IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i14p5444-d1196335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Parametric Analysis Based on Physico-Chemical Characterization and Biochemical Methane Potential Estimation for the Selection of Industrial Wastes as Co-Substrates in Anaerobic Digestion

Author

Listed:
  • Luz Marina Ruiz

    (Environmental Technologies, Civil Engineering Department, E.T.S.I. Caminos, Canales y Puertos, University of Granada, Dr. Severo Ochoa St., 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • María Fernández

    (Environmental Technologies, Civil Engineering Department, E.T.S.I. Caminos, Canales y Puertos, University of Granada, Dr. Severo Ochoa St., 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Ana Genaro

    (Empresa Municipal de Abastecimiento y Saneamiento de Granada S.A., Molinos St., 58-60, 18009 Granada, Spain)

  • Jaime Martín-Pascual

    (Environmental Technologies, Civil Engineering Department, E.T.S.I. Caminos, Canales y Puertos, University of Granada, Dr. Severo Ochoa St., 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Montserrat Zamorano

    (Environmental Technologies, Civil Engineering Department, E.T.S.I. Caminos, Canales y Puertos, University of Granada, Dr. Severo Ochoa St., 18071 Granada, Spain)

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion is considered as one of the most feasible waste-to-energy technologies for the valorization of organic wastes. It can be applied to many different substrates but the mono-digestion of a single substrate usually has some important drawbacks due to the physico-chemical characteristics of the substrate. A feasible solution is the simultaneous co-digestion of several substrates with different composition and characteristics, so that synergetic effects may be generated and physico-chemical characteristics may be compensated, thus reaching higher process efficiencies and biogas production rates. In this work, a multi-parametric analysis for the objective comparison of industrial wastes was developed in order to help with decision making about their suitability as a co-substrate in anaerobic co-digestion. Criteria considered for this analysis included sample composition, C/N ratios, theoretical biochemical methane potential (BMP), and other important issues such as production rates, seasonality, and the distance to the WWTP or pre-treatment requirements. Results showed that, among the 13 evaluated wastes, 2 of them showed a higher potential for being used in anaerobic co-digestion: 1. Fried corn from the snack food industry and 2. Wet fatty pomace from the olive oil industry. Both wastes showed high estimated BMP values, high lipid and carbohydrate content, and C/N ratios in a proper range to improve the low C/N ratio of sewage sludge. Other wastes such as olive pomace (dry), skinless corn (not fried), and grape pomace from the winery industry may also be used as co-substrates. As a conclusion, this procedure based on a selection matrix can be considered as a useful tool to help both producers and WWTP operators to make decisions about the potential applicability of specific industrial wastes as co-substrates in anaerobic co-digestion.

Suggested Citation

  • Luz Marina Ruiz & María Fernández & Ana Genaro & Jaime Martín-Pascual & Montserrat Zamorano, 2023. "Multi-Parametric Analysis Based on Physico-Chemical Characterization and Biochemical Methane Potential Estimation for the Selection of Industrial Wastes as Co-Substrates in Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:14:p:5444-:d:1196335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/14/5444/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/14/5444/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elalami, D. & Carrere, H. & Monlau, F. & Abdelouahdi, K. & Oukarroum, A. & Barakat, A., 2019. "Pretreatment and co-digestion of wastewater sludge for biogas production: Recent research advances and trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Cheng, Jun & Ding, Lingkan & Lin, Richen & Yue, Liangchen & Liu, Jianzhong & Zhou, Junhu & Cen, Kefa, 2016. "Fermentative biohydrogen and biomethane co-production from mixture of food waste and sewage sludge: Effects of physiochemical properties and mix ratios on fermentation performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1-8.
    3. Jinming Liu & Changhao Zeng & Na Wang & Jianfei Shi & Bo Zhang & Changyu Liu & Yong Sun, 2021. "Rapid Biochemical Methane Potential Evaluation of Anaerobic Co-Digestion Feedstocks Based on Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Chemometrics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Derick Lima & Gregory Appleby & Li Li, 2023. "A Scoping Review of Options for Increasing Biogas Production from Sewage Sludge: Challenges and Opportunities for Enhancing Energy Self-Sufficiency in Wastewater Treatment Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-34, March.
    5. Alexandros Eftaxias & Evangelia Anna Passa & Christos Michailidis & Christodoulos Daoutis & Apostolos Kantartzis & Vasileios Diamantis, 2022. "Residual Forest Biomass in Pinus Stands: Accumulation and Biogas Production Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-11, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Justyna Górka & Małgorzata Cimochowicz-Rybicka & Dominika Poproch, 2022. "Sludge Management at the Kraków-Płaszów WWTP—Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-11, June.
    2. Sun, Chihe & Xia, Ao & Liao, Qiang & Fu, Qian & Huang, Yun & Zhu, Xun & Wei, Pengfei & Lin, Richen & Murphy, Jerry D., 2018. "Improving production of volatile fatty acids and hydrogen from microalgae and rice residue: Effects of physicochemical characteristics and mix ratios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 1082-1092.
    3. Bakonyi, Péter & Buitrón, Germán & Valdez-Vazquez, Idania & Nemestóthy, Nándor & Bélafi-Bakó, Katalin, 2017. "A novel gas separation integrated membrane bioreactor to evaluate the impact of self-generated biogas recycling on continuous hydrogen fermentation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 813-823.
    4. Sun, Chihe & Xia, Ao & Liao, Qiang & Fu, Qian & Huang, Yun & Zhu, Xun, 2019. "Life-cycle assessment of biohythane production via two-stage anaerobic fermentation from microalgae and food waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 395-410.
    5. Christine Peyrelasse & Abdellatif Barakat & Camille Lagnet & Prasad Kaparaju & Florian Monlau, 2021. "Anaerobic Digestion of Wastewater Sludge and Alkaline-Pretreated Wheat Straw at Semi-Continuous Pilot Scale: Performances and Energy Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Peng, Wei & Beggio, Giovanni & Pivato, Alberto & Zhang, Hua & Lü, Fan & He, Pinjing, 2022. "Applications of near infrared spectroscopy and hyperspectral imaging techniques in anaerobic digestion of bio-wastes: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    7. Gérard Merlin & Jonathan Outin & Hervé Boileau, 2021. "Co-Digestion of Extended Aeration Sewage Sludge with Whey, Grease and Septage: Experimental and Modeling Determination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Shuang Liu & Wenzhe Li & Guoxiang Zheng & Haiyan Yang & Longhai Li, 2020. "Optimization of Cattle Manure and Food Waste Co-Digestion for Biohydrogen Production in a Mesophilic Semi-Continuous Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-13, July.
    9. Khalekuzzaman, Md & Jahan, Nusrat & Bin Kabir, Sadib & Hasan, Mehedi, 2024. "An integrated energy recovery approach of biohythane-biocrude production from microalgae-sludge through co-digestion and co-liquefaction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    10. Xia, Ao & Sun, Chihe & Fu, Qian & Liao, Qiang & Huang, Yun & Zhu, Xun & Li, Qing, 2020. "Biofuel production from wet microalgae biomass: Comparison of physicochemical properties and extraction performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    11. Haili Liu & Xu Zhang & Qingchao Hong, 2021. "Emission Characteristics of Pollution Gases from the Combustion of Food Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-11, October.
    12. Kasinath, Archana & Byliński, Hubert & Artichowicz, Wojciech & Remiszewska –Skwarek, Anna & Szopińska, Małgorzata & Zaborowska, Ewa & Luczkiewicz, Aneta & Fudala –Ksiazek, Sylwia, 2023. "Biochemical assays of intensified methane content in biogas from low-temperature processing of waste activated sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    13. Kumar, Atul & Samadder, S.R., 2020. "Performance evaluation of anaerobic digestion technology for energy recovery from organic fraction of municipal solid waste: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    14. Chiappero, Marco & Norouzi, Omid & Hu, Mingyu & Demichelis, Francesca & Berruti, Franco & Di Maria, Francesco & Mašek, Ondřej & Fiore, Silvia, 2020. "Review of biochar role as additive in anaerobic digestion processes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    15. Manuel García & Paula Oulego & Mario Díaz & Sergio Collado, 2021. "Non-Energetic Chemical Products by Fermentation of Hydrolyzed Sewage Sludge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-37, May.
    16. Cho, Si-Kyung & Jeong, Min-Wook & Choi, Yun-Kyu & Shin, Juhee & Shin, Seung Gu, 2018. "Effects of low-strength ultrasonication on dark fermentative hydrogen production: Start-up performance and microbial community analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 34-41.
    17. Baishao Zhan & Peng Li & Ming Li & Wei Luo & Hailiang Zhang, 2023. "Detection of Soluble Solids Content (SSC) in Pears Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Combined with LASSO–GWF–PLS Model," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, July.
    18. Negri, Camilla & Ricci, Marina & Zilio, Massimo & D'Imporzano, Giuliana & Qiao, Wei & Dong, Renjie & Adani, Fabrizio, 2020. "Anaerobic digestion of food waste for bio-energy production in China and Southeast Asia: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    19. Huang, Bao-Cheng & Lu, Yan & Li, Wen-Wei, 2020. "Exploiting the energy potential of municipal wastewater in China by incorporating tailored anaerobic treatment processes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 534-540.
    20. Francesca Valenti & Attilio Toscano, 2021. "A GIS-Based Model to Assess the Potential of Wastewater Treatment Plants for Enhancing Bioenergy Production within the Context of the Water–Energy Nexus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:14:p:5444-:d:1196335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.