IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i2p639-d726576.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision-Making under the Risk, Uncertainty and COVID-19 Pandemic Conditions Applying the PL9A Method of Logistics Planning—Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Wiesław Staniuk

    (Faculty of Transport, Warsaw University of Technology, 00662 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Michał Staniuk

    (Faculty of Transport, Warsaw University of Technology, 00662 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Norbert Chamier-Gliszczynski

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Koszalin University of Technology, 75453 Koszalin, Poland)

  • Marianna Jacyna

    (Faculty of Transport, Warsaw University of Technology, 00662 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Michał Kłodawski

    (Faculty of Transport, Warsaw University of Technology, 00662 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

The next industrial revolution, which coincided with the COVID-19 pandemic, is prompting a different look at the issue of supply chain change management. A new perspective should take into account the aspect of supply chain efficiency at multiple levels. Efficient logistics is green and energy-saving, both of which need to be systematically integrated with the logistical planning processes. The dynamic changes on the demand and supply side resulting from social, political, and economic transformations have significantly influenced the shaping of long-term supply chains. The development of new manufacturing and logistics technologies prompts the development and implementation of new integrated planning methods to support supply chain management processes. Modern supply chains are oriented towards operations in a dynamically changing socio-economic environment. The new methods are capable of incorporating dynamic adaptation of logistics infrastructure which respond to changing relationships between supply and demand. To meet the identified problems of complexity, relevance, and time-consumption of the logistic planning process in modern enterprise management, the PL9A method of logistic planning and 9A LOGPLANNER application for logistics planning were developed. The article presents the results of experimental and simulation studies on the improvement of logistic processes in a working manufacturing enterprise with application of the PL9A method. The results of the experimental work indicate that the application of the PL9A method embedded in the 9A LOGPLANNER software makes it possible to dynamically simulate any number of logistics system variants in a short period of time, while reducing risk and obtaining tangible benefits in terms of energy and ecological efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Wiesław Staniuk & Michał Staniuk & Norbert Chamier-Gliszczynski & Marianna Jacyna & Michał Kłodawski, 2022. "Decision-Making under the Risk, Uncertainty and COVID-19 Pandemic Conditions Applying the PL9A Method of Logistics Planning—Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-23, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:639-:d:726576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/2/639/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/2/639/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beata Mrugalska & Junaid Ahmed, 2021. "Organizational Agility in Industry 4.0: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-23, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Govindan, Kannan & Kannan, Devika & Jørgensen, Thomas Ballegård & Nielsen, Tim Straarup, 2022. "Supply Chain 4.0 performance measurement: A systematic literature review, framework development, and empirical evidence," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    2. Artur Kwasek & Maria Kocot & Tomasz Pajewski & Agnieszka Wala & Adam Muszynski & Hubert Gasinski, 2024. "Key Motivational Factors of an Agile Organization in a Triangulation Self-Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 1353-1372.
    3. Alessandra Neri & Marta Negri & Enrico Cagno & Vikas Kumar & Jose Arturo Garza‐Reyes, 2023. "What digital‐enabled dynamic capabilities support the circular economy? A multiple case study approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 5083-5101, November.
    4. Damian Kocot & Katarzyna Olejko & Monika Bednarczyk & Artur Kwasek & Aleksandra Wentkowska & Hubert Gasinski, 2024. "The Impact of Remote Work on Shaping Agility Attributes," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 1373-1390.
    5. Machkour Badr & Abriane Ahmed, 2024. "Entrepreneurship 4.0 and Success Factors in the Context of Industry 4.0: A literature review [Entrepreneuriat 4.0 et facteurs de succès dans le contexte de l'industrie 4.0 : Une revue de littératur," Post-Print hal-04704435, HAL.
    6. Maria Kocot & Malgorzta Golinska-Pieszynska & Artur Kwasek & Edyta Dubois & Izabela Gontarek & Hubert Gasinski, 2024. "Agile Human Resource Management Practices in the Context of Remote Work Effectiveness Research," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 1332-1352.
    7. Dilek Cetindamar & Mile Katic & Steve Burdon & Ayse Gunsel, 2021. "The Interplay among Organisational Learning Culture, Agility, Growth, and Big Data Capabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, November.
    8. Magdalena Maciaszczyk & Maria Kocot & Artur Kwasek & Barbara Szymoniuk, 2024. "Factors Influencing Consumers‘ Purchase Decisions Regarding Eco-Friendly Products in Online Sales," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special B), pages 395-413.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:639-:d:726576. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.