IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i21p7914-d952798.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Temperature and Residence Time on Torrefaction Coupled to Fast Pyrolysis for Valorizing Agricultural Waste

Author

Listed:
  • Angel Alcazar-Ruiz

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Avda. Camilo José Cela 12, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain)

  • Fernando Dorado

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Avda. Camilo José Cela 12, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain)

  • Luz Sanchez-Silva

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Avda. Camilo José Cela 12, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain)

Abstract

Torrefaction is a promising pretreatment technology for valorizing biomass and upgrading pyrolysis products. This study sets out an original procedure consisting of subjecting the biomass to torrefaction before fast pyrolysis to increased value-added compounds based on agricultural waste biomasses production. This study uses a combined biomass treatment consisting of torrefaction (280–320 °C) and subsequent fast pyrolysis (500 °C) using the same reactor. Under different torrefaction temperatures and residence times, olive pomace (OP) and almond shell (AS) have been evaluated. The study demonstrated OP rather than AS was thermally unstable. The highest total yield of carboxylic acids (mainly acetic acid) was obtained by means of torrefaction at 280 °C with a residence time of 20 s for OP, and at 300 °C and 20 s for AS. Higher torrefaction temperature and residence time promoted phenolic compounds production for OP. However, OP had a higher lignin content and inherent metals that promoted a catalytic reaction during the procedure. The highest yield (47.7%) was obtained using torrefaction at 320 °C with a residence time of 240 s. Overall, the torrefaction of biomass combined with fast pyrolysis constituted a very simple and efficient strategy for valorizing the conversion of agricultural waste biomass into value-added chemicals.

Suggested Citation

  • Angel Alcazar-Ruiz & Fernando Dorado & Luz Sanchez-Silva, 2022. "Influence of Temperature and Residence Time on Torrefaction Coupled to Fast Pyrolysis for Valorizing Agricultural Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:21:p:7914-:d:952798
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/21/7914/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/21/7914/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khan, Shoaib Raza & Zeeshan, Muhammad, 2022. "Catalytic potential of low-cost natural zeolite and influence of various pretreatments of biomass on pyro-oil up-gradation during co-pyrolysis with scrap rubber tires," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    2. Xuejun Qian & Jingwen Xue & Yulai Yang & Seong W. Lee, 2021. "Thermal Properties and Combustion-Related Problems Prediction of Agricultural Crop Residues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Dai, Leilei & Wang, Yunpu & Liu, Yuhuan & Ruan, Roger & He, Chao & Yu, Zhenting & Jiang, Lin & Zeng, Zihong & Tian, Xiaojie, 2019. "Integrated process of lignocellulosic biomass torrefaction and pyrolysis for upgrading bio-oil production: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 20-36.
    4. Kumar, Ashwani & Kumar, Kapil & Kaushik, Naresh & Sharma, Satyawati & Mishra, Saroj, 2010. "Renewable energy in India: Current status and future potentials," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(8), pages 2434-2442, October.
    5. Xuejun Qian & Seong Lee & Ana-maria Soto & Guangming Chen, 2018. "Regression Model to Predict the Higher Heating Value of Poultry Waste from Proximate Analysis," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohamad Aziz, Nur Atiqah & Mohamed, Hassan & Kania, Dina & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Zainal, Bidattul Syirat & Junoh, Hazlina & Ker, Pin Jern & Silitonga, A.S., 2024. "Bioenergy production by integrated microwave-assisted torrefaction and pyrolysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    2. Juraj Kukuruzović & Ana Matin & Mislav Kontek & Tajana Krička & Božidar Matin & Ivan Brandić & Alan Antonović, 2023. "The Effects of Demineralization on Reducing Ash Content in Corn and Soy Biomass with the Goal of Increasing Biofuel Quality," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-12, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Hao & Cheng, Shuo & Hungwe, Douglas & Yoshikawa, Kunio & Takahashi, Fumitake, 2022. "Co-pyrolysis coupled with torrefaction enhances hydrocarbons production from rice straw and oil sludge: The effect of torrefaction on co-pyrolysis synergistic behaviors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    2. W. A. M. A. N. Illankoon & Chiara Milanese & Alessandro Girella & Puhulwella G. Rathnasiri & K. H. M. Sudesh & Maria Medina Llamas & Maria Cristina Collivignarelli & Sabrina Sorlini, 2022. "Agricultural Biomass-Based Power Generation Potential in Sri Lanka: A Techno-Economic Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Atilgan Atilgan & Anna Krakowiak-Bal & Hasan Ertop & Burak Saltuk & Mateusz Malinowski, 2023. "The Energy Potential of Waste from Banana Production: A Case Study of the Mediterranean Region," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Yang, Yantao & Qu, Xia & Huang, Guorun & Ren, Suxia & Dong, Lili & Sun, Tanglei & Liu, Peng & Li, Yanling & Lei, Tingzhou & Cai, Junmeng, 2023. "Insight into lignocellulosic biomass torrefaction kinetics with case study of pinewood sawdust torrefaction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    5. Huang, Shih-Chieh & Lo, Shang-Lien & Lin, Yen-Ching, 2013. "Application of a fuzzy cognitive map based on a structural equation model for the identification of limitations to the development of wind power," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 851-861.
    6. Toklu, E., 2013. "Overview of potential and utilization of renewable energy sources in Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 456-463.
    7. Lauri Leppäkoski & Miika P. Marttila & Ville Uusitalo & Jarkko Levänen & Vilma Halonen & Mirja H. Mikkilä, 2021. "Assessing the Carbon Footprint of Biochar from Willow Grown on Marginal Lands in Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Agnes Csiszarik-Kocsir, 2017. "How to finance renewable energy projects – facts and trends," Proceedings of FIKUSZ 2017, in: Monika Fodor (ed.), Proceedings of FIKUSZ '17, pages 44-56, Óbuda University, Keleti Faculty of Business and Management.
    9. Ahmed, Shamsuddin & Islam, Md Tasbirul & Karim, Mohd Aminul & Karim, Nissar Mohammad, 2014. "Exploitation of renewable energy for sustainable development and overcoming power crisis in Bangladesh," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 223-235.
    10. Radoslaw Slezak & Hilal Unyay & Szymon Szufa & Stanislaw Ledakowicz, 2023. "An Extensive Review and Comparison of Modern Biomass Reactors Torrefaction vs. Biomass Pyrolizers—Part 2," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-25, February.
    11. Punia Sindhu, Sonal & Nehra, Vijay & Luthra, Sunil, 2016. "Recognition and prioritization of challenges in growth of solar energy using analytical hierarchy process: Indian outlook," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 332-348.
    12. Muhammad Usman & Atif Jahanger & Muhammad Sohail Amjad Makhdum & Magdalena Radulescu & Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente & Elena Jianu, 2022. "An Empirical Investigation of Ecological Footprint Using Nuclear Energy, Industrialization, Fossil Fuels and Foreign Direct Investment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-26, September.
    13. Shih-Chieh Huang & Shang-Lien Lo & Yen-Ching Lin, 2013. "To Re-Explore the Causality between Barriers to Renewable Energy Development: A Case Study of Wind Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-24, August.
    14. Neeraj Sharma & Rajat Agrawal, 2017. "Locating a Wind Energy Project: A Case of a Leading Oil and Gas Producer in India," Vision, , vol. 21(2), pages 172-194, June.
    15. Singh, Rhythm, 2018. "Energy sufficiency aspirations of India and the role of renewable resources: Scenarios for future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2783-2795.
    16. Hu, Mao & Guo, Kai & Zhou, Haiqin & Shen, Fei & Zhu, Wenkun & Dai, Lichun, 2024. "Insights into the kinetics, thermodynamics and evolved gases for the pyrolysis of freshly excreted and solid-liquid separated swine manures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    17. Nithya Saiprasad & Akhtar Kalam & Aladin Zayegh, 2019. "Triple Bottom Line Analysis and Optimum Sizing of Renewable Energy Using Improved Hybrid Optimization Employing the Genetic Algorithm: A Case Study from India," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, January.
    18. Kim, Jung-Hun & Oh, Jeong-Ik & Tsang, Yiu Fai & Park, Young-Kwon & Lee, Jechan & Kwon, Eilhann E., 2020. "CO2-assisted catalytic pyrolysis of digestate with steel slag," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    19. Zhang, Dahai & Wang, Jiaqi & Lin, Yonggang & Si, Yulin & Huang, Can & Yang, Jing & Huang, Bin & Li, Wei, 2017. "Present situation and future prospect of renewable energy in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 865-871.
    20. Rohankar, Nishant & Jain, A.K. & Nangia, Om P. & Dwivedi, Prasoom, 2016. "A study of existing solar power policy framework in India for viability of the solar projects perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 510-518.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:21:p:7914-:d:952798. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.