IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i21p8101-d959006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Case Study of Field Thermal Response Test and Laboratory Test Based on Distributed Optical Fiber Temperature Sensor

Author

Listed:
  • Yongjie Ma

    (College of Construction Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China
    Engineering Research Center of Geothermal Resources Development Technology and Equipment, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China)

  • Yanjun Zhang

    (College of Construction Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China
    Engineering Research Center of Geothermal Resources Development Technology and Equipment, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China)

  • Yuxiang Cheng

    (Engineering Research Center of Geothermal Resources Development Technology and Equipment, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China
    Key Lab of Groundwater Resource and Environment, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China)

  • Yu Zhang

    (State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Xuefeng Gao

    (College of Construction Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China)

  • Kun Shan

    (College of Construction Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China)

Abstract

To design an efficient ground source heat pump (GSHP) system, it is important to accurately measure the thermophysical parameters of the geotechnical layer. In the current study, a borehole is tested in detail using a combined thermal response test system (CTRTS) based on a distributed optical fiber temperature sensor (DOFTS) and a laboratory test. Real-time monitoring of the stratum temperature according to depth and operation time and the geothermal profile and thermal conductivity of each stratum are obtained. The results show that the undisturbed ground temperature is 10.0 °C, and the formation temperature field within 130 m can be divided into variable temperature formation, constant temperature formation (9.13 °C), and warming formation (geothermal gradient is 3.0 °C/100 m). The comprehensive thermal conductivity of the region is 1.862 W/m·K. From top to bottom, the average thermal conductivity of silty clay, mudstone, argillaceous siltstone, and mudstone is 1.631 W/m·K, 1.888 W/m·K, 1.862 W/m·K, and 2.144 W/m·K, respectively. By comparing the measurement results, the accuracy and effectiveness of the CTRTS are verified. Therefore, it is recommended to use the thermal conductivity obtained by the CTRTS to optimize the design of the borehole heat exchanger (BHE). This study provides a case for establishing a standard distributed thermal response test (DTRT).

Suggested Citation

  • Yongjie Ma & Yanjun Zhang & Yuxiang Cheng & Yu Zhang & Xuefeng Gao & Kun Shan, 2022. "A Case Study of Field Thermal Response Test and Laboratory Test Based on Distributed Optical Fiber Temperature Sensor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:21:p:8101-:d:959006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/21/8101/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/21/8101/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huang, Yibin & Zhang, Yanjun & Xie, Yangyang & Zhang, Yu & Gao, Xuefeng & Ma, Jingchen, 2020. "Field test and numerical investigation on deep coaxial borehole heat exchanger based on distributed optical fiber temperature sensor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    2. Shim, B.O. & Park, C.-H., 2013. "Ground thermal conductivity for (ground source heat pumps) GSHPs in Korea," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 167-174.
    3. Zhang, Bo & Gu, Kai & Shi, Bin & Liu, Chun & Bayer, Peter & Wei, Guangqing & Gong, Xülong & Yang, Lei, 2020. "Actively heated fiber optics based thermal response test: A field demonstration," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Hakala, Petri & Vallin, Sami & Arola, Teppo & Martinkauppi, Ilkka, 2022. "Novel use of the enhanced thermal response test in crystalline bedrock," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 467-482.
    5. Dehkordi, S. Emad & Schincariol, Robert A. & Reitsma, Stanley, 2015. "Thermal performance of a tight borehole heat exchanger," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 698-704.
    6. Beier, Richard A., 2011. "Vertical temperature profile in ground heat exchanger during in-situ test," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 1578-1587.
    7. Roth, P. & Georgiev, A. & Busso, A. & Barraza, E., 2004. "First in situ determination of ground and borehole thermal properties in Latin America," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(12), pages 1947-1963.
    8. Zhang, Changxing & Lu, Jiahui & Wang, Xinjie & Xu, Hang & Sun, Shicai, 2022. "Effect of geological stratification on estimated accuracy of ground thermal parameters in thermal response test," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 585-595.
    9. Yanjun Zhang & Ling Zhou & Zhongjun Hu & Ziwang Yu & Shuren Hao & Zhihong Lei & Yangyang Xie, 2018. "Prediction of Layered Thermal Conductivity Using Artificial Neural Network in Order to Have Better Design of Ground Source Heat Pump System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-25, July.
    10. Acuña, José & Palm, Björn, 2013. "Distributed thermal response tests on pipe-in-pipe borehole heat exchangers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 312-320.
    11. Yang, H. & Cui, P. & Fang, Z., 2010. "Vertical-borehole ground-coupled heat pumps: A review of models and systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 16-27, January.
    12. Wagner, Valentin & Bayer, Peter & Kübert, Markus & Blum, Philipp, 2012. "Numerical sensitivity study of thermal response tests," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 245-253.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chae, Hobyung & Bae, Sangmu & Jeong, Jae-Weon & Nam, Yujin, 2024. "Performance and economic analysis for optimal length of borehole heat exchanger considering effects of groundwater," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    2. Zhiheng Liu & Yongqing Wang & Jiuxi Cheng & Peijie Han & Zhibin Liu & Zhaoyan Zhang & Xiaoguang Li & Jianquan Yao, 2023. "Dual Sagnac Interferometer Distributed Optical Fiber Localization Method Based on Hilbert–Huang Transform," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Yongjie Ma & Jingyong Wang & Fuhang Hu & Echuan Yan & Yu Zhang & Yibin Huang & Hao Deng & Xuefeng Gao & Jianguo Kang & Haoxin Shi & Xin Zhang & Jianqiao Zheng & Jixiang Guo, 2024. "Analysis of the Heat Transfer Performance of a Buried Pipe in the Heating Season Based on Field Testing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-33, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wilke, Sascha & Menberg, Kathrin & Steger, Hagen & Blum, Philipp, 2020. "Advanced thermal response tests: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Soldo, Vladimir & Boban, Luka & Borović, Staša, 2016. "Vertical distribution of shallow ground thermal properties in different geological settings in Croatia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1202-1212.
    3. Raymond, Jasmin & Lamarche, Louis & Malo, Michel, 2015. "Field demonstration of a first thermal response test with a low power source," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 30-39.
    4. Zhang, Changxing & Song, Wei & Liu, Yufeng & Kong, Xiangqiang & Wang, Qing, 2019. "Effect of vertical ground temperature distribution on parameter estimation of in-situ thermal response test with unstable heat rate," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 264-274.
    5. Deng, Zhenpeng & Nian, Yongle & Cheng, Wen-long, 2023. "Estimation method of layered ground thermal conductivity for U-tube BHE based on the quasi-3D model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 121-133.
    6. Zhang, Linfeng & Zhang, Quan & Huang, Gongsheng & Du, Yaxing, 2014. "A p(t)-linear average method to estimate the thermal parameters of the borehole heat exchangers for in situ thermal response test," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 211-221.
    7. Zhang, Xueping & Han, Zongwei & Ji, Qiang & Zhang, Hongzhi & Li, Xiuming, 2021. "Thermal response tests for the identification of soil thermal parameters: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 1123-1135.
    8. Choi, Wonjun & Ooka, Ryozo, 2016. "Effect of disturbance on thermal response test, part 1: Development of disturbance analytical model, parametric study, and sensitivity analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 306-318.
    9. Louis Lamarche & Jasmin Raymond & Claude Hugo Koubikana Pambou, 2017. "Evaluation of the Internal and Borehole Resistances during Thermal Response Tests and Impact on Ground Heat Exchanger Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Luo, Jin & Rohn, Joachim & Bayer, Manfred & Priess, Anna & Xiang, Wei, 2014. "Analysis on performance of borehole heat exchanger in a layered subsurface," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 55-65.
    11. Nian, Yong-Le & Wang, Xiang-Yang & Xie, Kun & Cheng, Wen-Long, 2020. "Estimation of ground thermal properties for coaxial BHE through distributed thermal response test," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1209-1219.
    12. Paul Christodoulides & Ana Vieira & Stanislav Lenart & João Maranha & Gregor Vidmar & Rumen Popov & Aleksandar Georgiev & Lazaros Aresti & Georgios Florides, 2020. "Reviewing the Modeling Aspects and Practices of Shallow Geothermal Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-45, August.
    13. Zhang, Bo & Gu, Kai & Shi, Bin & Liu, Chun & Bayer, Peter & Wei, Guangqing & Gong, Xülong & Yang, Lei, 2020. "Actively heated fiber optics based thermal response test: A field demonstration," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    14. Beier, Richard A. & Spitler, Jeffrey D., 2016. "Weighted average of inlet and outlet temperatures in borehole heat exchangers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 118-129.
    15. Choi, Wonjun & Ooka, Ryozo, 2016. "Effect of disturbance on thermal response test, part 2: Numerical study of applicability and limitation of infinite line source model for interpretation under disturbance from outdoor environment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1090-1105.
    16. Zhang, Bo & Gu, Kai & Wei, Zhuang & Jiang, Lin & Zheng, Yu & Wang, Baojun & Shi, Bin, 2023. "Governing factors for actively heated fiber optics based thermal response tests," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P1).
    17. Christopher Vella & Simon Paul Borg & Daniel Micallef, 2020. "The Effect of Shank-Space on the Thermal Performance of Shallow Vertical U-Tube Ground Heat Exchangers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, January.
    18. Spitler, Jeffrey D. & Gehlin, Signhild E.A., 2015. "Thermal response testing for ground source heat pump systems—An historical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1125-1137.
    19. Zhang, Linfeng & Zhang, Quan & Huang, Gongsheng, 2016. "A transient quasi-3D entire time scale line source model for the fluid and ground temperature prediction of vertical ground heat exchangers (GHEs)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 65-75.
    20. Shangyuan Chen & Jinfeng Mao & Xu Han & Chaofeng Li & Liyao Liu, 2016. "Numerical Analysis of the Factors Influencing a Vertical U-Tube Ground Heat Exchanger," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-12, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:21:p:8101-:d:959006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.