IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i5p1333-d508235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Autonomous Operation of Stationary Battery Energy Storage Systems—Optimal Storage Design and Economic Potential

Author

Listed:
  • Bernhard Faessler

    (Faculty of Engineering and Science, University of Agder, Jon Lilletuns Vei 9, 4879 Grimstad, Norway)

  • Aleksander Bogunović Jakobsen

    (Faculty of Engineering and Science, University of Agder, Jon Lilletuns Vei 9, 4879 Grimstad, Norway)

Abstract

Global warming requires a changeover from fossil fuel based to renewable energy sources on the electrical supply side and electrification of the demand side. Due to the transient nature of renewables and fluctuating demand, buffer capacities are necessary to compensate for supply/demand imbalances. Battery energy storage systems are promising. However, the initial costs are high. Repurposing electric vehicle batteries can reduce initial costs. Further, storage design optimization could significantly improve costs. Therefore, a battery control algorithm was developed, and a simulation study was performed to identify the optimal storage design and its economic potential. The algorithm used is based on autonomous (on-site) optimization, which relies on an incentive determining the operation mode (charge, discharge, or idle). The incentive used was the historic day-ahead stock market price for electricity, and the resulting potential economic gains for different European countries were compared for the years 2015–2019. This showed that there is a correlation between economic gain, optimal storage design (capacity-to-power ratio), and the mean standard deviation, as well as the mean relative change of the different day-ahead prices. Low yearly mean standard deviations of about 0.5 Euro Cents per kWh battery capacity lead to yearly earnings of about 1 €/kWh, deviations of 1 Euro Cent to 10 €/kWh, and deviations of 2 Euro Cents to 20 €/kWh. Small yearly mean relative changes, lower than 5%, lead to capacity-to-power ratios greater than 3, relative changes around 10% to an optimal capacity-to-power between 1.5 and 3, and for relative changes greater than 10% to an optimal capacity-to-power ratios of 1. While in countries like the United Kingdom, high potential earnings are expected, the economic prospective in countries like Norway is low due to limited day-ahead price performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernhard Faessler & Aleksander Bogunović Jakobsen, 2021. "Autonomous Operation of Stationary Battery Energy Storage Systems—Optimal Storage Design and Economic Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-12, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:5:p:1333-:d:508235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/5/1333/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/5/1333/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Langni, Ole & Diekmann, Jochen & Lehr, Ulrike, 2009. "Advanced mechanisms for the promotion of renewable energy--Models for the future evolution of the German Renewable Energy Act," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1289-1297, April.
    2. Heide, Dominik & von Bremen, Lueder & Greiner, Martin & Hoffmann, Clemens & Speckmann, Markus & Bofinger, Stefan, 2010. "Seasonal optimal mix of wind and solar power in a future, highly renewable Europe," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 2483-2489.
    3. Hannan, M.A. & Lipu, M.S.H. & Hussain, A. & Mohamed, A., 2017. "A review of lithium-ion battery state of charge estimation and management system in electric vehicle applications: Challenges and recommendations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 834-854.
    4. Yang, Yuqing & Bremner, Stephen & Menictas, Chris & Kay, Merlinde, 2018. "Battery energy storage system size determination in renewable energy systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 109-125.
    5. Agata Zdyb & Slawomir Gulkowski, 2020. "Performance Assessment of Four Different Photovoltaic Technologies in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Chih-Chun Kung & Bruce A. McCarl, 2018. "Sustainable Energy Development under Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-4, September.
    7. A. Stephan & B. Battke & M. D. Beuse & J. H. Clausdeinken & T. S. Schmidt, 2016. "Limiting the public cost of stationary battery deployment by combining applications," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 1(7), pages 1-9, July.
    8. Lei Zhang & Yingqi Liu & Beibei Pang & Bingxiang Sun & Ari Kokko, 2020. "Second Use Value of China’s New Energy Vehicle Battery: A View Based on Multi-Scenario Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, January.
    9. Patrick Moriarty & Damon Honnery, 2019. "Energy Efficiency or Conservation for Mitigating Climate Change?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-17, September.
    10. Opitz, A. & Badami, P. & Shen, L. & Vignarooban, K. & Kannan, A.M., 2017. "Can Li-Ion batteries be the panacea for automotive applications?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 685-692.
    11. Tamer Khatib, 2014. "Optimization of a grid-connected renewable energy system for a case study in Nablus, Palestine," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 9(4), pages 311-318.
    12. Faessler, B. & Kepplinger, P. & Petrasch, J., 2017. "Decentralized price-driven grid balancing via repurposed electric vehicle batteries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 446-455.
    13. Sugiyama, Masahiro, 2012. "Climate change mitigation and electrification," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 464-468.
    14. Holger C. Hesse & Michael Schimpe & Daniel Kucevic & Andreas Jossen, 2017. "Lithium-Ion Battery Storage for the Grid—A Review of Stationary Battery Storage System Design Tailored for Applications in Modern Power Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-42, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bernhard Faessler, 2021. "Stationary, Second Use Battery Energy Storage Systems and Their Applications: A Research Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bernhard Faessler, 2021. "Stationary, Second Use Battery Energy Storage Systems and Their Applications: A Research Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Calise, Francesco & Cappiello, Francesco Liberato & Cartenì, Armando & Dentice d’Accadia, Massimo & Vicidomini, Maria, 2019. "A novel paradigm for a sustainable mobility based on electric vehicles, photovoltaic panels and electric energy storage systems: Case studies for Naples and Salerno (Italy)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 97-114.
    3. Jürgen Marchgraber & Wolfgang Gawlik, 2021. "Dynamic Prioritization of Functions during Real-Time Multi-Use Operation of Battery Energy Storage Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-36, January.
    4. Siavash Asiaban & Nezmin Kayedpour & Arash E. Samani & Dimitar Bozalakov & Jeroen D. M. De Kooning & Guillaume Crevecoeur & Lieven Vandevelde, 2021. "Wind and Solar Intermittency and the Associated Integration Challenges: A Comprehensive Review Including the Status in the Belgian Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-41, May.
    5. Raijmakers, L.H.J. & Danilov, D.L. & Eichel, R.-A. & Notten, P.H.L., 2019. "A review on various temperature-indication methods for Li-ion batteries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 918-945.
    6. Haupt, Leon & Schöpf, Michael & Wederhake, Lars & Weibelzahl, Martin, 2020. "The influence of electric vehicle charging strategies on the sizing of electrical energy storage systems in charging hub microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    7. Gupta, Ruchi & Pena-Bello, Alejandro & Streicher, Kai Nino & Roduner, Cattia & Farhat, Yamshid & Thöni, David & Patel, Martin Kumar & Parra, David, 2021. "Spatial analysis of distribution grid capacity and costs to enable massive deployment of PV, electric mobility and electric heating," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    8. Trocino, Stefano & Lo Faro, Massimiliano & Zignani, Sabrina Campagna & Antonucci, Vincenzo & Aricò, Antonino Salvatore, 2019. "High performance solid-state iron-air rechargeable ceramic battery operating at intermediate temperatures (500–650 °C)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 386-394.
    9. Zhao, Chunyang & Andersen, Peter Bach & Træholt, Chresten & Hashemi, Seyedmostafa, 2023. "Grid-connected battery energy storage system: a review on application and integration," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    10. Englberger, Stefan & Abo Gamra, Kareem & Tepe, Benedikt & Schreiber, Michael & Jossen, Andreas & Hesse, Holger, 2021. "Electric vehicle multi-use: Optimizing multiple value streams using mobile storage systems in a vehicle-to-grid context," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    11. Müller, Simon C. & Welpe, Isabell M., 2018. "Sharing electricity storage at the community level: An empirical analysis of potential business models and barriers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 492-503.
    12. Ioan Aschilean & Mihai Varlam & Mihai Culcer & Mariana Iliescu & Mircea Raceanu & Adrian Enache & Maria Simona Raboaca & Gabriel Rasoi & Constantin Filote, 2018. "Hybrid Electric Powertrain with Fuel Cells for a Series Vehicle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-12, May.
    13. Mostafa Farrokhabadi, 2019. "Data-Driven Mitigation of Energy Scheduling Inaccuracy in Renewable-Penetrated Grids: Summerside Electric Use Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-23, June.
    14. Javier L'opez Prol & Wolf-Peter Schill, 2020. "The Economics of Variable Renewables and Electricity Storage," Papers 2012.15371, arXiv.org.
    15. Yang, Yuqing & Bremner, Stephen & Menictas, Chris & Kay, Merlinde, 2022. "Modelling and optimal energy management for battery energy storage systems in renewable energy systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    16. Rodrigo Martins & Holger C. Hesse & Johanna Jungbauer & Thomas Vorbuchner & Petr Musilek, 2018. "Optimal Component Sizing for Peak Shaving in Battery Energy Storage System for Industrial Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, August.
    17. Braeuer, Fritz & Rominger, Julian & McKenna, Russell & Fichtner, Wolf, 2019. "Battery storage systems: An economic model-based analysis of parallel revenue streams and general implications for industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 1424-1440.
    18. Park, Jinhyeong & Kim, Kunwoo & Park, Seongyun & Baek, Jongbok & Kim, Jonghoon, 2021. "Complementary cooperative SOC/capacity estimator based on the discrete variational derivative combined with the DEKF for electric power applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    19. Xu, Wenqiang & Wu, Xiaogang & Li, Yalun & Wang, Hewu & Lu, Languang & Ouyang, Minggao, 2023. "A comprehensive review of DC arc faults and their mechanisms, detection, early warning strategies, and protection in battery systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    20. Terlouw, Tom & AlSkaif, Tarek & Bauer, Christian & van Sark, Wilfried, 2019. "Multi-objective optimization of energy arbitrage in community energy storage systems using different battery technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 356-372.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:5:p:1333-:d:508235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.