IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i10p3486-d812297.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the Effects of Using the Giant Miscanthus ( Miscanthus × Giganteus ) Biomass in Various Energy Conversion Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Alina Kowalczyk-Juśko

    (Department of Environmental Engineering and Geodesy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Leszczyńskiego 7, 20-069 Lublin, Poland)

  • Andrzej Mazur

    (Department of Environmental Engineering and Geodesy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Leszczyńskiego 7, 20-069 Lublin, Poland)

  • Patrycja Pochwatka

    (Department of Environmental Engineering and Geodesy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Leszczyńskiego 7, 20-069 Lublin, Poland)

  • Damian Janczak

    (Department of Biosystems Engineering, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 50, 60-624 Poznan, Poland)

  • Jacek Dach

    (Department of Biosystems Engineering, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 50, 60-624 Poznan, Poland)

Abstract

The giant miscanthus ( Miscanthus × giganteus ) is one of the most essential energy plants. It also finds various alternative uses, including installing belts to prevent soil erosion. Biomass from such belts should be removed and rationally managed every year. The parameters of miscanthus biomass were investigated in terms of its suitability for combustion and anaerobic fermentation. Under the conditions of the experiment, miscanthus achieved a stable yield already in the second year of vegetation, mainly due to the high planting density. Energy parameters turned out to be typical for straw biomass (calorific value 18.06 MJ/kg). Relatively low ash melting temperatures (<1400 °C) and their chemical composition meant a high risk of contamination depositing on heating devices, which is often indicated as a shortcoming of biomass compared to hard coal. Miscanthus silage can be a valuable substrate for anaerobic digestion, but it requires a sufficiently early harvest, which affects the yield of biomass. The yield of energy in biomass obtained after drying plants was 163,623.6 MJ/ha. In contrast, the yield of energy from biomass collected in summer and processed into biomethane was much lower and amounted to 72,978.2 MJ/ha.

Suggested Citation

  • Alina Kowalczyk-Juśko & Andrzej Mazur & Patrycja Pochwatka & Damian Janczak & Jacek Dach, 2022. "Evaluation of the Effects of Using the Giant Miscanthus ( Miscanthus × Giganteus ) Biomass in Various Energy Conversion Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:10:p:3486-:d:812297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/10/3486/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/10/3486/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Yongsheng & Zahid, Ibrar & Danial, Ali & Minaret, Jamie & Cao, Yijun & Dutta, Animesh, 2021. "Hydrothermal carbonization of miscanthus: Processing, properties, and synergistic Co-combustion with lignite," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    2. Iqbal, Y. & Gauder, M. & Claupein, W. & Graeff-Hönninger, S. & Lewandowski, I., 2015. "Yield and quality development comparison between miscanthus and switchgrass over a period of 10 years," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 268-276.
    3. Kowalczyk-Juśko, Alina & Pochwatka, Patrycja & Zaborowicz, Maciej & Czekała, Wojciech & Mazurkiewicz, Jakub & Mazur, Andrzej & Janczak, Damian & Marczuk, Andrzej & Dach, Jacek, 2020. "Energy value estimation of silages for substrate in biogas plants using an artificial neural network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    4. Bok, Jin Pil & Choi, Hang Seok & Choi, Joon Weon & Choi, Yeon Seok, 2013. "Fast pyrolysis of Miscanthus sinensis in fluidized bed reactors: Characteristics of product yields and biocrude oil quality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 44-52.
    5. Kim, Jae-Young & Oh, Shinyoung & Hwang, Hyewon & Moon, Youn-Ho & Choi, Joon Weon, 2014. "Assessment of miscanthus biomass (Miscanthus sacchariflorus) for conversion and utilization of bio-oil by fluidized bed type fast pyrolysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 284-291.
    6. Winkler, Bastian & Mangold, Anja & von Cossel, Moritz & Clifton-Brown, John & Pogrzeba, Marta & Lewandowski, Iris & Iqbal, Yasir & Kiesel, Andreas, 2020. "Implementing miscanthus into farming systems: A review of agronomic practices, capital and labour demand," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    7. Dubis, Bogdan & Jankowski, Krzysztof Józef & Załuski, Dariusz & Sokólski, Mateusz, 2020. "The effect of sewage sludge fertilization on the biomass yield of giant miscanthus and the energy balance of the production process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evgeny Chupakhin & Olga Babich & Stanislav Sukhikh & Svetlana Ivanova & Ekaterina Budenkova & Olga Kalashnikova & Olga Kriger, 2021. "Methods of Increasing Miscanthus Biomass Yield for Biofuel Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-30, December.
    2. Stolarski, Mariusz J. & Krzyżaniak, Michał & Olba-Zięty, Ewelina, 2024. "Energy efficiency of Silphium perfoliatum and Helianthus salicifolius biomass production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    3. Jankowski, Krzysztof Józef & Dubis, Bogdan & Kozak, Marcin, 2021. "Sewage sludge and the energy balance of Jerusalem artichoke production - A case study in north-eastern Poland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    4. Jan Weger & Jaroslav Knápek & Jaroslav Bubeník & Kamila Vávrová & Zdeněk Strašil, 2021. "Can Miscanthus Fulfill Its Expectations as an Energy Biomass Source in the Current Conditions of the Czech Republic?—Potentials and Barriers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Ioannis Gazoulis & Panagiotis Kanatas & Panayiota Papastylianou & Alexandros Tataridas & Efthymia Alexopoulou & Ilias Travlos, 2021. "Weed Management Practices to Improve Establishment of Selected Lignocellulosic Crops," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Von Cossel, M. & Lebendig, F. & Müller, M. & Hieber, C. & Iqbal, Y. & Cohnen, J. & Jablonowski, N.D., 2022. "Improving combustion quality of Miscanthus by adding biomass from perennial flower-rich wild plant species," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    7. Andrzej Mazur & Alina Kowalczyk-Juśko, 2021. "The Assessment of the Usefulness of Miscanthus x giganteus to Water and Soil Protection against Erosive Degradation," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, June.
    8. Leng, Erwei & He, Ben & Chen, Jingwei & Liao, Gaoliang & Ma, Yinjie & Zhang, Feng & Liu, Shuai & E, Jiaqiang, 2021. "Prediction of three-phase product distribution and bio-oil heating value of biomass fast pyrolysis based on machine learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    9. Wojciech Rzeźnik & Ilona Rzeźnik & Paulina Mielcarek-Bocheńska & Mateusz Urbański, 2023. "Air Pollutants Emission during Co-Combustion of Animal Manure and Wood Pellets in 15 kW Boiler," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-17, September.
    10. Czekała, Wojciech & Łukomska, Aleksandra & Pulka, Jakub & Bojarski, Wiktor & Pochwatka, Patrycja & Kowalczyk-Juśko, Alina & Oniszczuk, Anna & Dach, Jacek, 2023. "Waste-to-energy: Biogas potential of waste from coffee production and consumption," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    11. Tianran Ding & Wouter Achten, 2023. "Coupling agent-based modeling with territorial LCA to support agricultural land-use planning," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/359527, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    12. Anita Konieczna & Kamila Mazur & Adam Koniuszy & Andrzej Gawlik & Igor Sikorski, 2022. "Thermal Energy and Exhaust Emissions of a Gasifier Stove Feeding Pine and Hemp Pellets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Bogusława Waliszewska & Mieczysław Grzelak & Eliza Gaweł & Agnieszka Spek-Dźwigała & Agnieszka Sieradzka & Wojciech Czekała, 2021. "Chemical Characteristics of Selected Grass Species from Polish Meadows and Their Potential Utilization for Energy Generation Purposes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    14. Stolarski, Mariusz J. & Krzyżaniak, Michał & Warmiński, Kazimierz & Tworkowski, Józef & Szczukowski, Stefan & Olba–Zięty, Ewelina & Gołaszewski, Janusz, 2017. "Energy efficiency of perennial herbaceous crops production depending on the type of digestate and mineral fertilizers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 50-60.
    15. Choi, Sang Kyu & Choi, Yeon Seok & Han, So Young & Kim, Seock Joon & Rahman, Tawsif & Jeong, Yeon Woo & Van Nguyen, Quynh & Cha, Young Rok, 2019. "Bio-crude oil production from a new genotype of Miscanthus sacchariflorus Geodae-Uksae 1," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 153-158.
    16. Oh, Shinyoung & Kim, Ung-Jin & Choi, In-Gyu & Choi, Joon Weon, 2016. "Solvent effects on improvement of fuel properties during hydrodeoxygenation process of bio-oil in the presence of Pt/C," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 116-123.
    17. Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski & Paweł Dudziec & Michał Krzyżaniak & Ewelina Olba-Zięty, 2021. "Solid Biomass Energy Potential as a Development Opportunity for Rural Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    18. Sang Kyu Choi & Yeon Seok Choi & Yeon Woo Jeong & So Young Han & Quynh Van Nguyen, 2020. "Simulation of the Fast Pyrolysis of Coffee Ground in a Tilted-Slide Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    19. Jin, Sung Ho & Lee, Hyung Won & Ryu, Changkook & Jeon, Jong-Ki & Park, Young-Kwon, 2015. "Catalytic fast pyrolysis of Geodae-Uksae 1 over zeolites," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 41-46.
    20. Karol Kupryaniuk & Agnieszka Wójtowicz & Jakub Mazurkiewicz & Tomasz Słowik & Arkadiusz Matwijczuk, 2021. "The Influence of the Pressure-Thermal Agglomeration Methods of Corn Bran on Their Selected Physicochemical Properties and Biogas Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-26, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:10:p:3486-:d:812297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.