IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i4p1469-d751326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of the Contamination of Fuel with Fly Ash Originating from Biomass Gasification on the Performance of the Anode-Supported SOFC

Author

Listed:
  • Marek Skrzypkiewicz

    (Department of High Temperature Electrochemical Processes (HiTEP), Institute of Power Engineering, Mory 8, 01-330 Warsaw, Poland
    CTH2—Center for Hydrogen Technologies, Institute of Power Engineering, Augustówka 36, 02-981 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Michal Wierzbicki

    (Department of High Temperature Electrochemical Processes (HiTEP), Institute of Power Engineering, Mory 8, 01-330 Warsaw, Poland
    CTH2—Center for Hydrogen Technologies, Institute of Power Engineering, Augustówka 36, 02-981 Warsaw, Poland
    The Faculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering, Institute of Heat Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 21/25, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Stanislaw Jagielski

    (Department of High Temperature Electrochemical Processes (HiTEP), Institute of Power Engineering, Mory 8, 01-330 Warsaw, Poland
    CTH2—Center for Hydrogen Technologies, Institute of Power Engineering, Augustówka 36, 02-981 Warsaw, Poland
    The Faculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering, Institute of Heat Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 21/25, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Yevgeniy Naumovich

    (Department of High Temperature Electrochemical Processes (HiTEP), Institute of Power Engineering, Mory 8, 01-330 Warsaw, Poland
    CTH2—Center for Hydrogen Technologies, Institute of Power Engineering, Augustówka 36, 02-981 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Konrad Motylinski

    (Department of High Temperature Electrochemical Processes (HiTEP), Institute of Power Engineering, Mory 8, 01-330 Warsaw, Poland
    CTH2—Center for Hydrogen Technologies, Institute of Power Engineering, Augustówka 36, 02-981 Warsaw, Poland
    The Faculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering, Institute of Heat Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 21/25, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Jakub Kupecki

    (Department of High Temperature Electrochemical Processes (HiTEP), Institute of Power Engineering, Mory 8, 01-330 Warsaw, Poland
    CTH2—Center for Hydrogen Technologies, Institute of Power Engineering, Augustówka 36, 02-981 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Zurawska

    (Department of High Temperature Electrochemical Processes (HiTEP), Institute of Power Engineering, Mory 8, 01-330 Warsaw, Poland
    CTH2—Center for Hydrogen Technologies, Institute of Power Engineering, Augustówka 36, 02-981 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Magdalena Kosiorek

    (Department of High Temperature Electrochemical Processes (HiTEP), Institute of Power Engineering, Mory 8, 01-330 Warsaw, Poland
    CTH2—Center for Hydrogen Technologies, Institute of Power Engineering, Augustówka 36, 02-981 Warsaw, Poland
    The Faculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering, Institute of Heat Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 21/25, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

The integration of solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) with biomass gasification reactors raises the possibility of solid particle contamination of the gaseous fuel entering the cell. Technical specifications from SOFC manufacturers, among other sources, claim that SOFCs do not tolerate the presence of solid particles in fuel. However, there is very limited literature on the experimental investigation of feeding SOFCs with particulate matter aerosols. In this study, a standard 5 × 5 cm anode-supported SOFC was fueled by two types of aerosols, namely, (1) inert powder of grain sizes and concentration equivalent to gasifier fly ash and (2) a real downdraft gasifier fly ash, both suspended in a gaseous fuel mixture. For reference, cells were also investigated with a dust-free fuel gas of the same composition. A straightforward negative influence of the inert powder aerosol could not be confirmed in experiments with a duration of 6 days. That said, the introduction of carbonaceous fly ash aerosol caused slow but irreversible damage to the SOFC. The degradation mechanisms were studied, and the presence of carbon-containing particles was found to clog the pores of the SOFC anode. The maximum measured power density of the SOFC equaled 855 mW/cm 2 (850 °C, reference fuel). Feeding inert aerosol fuel caused no rapid changes in power density. A moderate drop in performance was observed throughout the experiment. The contamination of fuel with fly ash resulted in an initial performance gain and a ca. 25% performance drop longer term (43 h of contamination). Post-mortem analysis revealed contamination on the walls of the gas channels, with some visible alumina or fly ash spots in the anode area.

Suggested Citation

  • Marek Skrzypkiewicz & Michal Wierzbicki & Stanislaw Jagielski & Yevgeniy Naumovich & Konrad Motylinski & Jakub Kupecki & Agnieszka Zurawska & Magdalena Kosiorek, 2022. "Influence of the Contamination of Fuel with Fly Ash Originating from Biomass Gasification on the Performance of the Anode-Supported SOFC," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:4:p:1469-:d:751326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/4/1469/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/4/1469/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiao, Yong & Zhang, Liqin & An, Wenting & Zhou, Wei & Sha, Yujing & Shao, Zongping & Bai, Jianping & Li, Si-Dian, 2016. "Controlled deposition and utilization of carbon on Ni-YSZ anodes of SOFCs operating on dry methane," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 432-443.
    2. Subotić, Vanja & Baldinelli, Arianna & Barelli, Linda & Scharler, Robert & Pongratz, Gernot & Hochenauer, Christoph & Anca-Couce, Andrés, 2019. "Applicability of the SOFC technology for coupling with biomass-gasifier systems: Short- and long-term experimental study on SOFC performance and degradation behaviour," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    3. Jiao, Yong & Tian, Wenjuan & Chen, Huili & Shi, Huangang & Yang, Binbin & Li, Chao & Shao, Zongping & Zhu, Zhenping & Li, Si-Dian, 2015. "In situ catalyzed Boudouard reaction of coal char for solid oxide-based carbon fuel cells with improved performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 200-208.
    4. Gadsbøll, Rasmus Østergaard & Thomsen, Jesper & Bang-Møller, Christian & Ahrenfeldt, Jesper & Henriksen, Ulrik Birk, 2017. "Solid oxide fuel cells powered by biomass gasification for high efficiency power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 198-206.
    5. Pongratz, G. & Subotić, V. & Schroettner, H. & Hochenauer, C. & Skrzypkiewicz, M. & Kupecki, Jakub & Anca-Couce, A. & Scharler, R., 2021. "Analysis of H2S-related short-term degradation and regeneration of anode- and electrolyte supported solid oxide fuel cells fueled with biomass steam gasifier product gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pongratz, Gernot & Subotić, Vanja & Hochenauer, Christoph & Scharler, Robert & Anca-Couce, Andrés, 2022. "Solid oxide fuel cell operation with biomass gasification product gases: Performance- and carbon deposition risk evaluation via a CFD modelling approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    2. Habibollahzade, Ali & Rosen, Marc A., 2021. "Syngas-fueled solid oxide fuel cell functionality improvement through appropriate feedstock selection and multi-criteria optimization using Air/O2-enriched-air gasification agents," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    3. Cai, Weizi & Cao, Dan & Zhou, Mingyang & Yan, Xiaomin & Li, Yuzhi & Wu, Zhen & Lü, Shengping & Mao, Caiyun & Xie, Yongmin & Zhao, Caiwen & Yu, Jialing & Ni, Meng & Liu, Jiang & Wang, Hailin, 2020. "Sulfur-tolerant Fe-doped La0·3Sr0·7TiO3 perovskite as anode of direct carbon solid oxide fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    4. Zhao, Xinyue & Chen, Heng & Zheng, Qiwei & Liu, Jun & Pan, Peiyuan & Xu, Gang & Zhao, Qinxin & Jiang, Xue, 2023. "Thermo-economic analysis of a novel hydrogen production system using medical waste and biogas with zero carbon emission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    5. Teng, Su & Hamrang, Farzad & Ashraf Talesh, Seyed Saman, 2021. "Economic performance assessment of a novel combined power generation cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    6. Hanif, Muhammad Bilal & Rauf, Sajid & Sultan, Amir & Tayyab, Zuhra & Zheng, Kun & Makarov, Hryhorii & Madej, Dominika & Łasocha, Wiesław & Roch, Tomas & Mosiałek, Michał & Baker, Richard T. & Li, Chen, 2024. "Boosting the electrochemical performance of oxygen electrodes via the formation of LSCF-BaCe0.9–xMoxY0.1O3–δ triple conducting composite for solid oxide fuel cells: Part II," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    7. Yoon, Kwangsuk & Lee, Sang Soo & Ok, Yong Sik & Kwon, Eilhann E. & Song, Hocheol, 2019. "Enhancement of syngas for H2 production via catalytic pyrolysis of orange peel using CO2 and bauxite residue," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    8. Anca-Couce, A. & Hochenauer, C. & Scharler, R., 2021. "Bioenergy technologies, uses, market and future trends with Austria as a case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    9. Wang, Chaoqi & Lü, Zhe & Li, Jingwei & Cao, Zhiqun & Wei, Bo & Li, Huan & Shang, Minghao & Su, Chaoxiang, 2020. "Efficient use of waste carton for power generation, tar and fertilizer through direct carbon solid oxide fuel cell," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 410-420.
    10. Tanveer, Waqas Hassan & Rezk, Hegazy & Nassef, Ahmed & Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali & Kolosz, Ben & Karuppasamy, K. & Aslam, Jawad & Gilani, Syed Omer, 2020. "Improving fuel cell performance via optimal parameters identification through fuzzy logic based-modeling and optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    11. Shayan, E. & Zare, V. & Mirzaee, I., 2019. "On the use of different gasification agents in a biomass fueled SOFC by integrated gasifier: A comparative exergo-economic evaluation and optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1126-1138.
    12. Jiao, Yong & Zhang, Liqin & An, Wenting & Zhou, Wei & Sha, Yujing & Shao, Zongping & Bai, Jianping & Li, Si-Dian, 2016. "Controlled deposition and utilization of carbon on Ni-YSZ anodes of SOFCs operating on dry methane," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 432-443.
    13. Pan, Zehua & Shen, Jian & Wang, Jingyi & Xu, Xinhai & Chan, Wei Ping & Liu, Siyu & Zhou, Yexin & Yan, Zilin & Jiao, Zhenjun & Lim, Teik-Thye & Zhong, Zheng, 2022. "Thermodynamic analyses of a standalone diesel-fueled distributed power generation system based on solid oxide fuel cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    14. Gadsbøll, Rasmus Østergaard & Sárossy, Zsuzsa & Jørgensen, Lars & Ahrenfeldt, Jesper & Henriksen, Ulrik Birk, 2018. "Oxygen-blown operation of the TwoStage Viking gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 495-503.
    15. Jeong, Yong-Seong & Kim, Jong-Woo & Seo, Myung-Won & Mun, Tae-Young & Kim, Joo-Sik, 2021. "Characteristics of two-stage air gasification of polystyrene with active carbon as a tar removal agent," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    16. Lei, Libin & Keels, Jayson M. & Tao, Zetian & Zhang, Jihao & Chen, Fanglin, 2018. "Thermodynamic and experimental assessment of proton conducting solid oxide fuel cells with internal methane steam reforming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 280-288.
    17. Chen, Huili & Wang, Fen & Wang, Wei & Chen, Daifen & Li, Si-Dian & Shao, Zongping, 2016. "H2S poisoning effect and ways to improve sulfur tolerance of nickel cermet anodes operating on carbonaceous fuels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 765-777.
    18. Gadsbøll, Rasmus Østergaard & Clausen, Lasse Røngaard & Thomsen, Tobias Pape & Ahrenfeldt, Jesper & Henriksen, Ulrik Birk, 2019. "Flexible TwoStage biomass gasifier designs for polygeneration operation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 939-950.
    19. Ferreira, Victor J. & Wolff, Deidre & Hornés, Aitor & Morata, Alex & Torrell, M. & Tarancón, Albert & Corchero, Cristina, 2021. "5 kW SOFC stack via 3D printing manufacturing: An evaluation of potential environmental benefits," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    20. Kong, Mengdi & Ye, Xuemin & Liu, Di & Li, Chunxi, 2024. "Comprehensive evaluation of medical waste gasification low-carbon multi-generation system based on AHP–EWM–GFCE method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:4:p:1469-:d:751326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.