IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i7p2667-d787458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sectoral Analysis of the Fundamental Criteria for the Evaluation of the Viability of Wave Energy Generation Facilities in Ports—Application of the Delphi Methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Raúl Cascajo

    (Doctorado en Ingeniería Naval y Oceánica, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Rafael Molina

    (ETSI de Caminos, Canales y Puertos, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), CEHINAV-UPM, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Luís Pérez-Rojas

    (ETSI Navales, Shipbuilding and Naval Architecture Department, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), CEHINAV-UPM, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Nearly 40% of the world’s population lives within 100 kilometres of the coast with the risk that this implies in terms of exposure to the effects of climate change. Ocean energy, according to the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) in 2019, has been identified as one of the measures for mitigating these effects. In addition, ocean energy can play an essential role in achieving some of the SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals) set at the Paris Climate Summit in 2015, namely SDG 7 (clean and affordable energy) and SDG 13 (climate action) and could have a substantial impact on others such as SDG 1 (poverty eradication), SDG 2 (end hunger), SDG 5 (gender equality), SDG 6 (universal energy access), SDG 8 (promote sustainable economic growth), SDG 9 (build resilient infrastructure), SDG 14 (sustainable conservation of oceans and seas) and SDG 17 (promote sustainable development cooperation). There are several projects under development around the world aimed at extracting energy from waves. However, to date, no technology has been found that, in general terms, is superior to others. There are several conditioning factors that prevent this type of energy from reaching the level of maturity of other marine renewable energies. These are mainly economic, technological, environmental, and regulatory, to mention the most important. This article aims to analyse the approaches that other researchers have adopted to evaluate wave energy projects and, through a prospective method of expert consultation such as the Delphi methodology, will present the most generally accepted criteria for successful wave energy projects. Subsequently, the validity of these results will be analysed for the case of the use of the energy produced for self-consumption in ports.

Suggested Citation

  • Raúl Cascajo & Rafael Molina & Luís Pérez-Rojas, 2022. "Sectoral Analysis of the Fundamental Criteria for the Evaluation of the Viability of Wave Energy Generation Facilities in Ports—Application of the Delphi Methodology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-25, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:7:p:2667-:d:787458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/7/2667/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/7/2667/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jahanshahi, Akram & Kamali, Mohammadreza & Khalaj, Mohammadreza & Khodaparast, Zahra, 2019. "Delphi-based prioritization of economic criteria for development of wave and tidal energy technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 819-827.
    2. Ghosh, Soumya & Chakraborty, Tilottama & Saha, Satyabrata & Majumder, Mrinmoy & Pal, Manish, 2016. "Development of the location suitability index for wave energy production by ANN and MCDM techniques," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1017-1028.
    3. Amélie Têtu & Julia Fernandez Chozas, 2021. "A Proposed Guidance for the Economic Assessment of Wave Energy Converters at Early Development Stages," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Wanan Sheng & Hui Li, 2017. "A Method for Energy and Resource Assessment of Waves in Finite Water Depths," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Majidi, Ajab Gul & Bingölbali, Bilal & Akpınar, Adem & Rusu, Eugen, 2021. "Wave power performance of wave energy converters at high-energy areas of a semi-enclosed sea," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    6. Lavidas, George & Blok, Kornelis, 2021. "Shifting wave energy perceptions: The case for wave energy converter (WEC) feasibility at milder resources," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1143-1155.
    7. Adrian De Andres & Jéromine Maillet & Jørgen Hals Todalshaug & Patrik Möller & David Bould & Henry Jeffrey, 2016. "Techno-Economic Related Metrics for a Wave Energy Converters Feasibility Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Unknown, 2016. "Energy for Sustainable Development," Conference Proceedings 253270, Guru Arjan Dev Institute of Development Studies (IDSAsr).
    9. Morim, Joao & Cartwright, Nick & Hemer, Mark & Etemad-Shahidi, Amir & Strauss, Darrell, 2019. "Inter- and intra-annual variability of potential power production from wave energy converters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1224-1241.
    10. Chang, Grace & Jones, Craig A. & Roberts, Jesse D. & Neary, Vincent S., 2018. "A comprehensive evaluation of factors affecting the levelized cost of wave energy conversion projects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 344-354.
    11. John Hutcheson & Adrián De Andrés & Henry Jeffrey, 2016. "Risk vs. Reward: A Methodology to Assess Investment in Marine Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-44, August.
    12. Nobre, Ana & Pacheco, Miguel & Jorge, Raquel & Lopes, M.F.P. & Gato, L.M.C., 2009. "Geo-spatial multi-criteria analysis for wave energy conversion system deployment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 97-111.
    13. Guillou, Nicolas & Chapalain, Georges, 2018. "Annual and seasonal variabilities in the performances of wave energy converters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 812-823.
    14. Lavidas, George, 2020. "Selection index for Wave Energy Deployments (SIWED): A near-deterministic index for wave energy converters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    15. Bertram, D.V. & Tarighaleslami, A.H. & Walmsley, M.R.W. & Atkins, M.J. & Glasgow, G.D.E., 2020. "A systematic approach for selecting suitable wave energy converters for potential wave energy farm sites," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    16. Wanan Sheng & Hui Li & Jimmy Murphy, 2017. "An Improved Method for Energy and Resource Assessment of Waves in Finite Water Depths," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    17. Lavidas, George, 2019. "Energy and socio-economic benefits from the development of wave energy in Greece," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1290-1300.
    18. Ribeiro, A.S. & deCastro, M. & Costoya, X. & Rusu, Liliana & Dias, J.M. & Gomez-Gesteira, M., 2021. "A Delphi method to classify wave energy resource for the 21st century: Application to the NW Iberian Peninsula," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    19. Choupin, O. & Pinheiro Andutta, F. & Etemad-Shahidi, A. & Tomlinson, R., 2021. "A decision-making process for wave energy converter and location pairing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    20. Flocard, Francois & Ierodiaconou, Daniel & Coghlan, Ian R., 2016. "Multi-criteria evaluation of wave energy projects on the south-east Australian coast," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 80-94.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Choupin, O. & Têtu, A. & Del Río-Gamero, B. & Ferri, F. & Kofoed, JP., 2022. "Premises for an annual energy production and capacity factor improvement towards a few optimised wave energy converters configurations and resources pairs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    2. Choupin, Ophelie & Del Río-Gamero, B. & Schallenberg-Rodríguez, Julieta & Yánez-Rosales, Pablo, 2022. "Integration of assessment-methods for wave renewable energy: Resource and installation feasibility," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 455-482.
    3. Choupin, O. & Pinheiro Andutta, F. & Etemad-Shahidi, A. & Tomlinson, R., 2021. "A decision-making process for wave energy converter and location pairing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    4. Choupin, Ophelie & Henriksen, Michael & Tomlinson, Rodger, 2022. "Interrelationship between variables for wave direction-dependent WEC/site-configuration pairs using the CapEx method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    5. Chenglong Guo & Wanan Sheng & Dakshina G. De Silva & George Aggidis, 2023. "A Review of the Levelized Cost of Wave Energy Based on a Techno-Economic Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-30, February.
    6. Foteinis, Spyros, 2022. "Wave energy converters in low energy seas: Current state and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    7. Castro-Santos, Laura & Filgueira-Vizoso, Almudena & Costoya, Xurxo & Arguilé-Pérez, Beatriz & Ribeiro, Américo Soares, 2024. "Economic viability of floating wave power farms considering the energy generated in the near future," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    8. Şan, Murat & Akpınar, Adem & Bingölbali, Bilal & Kankal, Murat, 2021. "Geo-spatial multi-criteria evaluation of wave energy exploitation in a semi-enclosed sea," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    9. Ophelie Choupin & Michael Henriksen & Amir Etemad-Shahidi & Rodger Tomlinson, 2021. "Breaking-Down and Parameterising Wave Energy Converter Costs Using the CapEx and Similitude Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-27, February.
    10. Majidi, Ajab Gul & Bingölbali, Bilal & Akpınar, Adem & Rusu, Eugen, 2021. "Wave power performance of wave energy converters at high-energy areas of a semi-enclosed sea," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    11. Jaan Rönkkö & Ali Khosravi & Sanna Syri, 2023. "Techno-Economic Assessment of a Hybrid Offshore Wind–Wave Farm: Case Study in Norway," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-24, May.
    12. Zhang, Na & Li, Shuai & Wu, Yongsheng & Wang, Keh-Han & Zhang, Qinghe & You, Zai-Jin & Wang, Jin, 2020. "Effects of sea ice on wave energy flux distribution in the Bohai Sea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 2330-2343.
    13. Yi Zhang & Dapeng Zhang & Haoyu Jiang, 2023. "A Review of Offshore Wind and Wave Installations in Some Areas with an Eye towards Generating Economic Benefits and Offering Commercial Inspiration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-32, May.
    14. Xu, Xingkun & Sasmal, Kaushik & Wen, Yi & Xu, Haihua & Ma, Peifeng & Tkalich, Pavel & Lin, Pengzhi, 2024. "An integrated approach for the decision of wave energy converter deployment based on forty-five-years high-resolution wave climate modeling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    15. Santo, H. & Taylor, P.H. & Stansby, P.K., 2020. "The performance of the three-float M4 wave energy converter off Albany, on the south coast of western Australia, compared to Orkney (EMEC) in the U.K," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 444-459.
    16. Sellak, Hamza & Ouhbi, Brahim & Frikh, Bouchra & Palomares, Iván, 2017. "Towards next-generation energy planning decision-making: An expert-based framework for intelligent decision support," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1544-1577.
    17. Pınar Kaya Samut, 2017. "Integrated FANP-f-MIGP model for supplier selection in the renewable energy sector," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 427-450, May.
    18. Manuel Corrales-Gonzalez & George Lavidas & Giovanni Besio, 2023. "Feasibility of Wave Energy Harvesting in the Ligurian Sea, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, June.
    19. Satymov, Rasul & Bogdanov, Dmitrii & Dadashi, Mojtaba & Lavidas, George & Breyer, Christian, 2024. "Techno-economic assessment of global and regional wave energy resource potentials and profiles in hourly resolution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 364(C).
    20. Sudipa Choudhury & Apu Kumar Saha & Mrinmoy Majumder, 2020. "Optimal location selection for installation of surface water treatment plant by Gini coefficient-based analytical hierarchy process," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 4073-4099, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:7:p:2667-:d:787458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.