IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i4p1314-d747272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Responsive Building Envelope Designs through Robustness-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Zero-Emission Buildings

Author

Listed:
  • Roberta Moschetti

    (SINTEF Community, 7465 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Shabnam Homaei

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Ellika Taveres-Cachat

    (SINTEF Community, 7465 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Steinar Grynning

    (SINTEF Community, 7465 Trondheim, Norway)

Abstract

Responsive building envelopes (RBEs) are central to developing sustainability strategies for zero emission/energy buildings (ZEBs). RBEs are a large group of complex technologies and systems, which is why multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods are helpful to navigate sustainability assessments considering various performance indicators. This article first provides a literature review of assessment criteria and key performance indicators for RBEs and an analysis of existing robustness-based MCDM methods. Then, a methodological approach to assess RBE designs in ZEB projects is proposed as an extension of a novel robustness-based MCDM method that normalizes the objective functions according to defined targets and combines them into one comprehensive indicator (MT-KPI), thereby eliminating the need to weight objectives. The proposed methodological approach is finally tested on a case study of a Norwegian ZEB, where five competitive RBE designs (including building integrated photovoltaics, phase change material, and electrochromic windows) and eight occupancy and climate scenarios are investigated considering three main performance areas: energy use, thermal comfort, and load matching. The results in the case study show that with the proposed MCDM approach the different designs have MT-KPI values between 1.4 and 12.8, where a lower value is better. In this specific case, the most robust building RBE alternative was identified as the one with electrochromic windows and a control based on incident solar radiation and indoor air temperature.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberta Moschetti & Shabnam Homaei & Ellika Taveres-Cachat & Steinar Grynning, 2022. "Assessing Responsive Building Envelope Designs through Robustness-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Zero-Emission Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:4:p:1314-:d:747272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/4/1314/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/4/1314/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nematchoua, Modeste Kameni & Marie-Reine Nishimwe, Antoinette & Reiter, Sigrid, 2021. "Towards nearly zero-energy residential neighbourhoods in the European Union: A case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    2. Favoino, Fabio & Overend, Mauro & Jin, Qian, 2015. "The optimal thermo-optical properties and energy saving potential of adaptive glazing technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1-15.
    3. Kokaraki, Nikoleta & Hopfe, Christina J. & Robinson, Elaine & Nikolaidou, Elli, 2019. "Testing the reliability of deterministic multi-criteria decision-making methods using building performance simulation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 991-1007.
    4. Sadineni, Suresh B. & Madala, Srikanth & Boehm, Robert F., 2011. "Passive building energy savings: A review of building envelope components," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3617-3631.
    5. Goia, Francesco & Haase, Matthias & Perino, Marco, 2013. "Optimizing the configuration of a façade module for office buildings by means of integrated thermal and lighting simulations in a total energy perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 515-527.
    6. Christofer Skaar & Nathalie Labonnote & Klodian Gradeci, 2018. "From Zero Emission Buildings (ZEB) to Zero Emission Neighbourhoods (ZEN): A Mapping Review of Algorithm-Based LCA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Li, Danny H.W. & Yang, Liu & Lam, Joseph C., 2013. "Zero energy buildings and sustainable development implications – A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-10.
    8. Carlucci, Salvatore & Causone, Francesco & De Rosa, Francesco & Pagliano, Lorenzo, 2015. "A review of indices for assessing visual comfort with a view to their use in optimization processes to support building integrated design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 1016-1033.
    9. United Nations UN, 2015. "Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development," Working Papers id:7559, eSocialSciences.
    10. Casini, Marco, 2018. "Active dynamic windows for buildings: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 923-934.
    11. Yang, Kun & Zhu, Neng & Chang, Chen & Wang, Daquan & Yang, Shan & Ma, Shengming, 2018. "A methodological concept for phase change material selection based on multi-criteria decision making (MCDM): A case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1085-1096.
    12. Homaei, Shabnam & Hamdy, Mohamed, 2020. "A robustness-based decision making approach for multi-target high performance buildings under uncertain scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    13. Salom, Jaume & Marszal, Anna Joanna & Widén, Joakim & Candanedo, José & Lindberg, Karen Byskov, 2014. "Analysis of load match and grid interaction indicators in net zero energy buildings with simulated and monitored data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 119-131.
    14. Sofia Agostinelli & Fabrizio Cumo & Giambattista Guidi & Claudio Tomazzoli, 2021. "Cyber-Physical Systems Improving Building Energy Management: Digital Twin and Artificial Intelligence," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-25, April.
    15. Bui, Dac-Khuong & Nguyen, Tuan Ngoc & Ghazlan, Abdallah & Ngo, Ngoc-Tri & Ngo, Tuan Duc, 2020. "Enhancing building energy efficiency by adaptive façade: A computational optimization approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    16. Ochoa, Carlos E. & Aries, Myriam B.C. & van Loenen, Evert J. & Hensen, Jan L.M., 2012. "Considerations on design optimization criteria for windows providing low energy consumption and high visual comfort," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 238-245.
    17. Loonen, R.C.G.M. & Trčka, M. & Cóstola, D. & Hensen, J.L.M., 2013. "Climate adaptive building shells: State-of-the-art and future challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 483-493.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. D'Agostino, Diana & De Falco, Francesco & Minelli, Federico & Minichiello, Francesco, 2024. "New robust multi-criteria decision-making framework for thermal insulation of buildings under conflicting stakeholder interests," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 376(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Favoino, Fabio & Fiorito, Francesco & Cannavale, Alessandro & Ranzi, Gianluca & Overend, Mauro, 2016. "Optimal control and performance of photovoltachromic switchable glazing for building integration in temperate climates," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 943-961.
    2. Marchini, F. & Chiatti, C. & Fabiani, C. & Pisello, A.L., 2023. "Development of an innovative translucent–photoluminescent coating for smart windows applications: An experimental and numerical investigation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    3. Paulína Šujanová & Monika Rychtáriková & Tiago Sotto Mayor & Affan Hyder, 2019. "A Healthy, Energy-Efficient and Comfortable Indoor Environment, a Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-37, April.
    4. Abdo Abdullah Ahmed Gassar & Choongwan Koo & Tae Wan Kim & Seung Hyun Cha, 2021. "Performance Optimization Studies on Heating, Cooling and Lighting Energy Systems of Buildings during the Design Stage: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-47, September.
    5. Zeng, Zhaoyun & Augenbroe, Godfried & Chen, Jianli, 2022. "Realization of bi-level optimization of adaptive building envelope with a finite-difference model featuring short execution time and versatility," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    6. Soulios, V. & Loonen, R.C.G.M. & Metavitsiadis, V. & Hensen, J.L.M., 2018. "Computational performance analysis of overheating mitigation measures in parked vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 635-644.
    7. Amir Faraji & Maria Rashidi & Fatemeh Rezaei & Payam Rahnamayiezekavat, 2023. "A Meta-Synthesis Review of Occupant Comfort Assessment in Buildings (2002–2022)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-36, February.
    8. Jungwon Yoon & Sanghyun Bae, 2020. "Performance Evaluation and Design of Thermo-Responsive SMP Shading Prototypes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-35, May.
    9. Hoon Lee, Jae & Jeong, Jinhwa & Tae Chae, Young, 2020. "Optimal control parameter for electrochromic glazing operation in commercial buildings under different climatic conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    10. Halawa, Edward & Ghaffarianhoseini, Amirhosein & Ghaffarianhoseini, Ali & Trombley, Jeremy & Hassan, Norhaslina & Baig, Mirza & Yusoff, Safiah Yusmah & Azzam Ismail, Muhammad, 2018. "A review on energy conscious designs of building façades in hot and humid climates: Lessons for (and from) Kuala Lumpur and Darwin," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2147-2161.
    11. Sommese, Francesco & Badarnah, Lidia & Ausiello, Gigliola, 2022. "A critical review of biomimetic building envelopes: towards a bio-adaptive model from nature to architecture," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    12. Rocha, Helder R.O. & Fiorotti, Rodrigo & Louzada, Danilo M. & Silvestre, Leonardo J. & Celeste, Wanderley C. & Silva, Jair A.L., 2024. "Net Zero Energy cost Building system design based on Artificial Intelligence," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    13. Miroslav Čekon & Richard Slávik, 2017. "A Non-Ventilated Solar Façade Concept Based on Selective and Transparent Insulation Material Integration: An Experimental Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.
    14. Ihara, Takeshi & Gao, Tao & Grynning, Steinar & Jelle, Bjørn Petter & Gustavsen, Arild, 2015. "Aerogel granulate glazing facades and their application potential from an energy saving perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 179-191.
    15. Fiorito, Francesco & Sauchelli, Michele & Arroyo, Diego & Pesenti, Marco & Imperadori, Marco & Masera, Gabriele & Ranzi, Gianluca, 2016. "Shape morphing solar shadings: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 863-884.
    16. Artem Holstov & Graham Farmer & Ben Bridgens, 2017. "Sustainable Materialisation of Responsive Architecture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-20, March.
    17. Capeluto, I. Guedi & Ochoa, Carlos E., 2014. "Simulation-based method to determine climatic energy strategies of an adaptable building retrofit façade system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 375-384.
    18. Al-Saadi, Saleh Nasser & Shaaban, Awni K., 2019. "Zero energy building (ZEB) in a cooling dominated climate of Oman: Design and energy performance analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 299-316.
    19. Garshasbi, Samira & Kurnitski, Jarek & Mohammadi, Yousef, 2016. "A hybrid Genetic Algorithm and Monte Carlo simulation approach to predict hourly energy consumption and generation by a cluster of Net Zero Energy Buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 626-637.
    20. Pilechiha, Peiman & Mahdavinejad, Mohammadjavad & Pour Rahimian, Farzad & Carnemolla, Phillippa & Seyedzadeh, Saleh, 2020. "Multi-objective optimisation framework for designing office windows: quality of view, daylight and energy efficiency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:4:p:1314-:d:747272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.