IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i5p1796-d761048.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distributionally Robust Joint Chance-Constrained Dispatch for Electricity–Gas–Heat Integrated Energy System Considering Wind Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Hui Liu

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
    Guangxi Key Laboratory of Power System Optimization and Energy Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Zhenggang Fan

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
    Guangxi Key Laboratory of Power System Optimization and Energy Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Haimin Xie

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
    Guangxi Key Laboratory of Power System Optimization and Energy Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Ni Wang

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
    Guangxi Key Laboratory of Power System Optimization and Energy Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

Abstract

With the increasing penetration of wind power, the uncertainty associated with it brings more challenges to the operation of the integrated energy system (IES), especially the power subsystem. However, the typical strategies to deal with wind power uncertainty have poor performance in balancing economy and robustness. Therefore, this paper proposes a distributionally robust joint chance-constrained dispatch (DR-JCCD) model to coordinate the economy and robustness of the IES with uncertain wind power. The optimization dispatch model is formulated as a two-stage problem to minimize both the day-ahead and the real-time operation costs. Moreover, the ambiguity set is generated using Wasserstein distance, and the joint chance constraints are used to ensure that the safety constraints (e.g., ramping limit and transmission limit) can be satisfied jointly under the worst-case probability distribution of wind power. The model is remodeled as a mixed-integer tractable programming issue, which can be solved efficiently by ready-made solvers using linear decision rules and linearization methods. Case studies on an electricity–gas–heat regional integrated system, which includes a modified IEEE 24-bus system, 20 natural gas-nodes, and 6 heat-node system, are investigated for verification. Numerical simulation results demonstrate that the proposed DR-JCCD approach effectively coordinates the economy and robustness of IES and can offer operators a reasonable energy management scheme with an acceptable risk level.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui Liu & Zhenggang Fan & Haimin Xie & Ni Wang, 2022. "Distributionally Robust Joint Chance-Constrained Dispatch for Electricity–Gas–Heat Integrated Energy System Considering Wind Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:5:p:1796-:d:761048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/5/1796/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/5/1796/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xin Chen & Melvyn Sim & Peng Sun & Jiawei Zhang, 2008. "A Linear Decision-Based Approximation Approach to Stochastic Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(2), pages 344-357, April.
    2. Céline Gicquel & Jianqiang Cheng, 2018. "A joint chance-constrained programming approach for the single-item capacitated lot-sizing problem with stochastic demand," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 264(1), pages 123-155, May.
    3. Fang, Xin & Cui, Hantao & Yuan, Haoyu & Tan, Jin & Jiang, Tao, 2019. "Distributionally-robust chance constrained and interval optimization for integrated electricity and natural gas systems optimal power flow with wind uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Wang, J. & Botterud, A. & Bessa, R. & Keko, H. & Carvalho, L. & Issicaba, D. & Sumaili, J. & Miranda, V., 2011. "Wind power forecasting uncertainty and unit commitment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 4014-4023.
    5. Erick Delage & Yinyu Ye, 2010. "Distributionally Robust Optimization Under Moment Uncertainty with Application to Data-Driven Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 595-612, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gengli Song & Hua Wei, 2022. "Distributionally Robust Multi-Energy Dynamic Optimal Power Flow Considering Water Spillage with Wasserstein Metric," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Wang, Yuwei & Shi, Lin & Song, Minghao & Jia, Mengyao & Li, Bingkang, 2024. "Evaluating the energy-exergy-economy-environment performance of the biomass-photovoltaic-hydrogen integrated energy system based on hybrid multi-criterion decision-making model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    3. Leijiao Ge & Jun Yan & Yonghui Sun & Zhongguan Wang, 2022. "Situational Awareness for Smart Distribution Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-3, June.
    4. Zhang, Houwang & Wu, Qiuwei & Chen, Jian & Lu, Lina & Zhang, Jiangfeng & Zhang, Shuyi, 2023. "Multiple stage stochastic planning of integrated electricity and gas system based on distributed approximate dynamic programming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhi Chen & Melvyn Sim & Huan Xu, 2019. "Distributionally Robust Optimization with Infinitely Constrained Ambiguity Sets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1328-1344, September.
    2. Chen, Qingxin & Ma, Shoufeng & Li, Hongming & Zhu, Ning & He, Qiao-Chu, 2024. "Optimizing bike rebalancing strategies in free-floating bike-sharing systems: An enhanced distributionally robust approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    3. Haolin Ruan & Zhi Chen & Chin Pang Ho, 2023. "Adjustable Distributionally Robust Optimization with Infinitely Constrained Ambiguity Sets," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 1002-1023, September.
    4. Ang, James & Meng, Fanwen & Sun, Jie, 2014. "Two-stage stochastic linear programs with incomplete information on uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 16-22.
    5. Joel Goh & Melvyn Sim, 2011. "Robust Optimization Made Easy with ROME," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(4), pages 973-985, August.
    6. Chen, Yue & Wei, Wei & Liu, Feng & Mei, Shengwei, 2016. "Distributionally robust hydro-thermal-wind economic dispatch," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 511-519.
    7. Yongzhen Li & Xueping Li & Jia Shu & Miao Song & Kaike Zhang, 2022. "A General Model and Efficient Algorithms for Reliable Facility Location Problem Under Uncertain Disruptions," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 407-426, January.
    8. Dimitris Bertsimas & Melvyn Sim & Meilin Zhang, 2019. "Adaptive Distributionally Robust Optimization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 604-618, February.
    9. Huan Xu & Constantine Caramanis & Shie Mannor, 2012. "Optimization Under Probabilistic Envelope Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 682-699, June.
    10. Chrysanthos E. Gounaris & Wolfram Wiesemann & Christodoulos A. Floudas, 2013. "The Robust Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem Under Demand Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 677-693, June.
    11. Mengshi Lu & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, 2021. "A Review of Robust Operations Management under Model Uncertainty," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(6), pages 1927-1943, June.
    12. Zhu, Ning & Fu, Chenyi & Zhang, Xuanyi & Ma, Shoufeng, 2022. "A network sensor location problem for link flow observability and estimation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 428-448.
    13. Angelos Georghiou & Angelos Tsoukalas & Wolfram Wiesemann, 2019. "Robust Dual Dynamic Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 813-830, May.
    14. Shao-Wei Lam & Tsan Sheng Ng & Melvyn Sim & Jin-Hwa Song, 2013. "Multiple Objectives Satisficing Under Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 214-227, February.
    15. Joel Goh & Melvyn Sim, 2010. "Distributionally Robust Optimization and Its Tractable Approximations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(4-part-1), pages 902-917, August.
    16. Jun-ya Gotoh & Michael Jong Kim & Andrew E. B. Lim, 2020. "Worst-case sensitivity," Papers 2010.10794, arXiv.org.
    17. Zhang, Hanxiao & Li, Yan-Fu, 2022. "Robust optimization on redundancy allocation problems in multi-state and continuous-state series–parallel systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    18. J. F. F. Almeida & S. V. Conceição & L. R. Pinto & B. R. P. Oliveira & L. F. Rodrigues, 2022. "Optimal sales and operations planning for integrated steel industries," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 773-790, August.
    19. Soonhui Lee & Tito Homem-de-Mello & Anton Kleywegt, 2012. "Newsvendor-type models with decision-dependent uncertainty," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 76(2), pages 189-221, October.
    20. Gauvin, Charles & Delage, Erick & Gendreau, Michel, 2017. "Decision rule approximations for the risk averse reservoir management problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 317-336.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:5:p:1796-:d:761048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.