IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i22p8577-d974466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Assessment of Demand Response Using Coupled National and Regional Optimisation Models

Author

Listed:
  • Wilko Heitkoetter

    (German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Networked Energy Systems, Carl-von-Ossietzky-Str. 15, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany
    School of Mathematics and Science, University of Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 114-118, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany)

  • Wided Medjroubi

    (German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Networked Energy Systems, Carl-von-Ossietzky-Str. 15, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany)

  • Thomas Vogt

    (German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Networked Energy Systems, Carl-von-Ossietzky-Str. 15, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany)

  • Carsten Agert

    (German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Networked Energy Systems, Carl-von-Ossietzky-Str. 15, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany)

Abstract

In this work, we investigate the economic viability of demand response (DR) as a balancing option for variable renewable energies, such as wind and solar. Our assessment is based on a highly resolved national energy system model for Germany coupled with a regional DR optimisation model. First, this allows us to determine the spatially resolved flexibility demand, e.g., for avoiding transmission grid congestion. Second, a high number of DR technologies from the residential, commercial and industrial sector, as well as sector coupling, can be considered to cover the regional flexibility demand. Our analysis is based on a scenario for 2035 with a 66 % share of renewable energy sources in the power generation. The results show that the largest DR capacity is being installed in the west of Germany, an area with a high density of population and industry. All DR units have an aggregated capacity below 100 MW per transmission grid node. For the economic assessment, we further differentiate between two cases. In the first case with full DR cost consideration, the optimisation selects only large-scale technologies with low specific investment costs. The second case assumes that the required communication components are already installed. Here, we consider only variable costs and disregard the investment costs. As a result, several small-scale DR technologies are used, such as e-mobility. We publish the developed methodology as an open-source model, which allows reuse for other scientific purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Wilko Heitkoetter & Wided Medjroubi & Thomas Vogt & Carsten Agert, 2022. "Economic Assessment of Demand Response Using Coupled National and Regional Optimisation Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-25, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:22:p:8577-:d:974466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/22/8577/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/22/8577/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lukas Wienholt & Ulf Philipp Müller & Julian Bartels, 2018. "Optimal Sizing and Spatial Allocation of Storage Units in a High-Resolution Power System Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Heitkoetter, Wilko & Medjroubi, Wided & Vogt, Thomas & Agert, Carsten, 2020. "Regionalised heat demand and power-to-heat capacities in Germany – An open dataset for assessing renewable energy integration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    3. Alexander Kies & Bruno U. Schyska & Lueder Von Bremen, 2016. "The Demand Side Management Potential to Balance a Highly Renewable European Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Remer, Donald S. & Nieto, Armando P., 1995. "A compendium and comparison of 25 project evaluation techniques. Part 2: Ratio, payback, and accounting methods," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 101-129, December.
    5. Misconel, Steffi & Zöphel, Christoph & Möst, Dominik, 2021. "Assessing the value of demand response in a decarbonized energy system – A large-scale model application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    6. Luz, Thiago & Moura, Pedro, 2019. "100% Renewable energy planning with complementarity and flexibility based on a multi-objective assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    7. Remer, Donald S. & Nieto, Armando P., 1995. "A compendium and comparison of 25 project evaluation techniques. Part 1: Net present value and rate of return methods," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 79-96, November.
    8. Shafiekhani, Morteza & Ahmadi, Abdollah & Homaee, Omid & Shafie-khah, Miadreza & Catalão, João P.S., 2022. "Optimal bidding strategy of a renewable-based virtual power plant including wind and solar units and dispatchable loads," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    9. Ulf Philipp Müller & Birgit Schachler & Malte Scharf & Wolf-Dieter Bunke & Stephan Günther & Julian Bartels & Guido Pleßmann, 2019. "Integrated Techno-Economic Power System Planning of Transmission and Distribution Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-30, May.
    10. Frysztacki, Martha Maria & Hörsch, Jonas & Hagenmeyer, Veit & Brown, Tom, 2021. "The strong effect of network resolution on electricity system models with high shares of wind and solar," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    11. Kirkerud, J.G. & Nagel, N.O. & Bolkesjø, T.F., 2021. "The role of demand response in the future renewable northern European energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    12. Paulus, Moritz & Borggrefe, Frieder, 2011. "The potential of demand-side management in energy-intensive industries for electricity markets in Germany," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 432-441, February.
    13. Cai, Qiran & Xu, Qingyang & Qing, Jing & Shi, Gang & Liang, Qiao-Mei, 2022. "Promoting wind and photovoltaics renewable energy integration through demand response: Dynamic pricing mechanism design and economic analysis for smart residential communities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    14. Gils, Hans Christian, 2016. "Economic potential for future demand response in Germany – Modeling approach and case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 401-415.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dranka, Géremi Gilson & Ferreira, Paula, 2019. "Review and assessment of the different categories of demand response potentials," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 280-294.
    2. Wilko Heitkoetter & Wided Medjroubi & Thomas Vogt & Carsten Agert, 2019. "Comparison of Open Source Power Grid Models—Combining a Mathematical, Visual and Electrical Analysis in an Open Source Tool," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Magni, Carlo Alberto, 2016. "Capital depreciation and the underdetermination of rate of return: A unifying perspective," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 54-79.
    4. Dodoo, Ambrose & Gustavsson, Leif & Tettey, Uniben Y.A., 2017. "Final energy savings and cost-effectiveness of deep energy renovation of a multi-storey residential building," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 563-576.
    5. Frysztacki, Martha Maria & Hagenmeyer, Veit & Brown, Tom, 2023. "Inverse methods: How feasible are spatially low-resolved capacity expansion modelling results when disaggregated at high spatial resolution?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    6. Cuthbert, James R. & Magni, Carlo Alberto, 2016. "Measuring the inadequacy of IRR in PFI schemes using profitability index and AIRR," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 130-140.
    7. García Kerdan, Iván & Raslan, Rokia & Ruyssevelt, Paul & Morillón Gálvez, David, 2017. "A comparison of an energy/economic-based against an exergoeconomic-based multi-objective optimisation for low carbon building energy design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 244-263.
    8. Carlo Alberto Magni & Ken V. Peasnell, 2015. "The Term Structure of Capital Values:An accounting-based framework for measuring economic profitability," Department of Economics 0060, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    9. Héctor Marañón-Ledesma & Asgeir Tomasgard, 2019. "Analyzing Demand Response in a Dynamic Capacity Expansion Model for the European Power Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-24, August.
    10. Misconel, Steffi & Zöphel, Christoph & Möst, Dominik, 2021. "Assessing the value of demand response in a decarbonized energy system – A large-scale model application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    11. Hosseininasab, Amin & Ahmadi, Abbas, 2015. "Selecting a supplier portfolio with value, development, and risk consideration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(1), pages 146-156.
    12. Fatras, Nicolas & Ma, Zheng & Jørgensen, Bo Nørregaard, 2022. "Process-to-market matrix mapping: A multi-criteria evaluation framework for industrial processes’ electricity market participation feasibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    13. Müller, Theresa & Möst, Dominik, 2018. "Demand Response Potential: Available when Needed?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 181-198.
    14. Yasser Alizadeh & Antonie J. Jetter, 2019. "Pathways for Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Innovations: A Review and Expansion of Ambidexterity Theory," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(05), pages 1-33, August.
    15. Ayman Esmat & Julio Usaola & María Ángeles Moreno, 2018. "Distribution-Level Flexibility Market for Congestion Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-24, April.
    16. Aurora Greta Ruggeri & Laura Gabrielli & Massimiliano Scarpa, 2020. "Energy Retrofit in European Building Portfolios: A Review of Five Key Aspects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-38, September.
    17. Ekaterina Makarova & Anna Sokolova, 2012. "The Best Practices of Evaluating S&T Foresight: Basic Elements and Key Criteria," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 6(3), pages 62-74.
    18. Cuéllar-Franca, Rosa & García-Gutiérrez, Pelayo & Dimitriou, Ioanna & Elder, Rachael H. & Allen, Ray W.K. & Azapagic, Adisa, 2019. "Utilising carbon dioxide for transport fuels: The economic and environmental sustainability of different Fischer-Tropsch process designs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    19. Man Ying (Annie) Ho & Joseph H. K. Lai & Huiying (Cynthia) Hou & Dadi Zhang, 2021. "Key Performance Indicators for Evaluation of Commercial Building Retrofits: Shortlisting via an Industry Survey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-30, November.
    20. Sommerfeldt, Nelson & Madani, Hatef, 2017. "Revisiting the techno-economic analysis process for building-mounted, grid-connected solar photovoltaic systems: Part one – Review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1379-1393.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:22:p:8577-:d:974466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.