IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i4p2004-d1072169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Catalytic Intermediate Pyrolysis of Rapeseed Meal

Author

Listed:
  • Tahereh Soleymani Angili

    (Faculty of Geo-Data Science, Geodesy and Environmental Engineering, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza Av. 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Grzesik

    (Faculty of Geo-Data Science, Geodesy and Environmental Engineering, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza Av. 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

  • Wojciech Jerzak

    (Faculty of Metals Engineering and Industrial Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza Av. 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

Biowaste valorization is a means for tackling resource depletion and climate change, which gives rise to environmental benefits and economic growth. One of the most known technological routes to convert biowaste into bioproducts is pyrolysis, which may conduct with and without catalyst application. The purpose of this study was to investigate an early-stage life-cycle assessment (LCA) for catalytic intermediate pyrolysis to valorize rapeseed meal, split over the scenarios using ZSM-5 and zeolite Y catalysts. Four selected environmental impact categories were assessed by IMPACT 2002+ methodology. The results revealed that the ZSM-5 catalytic pyrolysis led to bigger environmental impacts than the pyrolysis utilizing zeolite Y in all compared impact categories except global warming. The scenario that involved zeolite Y had around 20% GHG intensity greater than ZSM-5 pyrolysis. The bulk of GHG emissions mostly involved CO 2 and methane generated from electricity consumption, which was provided by fossil resources. Applying ZSM-5 in the pyrolysis increased environmental burdens in non-renewable energy, respiratory inorganics, and terrestrial ecotoxicity by 140.88 MJ primary, 8.83 × 10 −3 kg PM 2.5 eq. and 125.63 kg TEG soil, respectively. The major driving factor of high value in mentioned categories was the manufacturing process of the ZSM-5 catalyst by utilizing natural gas and chemicals, such as phosphorus trichloride, sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate. Given that catalysts can play a substantial role in the emissions resulting from bio-based products, hence LCAs of pyrolysis should consider the potential influence of catalysts in the valorization processes. This study can predict environmental hotspots in the early stages of bio-waste valorization and show the potential defects of implanted biorefinery at pilot/industrial scales.

Suggested Citation

  • Tahereh Soleymani Angili & Katarzyna Grzesik & Wojciech Jerzak, 2023. "Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Catalytic Intermediate Pyrolysis of Rapeseed Meal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:4:p:2004-:d:1072169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/4/2004/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/4/2004/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tahereh Soleymani Angili & Katarzyna Grzesik & Erfaneh Salimi & Maria Loizidou, 2022. "Life Cycle Analysis of Food Waste Valorization in Laboratory-Scale," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Brassard, P. & Godbout, S. & Hamelin, L., 2021. "Framework for consequential life cycle assessment of pyrolysis biorefineries: A case study for the conversion of primary forestry residues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    3. Bieber, Niclas & Ker, Jen Ho & Wang, Xiaonan & Triantafyllidis, Charalampos & van Dam, Koen H. & Koppelaar, Rembrandt H.E.M. & Shah, Nilay, 2018. "Sustainable planning of the energy-water-food nexus using decision making tools," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 584-607.
    4. Dhyani, Vaibhav & Bhaskar, Thallada, 2018. "A comprehensive review on the pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PB), pages 695-716.
    5. Tahereh Soleymani Angili & Katarzyna Grzesik & Anne Rödl & Martin Kaltschmitt, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment of Bioethanol Production: A Review of Feedstock, Technology and Methodology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zalazar-Garcia, Daniela & Fernandez, Anabel & Rodriguez-Ortiz, Leandro & Torres, Erick & Reyes-Urrutia, Andrés & Echegaray, Marcelo & Rodriguez, Rosa & Mazza, Germán, 2022. "Exergo-ecological analysis and life cycle assessment of agro-wastes using a combined simulation approach based on Cape-Open to Cape-Open (COCO) and SimaPro free-software," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1), pages 60-71.
    2. Yek, Peter Nai Yuh & Cheng, Yoke Wang & Liew, Rock Keey & Wan Mahari, Wan Adibah & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Peng, Wanxi & Park, Young-Kwon & Sonne, Christian & Kong, Sieng Huat & Tabatabaei, 2021. "Progress in the torrefaction technology for upgrading oil palm wastes to energy-dense biochar: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    3. Ayub, Yousaf & Ren, Jingzheng & Shi, Tao & Shen, Weifeng & He, Chang, 2023. "Poultry litter valorization: Development and optimization of an electro-chemical and thermal tri-generation process using an extreme gradient boosting algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    4. Elhambakhsh, Abbas & Van Duc Long, Nguyen & Lamichhane, Pradeep & Hessel, Volker, 2023. "Recent progress and future directions in plasma-assisted biomass conversion to hydrogen," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    5. Zhao, Ming & Memon, Muhammad Zaki & Ji, Guozhao & Yang, Xiaoxiao & Vuppaladadiyam, Arun K. & Song, Yinqiang & Raheem, Abdul & Li, Jinhui & Wang, Wei & Zhou, Hui, 2020. "Alkali metal bifunctional catalyst-sorbents enabled biomass pyrolysis for enhanced hydrogen production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 168-175.
    6. Zang, Guiyan & Zhang, Jianan & Jia, Junxi & Lora, Electo Silva & Ratner, Albert, 2020. "Life cycle assessment of power-generation systems based on biomass integrated gasification combined cycles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 336-346.
    7. Kumar, R. & Strezov, V., 2021. "Thermochemical production of bio-oil: A review of downstream processing technologies for bio-oil upgrading, production of hydrogen and high value-added products," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    8. Gupta, Shubhi & Gupta, Goutam Kishore & Mondal, Monoj Kumar, 2019. "Slow pyrolysis of chemically treated walnut shell for valuable products: Effect of process parameters and in-depth product analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 665-676.
    9. Adnan, Muflih A. & Hossain, Mohammad M. & Kibria, Md Golam, 2020. "Biomass upgrading to high-value chemicals via gasification and electrolysis: A thermodynamic analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1367-1379.
    10. Lech Nowicki & Dorota Siuta & Maciej Markowski, 2020. "Pyrolysis of Rapeseed Oil Press Cake and Steam Gasification of Solid Residues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-12, August.
    11. Nicholas R. Magliocca, 2020. "Agent-Based Modeling for Integrating Human Behavior into the Food–Energy–Water Nexus," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-25, December.
    12. Andrade Díaz, Christhel & Albers, Ariane & Zamora-Ledezma, Ezequiel & Hamelin, Lorie, 2024. "The interplay between bioeconomy and the maintenance of long-term soil organic carbon stock in agricultural soils: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    13. Pérez, Nestor Proenza & Pedroso, Daniel Travieso & Machin, Einara Blanco & Antunes, Julio Santana & Tuna, Celso Eduardo & Silveira, José Luz, 2019. "Geometrical characteristics of sugarcane bagasse for being used as fuel in fluidized bed technologies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1210-1224.
    14. Liu, Hui & Liu, Jingyong & Huang, Hongyi & Evrendilek, Fatih & Wen, Shaoting & Li, Weixin, 2021. "Optimizing bioenergy and by-product outputs from durian shell pyrolysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 407-418.
    15. Pang, Yunji & Wu, Yuting & Chen, Yisheng & Luo, Fuliang & Chen, Junjun, 2020. "Degradation effect of Ce/Al2O3 catalyst on pyrolysis volatility of pine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 134-143.
    16. Burov, Nikita O. & Savelenko, Vsevolod D. & Ershov, Mikhail A. & Vikhritskaya, Anastasia O. & Tikhomirova, Ekaterina O. & Klimov, Nikita A. & Kapustin, Vladimir M. & Chernysheva, Elena A. & Sereda, Al, 2023. "Knowledge contribution from science to technology in the conceptualization model to produce sustainable aviation fuels from lignocellulosic biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    17. Mehta, Neha & Anderson, Aine & Johnston, Christopher R. & Rooney, David W., 2022. "Evaluating the opportunity for utilising anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis of livestock manure and grass silage to decarbonise gas infrastructure: A Northern Ireland case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 343-357.
    18. Lacrimioara Senila & Ioan Tenu & Petru Carlescu & Daniela Alexandra Scurtu & Eniko Kovacs & Marin Senila & Oana Cadar & Marius Roman & Diana Elena Dumitras & Cecilia Roman, 2022. "Characterization of Biobriquettes Produced from Vineyard Wastes as a Solid Biofuel Resource," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, February.
    19. Kim, D. & Hadigheh, S.A., 2024. "Oxidative pyrolysis of biosolid: Air concentration effects on biochar formation and kinetics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    20. Polin, Joseph P. & Peterson, Chad A. & Whitmer, Lysle E. & Smith, Ryan G. & Brown, Robert C., 2019. "Process intensification of biomass fast pyrolysis through autothermal operation of a fluidized bed reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 276-285.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:4:p:2004-:d:1072169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.