IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i20p7483-d939282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction of the Behavior of Sunflower Husk Ash after Its Processing by Various Torrefaction Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Rafail Isemin

    (Biocenter, Tambov State Technical University, 392000 Tambov, Russia)

  • Fouzi Tabet

    (Opti’Tech, 04107 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Artemy Nebyvaev

    (Biocenter, Tambov State Technical University, 392000 Tambov, Russia)

  • Vadim Kokh-Tatarenko

    (Biocenter, Tambov State Technical University, 392000 Tambov, Russia)

  • Sergey Kuzmin

    (Biocenter, Tambov State Technical University, 392000 Tambov, Russia)

  • Oleg Milovanov

    (Biocenter, Tambov State Technical University, 392000 Tambov, Russia)

  • Dmitry Klimov

    (Biocenter, Tambov State Technical University, 392000 Tambov, Russia)

  • Alexander Mikhalev

    (Biocenter, Tambov State Technical University, 392000 Tambov, Russia)

  • Semen Dobkin

    (Head Specialized Design Bureau for a Complex of Equipment for the Microclimate, 224014 Brest, Belarus)

  • Yuri Zhulaev

    (Head Specialized Design Bureau for a Complex of Equipment for the Microclimate, 224014 Brest, Belarus)

Abstract

Biomass can be considered an alternative to coal in the production of heat and electricity. Many types of biomass are waste from agriculture and the food industry. This waste is cheap, readily available, and replenished annually. However, most agricultural and food industry wastes (sugar cane pulp, olive and sunflower oil production wastes, straw, etc.) have ash with a low melting point. This leads to a rapid growth of ash deposits on the heating surfaces of boilers; as a result, the actual efficiency of boilers in which waste from agriculture and the food industry is burned is 45–50%. Known biomass pre-treatment technologies that allow for the fuel characteristics of biowaste. For example, leaching of biowaste in water at a temperature of 80–240 °C makes it possible to drastically reduce the content of alkali metal compounds in the ash, the presence of which reduces the melting point of the ash. However, this biomass pre-treatment technology is complex and requires additional costs for drying the treated biomass. We proposed to use torrefaction for pre-treatment of biomass, which makes it possible to increase the heat of combustion of biomass, increase the hydrophobicity of biomass, and reduce the cost of grinding it. However, we are not aware of studies that have studied the effect of torrefaction on the chemical composition of ash from the point of view of solving the problem of preventing the formation of agglomerates and reducing the growth rate of ash deposits on the convective heating surfaces of boilers. In this paper, the characteristics of sunflower husk subjected to torrefaction in an environment of superheated steam at a temperature of 300 °C and in an environment of gaseous products at a temperature of 250 °C are studied. All experiments were conducted using fluidized bed technology. The resulting biochar has a calorific value of 14.8–23% higher than the initial husk. To assess the behavior of sunflower husk ash, predictive coefficients were calculated. Torrefaction of sunflower husks does not exclude the possibility of slagging of the furnace but reduces the likelihood of slagging by 2.31–7.27 times. According to calculations, the torrefaction of sunflower husks reduces the likelihood of ash deposits on the convective heating surfaces of the boiler by 2.1–12.2 times. According to its fuel characteristics, the husk, after torrefaction in an environment of superheated steam, approaches wood waste, i.e., can be burned separately without additives or mixtures with other fuels with refractory ash.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafail Isemin & Fouzi Tabet & Artemy Nebyvaev & Vadim Kokh-Tatarenko & Sergey Kuzmin & Oleg Milovanov & Dmitry Klimov & Alexander Mikhalev & Semen Dobkin & Yuri Zhulaev, 2022. "Prediction of the Behavior of Sunflower Husk Ash after Its Processing by Various Torrefaction Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:20:p:7483-:d:939282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/20/7483/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/20/7483/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rafail Isemin & Alexander Mikhalev & Oleg Milovanov & Dmitry Klimov & Vadim Kokh-Tatarenko & Mathieu Brulé & Fouzi Tabet & Artemy Nebyvaev & Sergey Kuzmin & Valentin Konyakhin, 2022. "Comparison of Characteristics of Poultry Litter Pellets Obtained by the Processes of Dry and Wet Torrefaction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Michael Binns & Hafiz Muhammad Uzair Ayub, 2021. "Model Reduction Applied to Empirical Models for Biomass Gasification in Downdraft Gasifiers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Hafiz Muhammad Uzair Ayub & Sang Jin Park & Michael Binns, 2020. "Biomass to Syngas: Modified Non-Stoichiometric Thermodynamic Models for the Downdraft Biomass Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Hafiz Muhammad Uzair Ayub & Sang Jin Park & Michael Binns, 2020. "Biomass to Syngas: Modified Stoichiometric Thermodynamic Models for Downdraft Biomass Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    5. Fariha Kanwal & Ashfaq Ahmed & Farrukh Jamil & Sikander Rafiq & H. M. Uzair Ayub & Moinuddin Ghauri & M. Shahzad Khurram & Shahid Munir & Abrar Inayat & Muhammad S. Abu Bakar & Surendar Moogi & Su Shi, 2021. "Co-Combustion of Blends of Coal and Underutilised Biomass Residues for Environmental Friendly Electrical Energy Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, April.
    6. Jae-Hyun Park & Young-Chan Choi & Young-Joo Lee & Hyung-Taek Kim, 2020. "Characteristics of Miscanthus Fuel by Wet Torrefaction on Fuel Upgrading and Gas Emission Behavior," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-10, May.
    7. Miguel-Angel Perea-Moreno & Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro & Alberto-Jesus Perea-Moreno, 2018. "Sustainable Energy Based on Sunflower Seed Husk Boiler for Residential Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuliia Shyshko & Anatolii Cherniavskyi & Daria Shyshko & Olena Borychenko & Artur Zaporozhets & Ievgen Zaitsev, 2024. "Increasing the Efficiency of Loading Devices for Biomass Boilers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-15, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fariha Kanwal & Ashfaq Ahmed & Farrukh Jamil & Sikander Rafiq & H. M. Uzair Ayub & Moinuddin Ghauri & M. Shahzad Khurram & Shahid Munir & Abrar Inayat & Muhammad S. Abu Bakar & Surendar Moogi & Su Shi, 2021. "Co-Combustion of Blends of Coal and Underutilised Biomass Residues for Environmental Friendly Electrical Energy Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Marco Puglia & Nicolò Morselli & Simone Pedrazzi & Paolo Tartarini & Giulio Allesina & Alberto Muscio, 2021. "Specific and Cumulative Exhaust Gas Emissions in Micro-Scale Generators Fueled by Syngas from Biomass Gasification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Valentina Segneri & Jean Henry Ferrasse & Antonio Trinca & Giorgio Vilardi, 2022. "An Overview of Waste Gasification and Syngas Upgrading Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-7, September.
    4. Antonios Nazos & Dorothea Politi & Georgios Giakoumakis & Dimitrios Sidiras, 2022. "Simulation and Optimization of Lignocellulosic Biomass Wet- and Dry-Torrefaction Process for Energy, Fuels and Materials Production: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-35, November.
    5. Silva, Isabelly P. & Lima, Rafael M.A. & Santana, Hortência E.P. & Silva, Gabriel F. & Ruzene, Denise S. & Silva, Daniel P., 2022. "Development of a semi-empirical model for woody biomass gasification based on stoichiometric thermodynamic equilibrium model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    6. Michael Binns & Hafiz Muhammad Uzair Ayub, 2021. "Model Reduction Applied to Empirical Models for Biomass Gasification in Downdraft Gasifiers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, November.
    7. Zhang, Jinchun & Hou, Jinxiu & Zhang, Zichuan, 2022. "Real-time identification of out-of-control and instability in process parameter for gasification process: Integrated application of control chart and kalman filter," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    8. M. Shahabuddin & Sankar Bhattacharya, 2021. "Co-Gasification Characteristics of Coal and Biomass Using CO 2 Reactant under Thermodynamic Equilibrium Modelling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-12, November.
    9. Jacek Grams, 2022. "Upgrading of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Hydrogen-Rich Gas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-5, December.
    10. María Pilar González-Vázquez & Fernando Rubiera & Covadonga Pevida & Daniel T. Pio & Luís A.C. Tarelho, 2021. "Thermodynamic Analysis of Biomass Gasification Using Aspen Plus: Comparison of Stoichiometric and Non-Stoichiometric Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, January.
    11. Miguel-Angel Perea-Moreno & Quetzalcoatl Hernandez-Escobedo & Fernando Rueda-Martinez & Alberto-Jesus Perea-Moreno, 2020. "Zapote Seed ( Pouteria mammosa L. ) Valorization for Thermal Energy Generation in Tropical Climates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    12. Zixia Xiang & Yanhong Yin & Yuanwen He, 2018. "A Microeconomic Methodology to Evaluate Energy Efficiency by Consumption Behaviors and Strategies to Improve Energy Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-11, November.
    13. Carmen de la Cruz-Lovera & Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro & Esther Salmerón-Manzano & José-Luis de la Cruz-Fernández & Alberto-Jesus Perea-Moreno, 2019. "Date Seeds ( Phoenix dactylifera L. ) Valorization for Boilers in the Mediterranean Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, January.
    14. Luigi Pari & Francesco Latterini & Walter Stefanoni, 2020. "Herbaceous Oil Crops, a Review on Mechanical Harvesting State of the Art," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-25, July.
    15. Mohd Zeeshan & Rohan R. Pande & Purnanand V. Bhale, 2024. "A modeling study for the gasification of refuse-derived fuel as an alternative to waste disposal," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 23985-24008, September.
    16. Quetzalcoatl Hernandez-Escobedo & Alida Ramirez-Jimenez & Jesús Manuel Dorador-Gonzalez & Miguel-Angel Perea-Moreno & Alberto-Jesus Perea-Moreno, 2020. "Sustainable Solar Energy in Mexican Universities. Case Study: The National School of Higher Studies Juriquilla (UNAM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, April.
    17. Marina Nikolić Topalović & Milenko Stanković & Goran Ćirović & Dragan Pamučar, 2018. "Comparison of the Applied Measures on the Simulated Scenarios for the Sustainable Building Construction through Carbon Footprint Emissions—Case Study of Building Construction in Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.
    18. Rafail Isemin & Alexander Mikhalev & Oleg Milovanov & Artemy Nebyvaev, 2022. "Some Results of Poultry Litter Processing into a Fertilizer by the Wet Torrefaction Method in a Fluidized Bed," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-11, March.
    19. Ardit Sertolli & Zoltán Gabnai & Péter Lengyel & Attila Bai, 2022. "Biomass Potential and Utilization in Worldwide Research Trends—A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, May.
    20. Hafiz Muhammad Uzair Ayub & Sang Jin Park & Michael Binns, 2020. "Biomass to Syngas: Modified Non-Stoichiometric Thermodynamic Models for the Downdraft Biomass Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:20:p:7483-:d:939282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.