Pinus Stands: Accumulation and Biogas Production Potential

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandros Eftaxias

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, GR67132 Xanthi, Greece)

  • Evangelia Anna Passa

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, GR67132 Xanthi, Greece)

  • Christos Michailidis

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, GR67132 Xanthi, Greece)

  • Christodoulos Daoutis

    (Department of Forestry and Management of the Environment and Natural Resources, Democritus University of Thrace, GR68200 Orestiada, Greece)

  • Apostolos Kantartzis

    (Department of Forestry and Management of the Environment and Natural Resources, Democritus University of Thrace, GR68200 Orestiada, Greece)

  • Vasileios Diamantis

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, GR67132 Xanthi, Greece)

Abstract

Lignocellulosic biomass is an abundant resource that can be valorized for the production of bioenergy. However, studies aiming to quantify the amount of biogas production potential per km forest road are scarce in the literature. In this study, fresh pine needles, pine needle litter, pine branches, and pine bark were digested in batch reactors under mesophilic conditions after a grinding/milling pre-treatment. All samples were collected from a low-altitude Mediterranean Pinus forest (North Greece) adjacent to a category G forest road with a gentle slope. The methane yield of fresh pine needles was between 115 and 164 NmL g −1 volatile solids (VS), depending on the Pinus tree size. Pine needle litter produced a significantly lower methane yield (between 58 and 77 NmL g −1 VS), followed by pine bark (85 NmL g −1 VS) and pine branches (138 NmL g −1 VS). Considering the quantity of pine needle litter accumulated on adjacent forest roads (600 ± 200 g m −2 ), it was possible to calculate the biomethane production potential per km of forest road (up to 500 Nm 3 km −1 ) if the biomass collected was disposed of at an anaerobic digestion facility. The results of the study demonstrate that residual forest biomass represents an additional resource for bioenergy production. Moreover, harvesting residual forest biomass can decrease the incidence of devastating summer forest fires and their disastrous consequences for the environment, the economy, and the local populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandros Eftaxias & Evangelia Anna Passa & Christos Michailidis & Christodoulos Daoutis & Apostolos Kantartzis & Vasileios Diamantis, 2022. "Residual Forest Biomass in Pinus Stands: Accumulation and Biogas Production Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-11, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:14:p:5233-:d:866431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/14/5233/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/14/5233/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Panigrahi, Sagarika & Sharma, Hari Bhakta & Tiwari, Bikash Ranjan & Krishna, Nakka Vamsi & Ghangrekar, M.M. & Dubey, Brajesh Kumar, 2021. "Insight into understanding the performance of electrochemical pretreatment on improving anaerobic biodegradability of yard waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 1166-1178.
    2. Diamantis, Vasileios & Eftaxias, Alexandros & Stamatelatou, Katerina & Noutsopoulos, Constantinos & Vlachokostas, Christos & Aivasidis, Alexandros, 2021. "Bioenergy in the era of circular economy: Anaerobic digestion technological solutions to produce biogas from lipid-rich wastes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 438-447.
    3. Dhyani, Vaibhav & Bhaskar, Thallada, 2018. "A comprehensive review on the pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PB), pages 695-716.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Muñoz-Rodríguez & Pilar Aparicio-Martínez & Alberto-Jesus Perea-Moreno, 2022. "Contribution of Agroforestry Biomass Valorisation to Energy and Environmental Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-7, November.
    2. Małgorzata Hawrot-Paw & Adam Koniuszy & Patryk Ratomski & Magdalena Sąsiadek & Andrzej Gawlik, 2023. "Biogas Production from Arthrospira platensis Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-12, May.
    3. Luz Marina Ruiz & María Fernández & Ana Genaro & Jaime Martín-Pascual & Montserrat Zamorano, 2023. "Multi-Parametric Analysis Based on Physico-Chemical Characterization and Biochemical Methane Potential Estimation for the Selection of Industrial Wastes as Co-Substrates in Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-19, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Longo, Sonia & Cellura, Maurizio & Luu, Le Quyen & Nguyen, Thanh Quang & Rincione, Roberta & Guarino, Francesco, 2024. "Circular economy and life cycle thinking applied to the biomass supply chain: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    2. Yang, Yuhan & Wang, Tiancheng & Hu, Hongyun & Yao, Dingding & Zou, Chan & Xu, Kai & Li, Xian & Yao, Hong, 2021. "Influence of partial components removal on pyrolysis behavior of lignocellulosic biowaste in molten salts," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 616-625.
    3. Ayub, Yousaf & Ren, Jingzheng & Shi, Tao & Shen, Weifeng & He, Chang, 2023. "Poultry litter valorization: Development and optimization of an electro-chemical and thermal tri-generation process using an extreme gradient boosting algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    4. Primaz, Carmem T. & Ribes-Greus, Amparo & Jacques, Rosângela A., 2021. "Valorization of cotton residues for production of bio-oil and engineered biochar," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    5. Ye, Lian & Zhang, Jianliang & Wang, Guangwei & Wang, Chen & Mao, Xiaoming & Ning, Xiaojun & Zhang, Nan & Teng, Haipeng & Li, Jinhua & Wang, Chuan, 2023. "Feasibility analysis of plastic and biomass hydrochar for blast furnace injection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    6. Elhambakhsh, Abbas & Van Duc Long, Nguyen & Lamichhane, Pradeep & Hessel, Volker, 2023. "Recent progress and future directions in plasma-assisted biomass conversion to hydrogen," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    7. Hu, Hangli & Luo, Yanru & Zou, Jianfeng & Zhang, Shukai & Yellezuome, Dominic & Rahman, Md Maksudur & Li, Yingkai & Li, Chong & Cai, Junmeng, 2022. "Exploring aging kinetic mechanisms of bio-oil from biomass pyrolysis based on change in carbonyl content," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 782-790.
    8. Zhao, Ming & Memon, Muhammad Zaki & Ji, Guozhao & Yang, Xiaoxiao & Vuppaladadiyam, Arun K. & Song, Yinqiang & Raheem, Abdul & Li, Jinhui & Wang, Wei & Zhou, Hui, 2020. "Alkali metal bifunctional catalyst-sorbents enabled biomass pyrolysis for enhanced hydrogen production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 168-175.
    9. Zang, Guiyan & Zhang, Jianan & Jia, Junxi & Lora, Electo Silva & Ratner, Albert, 2020. "Life cycle assessment of power-generation systems based on biomass integrated gasification combined cycles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 336-346.
    10. Alsulami, Radi A. & El-Sayed, Saad A. & Eltaher, Mohamed A. & Mohammad, Akram & Almitani, Khalid H. & Mostafa, Mohamed E., 2023. "Pyrolysis kinetics and thermal degradation characteristics of coffee, date seed, and prickly pear wastes and their blends," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    11. Sitek, Tomáš & Pospíšil, Jiří & Poláčik, Ján & Špiláček, Michal & Varbanov, Petar, 2019. "Fine combustion particles released during combustion of unit mass of beechwood," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 390-396.
    12. Kumar, R. & Strezov, V., 2021. "Thermochemical production of bio-oil: A review of downstream processing technologies for bio-oil upgrading, production of hydrogen and high value-added products," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    13. Juan García-Quezada & Ricardo Musule-Lagunes & José Angel Prieto-Ruíz & Daniel José Vega-Nieva & Artemio Carrillo-Parra, 2022. "Evaluation of Four Types of Kilns Used to Produce Charcoal from Several Tree Species in Mexico," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-22, December.
    14. Xu, Xiaodong & Sielicki, Krzysztof & Min, Jiakang & Li, Jiaxin & Hao, Chuncheng & Wen, Xin & Chen, Xuecheng & Mijowska, Ewa, 2022. "One-step converting biowaste wolfberry fruits into hierarchical porous carbon and its application for high-performance supercapacitors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 187-195.
    15. Gupta, Shubhi & Gupta, Goutam Kishore & Mondal, Monoj Kumar, 2019. "Slow pyrolysis of chemically treated walnut shell for valuable products: Effect of process parameters and in-depth product analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 665-676.
    16. Adnan, Muflih A. & Hossain, Mohammad M. & Kibria, Md Golam, 2020. "Biomass upgrading to high-value chemicals via gasification and electrolysis: A thermodynamic analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1367-1379.
    17. Salvilla, John Nikko V. & Ofrasio, Bjorn Ivan G. & Rollon, Analiza P. & Manegdeg, Ferdinand G. & Abarca, Ralf Ruffel M. & de Luna, Mark Daniel G., 2020. "Synergistic co-pyrolysıs of polyolefin plastics with wood and agricultural wastes for biofuel production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    18. González-Arias, Judith & González-Castaño, Miriam & Sánchez, Marta Elena & Cara-Jiménez, Jorge & Arellano-García, Harvey, 2022. "Valorization of biomass-derived CO2 residues with Cu-MnOx catalysts for RWGS reaction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 443-451.
    19. Lech Nowicki & Dorota Siuta & Maciej Markowski, 2020. "Pyrolysis of Rapeseed Oil Press Cake and Steam Gasification of Solid Residues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-12, August.
    20. Radoslaw Slezak & Hilal Unyay & Szymon Szufa & Stanislaw Ledakowicz, 2023. "An Extensive Review and Comparison of Modern Biomass Reactors Torrefaction vs. Biomass Pyrolizers—Part 2," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-25, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:14:p:5233-:d:866431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.