IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i14p5259-d867221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Demand Response Impact Evaluation: A Review of Methods for Estimating the Customer Baseline Load

Author

Listed:
  • Ottavia Valentini

    (European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, Italy
    Department of Science, Technology and Society, University School for Advanced Studies IUSS, 27100 Pavia, Italy
    Department of Economics, University of Insubria, Via Monte Generoso 71, 21100 Varese, Italy)

  • Nikoleta Andreadou

    (European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, Italy)

  • Paolo Bertoldi

    (European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, Italy)

  • Alexandre Lucas

    (European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, Italy
    Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science—INESC TEC, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Iolanda Saviuc

    (Department of Engineering Management, Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Evangelos Kotsakis

    (European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, Italy)

Abstract

Climate neutrality is one of the greatest challenges of our century, and a decarbonised energy system is a key step towards this goal. To this end, the electricity system is expected to become more interconnected, digitalised, and flexible by engaging consumers both through microgeneration and through demand side flexibility. A successful use of these flexibility tools depends widely on the evaluation of their effects, hence the definition of methods to assess and evaluate them is essential for their implementation. In order to enable a reliable assessment of the benefits from participating in demand response, it is necessary to define a reference value (“baseline”) to allow for a fair comparison. Different methodologies have been investigated, developed, and adopted for estimating the customer baseline load. The article presents a structured overview of methods for the estimating the customer baseline load, based on a review of academic literature, existing standardisation efforts, and lessons from use cases. In particular, the article describes and focuses on the different baseline methods applied in some European H2020 projects, showing the results achieved in terms of measurement accuracy and costs in real test cases. The most suitable methodology choice among the several available depends on many factors. Some of them can be the function of the Demand Response (DR) service in the system, the broader regulatory framework for DR participation in wholesale markets, or the DR providers characteristics, and this list is not exclusive. The evaluation shows that the baseline methodology choice presents a trade-off among complexity, accuracy, and cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Ottavia Valentini & Nikoleta Andreadou & Paolo Bertoldi & Alexandre Lucas & Iolanda Saviuc & Evangelos Kotsakis, 2022. "Demand Response Impact Evaluation: A Review of Methods for Estimating the Customer Baseline Load," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-36, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:14:p:5259-:d:867221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/14/5259/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/14/5259/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Todd, Annika & Cappers, Peter & Spurlock, C. Anna & Jin, Ling, 2019. "Spillover as a cause of bias in baseline evaluation methods for demand response programs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 344-357.
    2. Pereira, Guillermo Ivan & Specht, Jan Martin & Silva, Patrícia Pereira & Madlener, Reinhard, 2018. "Technology, business model, and market design adaptation toward smart electricity distribution: Insights for policy making," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 426-440.
    3. Xu Chen and Andrew N. Kleit, 2016. "Money for Nothing? Why FERC Order 745 Should have Died," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    4. Javed, Fahad & Arshad, Naveed & Wallin, Fredrik & Vassileva, Iana & Dahlquist, Erik, 2012. "Forecasting for demand response in smart grids: An analysis on use of anthropologic and structural data and short term multiple loads forecasting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 150-160.
    5. Lu, Renzhi & Hong, Seung Ho, 2019. "Incentive-based demand response for smart grid with reinforcement learning and deep neural network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 937-949.
    6. Saehong Park & Seunghyoung Ryu & Yohwan Choi & Jihyo Kim & Hongseok Kim, 2015. "Data-Driven Baseline Estimation of Residential Buildings for Demand Response," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Ziras, Charalampos & Heinrich, Carsten & Bindner, Henrik W., 2021. "Why baselines are not suited for local flexibility markets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    8. Hu, Maomao & Xiao, Fu, 2018. "Price-responsive model-based optimal demand response control of inverter air conditioners using genetic algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 151-164.
    9. Chen, Yongbao & Xu, Peng & Chu, Yiyi & Li, Weilin & Wu, Yuntao & Ni, Lizhou & Bao, Yi & Wang, Kun, 2017. "Short-term electrical load forecasting using the Support Vector Regression (SVR) model to calculate the demand response baseline for office buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 659-670.
    10. João Abel Peças Lopes & André Guimarães Madureira & Manuel Matos & Ricardo Jorge Bessa & Vítor Monteiro & João Luiz Afonso & Sérgio F. Santos & João P. S. Catalão & Carlos Henggeler Antunes & Pedro Ma, 2020. "The future of power systems: Challenges, trends, and upcoming paradigms," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), May.
    11. Alexandre Lucas & Luca Jansen & Nikoleta Andreadou & Evangelos Kotsakis & Marcelo Masera, 2019. "Load Flexibility Forecast for DR Using Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring in the Residential Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    12. Hung-po Chao, 2011. "Demand response in wholesale electricity markets: the choice of customer baseline," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 68-88, February.
    13. Gabaldón, A. & García-Garre, A. & Ruiz-Abellón, M.C. & Guillamón, A. & Álvarez-Bel, C. & Fernandez-Jimenez, L.A., 2021. "Improvement of customer baselines for the evaluation of demand response through the use of physically-based load models," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    14. Bradley, Peter & Leach, Matthew & Torriti, Jacopo, 2013. "A review of the costs and benefits of demand response for electricity in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 312-327.
    15. Olsthoorn, Mark & Schleich, Joachim & Klobasa, Marian, 2015. "Barriers to electricity load shift in companies: A survey-based exploration of the end-user perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 32-42.
    16. Parrish, Bryony & Heptonstall, Phil & Gross, Rob & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2020. "A systematic review of motivations, enablers and barriers for consumer engagement with residential demand response," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    17. Chao, Hung-po, 2010. "Price-Responsive Demand Management for a Smart Grid World," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 7-20, January.
    18. Pallonetto, Fabiano & De Rosa, Mattia & Milano, Federico & Finn, Donal P., 2019. "Demand response algorithms for smart-grid ready residential buildings using machine learning models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 1265-1282.
    19. Xenias, Dimitrios & Axon, Colin J. & Whitmarsh, Lorraine & Connor, Peter M. & Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Spence, Alexa, 2015. "UK smart grid development: An expert assessment of the benefits, pitfalls and functions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 89-102.
    20. He, Xian & Keyaerts, Nico & Azevedo, Isabel & Meeus, Leonardo & Hancher, Leigh & Glachant, Jean-Michel, 2013. "How to engage consumers in demand response: A contract perspective," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 108-122.
    21. Reiss, Peter C. & White, Matthew W., 2003. "Demand and Pricing in Electricity Markets: Evidence from San Diego During California's Energy Crisis," Research Papers 1829, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    22. Vuelvas, José & Ruiz, Fredy & Gruosso, Giambattista, 2018. "Limiting gaming opportunities on incentive-based demand response programs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 668-681.
    23. Peter C. Reiss & Matthew W. White, 2003. "Demand and Pricing in Electricity Markets: Evidence from San Diego During California's Energy Crisis," NBER Working Papers 9986, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    24. Kim, Jin-Ho & Shcherbakova, Anastasia, 2011. "Common failures of demand response," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 873-880.
    25. Vázquez-Canteli, José R. & Nagy, Zoltán, 2019. "Reinforcement learning for demand response: A review of algorithms and modeling techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1072-1089.
    26. Sha, Huajing & Xu, Peng & Lin, Meishun & Peng, Chen & Dou, Qiang, 2021. "Development of a multi-granularity energy forecasting toolkit for demand response baseline calculation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    27. Jin, Xin & Baker, Kyri & Christensen, Dane & Isley, Steven, 2017. "Foresee: A user-centric home energy management system for energy efficiency and demand response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1583-1595.
    28. Hung-po Chao & Mario DePillis, 2013. "Incentive effects of paying demand response in wholesale electricity markets," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 265-283, June.
    29. Eid, Cherrelle & Koliou, Elta & Valles, Mercedes & Reneses, Javier & Hakvoort, Rudi, 2016. "Time-based pricing and electricity demand response: Existing barriers and next steps," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 15-25.
    30. Ellabban, Omar & Abu-Rub, Haitham, 2016. "Smart grid customers' acceptance and engagement: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 1285-1298.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marcel Antal & Vlad Mihailescu & Tudor Cioara & Ionut Anghel, 2022. "Blockchain-Based Distributed Federated Learning in Smart Grid," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Lind, Leandro & Chaves-Ávila, José Pablo & Valarezo, Orlando & Sanjab, Anibal & Olmos, Luis, 2024. "Baseline methods for distributed flexibility in power systems considering resource, market, and product characteristics," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    3. Nikoleta Andreadou & Dimitrios Thomas & Antonio De Paola & Evangelos Kotsakis & Gianluca Fulli, 2023. "Holistic Evaluation of Demand Response Events in Real Pilot Sites: From Baseline Calculation to Evaluation of Key Performance Indicators," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-28, August.
    4. Jaka Rober & Leon Maruša & Miloš Beković, 2023. "A Machine Learning Application for the Energy Flexibility Assessment of a Distribution Network for Consumers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-20, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antonopoulos, Ioannis & Robu, Valentin & Couraud, Benoit & Kirli, Desen & Norbu, Sonam & Kiprakis, Aristides & Flynn, David & Elizondo-Gonzalez, Sergio & Wattam, Steve, 2020. "Artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches to energy demand-side response: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    2. Iliopoulos, Nikolaos & Esteban, Miguel & Kudo, Shogo, 2020. "Assessing the willingness of residential electricity consumers to adopt demand side management and distributed energy resources: A case study on the Japanese market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    3. Stede, Jan & Arnold, Karin & Dufter, Christa & Holtz, Georg & von Roon, Serafin & Richstein, Jörn C., 2020. "The role of aggregators in facilitating industrial demand response: Evidence from Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    4. Leinauer, Christina & Schott, Paul & Fridgen, Gilbert & Keller, Robert & Ollig, Philipp & Weibelzahl, Martin, 2022. "Obstacles to demand response: Why industrial companies do not adapt their power consumption to volatile power generation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    5. Ramos, Dorel Soares & Del Carpio Huayllas, Tesoro Elena & Morozowski Filho, Marciano & Tolmasquim, Mauricio Tiomno, 2020. "New commercial arrangements and business models in electricity distribution systems: The case of Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    6. Tim Schittekatte & Valerie Reif & Leonardo Meeus, 2021. "Welcoming New Entrants into European Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, July.
    7. Olga Bogdanova & Karīna Viskuba & Laila Zemīte, 2023. "A Review of Barriers and Enables in Demand Response Performance Chain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-33, September.
    8. Katz, Jonas, 2014. "Linking meters and markets: Roles and incentives to support a flexible demand side," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 74-84.
    9. Osaru Agbonaye & Patrick Keatley & Ye Huang & Motasem Bani Mustafa & Neil Hewitt, 2020. "Design, Valuation and Comparison of Demand Response Strategies for Congestion Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-29, November.
    10. Ibrahim, Muhammad Sohail & Dong, Wei & Yang, Qiang, 2020. "Machine learning driven smart electric power systems: Current trends and new perspectives," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    11. Ussama Assad & Muhammad Arshad Shehzad Hassan & Umar Farooq & Asif Kabir & Muhammad Zeeshan Khan & S. Sabahat H. Bukhari & Zain ul Abidin Jaffri & Judit Oláh & József Popp, 2022. "Smart Grid, Demand Response and Optimization: A Critical Review of Computational Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-36, March.
    12. Clastres, Cédric & Khalfallah, Haikel, 2021. "Dynamic pricing efficiency with strategic retailers and consumers: An analytical analysis of short-term market interactions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    13. Boza, Pal & Evgeniou, Theodoros, 2021. "Artificial intelligence to support the integration of variable renewable energy sources to the power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    14. Cédric Clastres & Haikel Khalfallah, 2021. "Dynamic pricing efficiency with strategic retailers and consumers: An analytical analysis of short-term market interactions," Post-Print hal-03193212, HAL.
    15. Patrick Ludwig & Christian Winzer, 2022. "Tariff Menus to Avoid Rebound Peaks: Results from a Discrete Choice Experiment with Swiss Customers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, August.
    16. Lee, Eunjung & Lee, Kyungeun & Lee, Hyoseop & Kim, Euncheol & Rhee, Wonjong, 2019. "Defining virtual control group to improve customer baseline load calculation of residential demand response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 946-958.
    17. Good, Nicholas & Ellis, Keith A. & Mancarella, Pierluigi, 2017. "Review and classification of barriers and enablers of demand response in the smart grid," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 57-72.
    18. Cédric Clastres & Haikel Khalfallah, 2020. "Retailers' strategies facing demand response and markets interactions," Working Papers hal-03167543, HAL.
    19. Ziras, Charalampos & Heinrich, Carsten & Bindner, Henrik W., 2021. "Why baselines are not suited for local flexibility markets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    20. Eduardo J. Salazar & Mauro Jurado & Mauricio E. Samper, 2023. "Reinforcement Learning-Based Pricing and Incentive Strategy for Demand Response in Smart Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-33, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:14:p:5259-:d:867221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.