IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i1p40-d477203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Miscanthus Fulfill Its Expectations as an Energy Biomass Source in the Current Conditions of the Czech Republic?—Potentials and Barriers

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Weger

    (Silva Tarouca Research Institute for Landscape and Ornamental Gardening, Public Research Institute (VÚKOZ), 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic)

  • Jaroslav Knápek

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering (ČVUL FEL), Department of Economics, Management and Humanities, Czech Technical University in Prague, 166 27 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Jaroslav Bubeník

    (Silva Tarouca Research Institute for Landscape and Ornamental Gardening, Public Research Institute (VÚKOZ), 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic)

  • Kamila Vávrová

    (Silva Tarouca Research Institute for Landscape and Ornamental Gardening, Public Research Institute (VÚKOZ), 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic)

  • Zdeněk Strašil

    (Crop Research Institute, Public Research Institute (VÚRV), 161 00 Prague-Ruzyně, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Our article analyzes the main biological potentials and economic barriers of using Miscanthus as a new energy crop in agricultural practice in the Czech Republic and the Central-Eastern European region. We have used primary data from long-term field experiments and commercial plantations to create production and economic models that also include an analysis of competitive ability with conventional crops. Our results showed that current economic conditions favor annual crops over Miscanthus (for energy biomass) and that this new crop shows very good adaptation to the effects of climate change. Selected clones of Miscanthus × giganteus reached high biomass yields between 15–17 t DM ha −1 y −1 despite very dry and warm periods and low-input agrotechnology, and they have good potential to become important biomass crops for future bioenergy and the bioeconomy. Key barriers and factors are identified, including gene pool and agronomy improvement, change of subsidy policy (Common agriculture policy-CAP), climate change trends, and further development of the bioeconomy.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Weger & Jaroslav Knápek & Jaroslav Bubeník & Kamila Vávrová & Zdeněk Strašil, 2021. "Can Miscanthus Fulfill Its Expectations as an Energy Biomass Source in the Current Conditions of the Czech Republic?—Potentials and Barriers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:40-:d:477203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/1/40/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/1/40/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vávrová, Kamila & Knápek, Jaroslav & Weger, Jan & Králík, Tomáš & Beranovský, Jiří, 2018. "Model for evaluation of locally available biomass competitiveness for decentralized space heating in villages and small towns," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PB), pages 853-865.
    2. Rahman, Md. Mizanur & B. Mostafiz, Suraiya & Paatero, Jukka V. & Lahdelma, Risto, 2014. "Extension of energy crops on surplus agricultural lands: A potentially viable option in developing countries while fossil fuel reserves are diminishing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 108-119.
    3. Iqbal, Y. & Gauder, M. & Claupein, W. & Graeff-Hönninger, S. & Lewandowski, I., 2015. "Yield and quality development comparison between miscanthus and switchgrass over a period of 10 years," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 268-276.
    4. Laurent, A. & Pelzer, E. & Loyce, C. & Makowski, D., 2015. "Ranking yields of energy crops: A meta-analysis using direct and indirect comparisons," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 41-50.
    5. Witzel, Carl-Philipp & Finger, Robert, 2016. "Economic evaluation of Miscanthus production – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 681-696.
    6. Vávrová, Kamila & Knápek, Jaroslav & Weger, Jan, 2014. "Modeling of biomass potential from agricultural land for energy utilization using high resolution spatial data with regard to food security scenarios," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 436-444.
    7. Winkler, Bastian & Mangold, Anja & von Cossel, Moritz & Clifton-Brown, John & Pogrzeba, Marta & Lewandowski, Iris & Iqbal, Yasir & Kiesel, Andreas, 2020. "Implementing miscanthus into farming systems: A review of agronomic practices, capital and labour demand," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    8. Szulczewski, Wiesław & Żyromski, Andrzej & Jakubowski, Wojciech & Biniak-Pieróg, Małgorzata, 2018. "A new method for the estimation of biomass yield of giant miscanthus (Miscanthus giganteus) in the course of vegetation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P2), pages 1787-1795.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski, 2021. "Industrial and Bioenergy Crops for Bioeconomy Development," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-5, September.
    2. Janota, Lukáš & Vávrová, Kamila & Weger, Jan & Knápek, Jaroslav & Králík, Tomáš, 2023. "Complex methodology for optimizing local energy supply and overall resilience of rural areas: A case study of Agrovoltaic system with Miscanthus x giganteus plantation within the energy community in t," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 738-750.
    3. Králík, T. & Knápek, J. & Vávrová, K. & Outrata, D. & Romportl, D. & Horák, M. & Jandera, J., 2023. "Ecosystem services and economic competitiveness of perennial energy crops in the modelling of biomass potential – A case study of the Czech Republic," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    4. Jaroslav Demko & Ján Machava, 2022. "Tree Resin, a Macroergic Source of Energy, a Possible Tool to Lower the Rise in Atmospheric CO 2 Levels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Evgeny Chupakhin & Olga Babich & Stanislav Sukhikh & Svetlana Ivanova & Ekaterina Budenkova & Olga Kalashnikova & Olga Kriger, 2021. "Methods of Increasing Miscanthus Biomass Yield for Biofuel Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-30, December.
    6. Knápek, J. & Králík, T. & Vávrová, K. & Valentová, M. & Horák, M. & Outrata, D., 2021. "Policy implications of competition between conventional and energy crops," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evgeny Chupakhin & Olga Babich & Stanislav Sukhikh & Svetlana Ivanova & Ekaterina Budenkova & Olga Kalashnikova & Olga Kriger, 2021. "Methods of Increasing Miscanthus Biomass Yield for Biofuel Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-30, December.
    2. Alina Kowalczyk-Juśko & Andrzej Mazur & Patrycja Pochwatka & Damian Janczak & Jacek Dach, 2022. "Evaluation of the Effects of Using the Giant Miscanthus ( Miscanthus × Giganteus ) Biomass in Various Energy Conversion Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Monia El Akkari & Fabien Ferchaud & Loïc Strullu & Ian Shield & Aurélie Perrin & Jean Louis Drouet & Pierre Alain Jayet & Benoît Gabrielle, 2020. "Using a Crop Model to Benchmark Miscanthus and Switchgrass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Winkler, Bastian & Mangold, Anja & von Cossel, Moritz & Clifton-Brown, John & Pogrzeba, Marta & Lewandowski, Iris & Iqbal, Yasir & Kiesel, Andreas, 2020. "Implementing miscanthus into farming systems: A review of agronomic practices, capital and labour demand," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    5. Róger Moya & Carolina Tenorio & Gloria Oporto, 2019. "Short Rotation Wood Crops in Latin American: A Review on Status and Potential Uses as Biofuel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Knápek, J. & Králík, T. & Vávrová, K. & Valentová, M. & Horák, M. & Outrata, D., 2021. "Policy implications of competition between conventional and energy crops," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    7. Stanisław Rolbiecki & Małgorzata Biniak-Pieróg & Andrzej Żyromski & Wiesława Kasperska-Wołowicz & Barbara Jagosz & Piotr Stachowski & Daniel Liberacki & Ewa Kanecka-Geszke & Hicran A. Sadan & Roman Ro, 2021. "Effect of Forecast Climate Changes on Water Needs of Giant Miscanthus Cultivated in the Kuyavia Region in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-13, October.
    8. Knápek, Jaroslav & Králík, Tomáš & Vávrová, Kamila & Weger, Jan, 2020. "Dynamic biomass potential from agricultural land," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    9. Ioannis Gazoulis & Panagiotis Kanatas & Panayiota Papastylianou & Alexandros Tataridas & Efthymia Alexopoulou & Ilias Travlos, 2021. "Weed Management Practices to Improve Establishment of Selected Lignocellulosic Crops," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, April.
    10. Chen, Huaihai & Dai, Zhongmin & Jager, Henriette I. & Wullschleger, Stan D. & Xu, Jianming & Schadt, Christopher W., 2019. "Influences of nitrogen fertilization and climate regime on the above-ground biomass yields of miscanthus and switchgrass: A meta-analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 303-311.
    11. Tianran Ding & Wouter Achten, 2023. "Coupling agent-based modeling with territorial LCA to support agricultural land-use planning," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/359527, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    12. Rahman, Md. Mizanur & Hasan, Mohammad Mahmodul & Paatero, Jukka V. & Lahdelma, Risto, 2014. "Hybrid application of biogas and solar resources to fulfill household energy needs: A potentially viable option in rural areas of developing countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 35-45.
    13. Anita Konieczna & Kamila Mazur & Adam Koniuszy & Andrzej Gawlik & Igor Sikorski, 2022. "Thermal Energy and Exhaust Emissions of a Gasifier Stove Feeding Pine and Hemp Pellets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Jan K. Kazak & Joanna A. Kamińska & Rafał Madej & Marta Bochenkiewicz, 2020. "Where Renewable Energy Sources Funds are Invested? Spatial Analysis of Energy Production Potential and Public Support," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-26, October.
    15. Monia El Akkari & Nosra Ben Fradj & Benoit Gabrielle & Sylvestre Njakou Djomo, 2023. "Spatially-explicit environmental assessment of bioethanol from miscanthus and switchgrass in France [Évaluation environnementale spatialement explicite du bioéthanol produit à partir de miscanthus ," Post-Print hal-04369771, HAL.
    16. Stolarski, Mariusz J. & Dudziec, Paweł & Krzyżaniak, Michał & Graban, Łukasz & Lajszner, Waldemar & Olba–Zięty, Ewelina, 2024. "How do key for the bioenergy industry properties of baled biomass change over two years of storage?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    17. Stolarski, Mariusz J. & Krzyżaniak, Michał & Warmiński, Kazimierz & Tworkowski, Józef & Szczukowski, Stefan & Olba–Zięty, Ewelina & Gołaszewski, Janusz, 2017. "Energy efficiency of perennial herbaceous crops production depending on the type of digestate and mineral fertilizers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 50-60.
    18. Jan Weger & Kamila Vávrová & Lukáš Janota & Jaroslav Knápek, 2024. "SDEWES 2023: Barriers and Possibilities for the Development of Short-Rotation Coppice as an Agroforestry System for Adaptation to Climate Change in Central European Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-22, April.
    19. Ewelina Olba-Zięty & Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski & Michał Krzyżaniak, 2021. "Economic Evaluation of the Production of Perennial Crops for Energy Purposes—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    20. Kotir, Julius H. & Bell, Lindsay W. & Kirkegaard, John A. & Whish, Jeremy & Aikins, Kojo Atta, 2022. "Labour demand – The forgotten input influencing the execution and adoptability of alternative cropping systems in Eastern Australia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:40-:d:477203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.