IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i22p8517-d972599.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance Analysis, and Economic-Feasibility Evaluation of Single-Slope Single-Basin Domestic Solar Still under Different Water-Depths

Author

Listed:
  • Om Prakash

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi 835215, India)

  • Asim Ahmad

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi 835215, India
    Faculty of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Usha Martin University, Ranchi 835103, India)

  • Anil Kumar

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Delhi Technological University, New Delhi 110042, India)

  • Rajeshwari Chatterjee

    (Department of Hotel Management and Catering Technology, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi 835215, India)

  • Somnath Chattopadhyaya

    (Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad 826004, India)

  • Shubham Sharma

    (Mechanical Engineering Department, University Center for Research & Development, Chandigarh University, Mohali 140413, India
    School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, China)

  • Aman Sharma

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, GLA University, Mathura 281406, India)

  • Changhe Li

    (School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, China)

  • Elsayed Mohamed Tag Eldin

    (Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Future University in Egypt New Cairo, New Cairo City 11835, Egypt)

Abstract

The impact of single-slope solar still with and without flat-plate collector was evaluated experimentally and numerically. Experimental analysis was conducted for four different water depths (3, 6, 9, 12 cm) in on-sunshine hours between 11 AM to 5 PM in Bhopal (23.2599° N, 77.4126° E), India. The thermo efficiency was 51.31% for 3 cm water depth while 24.29% for 12 cm water depth in an active mode of operation. In the case of passive mode, the thermo efficiency was 17.02% for 3 cm water depth and 6.77% for 12 cm water depth. The average exergy efficiency of single-slope solar still is 66.60% for 3 cm depth which is higher than 12 cm depth, i.e., 23.14%. The hourly variation parameters of solar still were also calculated and analyzed. The overall results obtained in the analysis state that solar still performs effectively when coupled with a flat-plate solar collector. According to econometric evaluation, the fabrication expense of a single-slope solar-basin-still is 126.43$ whereas the cost of producing distilled water per day is 1.61$, and the payback period of a single-slope solar-basin-still with FPC is 17.53 months. In a nutshell, the single-slope solar-basin-still design is commercially viable, functional, and technically sustainable, minimizing manufacturing costs in comparison with a traditional solar still, and past findings. The proposed solar still produced remarkable results in all experimental trials.

Suggested Citation

  • Om Prakash & Asim Ahmad & Anil Kumar & Rajeshwari Chatterjee & Somnath Chattopadhyaya & Shubham Sharma & Aman Sharma & Changhe Li & Elsayed Mohamed Tag Eldin, 2022. "Performance Analysis, and Economic-Feasibility Evaluation of Single-Slope Single-Basin Domestic Solar Still under Different Water-Depths," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-15, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:22:p:8517-:d:972599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/22/8517/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/22/8517/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. El-Sebaii, A.A. & Al-Ghamdi, A.A. & Al-Hazmi, F.S. & Faidah, Adel S., 2009. "Thermal performance of a single basin solar still with PCM as a storage medium," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(7-8), pages 1187-1195, July.
    2. Farid, Mohammed & Hamad, Faik, 1993. "Performance of a single-basin solar still," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 75-83.
    3. Durkaieswaran, P. & Murugavel, K. Kalidasa, 2015. "Various special designs of single basin passive solar still – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1048-1060.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nayi, Kuldeep H. & Modi, Kalpesh V., 2018. "Pyramid solar still: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 136-148.
    2. Tsilingiris, P.T., 2011. "The glazing temperature measurement in solar stills – Errors and implications on performance evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 4936-4944.
    3. Mu, L. & Chen, L. & Lin, L. & Park, Y.H. & Wang, H. & Xu, P. & Kota, K. & Kuravi, S., 2021. "An overview of solar still enhancement approaches for increased freshwater production rates from a thermal process perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    4. Rahman, Syed Masiur & Khondaker, A.N., 2012. "Mitigation measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and enhance carbon capture and storage in Saudi Arabia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2446-2460.
    5. Prakash, P. & Velmurugan, V., 2015. "Parameters influencing the productivity of solar stills – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 585-609.
    6. Rahbar, N. & Esfahani, J.A., 2013. "Productivity estimation of a single-slope solar still: Theoretical and numerical analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 289-297.
    7. Fadl A. Essa & AbdelKader Abdullah & Hasan Sh. Majdi & Ali Basem & Hayder A. Dhahad & Zakaria M. Omara & Suha A. Mohammed & Wissam H. Alawee & Amged Al Ezzi & Talal Yusaf, 2022. "Parameters Affecting the Efficiency of Solar Stills—Recent Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-58, August.
    8. Sathyamurthy, Ravishankar & El-Agouz, S.A. & Nagarajan, P.K. & Subramani, J. & Arunkumar, T. & Mageshbabu, D. & Madhu, B. & Bharathwaaj, R. & Prakash, N., 2017. "A Review of integrating solar collectors to solar still," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1069-1097.
    9. Milad Setareh & Mohammad Reza Assari & Hassan Basirat Tabrizi & Mohammad Alizadeh, 2024. "Performance of a stepped solar still using porous materials experimentally," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 28519-28538, November.
    10. Nadal-Bach, Joel & Bruno, Joan Carles & Farnós, Joan & Rovira, Miquel, 2021. "Solar stills and evaporators for the treatment of agro-industrial liquid wastes: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    11. Prasanna, U.R. & Umanand, L., 2011. "Modeling and design of a solar thermal system for hybrid cooking application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(5), pages 1740-1755, May.
    12. Sardari, Pouyan Talebizadeh & Mohammed, Hayder I. & Giddings, Donald & walker, Gavin S. & Gillott, Mark & Grant, David, 2019. "Numerical study of a multiple-segment metal foam-PCM latent heat storage unit: Effect of porosity, pore density and location of heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    13. Sujit Kumar & Om Prakash, 2022. "Improving the Single-Slope Solar Still Performance Using Solar Air Heater with Phase Change Materials," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-15, October.
    14. Li, Chennan & Goswami, Yogi & Stefanakos, Elias, 2013. "Solar assisted sea water desalination: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 136-163.
    15. Arunkumar, T. & Parbat, Dibyangana & Lee, Sang Joon, 2024. "Comprehensive review of advanced desalination technologies for solar-powered all-day, all-weather freshwater harvesting systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    16. Muftah, Ali. F. & Alghoul, M.A. & Fudholi, Ahmad & Abdul-Majeed, M.M. & Sopian, K., 2014. "Factors affecting basin type solar still productivity: A detailed review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 430-447.
    17. Joulin, Annabelle & Younsi, Zohir & Zalewski, Laurent & Lassue, Stéphane & Rousse, Daniel R. & Cavrot, Jean-Paul, 2011. "Experimental and numerical investigation of a phase change material: Thermal-energy storage and release," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(7), pages 2454-2462, July.
    18. Kaviti, Ajay Kumar & Yadav, Akhilesh & Shukla, Amit, 2016. "Inclined solar still designs: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 429-451.
    19. Omara, Z.M. & Kabeel, A.E. & Abdullah, A.S., 2017. "A review of solar still performance with reflectors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 638-649.
    20. Arunkumar, T. & Wang, Jiaqiang & Denkenberger, D., 2021. "Capillary flow-driven efficient nanomaterials for seawater desalination: Review of classifications, challenges, and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:22:p:8517-:d:972599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.