IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v255y2019ics0306261919315065.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

100% Renewable energy planning with complementarity and flexibility based on a multi-objective assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Luz, Thiago
  • Moura, Pedro

Abstract

The decarbonization of the power sector has led many academic, governmental and non-governmental institutions to design scenarios with 100% renewable energy and several options to compensate the mismatch between demand and generation have been presented. This paper addresses the benefits to renewable energy integration ensured by the complementarity, and flexibility options, such as demand-side management and batteries. A non-linear multi-objective problem is proposed that maximizes the complementarity and minimizes the total expansion cost. The model also optimizes the battery integration, complementarity between sources and regions, costs, demand-side management, hydropower storage requirements and spatial technology distribution with hourly resolution. The methodology is implemented for the Brazilian case and a scenario able to guarantee three consecutive years of extreme drought in 2050 is presented, without the need of new large reservoirs. Such scenario is ensured with 10% of solar energy, 43% of wind energy, 4.3% of biomass, 41% of hydropower and 1.7% of demand-side management.

Suggested Citation

  • Luz, Thiago & Moura, Pedro, 2019. "100% Renewable energy planning with complementarity and flexibility based on a multi-objective assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:255:y:2019:i:c:s0306261919315065
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261919315065
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113819?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:255:y:2019:i:c:s0306261919315065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.